Re: Frame.work might deliver RISC-V boards soon

On 2024-06-18 11:53, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, just some hint to some laptop I consider interesting: https://frame.work/de/de/blog/introducing-a-new-risc-v-mainboard-from-deepcomputing It would be good if we would make sure Debian will run on this hardware. If anyone is willing and able to

Re: Lack of replies

By far most users in all likelihood do not know that something like even DMARC exists. Do not discount them just because you know and can act accordingly. Cheers Mike Am 2. Januar 2024 20:10:27 MEZ schrieb Scott Kitterman : > > >On January 2, 2024 6:04:18 PM UTC, Steven Robbins wrote: >>O

Re: 2023 Debian Project survey: Sustainability now open!

I'm sure it wasn't the intention, but the questions presented in that survey feel more like they are phishing for specific people/information than curious about regular activities. It includes a number of open-ended questions with three text boxes for each, expecting the user to provide identifiabl

Re: Concerns regarding Debian 11 and 12 on VMWARE

? (To the content of your issues: For anyone you contact it would probably needed to know which desktop environment you use). Best Michael

Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?

Am 20. November 2022 23:04:05 MEZ schrieb Mattia Rizzolo : >On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote: >> On 11/20/22 22:14, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: >> > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Robinson >> > wrote: >> > >>

Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?

On 11/20/22 22:14, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Robinson wrote: Thank you for, perhaps inadvertently, compelling me to review some of the content of the package. I can now say that I am certain there is material of worth in the fortunes-off package and

Re: Are users of Debian software members of the Debian community?

On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:12:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 10:13 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Most people running interactive VMs (e.g., on a desktop with a graphical console) aren't using Xen, they're using kvm or virtualbox or just about anything else. While

Re: Are users of Debian software members of the Debian community?

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:54:09PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: On 9/16/22 10:13 AM, Michael Stone wrote: You have now sent a message about a particular udev issue to debian-user and I replied with one immediate thought. Some more thoughts: you're using a fairly obscure configuration

Re: Are users of Debian software members of the Debian community?

voice is completely nullified by those ad hominem attacks. And they continue. Michael Stone followed me to this list and condemned for me asking questions here on this list. There is no way *he* considers me a member of the Debian community who has a formal voice as a Debian user. Since you've

Re: Are users of Debian software members of the Debian community?

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:17:03PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: Thanks for this, Andy, I admit I did get caught up in behavior that appears as trolling. As you point out, the aforementioned thread only slightly has degenerated and I think there are some useful discussions in it despite the pro

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:55:28PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: On 2021/04/12 15:37, Michael Stone wrote: Not true, if someone identifies with fascist doctrine, even if they keep those views off of the project channels, then they are not welcome here, no matter where they engaged in those kind

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: On 2021/04/11 01:28, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Although I really prefer not to have them in the project, its is not the Debian project's task to rule about political believs, opinions, religions, fetishes and whatever else. But I expect

Re: [External] Re: ThinkPad laptops preinstalled Linux

e nice if such a thing would be available as an official Debian live cd rescue image. No debian-live currently includes tools like lvm, for example. So you depend on a working network setup for rescueing encrypted partitions etc. Just my 2 cents Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: libAWSL: Improving Human Efficiency for debian/copyright Reviewer

On Tue, 26 May 2020 08:13:24 -0400 Sam Hartman wrote: > Unfortunately, being a member of Debian, I find myself getting stuck in > the details and think you may have gotten a few things wrong. > > * I think that reviewing a file every time the salt changes is too > frequent. > It is a sign th

Re: Testing Discourse for Debian

gled forum stuff. At a glance, it looks like these features (and other subscription refinements) are available. They sound like they could (possibly) drastically improve how we communicate, raise concerns, gather consensus, etc. Cheers, -- Michael Lustfield

Re: Salsa as authentication provider for Debian

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:02:40 +0200 Jonathan Carter wrote: > [...] > This thread has had lots of discussion so far and no one has listed a > single reason against your proposal yet, IMHO if no one is standing in > your way it's time to just go ahead and do it. Multiple concerns have been raised a

