Hi, On 00-12-16 Adrian Bunk wrote: > My impression is that currently maintainers are accepted too early. For > some AMs it's enough that they build one package (and thanks to debhelper > it's relatively easy to build a package) and even if they make a buggy
Especially since people can build very easy a debian package from an original source package with the help of deb-make. :( > package this is sometimes enough to pass the "Tasks & Skills" test (e.g. Well, do yo have some other examples too? I think one example is nice, but some others would be good to have. > in [2]). We have currently over 600 developers and at about 6000 packages s/600/700 according to ldap. > that have over 600 RC bugs. If we don't have severe look at the quality of > the work of new maintainers it will become very hard to retain our > reputation of being a high quality distribution. Absolutely agreed. Especially since a lot of bugs are often very easy to fix, even if I look at the RCB list, I see some of this bugs. > Another important thing: We trust every single developer: > - We trust him when he signs the GPG key of a prospective developer. Well, I think we have to decide at this point, if the developer knows the prospective developer for a longer time now or not. > - A developer can make an upload for every single package in Debian. > We trust him that he doesn't do any harm. Do you want a system where you can only upload packages where you are the Maintainer? This would make it hard to do bugfixes and NMUs, if the maintainer went MIA. > - Every Debian developer represents Debian (e.g. at exhibitions). Agreed. > And another small point: When we let people become developers very fast > it's more likely that someone who has the idea "I want to get a > @debian.org address" but doesn't want to do do long term work for Debian > becomes a member of Debian - and we get more packages whose maintainer is > AWOL. Point taken. > I suggest the following instead (important is the general idea, not the > exact details): > Someone starts working for Debian (e.g. by maintaining packages or helping > at a port). After some months his sponsor, one of the port maintainers,... > (or wherever the applicant participates in Debian) says that he does good > work (e.g. high quality packages, quick reaction at bug reports,...) and Well, I think this should be also based on the decision of the person itself and not only be a decision of the sponsor. They both should make this decision. But then you need to make sure that the sponsors have a good knowledge about the debian build system and are qualified to make a judgement about a package. > suggests to the NM team that he should become a Debian account. The NM > team (perhaps the current NM-Committee plus other interested Debian > developers) then looks critical at the work of the applicant, makes a > "Philosophy and Procedures" check,... and discusses and decides whether > the applicant will be a valuable gain for the project. Interesting idea. > Additionally, we'll need a better organized sponsorship program to help > applicants to work for Debian. Absolutely agreed. Ciao Christian -- Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
pgpZcv9C2Uopa.pgp
Description: PGP signature