[Hopefully my last mail to this list.]
On 08/11/01, Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011104 15:08]:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > On 04/11/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > > > Indeed. Historically
[ How often do I need to tell you that I don't need a Cc? I'm currently
subscribed to thist list and read the answer here.]
On 05/11/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Christian Kurz writes:
> > On 04/11/01, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 09:39:25PM
On 04/11/01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 04/11/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > > Indeed. Historically, debian-qa have been the people who deal with
> > > orphaned packages - there are moves to make the BTS-
On 04/11/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Christian Kurz writes:
> > On 04/11/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > > than just dealing with orphaned packages. We don't have any more
> > Which hopefully moves to an extra list and therefor an extra group
> > taking care
On 04/11/01, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:16:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > while snooping through the package list, I noticed that we have an
> > inconsistent spelling of those two words mentioned in the subject.
> > 15 pack
[If you really need to send people a Cc altough there header contains
"Mail-Copies-To: never", then please at least mark it as copy.]
On 04/11/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Christian Kurz writes:
> > On 04/11/01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Sun, 04 No
On 04/11/01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2001, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 04 Nov 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > 15 packages are using QT, while 33 packages use Qt. And 93 packages are
> > > using Gnome, while 127 are
On 04/11/01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Wrong, I'm not of any authority to make decision about inconsistent or
> > consistent spelling of words in package descriptions. I can only write a
> Only the maintainers thems
On 01-11-04 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > 15 packages are using QT, while 33 packages use Qt. And 93 packages are
> > using Gnome, while 127 are using GNOME. This should be changed, since
> > it's called QT and GNOME
On 01-11-04 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011104 11:16]:
> > it's called QT and GNOME and not Qt or Gnome. Since this issue effects
> You surely meant to say that it's "Qt". At least http://www.trolltech.com/
> has
Hi,
while snooping through the package list, I noticed that we have an
inconsistent spelling of those two words mentioned in the subject.
15 packages are using QT, while 33 packages use Qt. And 93 packages are
using Gnome, while 127 are using GNOME. This should be changed, since
it's called QT a
On 21/10/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I can clean out some of the ssh2 stuff, but somebody who actually knows
> > > about ssh should have a look at the ones that aren't just build
> > > failures.
> > O
On 21/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> If there's consensus here then I'll request a new mailing list as
> follows:
[...]
> Comments?
Make it so. :-)
Christian
--
Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org)
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
pgpjyLq4Tr1D2.pgp
/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:26:06PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Are you willing to maintain it,
> > No, since I'm currently happy with the number of packages that I
> > maintain. Also I
On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > If I remember correctly, then ssh2 offers some authentication and chroot
> > options, that are not available with OpenSSH. And I'm not sure if all
> > those feature
On 17/10/01, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Grave functionality bugs - outstanding
> > * #59031: ssh2: ssh2_2.0.13-5 sshd cannot create .Xauthority
> >Package: ssh2; Severity: grave; Reported by: Ian Eure
> ><[EMAIL P
On 01-08-25 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ssh2
>
> - non-free
> - free ssh seems to include the same functionality
I don't agree with this one. If you take a closer look at ssh2 and
openssh you'll notice that ssh2 contains some options and features which
openssh doesn't support currently and won't as far
On 01-08-16 Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:34:21AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > I quite understand that we'll need to get those bugs in the base
> > packages fixed as soon as possible, but instead of contacting the
> > maintainer _and_ Debian QA
On 01-08-15 Registration to litoo newsletter wrote:
> You just have been registered to Litoo newsletter
>
> Your email is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which idiot registered this address for this letter and with which
purpose in mind? I would like to see [EMAIL PROTECTED] being
unsubscribed from this list
On 01-08-15 Anthony Towns wrote:
> Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The
> explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for
> moreinfo.
I quite understand that we'll need to get those bugs in the base
packages fixed as soon as possible, but instead of c
On 01-08-14 Anthony Towns wrote:
> Can someone please upload an exim that fixes 108285? (exim in testing is
> broken with upgrades from potato, exim in unstable is broken wrt ipv6)
If I I remember correctly, Mark is already working on a fixed package
that will be uploaded soon. So there's in my op
On 01-07-24 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:24:07AM -0400, Michael Stone écrivait:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:00:36AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > Who has the authority to remove a package in this state, and forestall
> > > angry complaints should the maintainer com
On 01-07-19 J?r?me Marant wrote:
> It has been a while since lintian has been updated and it seems
> that Sean (shaleh) has not more time to work on it (Sean, can you
> confirm?).
