On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:09:56PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> Chance has it that some Release
> Team members have been discussing internally about viewing the key package
> set differently already, because there are more potential boundaries to draw
> in the current set. (As an example of wha
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: serious
Example:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/monotone-viz
versions
oldstable: 1.0.2-3
stable: 1.0.2-4
unstable: 1.0.2-4
$ rmadison -a source monotone-viz
monotone-viz | 1.0.2-3 | oldoldstable | source
monotone-viz | 1.0.2-4 | oldstable
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/network-manager
arch: all
The linux-any packages seem to be ignored here.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The database table popcon_src (used for determining which packages
are key packages) is no longer being updated.
Possibly related, from /srv/udd.debian.org/udd/rudd.log :
D, [2017-10-29T13:43:15.348682
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
New sources were no longer added at sources.debian.net for some time,
and now the SSL certificate of sources.debian.net is also expired.
Please do sources.debian.net -> sources.debian.org wherever
the "browse source code" link target is set.
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
After the recent updates to tracker RM bugs are no longer shown.
Example:
#881693 is not shown at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/owl
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:13:09PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Package: tracker.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> On Thu, Aug 03 2017, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > Then, Tobias has a point, knowing which team members uploaded a package is
> > useful. So I have a simple proposal to achieve that:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: bls
The Build Log Scanner already checks for -march=native:
https://qa.debian.org/bls/bytag/E-march-native.html
It would be useful to have a similar check and error for the
(slightly less severe) -mtune=nat
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
I noticed that the links to the bugs from UDD bugs searches are
http and not https.
>From a quick grep through the sources there seem to be more
places where https could be used instead of http.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 02:48:02AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andreas,
> I just looked at #857897 ... haven't we done any i386 (or other 32-bit)
> archive wide rebuild since gcc-6 has become the default?
no and yes.
No, AFAIK noone has so far done a rebuild of the complete archive
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: ddpo
DDPO should display sid-strict piuparts results,
the sid piuparts falures are only a subset of
the sid-strict ones after the creation of sid-strict.
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
tracker.debian.org should display sid-strict piuparts results,
sid is only a subset after the creation of sid-strict.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:43:44PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > tracker.debian.org apparently has encoding issues, not of the “schei�
> > encoding” kind, but it even seems to break the HTML completely and even
> > introduces new
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/1479445206/packages/syslog-ng.html
It would be nice if the PTS link would go to tracker.d.o
instead of packages.qa.d.o
A related nice feature would be tracker.d.o links for the missing
(build) dependen
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:03:28PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/11/16 at 11:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: qa.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > I came across an odd bug affecting both packages.qa.d.o and UDD:
> >
> > https:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
I came across an odd bug affecting both packages.qa.d.o and UDD:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/b/banshee.html
[2016-09-01] banshee REMOVED from testing (Britney)
testing 2.6.2-4
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/banshee
Correct information that the package i
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:06:50PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:48:32 AM CDT Paul Wise wrote:
>...
> > Your upstream isn't naming snapshot tarballs correctly. This should be
> > fixed either in boost upstream
>
> I know this is the popular Debian perception and
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:05:25AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > I use the PTS feature of looking up historical source packages quite a
> > > > lot, so it would be a shame if it went away with the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 06:01:49PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in the BTS I tried running
>
> bugs.debian.org/tags:obsolete-conffile but that didn't work. I tried
> using the web interface with options such as below but that also
> didn't work -
>
> ebian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?
Control: clone 840062 -1
Control: retitle -1 tracker.debian.org should get a src: syntax
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 04:51:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: retitle -1 tracker.debian.org: show historical data of no-longer
> existing source packages
> Control: severity
Control: reopen -1
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2016, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=nxproxy
> > links to
> > https://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nxproxy.html
> &g
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=nxproxy
links to
https://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nxproxy.html
links to "tracker.debian.org/pkg/nxproxy", which is
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nx-libs-lite
How do I make tracker.debian.org show
Package: src:suphp
Version: 0.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: security
>From http://www.suphp.org/Home.html
suPHP 0.7.2 has been released.
This release fixes a security issue that was introduced with the 0.7.0 release.
