> > > 4. The package is not complete; the source also includes the gopher > > > server but there is no debian package.
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This was deliberate. [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client. > > It's another to distribute a non-free server.] On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:26:17PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > I am not sure what you mean? Is a non-free server really bad? Perhaps. In this case there are free alternatives for the application domain (for example, apache) and a lot of work would be required just to generate a decent debian package. -- Raul