According to my knowledge he was also working on a new lintian2 written
in python. I don't know what the current
Package: kworldwatch
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-13
Severity: normal
Hi,
the short and long description of kworldwatch are identical. The long
description should be used to describe the purpose and features of this
program. A user is currently not able to decide if the wants to install
the pac
Package: kteatime
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-13
Severity: normal
Hi,
the long description of this package is identical with the short one.
The extended description should describe the purpose and features of
this programm. Currently a user is unable to guess, what exactly this
program is usef
Package: kmoon
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-13
Severity: normal
Hi,
the short and long description of this package are identical. The long
description should be an extended description about the purpose and the
feature of this program. Please change the descriptions therefor in the
next upload.
Package: ktux
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-13
Severity: normal
Hi,
the short and long description of ktux are identical. The long description
should be used to describe the purpose and features of this program. A user is
currently not able to decide if the wants to install the package or not,
b
On 01-04-07 Carlos Laviola wrote:
> On 07-Apr-2001 Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > [Cc'ed to qa, so that nobody refixes this at the next bug party]
>
> Regarding the 'ascii' package, I'd also like to notify y'all publically that I
> have a new version of ascii waiting for the maintainer's permission
On 01-04-04 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Maybe we should stop using <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a Maintainer:
> address for packages maintained by QA and use somthing like
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> For now this should be setup to forward all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> but when enough packages use the ne
On 01-02-01 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> up the release process? The answer is at least partially evident: we
> need people actually doing QA. It looks like Raphael, whom, AFAIK, was
> playing QA coodinator, got caught up in RL, and other people are in a
> similar situation. Can we have an i
On 01-01-24 Daniel Tschernatsch wrote:
> Package: suck 4.2.5-2
> Template: suck/get-news/remoteserver
> Type: string
> Description: What default news server should be used by the get-news script?
> (This server name will be put in /etc/suck/get-news.conf)
> .
> Enter the fully qualified domain n
On 01-01-16 Edward Betts wrote:
> Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 01-01-14 Edward Betts wrote:
> > > I have created an NMU of mailx, it is at
> > > http://people.debian.org/~edward/mailx
> >
> > > The NMU fixes all but 7 of the bu
On 01-01-14 Edward Betts wrote:
> I have created an NMU of mailx, it is at
> http://people.debian.org/~edward/mailx
> The NMU fixes all but 7 of the bugs open against mailx.
> Do people want to take a look and see if they can see anything wrong
> with it?
I talked with Loic some time ago and I t
On 00-12-27 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 00-12-27 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > So does grafix-dev.
> > > >
> > > > But that is not
On 00-12-27 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > So does grafix-dev.
> >
> > But that is not fine. No package should contain any files that are in an
> > other package already. So the correct solution is to put those
> > co
On 00-12-27 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > grafix-dev should conflict with grafix, (at least this is what
> > > I think currently :-).
> >
> > No, I think those files that are in both package, should only be in one
>
On 00-12-27 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, James LewisMoss wrote:
> > Package: grafix-dev
> > Version: 1.6-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > or maybe conflict. dunno. anyway. here's log.
> [Summary for people on -qa:
> old package: grafix
> new packages: grafix1 (Replaces: grafix
On 00-12-19 Gordon Sadler wrote:
> qftp has 2 outstanding important bugs listed above. One is almost a
> year old the other is over 3 months. It appears the developer is rather
> busy. I took the liberty of addressing 71484 with a patch to the BTS.
> If one of the DD's here would apply it and recom
[Hey, I didn't Cc you, why do you Cc me know? I read -qa and -project,
so I don't really need three copies of this mail.]
On 00-12-17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Well, what you propose here is an an removal of a debian developer and I
&
On 00-12-17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > >No, I don't intend to change this. My point is: Someone who has a Debian
> > >account can do much harm (intentional or accidential). That's a reason why
> > >I think we should have a severe look at the work of an applic
On 00-12-17 Colin Watson wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >> more careful task&skill test would be helpful.
> >
> >Yes, and the main point of my proposal is: An applicant doesn't get his
&g
On 00-12-17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >...
> > > > > suggests to the NM team that he should become a Debian account. The NM
> > > > > team (perhaps the current NM-Committee plus other interested Debian
> > > &g
On 00-12-16 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >...