This issue affected the source-highlighting feature and could only be
exploite
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
It is confusing that pages like
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=packa...@qa.debian.org
list whoever maintained packages also under whoever is listed in
the maintainer field in stable - that person might have given up
maintainership of the package
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 02:20:14AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
>...
> > > So this alert sensors could perform some automatical tasks. For example:
> > >
> > > - Defcon 5 Send an automatic alert via email to Debian Qa
> >
> > What are the benefits of spamming Debian QA with hundreds of mails?
>
> To
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>...
It's a common misunderstanding that automatic tools would be able to
solve every problem.
Automatic tools might help you to identify QA problems, but they are
only
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > For each apparently stale ITP:
> >
> > 1) If the last thing that happened in the bug is a QA question "Do
> > you really still intend to upload this?" and there has been no
> > response for thirty days, then either convert it to RFP or clos
On 3 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Ok, I've gone through all the ITAs on the wnpp list and used Adrian's
> algorithm.
>
> Two more wnpp maintenance questions:
>
> 1) There are a metric ton of ITPs. *Something* should be done. But I
>don't know what.
>...
I did sometimes start to
Hi,
over one month ago I suggested the following:
<-- snip -->
Currently QA works the way that people find something to do themselves and
everyone works for himself at the tasks he sees. I propose to change this
to define tasks of QA work with usually 2-3 people responsible for each
area. The
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I think I read it in the Policy once... if the package links just to that
> one library, merely build-depending on it is fine; however, if it
> explicitely links to the others that just happen to be depended upon by that
> particular one, the other build-de
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 02:18:26PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Description:
> > cccd - A small GTK+ CD player program
> > Changes:
> > cccd (0.3beta4-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* debian/control:
> > + Removed unnec
On 1 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> So Adrian Bunk seems to have done the last run-through of this, and
> there are a number of packages for which the last mention was his "do
> you really still want to adopt this?"--so, Adrian, what's the status?
> I don'
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>...
> I'm sure not whether Adrian's proposal would work out or not. The idea
> of subdividing the QA tasks, I like, though. Maybe we should have a
> coordinator for each task, while at the same time allowing everyone to
> work on any task, as long as the
Hi,
I'd like to hear your opinion on the following proposal:
Currently QA works the way that people find something to do themselves and
everyone works for himself at the tasks he sees. I propose to change this
to define tasks of QA work with usually 2-3 people responsible for each
area. These pe
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi guys!
Hi Bas!
> I've written a script which generates overviews of the wnpp BTS entry.
> An example of a report in included below. These reports should enable
>...
There are two serious bugs in your script:
1. Your script wants to retitle an RFA
retitle 105531 Please remove xaw-wrappers from unstable
reassign 105531 ftp.debian.org
retitle 105532 Please remove nextaw from unstable
reassign 105532 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd suggest to remove the following orphaned packages
Another one that is now in incoming:
ilu_2.0.0.91-4_i386.changes
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
Hi,
I've uploaded the following packages to fix some bugs and to fix the
entries of the maintainer fields:
linuxconf_1.26r4-1_i386.changes
mmorph_2.3.4-7_i386.changes
psptools_1.2.2-6_i386.changes
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010907 12:00]:
> > It appears that grafix build depends on libltdl0-dev which is
> > unlikely to be built for ia64. The newer libltdl3-dev appears to be
> > built on more platforms. Any reason not to update the b
Hi,
the following old issues of the online Linux Magazine are now orphaned
(these seem to be the only issues of this magazine that are packaged):
lfocus-de-1998.03
lfocus-en-1997.11
lfocus-en-1998.03
lfocus-en-1998.05
Are there any objections against asking for their removal?
cu
Adrian
--
G
dbf2mysql_1.10d-3_i386.changes
qpage_3.3final-2_i386.changes
vic_2.8ucl1.1.3-6_i386.changes
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
On their way to incoming are:
gsn-curses_16-8_i386.changes
gsn-jigsaw_3-9_i386.changes
gumshoe_1-9_i386.changes
imaptool_0.9-2_i386.changes
so-far_6-9_i386.changes
tatctae_7-8_i386.changes
weather_6-9_i386.changes
xdemineur_2.1.1-1_i386.changes
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTE
And again two uploads:
lsh_0.70-3_i386.changes
picasm_1.6-1_i386.changes
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
Hi,
I've uploaded the following packages to set the maintainer to Debian QA:
leksbot_1.2-3_i386.changes
saydate_0.3.0-4_i386.changes
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Could you please tag them as "fixed" so that everyone sees that they
> > aren't present in the current packages?