Re: Salsa as authentication provider for Debian

n't aware of the stall a year ago, but we're here now, and I don't intend to work slowly. I'm confident you're aware of my "requirements gathering" phase. Design has been roughly discussed and I'm now taking a day to bury myself in documentation. Since I'm still playing the social distancing game, you can probably guess where my weekend priorities will be. :) Cheers, -- Michael Lustfield

Re: Salsa as authentication provider for Debian

27;t any practical issues with migrating away from salsa in the future, then I wouldn't have any objection, but the voice in the back of my head is screaming pretty loudly right now. -- Michael Lustfield

Re: Salsa as authentication provider for Debian

GSoC mentioned. Is there anything viable which can be taken from that effort? Also, please, don't focus on time to deployment. I'll do whatever we need in order to implement a proper long-term solution. As you may have noticed- I take my time to plan projects before execution. If anything, this is a change that should involve more planning than anything else. -- Michael Lustfield

Re: Request to Mini DebConf Montreal Organizers: Fight Israel not the DC20 Team

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:02:53AM +0100, Ansgar wrote: > the BDS movement, a movement that is uncontroversially seen as > antisemitic. Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

Re: The copyright checking question

n is going to provide a summary of certain scans, including preliminary license findings. I picture a future where at least a few of these checks can become part of a dak auto-reject rule, once they've been fine-tuned a bit. This would introduce a way to verify that a package is still very likely to be legally free. I apologize for the lack of details, but I'm digging in and have some down time from work. I'd like to make use of that time to just build. :) Cheers, -- Michael Lustfield

Re: possibly exhausted ftp-masters (Re: Do we still value contributions?

Maybe we should have a conversation about periodical rechecks, but packages like rdkit[1] languishing in NEW for almost two months and counting just because of a new PostgreSQL release is a bit depressing. Michael [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/rdkit_201909.1-1.html

Re: One-Time Pad Encryption Software to Debian Repository

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: First of all, all software in Debian must adhere to Debian Free Software Guidelines. And I can’t find the source code anywhere on your website. That said - who you seem to use a lot of buzz words and bold claims, but I would recommend

Re: Debian and Non-Free Services

to anything except master + I can be given maintainer access to a team owning those projects, but still run into all the same problems I can provide a much longer list, but it shouldn't be necessary. There are plenty of reasons why someone would prefer GitHub over other alternatives. Attempting to force one option only going to further divide our community. -- Michael Lustfield

Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task

On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 01:58:13PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I don't think we have heard enough voices yet to be able to answer that question. Are you really asking for a long list of +1s? Ok--I agree with the majority of expressed opinions that this is a bad idea.

Which idiot made Calamares used in Debian ?

The app is unaccessible for blind users fix your mess before adding crap ... -- Michaël C. Couturier

Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:56:49AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: The payoff needs to be correspondingly large to be worth the effort, and I'm just not seeing it. +1

Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa

Hi, On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:31:11PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > This probably has been floating around for some time. IMO, enough time > so that we start to discuss $subject. Why is this a GR and not a policy proposal? Michael

Re: metaphors and feminism

On 31.03.19 11:22, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Mike Hommey: > >> That's the primary structural distinction as an effect, but OTOH, the NM >> process is a rather extensive vetting process. > Not all Debian Developers went through the NM process. Account > creation was handled differently in the be

Re: Call for experiences of Norbert Preining

Outsider here. Conflict around Norbert's mode of discourse and Ian's mode of responding to it has clearly been an ongoing problem for Debian for over five years: https://lwn.net/Articles/575390/ What tools for resolving this exist now that didn't exist then? If the answer is "nothing much", the

Re: Planet Debian revisions

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 03:25:07PM +, Sean Whitton wrote: On Thu 03 Jan 2019 at 02:47pm GMT, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: Looks good! I like it. One tiny thingy based on a remark: I've looked up 'slur' in the dictionary and 'slander' and 'libel' seem to be synonyms that might be more widely known. M

Re: Conflict escalation and discipline

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Conflict escalation and discipline"): Most of the problems being discussed right now, and in general, seem to be of the sort where feelings are hurt, but harassment isn't happening. The situations seem to be

Re: Automatic downloading of non-free software by stuff in main

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:09:22AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: That's only because it lives in mm/shmem.c, not under fs/. It does support xattrs. Have you tried it? Mike Stone