> > > package this is sometimes enough to pass the "Tasks & Skills" test (e.g.
> >
> > Well, do yo have some other examples too? I think one example is nice,
> > but
Hi,
On 00-12-16 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> My impression is that currently maintainers are accepted too early. For
> some AMs it's enough that they build one package (and thanks to debhelper
> it's relatively easy to build a package) and even if they make a buggy
Especially since people can build very
On 00-12-14 Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 00-12-12 Cord Beermann wrote:
> >
> > > He is also responsible for the mailx-package, which hasn't been
> > > touched by him since mid-98, although there were appearing s
On 00-12-12 Cord Beermann wrote:
> Hallo! Du (Martin Michlmayr) hast geschrieben:
> >* Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001211 20:56]:
> >> If he doesn't answer till this date, you should take then his
> >> package over, but that's only my suggestio
On 00-12-11 Cord Beermann wrote:
> The current maintainer (Loic Prylli) doesn't respond and hasn't
> touched the package since 11 Nov 1998 (he is also responsible for the
> mailx-Package which isn't worked on since 1998 (besides some NMU
> security fixes.)), but the package isn't orphaned, or given
On 00-12-09 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001209 00:15]:
> > tbm's package seems to be on ftp-master, so I'll wait and see what
> > happens (if there's a conflict use his instead of mine, since I just
> > hacked it to build a non-rc version in a hurry, whereas he
On 00-12-09 Gordon Sadler wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but the libpam-pwdb that this bug refers to not
> being available seems to be in an odd position. It IS available,
> however only on auric, testing. I track quite a few mirrors, to
Well, maybe the maintainer of libpam-pwdb can comment on thi
[There's no need to Cc me, as I'm also on debian-qa, as you could assume
from my signature. ;)]
On 00-12-09 Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Wichert just orphaned lockvc in IRC when I talked with him about the
> > release-critical-bug in it. I then tried to recompile lockvc here on
> > woody and make
Hi,
Wichert just orphaned lockvc in IRC when I talked with him about the
release-critical-bug in it. I then tried to recompile lockvc here on
woody and make an orphaning upload which failed for me. So Wichert and I
would appreciate if someone of you could take this task over. Thanks.
Ciao
Ch
On 00-12-04 Dale Scheetz wrote:
> OK, I've read all the postings on this thread, and I must first correct
[...]
> secondary. Don't stop just because someone else is doing it different.
I have to admit that you wrote a great email, which describes very good
my concerns and expose possible and good
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 17:39]:
> > debian packages and fixing other bug packages. You can't only look at
> > the bug reports of people and judge them. You also should take a look at
> > how much th
On 00-12-03 Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> As a matter of fact he emphasised several times that I should take my time
> to do my job properly and was very serious about the quality of debian
> packages. He proved to be competent in all the aspects of packaging and
> 'debianness' we encountered so far. H
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 17:39]:
> > Well, I think that there are enough people to sponsor NMs. I currently
> > fail to see that we are missing enough sponsors.
> If there are so many sponsors, why haven
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 14:24]:
> > > The Build-Depends: I didn't count but I guess about 80 - 90% get
> >
> > Also I wonder how you can guess that the number is so high? I think
> > it would be
On 00-12-03 Lenart Janos wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:01:24PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 00-12-03 Lenart Janos wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko wrote:
> Hmm.
On 00-12-04 Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:24:29PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > documented well at all). And I have them fix it. There are packages
> >
> > And that should be the part that the sponsor should do. We have the
> > concept of s
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 00:01]:
> > When I see that a package with missing build dependencies (except
> > debhelper) that has in debian/copyright a "Copyright: not yet known"
> > and 2 other bugs is enough to become a Debian maintainer
> > (
Hi to all the readers of this mail,
On 00-12-03 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >...
> > > do either use the high standards I want to use for my applicants and they
> > > see that others with lower skills are already accepted by o
On 00-12-03 Lenart Janos wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko wrote:
> > Well, I can tell you, that if I see some really lazy Developers in the
> > future, I will complaining about them, even on -
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 13:11]:
> > Martin is only "an AM", but...
> I forgot to mention one thing: I think I'm the AM who asks the _most_
> questions about Philosophy & Procedures. I think this area is in
> particular important because th
Hi,
sorry to intercept here. I'm not subscribed to debian-newmaint-admin but
to debian-qa, so please send a copy of your answer to this mailing-list.