>
> Euh, you want to mark bugs that might appear in the future as fixed?
> That sounds like the wrong way around..
It is perhaps not pe
Hi,
I've uploaded a new bmv package to set the maintainer to Debian QA.
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
Hi,
I'd suggest to remove the following orphaned packages from unstable:
nextaw
xaw-wrappers
They are obsolete and no longer working with XFree4.
ssh2
- non-free
- free ssh seems to include the same functionality
- RC bugs are open
Any opinions?
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [E
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > procmail 103196 forwarded serious
> > procmail 103278 forwarded serious
> > procmail 104078 forwarded serious
>
> For the record: Those bugs are not currently present in woody or sid
> and may be ignored. I'm keeping them open because they
Hi,
at the moment I do the following uploads for orphaned packages to set the
maintainer to Debian QA and to fix some bugs:
biomode_1.002-5_i386.changes
bioperl_0.7.1-1_i386.changes
clustalw_1.7-9_i386.changes
dbf2sql_2.0-10_i386.changes
fastdnaml_1.2.2-2_i386.changes
fastlink_4.1P-fix81-2_i386.c
Hi,
I'll do in a few minutes an upload of ilu and krusader to set the
maintainer in the maintainer field to Debian QA and to fix some bugs.
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
reassign 82387 ftp.debian.org
retitle 82387 Please remove macgate from unstable
retitle 85261 Please remove macgate from unstable
thanks
Since MacGate seems to be no longer working and upstream is no longer
reaschable for some years this package should be removed from unstable.
TIA
Adrian
Version: 2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dstooltk - dynamical systems investigation (Tk version)
Closes: 96034
Changes:
dstooltk (2.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
*
Hi,
I've made an upload of dstooltk and dstooltk-doc to set the maintainer in
the maintainer field to Debian QA and to fix a RC bug.
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Bastian Blank wrote:
>...
> > You will notice that most other distros do the same. RedHat and SuSE
> > distribute _heavily_ patched kernels, for example. Debian's is actually
> > quite light as far as patches go.
>
> but they also include vanilla kernelsources
You don't want
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Edward Betts wrote:
> What follows is a list of libraries that are included in Debian, outside the
> oldlibs section. All of the libraries listed have a newer version available.
> My question, is what should be done with these libraries?
>...
> libqt2 (2 bugs) - move to oldlib
optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 61
Maintainer: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.1.2-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-1), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libxdelta2 (>= 1.1.2),
zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.3)
...
<-- snip -->
Please do better research before sayi
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> Currently open RC bugs against base packages are: (by source package)
>...
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> util-linux 86089 open grave [mount segfault bug; downgrade?]
This bug is already tagged "
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>...
> > What do you think about this all, guys ? Should I report critical bugs
> > against the above packages (the policy says "must") ?
>
> No, please no. It's really too much nitpicking here, those bugs aren't
> so important. All the packages are stil
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> For the freeze to work well, there are two separate QA tasks that need
> to be done: (1) fixing RC bugs before the packages they apply to freeze,
> and (2) improving packages' policy compliance and overall consistency.
>
> I suspect it might
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:46:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > As soon as libpng goes in testing roxen2 should go into testing and all
> > the libroxen-* packages that depend on "roxen | roxen2" can follow.