Re: Emeritus status, and email forwarding

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email forwarding. But it wouldn't have to have the wide powers of an active DD/DM account. Unless this

Report functional install on Clevo N130WU laptop

you, -- Michael

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

re > Conservancy for legal advice - specifically whether there is anything > wrong with this proposed letter. I would ask the Software Freedom Law Center. The Software Freedom Conservancy is another umbrella organization similar to SPI. -- Michael Schultheiss E-mai

Re: New derivatives page on Debian website

My gut feeling is the Derivatives page should be the page that lists distros derived from or "children" of Debian. Creating a new page is just more effort when the hard word has been done already. On 2 February 2017 at 19:21, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > Hello everyone, > > we (debian-www) are work

Re: Publicly-readable list for only DDs and DMs to post to

Just to chime in with a voice from a regular scientific Debian user: Whether there is a public or private Debian developers mailing list is about as relevant to me as the price of cheese on Venus. I honestly don't feel the community is any more open or closed regardless. As much as transparency i

Re: does Debian help detect gravitational waves?

ebian.git/tree/tools/backport-dsc > > This looks like a useful tool! Wouldn't it make sense to put it into the > devscripts package? https://bugs.debian.org/660208 Cheers, Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de

Re: does Debian help detect gravitational waves?

Hi, few years back when packaging htcondor I was in touch with the people running the IT of the German observatory. Their Condor pool ran on Debian. As far as I know it still does. Michael On Feb 12, 2016 09:21, "Daniel Pocock" wrote: > > > > https://www.lsc-group.phys.u

Re: Frustrated

gt; cake at other venues as well- I understand they can afford a lot of cake. Well, they did give away the cake for one reason, to celebrate Debian's birthday. No idea why this could be bad though. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|

Important information for your website

ting. Should you have any questions, please let us know. To improve the search engine visibility of your website, we look forward to hearing from you after you have had time to read our proposal. Best Regards, *Michael Dennis*

Re: Backports removed from sources.list ;-(

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I saw backports has been removed as default setting from sources.list in >> Jessie RC3. I am very disappointed by this last min

Re: Backports removed from sources.list ;-(

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > I saw backports has been removed as default setting from sources.list in > Jessie RC3. I am very disappointed by this last minute change, without > much discussion so far I know. The installer's export mode allows you to make

Re: draft alternative proposal: fix problem at the root

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: >> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes: > > Russ> There's another alternative to using the CTTE, and my > Russ> understanding is that this was generally the method used prior > Russ> to the existence of the CTTE, but I'm not sure it's rea

Re: Reminder: Removing < 2048 bit keys from the Debian keyrings

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:33:28PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > AIUI, you need to have at least one(?) additional signature on your new > 2048+ RSA key on top of your old DSA key, correct? I meant "on top of the signature from your old DSA key". Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Reminder: Removing < 2048 bit keys from the Debian keyrings

additional signature on your new 2048+ RSA key on top of your old DSA key, correct? If so, did you consider relaxing this requirement for the rollover? I.e. maybe having 2048 RSA keys signed by (only) old 1024 DSA keys in the keyring is better than having no key at all for a particular DD? Mi

Re: DEP-5 (copyright file format) ... gap with practice

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> another clear benefit is reduced package cruft. > The only thing that is reduced is the size of the orig tarball. People do actually do review package source changes (think every release team unblock, security analysis, etc.), and the

Re: DEP-5 (copyright file format) ... gap with practice

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> You could always use the Files-Excluded field to make uscan remove >> those files from the upstream tarball, > Too much work (at least when you are not repacking the tarball for other > reasons) for absolutely no gain. Not sure how that'

Re: DEP-5 (copyright file format) ... gap with practice

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > DEP-5 as defined in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ does not have any > clause allowing us to skip license entries for certain class of files. > > In practice, many packages lack entries for autotools generated files > which come with v

Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón wrote: > I really (and still) like the idea of having no default desktop at all > and let the users decide by themselves if they even want to get a DE when > performing a DVD based installation. Including all potential DE options on the main install disc (

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Michael Gilbert writes ("Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members"): >> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: >> > I don't think this achieves the goal of rotating more project members >> &

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: >>> We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years, >>> and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then >>> have to leave the committee for at least one term. > >> 8 seems like it would be near idea

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years, > and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then > have to leave the committee for at least one term. 8 seems like it would be near ideal: turnove

Re: Sponsoring a Tails hackfest?

ntity makes sense) > - they are doing a lot of their work in Debian -- the hackfest could be > seen as a Debian sprint > - they are addressing important issues, and clearly contribute to Debian > having something to say about such issues > > I am planning to allocate 5000 EUR

Re: systemd bad press? score card?