Thanks.
On 00-12-03 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [Cc to debian-qa because this mail explains why I'll quit Debian QA]
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko
Hi Adrian,
On 00-11-11 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > this bug report is now open for a long time without anyone taking care
> > about this issue. Does someone know where we get the upstream package
> > for this software or can we safe
On 00-10-22 Mark Brown wrote:
> I've prepared a new version of xwpe fixing the buffer overflow reported
> in #68433. Should I just upload it or is there some other procedure to
> be followed?
For package that are maintained by the Debian QA Team, there's no
special procedure. You only should be s
close 40719
thanks
Hi,
as no one answered to my qesstion about closing this report or not, I
will now close it.
Ciao
Christian
--
Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
pgplJvi9a2NIP.pgp
Descriptio
On 00-10-18 Christian Kurz wrote:
> open for a long time. May I ask if you are very busy or why there's no
> new package of slocate? In any case please send me an answer within a
> week, as otherwise I will start preparing a NMU of slocat to get the new
> source in woody.
I
Hi Garth,
I just heared that for about a month or two Kevin Lindays, the author of
slocate, notified you about the new version, which contains a lot of
bugfixes, will be available on
ftp://ftp.mkintraweb.com/pub/linux/slocate/src/. Your last mail on one
of the lists is dated to Aug 10 this year an
severity #56283 fixed
close 56283
thanks
Hi,
this bug report can be closed as netenv in woody has an Recommends
dialog in it. So I therefor close this report now.
Ciao
Christian
--
Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63E
Hi,
would some with a good knowledge about DSFG-free license please take
care about this issue and try to figure out a solution for this bug
report? It's now open for a year without any interaction and a solution
should not be to hard to find.
Ciao
Christian
--
Debian Developer an
Hi,
I'm not able to fix metamail, because on my woody machine it bails out
with the following error:
cc -c -I../. -O2 -g metamail.c
In file included from metamail.c:46:
/usr/include/signal.h:117: parse error before `-'
/usr/include/signal.h:117: parse error before `int'
and because pandora has
Hi,
I just fixed two bugs in asmodem and will upload the fixed package thise
evening. Just to inform you.
Ciao
Christian
--
Ein "Nein" ausgesprochen mit der tiefsten Überzeugung ist besser
und größer als ein "Ja" um zu gefallen oder noch schlimmer, um
Schwierigkeiten zu umgehen.
-- Mahatm
Hi,
I have a fixed a bug in chimera, metamail and vchkpw now and will upload
the fixed packages this evening.
Also I plan to upload an orphaned debauch as nobody wanted to adopt it.
Ciao
Christian
--
Ein "Nein" ausgesprochen mit der tiefsten Überzeugung ist besser
und größer als ein "Ja"
Hi,
this bug report is now open for a long time without anyone taking care
about this issue. Does someone know where we get the upstream package
for this software or can we safely remove the package from debian?
Ciao
Christian
--
Ein "Nein" ausgesprochen mit der tiefsten Überzeugung ist bes
Hi,
should we follow the suggestion of Lars and close the bug report or let
it stay open until a new version which contains a fix for this bug has
been uploaded into the archive?
Ciao
Christian
--
Ein "Nein" ausgesprochen mit der tiefsten Überzeugung ist besser
und größer als ein "Ja" um z
On 00-10-12 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Package: realplayer
> Version: 7.0.3.1
> Severity: normal
> realplayer segaults for me when I start it. Strangely it doesn't do it
> when I start it with strace (like, ``strace realplayer''). I don't know
> what information you need to track that bug down, if I
On 00-10-12 Konstantin Kubatkin wrote:
> When it is possible to expect occurrence of the new version vchkpw in
> Debian Woody? === http://www.inter7.com/vchkpw ===
A new version will appear in woody, when someone has enough free time to
package it. This means transferring the debian-files and pat
On 00-09-29 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> Thus spake Christian Kurz on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:43:49PM CDT
> > > My original post specified Debian 2.2. The numerals got stripped
> > > somewhere along the way. Sorry if the usage on this field was out
> > > of spec. I was
no influence. I make
judgements only on facts, that the people can affect for themselves.
> Thus spake Christian Kurz on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:34:17AM CDT
> > > My majordomo lists (one of which is commercial) have been down all day
> > > until
> > > one astute lis
On 00-09-29 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> Thus spake Christian Kurz on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:34:17AM CDT
> > On 00-09-28 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > > Package: unknown
> >
> > Not corrct, should be general.
