On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > For each apparently stale ITP: > > > > 1) If the last thing that happened in the bug is a QA question "Do > > you really still intend to upload this?" and there has been no > > response for thirty days, then either convert it to RFP or close > > it, depending on the history. > > 2) If the last thing that happened is not a QA question, then send > > the question. > > Hmm, this would indeed be a better solution, the only problem being that > it's not very easily automated. Maybe the bug should also be tagged > appropriately (unactive or something) when sending the QA question. Then > my script can easily determine which one to remove.
I'm still not a big fan of automatic renaming of bugs (the problems with several ITPs were already mentioned in this thread). My favorite solution would be to use your list perhaps as a basis but to do the real work manually - that's why I suggested in my tasks proposal that there's a seperate WNPP task. cu Adrian