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Joey Hess writes: > >> Russ Allbery wrote: >> > I think we're still in the middle of our process, which I understand >> > that a lot of people outside the project find baffling and protracted. >> >> Well, not only outside the project. >> >>

Re: systemd bad press? score card?

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Joey Hess wrote: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think we're still in the middle of our process, which I understand >> that a lot of people outside the project find baffling and protracted. > > Well, not only outside the project. > > The tech ctte has always operated in

Re: working with FSF on Debian Free-ness assessment

#x27;t look very useful to me. > > I know very well what their definition of freedom is. My question > challenges the valdity of their definition. I suggest you take that to their forums, then. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: working with FSF on Debian Free-ness assessment

F to refine current freeness > > assessment into more actionable items. > > Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway? You don't know what their definition of freedom is, but continue to assess their religious views? This doesn't look very useful to me. Mic

Re: Proposed MBF - mentions of the word "Ubuntu"

s/Ubuntu/no-name-anymore/ On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:56:37PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: >> Seems as though Joey is already taking the lead on this: >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debmirror.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc

Re: Debian companies group

? i do not think that informs the project. No, I'm only saying that the DPL is informed. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot

Re: Debian companies group

complaining that lea...@debian.org is not public? Relax, I'm just kidding. > i sincerely hope that other non-public aspects receive all due > scrutiny as well. > > don't you? You might want to search for those in the publicly available archives. Michael -- Michael Meskes Mic

Re: Debian companies group

onship in place, but at the same time may not be able to deliver what's needed. Why shouldn't they ask for help from competitors, because after all it'll help their own business as well. > could you elaborate on this, to help me understand? > > (2) Michael Meskes posted in

Re: Debian companies group

and that's partly why it has only 4 members. Given that debian-consultants doesn't have much traffic at all, I can see other reason, too. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Po

Re: Debian companies group

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:39:00PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 03/09/13 19:14, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Right and we already have a debian-consultants mailing list, don't we? > > Yes, and that list is also struggling, so why fork it? Because the list may be struggling becau

Re: Debian companies group

t; requirements, I am not interested to join such a list. Fine with me. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça

Re: Debian companies group

staff. What if the DD is only working part time? What if a company has > to lay of staff - will they be removed from the list if they drop beyond > 10? No, at least no immediately. :) There is no definitive answer for this. Let's try collecting a group first, before getting into those d

Re: Debian companies group

ybe not, but it's worth a try imo. The numbers are not set in stone btw, but I strongly believe in the beginning we should not start with everyone, but a group that is not really represented so far. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|O

Re: Debian companies group

scription policy that is changed. But my goal is to get some feedback about the idea in general as it hasn't got much traction so far. If there is no interest from companies we can simply close the list. But if there is we should start talking. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes

Debian companies group

es to subscribe to said mailing list. Of course I'm also available for questions and comments. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail

Re: Repositories dvds

Could it be possible to know what theses contain and what they didn't ? Michaël Caron Couturier <http://protocol.by/EntraideNet> 2013/5/12 Steve McIntyre > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:24:26AM -0400, michael caron couturier wrote: > >7 dvds aren't in the official

Repositories dvds

7 dvds aren't in the official site for ftp/http/torrent, however jigdo has them, when did they will be release as I need them ??? Michaël Caron Couturier

Re: Donations to Debian are too difficult

--- I haven't spoken with them, so > that *might* be a problem, but I don't think it would be. > > Just thinking out aloud, To add an additional thought, why not use the services of one of Deb{ian,Conf}'s major sponsors, and why not offer multiple one-click donation options to give users a choice? https://checkout.google.com/seller/npo/ -- Kind regards, Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2013 Results

Hi Becky, Just a heads-up that I've published this one. Cheers, Michael On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:59:28 +0200 Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Hi, > > The winner of the election is Lucas Nussbaum. > > His term will start on April 17th, 2013. > >

Re: LaMont Jones, WTH are you doing?