>
> No, the
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:46:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk écrivait:
> > The only problem with roxen2 seems to be that it's being held up by pike7
> > that waits for imlib (or it will become uninstallable on alpha) that waits
> &
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:35:03PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > Quoting Anthony Towns :
> > > + roxen-fonts-iso8859-2 uploaded 399 days ago, out of date by
> > > + roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 uploaded 399 days ago, out of date by
> > These are fonts. Why
Package: unixodbc
Version: 2.0.5-0.1
Severity: serious
unixodbc has build dependencies on both libgnome-dev and libdb2-dev
libgnome-dev in unstable depends on libdb3-dev
libdb3-dev conflicts with libdb2-dev
Package: gtoaster
Version: 0.2001010715-0.1
Severity: serious
gtoaster has build dependencies on both libgnome-dev and libdb2-dev
libgnome-dev in unstable depends on libdb3-dev
libdb3-dev conflicts with libdb2-dev
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> Package: libnewt-perl
> Version: 1.08-3
> Severity: serious
>...
Hi Stephen,
some months ago you said you intend to adopt libnewt-perl. Is this still
valid and are you working on adopting this package (then you should look
at this bug) or have you w
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Richard Hecker wrote:
> > > I've solved it, but I'm very reluctant to upload a package like set6x86
> > > which I have no way of testing, especially when I'm poking at assembler.
> > > Does anyone have a Cyrix 6x86 on which they could test my package?
> >
> > Richard Hecker <[
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> > > In ALL cases, discretion should be used. The goal is not to
> >
> > What do you mean with "discretion should be used"??? I always thought
> > Debian was an open project and that "We Won't Hide Problems"?
>
> Just to clarify this further, I now realize
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
>...
> > It's either that or ask for an override, which means that when and if
> > the package gets adopted you have to ask for a change again, which puts
> > more work on the shoulders of ftp admins. I rather put more work on
> > the shoulders of a mac
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> this is what people are seeing, which means bug reports go to those
> maintainers and not to -qa, which happens to add yet another point to
> my seemingly ethernal problem with orphaned packages. THEY ARE NOT
> MAINTAINED.
>...
Orphaned packa
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these
> > packages.
>
> As I said several hours ago,
> http://list
Hi,
I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these
packages.
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
Hi,
I plan to do some uploads for orphaned packages to fix some bugs. I'll
have them uploaded before tomorrow's dinstall run in approx. 28 hours.
cu,
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
Hi,
I'd like to suggest that we change the severity of WNPP bugs for withdrawn
packages (packages removed from Debian that are waiting in
project/orphaned for a new maintainer) from "wishlist" to "minor".
Currently withdrawn packages are a bit hidden between all the ITPs that
are also "wishlist".
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > severity 61448 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > sipp fails to build due to attempting to use an egcc compiler, which doesn't
> > exist on i386 or mips, and probably most other architectures. This should
> > be changed to gcc.
>
> Question: Did anybody u
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Bas!
>...
> Do you guys think this script is useful? Would it be OK to let it
The script is useful but please coordinate with http://lintian.debian.org
to avoid duplicated work.
> actually submit teh lintian errors and warnign to the BTS? What
...
> > When reading it you see that writing a single manual page is enough for
> > passing the current "Tasks & Skills" check to become a Debian developer.
> > Sorry, but I can't resist calling this kind of skills check a joke!
>
> Ahem, I have seen Chuan-kai's packaging and bug-fixing skills. Ch
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Well, what you propose here is an an removal of a debian developer and I
> don't think this should be so easy as you describe it. We should be able
> to have a checklist and if some checks fail delete his debian account.
> If someone is really MIA and w
On 17 Dec 2000, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
>...
> without being a maintainer" and everything comes to a halt. The
> goals I stated for joining Debian includes: work on the Chinese
> translation of w.d.o and help with QA work for Chinese-specific
> packages. Okay, enough for background information...
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Cord Beermann wrote:
> >No, I don't intend to change this. My point is: Someone who has a Debian
> >account can do much harm (intentional or accidential). That's a reason why
> >I think we should have a severe look at the work of an applicant before he
> >gets an account.
>
>
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
>...
> > > > suggests to the NM team that he should become a Debian account. The NM
> > > > team (perhaps the current NM-Committee plus other interested Debian
> > > > developers) then looks critical at the work of the applicant, makes a
> > > > "Philosop
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Christian,
>...
> > package this is sometimes enough to pass the "Tasks & Skills" test (e.g.
>
> Well, do yo have some other examples too? I think one example is nice,
> but some others would be good to have.
