On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these > > packages. > > As I said several hours ago, > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-0102/msg00163.html
I'm wondering why you didn't retitle #70864? When you intend to adopt it you should retitle the according WNPP bug. > so.. > I've moved the asmodem packages from /incoming to my ~ on auric, I'm > sure your package is fine, but I'd like to make this package > DFSG-free before uploading a fixed one into main, if the situation > can't be resolved (I doubt it), it should go into non-free. >... > This license does not meet criteria 3 of the DFSG "Derived Works" > i.e. it does not expressly permit modifications and redistributing > modified stuff. >... That sounds logical. Could you perhaps file a RC bug on the license issue? > - brian. cu Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