> >
> > > Version: Debian
> >
> >
On 00-09-15 Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:39:49PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > I think this is the normal behaviour of the people from the QA Team
> > already to first announce the upload and then do it really. So I would
> > say that the ag
On 00-09-15 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> when I do an upload for Debian QA I do inform you before. I'm wondering if
> it's possible to agree that everyone who wants to upload a package for
> Debian QA sends a short note to this list before he starts working to
> avoid duplicate work.
> Could you agree to
On 00-07-31 Debian QA Group wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: important
> Submitted: 19991213
> The current maintainer of this package has orphaned it, but the package
> itself is still on the distribution. If you are interested on the package
> please send a short note to /this/ bug ([EMAIL PRO
Package: vchkpw
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Hi,
can we please change the dependacy of vchkpw from qmail and ucspi-tcp to
qmail-src and ucspi-tcp-src? So this package would then have a satisfied
dependancy. Thanks!
Ciao
Christian
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: L
On 00-04-01 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Shorty raised that point yesterday on IRC...
> > Additionally QA is nothing that needs to be done in private behind
> > closed doors.
> ... however he said he'd rather get it closed to match the nam
On 00-03-20 Brian Kimball wrote:
> Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > think something like "This package intentionally depends on two packages
> > > not found in the Debian distribution because they are so non-free that
> > > only their sources can be distribute
On 00-03-19 Brian Kimball wrote:
> Christian Kurz wrote:
> > You mean qmail and ucspi-tcp? No, this is then no bug as the source are
> > available and debian-user can build binary-packages for themself. Debian
> > can't distributed binary package for this software a
close #60694
thanks
--
On 00-03-18 Brian Kimball wrote:
> Package: vchkpw
> Version: 3.1.2-6
> Severity: grave
> This package depends on two nonexistent packages.
You mean qmail and ucspi-tcp? No, this is then no bug as the source are
available and debian-user can build binary-packages for thems
On 00-03-14 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Christian Kurz wrote:
> > And how would suggest this could be fixed?
> Change c to be an int? getc() is defined to return an int instead of
> a char for that very same reason.
Well, would this break the whole code? Couldn't we
> Package: xpuzzles
> Version: 5.4.4-4
> There are about 67 occurences of the line...
> while ((c = getc(fp)) != EOF && c != SYMBOL);
> ... where c is a char.
> On architectures where char is unsigned (definately ARM and maybe PPC)
> this comparison fails because the int from getc has be
On 00-03-06 Martin Schulze wrote:
> Now that Bug Horizon has happened, the list of critical, grave and
> important bugs are shrinking, let's spend some work on other things
> that need to be done before potato can be released.
> . Are all dependencies and recommends fulfilled within every
>re
On 00-03-06 Martin Schulze wrote:
> . Are all dependencies and recommends fulfilled within every
>respective priority fulfilled?
Huh, I figured out how to find out which dependancies are unment and I
could work on this tomorrow. Then I will send out also some bugreports
and ask the maintainer
On 99-12-30 Kwasniak Miroslaw wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 03:40:22PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you reproduce this problem with the new xinetd or not?
> Yes, problem still exist (when REUSE flag disabled):
Hm, so what should we use as a soluti
Hi,
can you reproduce this problem with the new xinetd or not?
Ciao
Christian
--
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System *
an C++-Programmer
should take a look at the source first and fix it.
Ciao
Christian
--
****
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System *
time as he did the last uploads
> of dotfile.
Ehrm, I didn't talk about the dotfile-bug, I talked about the questions
and the RCB list above.
Ciao
Christian
--
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System *
still a lot of work for the QA-Team.
Ciao
Christian
--
****
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System *
I'll
> fix that tonight.
> Is it normal that the files are sitting here since a couple of days
> and I did not get warned by dinstall ?
I hope that this is not the normal case and that dinstall will get
modified to send out a warning.
Ciao
Christian
--
***
On 99-11-30 Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> Christian Kurz schrieb am Dienstag, den 30. November 1999:
What does this mean? ;)
> > Does netscape really needs libc5?
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /opt/netscape/netscape
> [...]
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4015
On 99-12-01 Fabrice Gautier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 07:51:00PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > Package: gnomba (main)
> > > > > Maintainer: Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 50399 XFree eat all the memory when i
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