E.g.
http://lists.debian.org/debia
Hi,
I want to suggest to change the way NM works.
Currently, someone applies at [1] and if he's lucky he has his account
less than 2 months after he applied.
My impression is that currently maintainers are accepted too early. For
some AMs it's enough that they build one package (and thanks to de
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Christian, hi Dale,
>...
> > do either use the high standards I want to use for my applicants and they
> > see that others with lower skills are already accepted by other AMs or
> > when I do suggest that they should become members of Debian bef
[Cc to debian-qa because this mail explains why I'll quit Debian QA]
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko wrote:
>...
> > We are talking about prospective maintainers, right?
> >
> > These are people who care enough about Debian to actually bother to
> > apply to be a maintainer so they can help ma
Hi,
I'll make some uploads for Debian QA until tomorrow's dinstall run (in
approx. 26 hours). Please contact me if you want to make uploads while
this period or if there are packages I shouldn't make uploads for.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Metthew,
> I've been a bit quiet on the Debian front for a little while
> (moving house, vacation, that sort of thing), and I'm sitting down to
> fix some bugs in my packages (and in some other packges, you'll be
> pleased to hear :). Anyho
retitle 68087 Please remove chimera completely
thanks
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Move xmap-[d|s]motif to project/orphaned
> > xmap-[d|s]motif are nonfree packages that need Motif. There are open bugs
> > that they need to be recompiled f
reassign 68087 ftp.debian.org
retitle Please remove chimera and xmap-[d|s]motif
thanks
Hi,
Please remove the following packages:
Move xmap-[d|s]motif to project/orphaned
xmap-[d|s]motif are nonfree packages that need Motif. There are open bugs
that they need to be recompiled for XFree4 - but Mot
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've done the uploads for the packages I announced some days ago except
> ntop where I'm waiting for a response of Wichert Akkerman if #70543 is
> really a bug. You'll notice my upload of ntop because it'll clo
Hi,
I've done the uploads for the packages I announced some days ago except
ntop where I'm waiting for a response of Wichert Akkerman if #70543 is
really a bug. You'll notice my upload of ntop because it'll close some
bugs. For various reasons I didn't make uploads for all of the other
packages I
Hi,
when I do an upload for Debian QA I do inform you before. I'm wondering if
it's possible to agree that everyone who wants to upload a package for
Debian QA sends a short note to this list before he starts working to
avoid duplicate work.
Could you agree to this or are there any reasons why th
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Torsten,
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:23:47PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >* Upload sponsored by Tony Mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> Do you want to take over the package once you are an official maintainer?
> I
Hi Wichert,
I'm wondering about your bug report because the "make distclean" in the
clean target of ntop does remove config.cache & friends. The only problem
I can see is if you abort the build process while configure runs: There's
no Makefile so "make distclean" fails, but config.cache & friends
Hi,
I will do uploads for the following packages to fix some bugs:
9menu
chimera
cthugha
cucipop
fnlib
ntop
tclx8.0.4
xabacus
xtrojka
Please tell me if someone else wants to make an upload for one or
more of these packages instead.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is bett
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:05:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Hm, I found out why I didn't have any problems: The German pages let
> > you still download the old version...
> >
> > Argl!
> >
> > Tha
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>...
> and then - it's new version with new name (csth instead of b2) so you have
> to rename rpm to what installer expects, and that's a hack.
>...
Hm, I found out why I didn't have any problems: The German pages let
you still download the old version
Hi,
I tried to download the Realplayer RPM and I had no problem with
downloading and installing it. If you can't explain what exactly your
problem is I tend to close this bug.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or wh
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 03:08:20AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > libc4 is still listed as withdrawn. There are discussions about removing
> > libc5 from Debian. Isn't it time to remove libc4 from project/orphaned ?
>
> Why?
Hi,
libc4 is still listed as withdrawn. There are discussions about removing
libc5 from Debian. Isn't it time to remove libc4 from project/orphaned ?
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trou
Hi,
the following packages have the wrong maintainer address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
cgiemail
dpkg-scriptlib
newscache
If noone disagrees, I will prepare fixed packages.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or wh
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