Thorsten Glaser writes: > I’ve been seeing this on d-d-changes for a while now. Please explain, > otherwise I’m going to call for an binNMU (on every binary you uploaded) > before wheezy is released, since we obviously cannot trust these bina‐ > ries and they’re not exactly leaf packages with < 10

Re: upload processing resumed

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > It's my understanding that this is a result of a debianqueued bug, not dak > it's self. > > It's unlikely other people are using it, IMHO That's making another assumption and isn't provable or disprovable. Even it is somehow true now, futu

Re: upload processing resumed

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 13054 March 1977, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: >> Is dak is present in a “released” state somewhere? Do other people use >> those releases? Meaning, should we ask for a CVE for this? > > No, no and no. > > We have git. We have people use that, t

Re: Feedback on your Whois system proposal - Was: Re: Review of personal information sources in Debian

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Enrico Zini wrote: > Recklessly exposing too much information outside the context in which it > was published can in some cases turn people away from contributing. If > ohloh were actually being taken seriously by people in my professional > circle, I would probably

Re: trademark policy draft

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > The benefit is that we have a legal tool against someone doing something > nasty with our name. Which is nice to have, but doesn't come for free. > It's hard to quantify as well: the benefit is for a future situation of > which we do not kn

Re: Presentation of iso downloads - simpler like Fedora?

. I think it is unfortunate that the button is part of the banner, I guess I quickly skip over the banner because I do not expect any important content in it and many other users might as well. Having a button left/right of the "Getting Started" section might be more visible. Mic

Re: General Resolution: Diversity statement results

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:08:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >> >> If I could get a copy of the Secretary's running source code I could >> also change it so that options were lettered rather than numbered. >> That would be /much/ less confusing

demudi hacked ?

I think the debian multimedia site is gotten hacked. http://www.demudi.org It displays some japanese (?) advert for DVD backups now. Please would someone be able to forward to the responsible people. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: 1 year release good enough.

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:21 AM, dE . wrote: > Hi. > > I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's > adaptability on the Desktops. If you want something with a faster release cycle, there is always testing, which is updated four times a day. If you want something slightly mo

Scientific article on Debian in PNAS

-access, but arxiv.org has the PDF http://arxiv.org/pdf/.5251 Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Arc

Re: Greaat disappointment

-project is totally the right list for this question, IMO. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111001120358.gd14...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org

Re: Greaat disappointment

there how frequently frustrated people from #ubuntu tried to sneak in to get support by claiming to run testing, cause the support in #d was much better. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Summary of scientific research on Debian (was: DD age histogram)

was from all point of views (social sciences, computer > science, etc.), but I'm pretty sure the BoF was based on some > bibliography of his. You might want to check that with him. Thanks for the note. Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Summary of scientific research on Debian (was: DD age histogram)

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:57:31AM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote: > 1. Create CategoryPublication > >We might want to further categorize publications whenever the number >gets large enough to justify that work. Done. > 2. Create PublicationTemplate > >That has

Re: Summary of scientific research on Debian (was: DD age histogram)

aching preprint-versions of their papers that may not be affected by licensing issues. Comments? Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..

Re: Summary of scientific research on Debian (was: DD age histogram)

t. The publication itself can be considered feedback -- it is just that you need to know that it is there in order to be able to read it in order to form a personal opinion. -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.o

Summary of scientific research on Debian (was: DD age histogram)

actual studies on Debian, like this one: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1247454 I find the social and technical dynamics of Debian fascinating -- I'm sure I'm not alone. By exposing prior research on the project more prominently we might be able to encourage further research and maybe lear

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf9/10[/11] accounting summary

95716.21 instead of EUR 59716.21, adding up to the above net loss of EUR 34584.57. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/

Re: gnome2

On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Michael Fogg wrote: > will debian in future releases use gnome 2.32 becuse gnome 3s fallback mode > just is not gnome 2.32. > i know it takes a lot to maintain gnome 2 but will you please keep it in the > system. > even if you dont maintain gnome 2

gnome2

will debian in future releases use gnome 2.32 becuse gnome 3s fallback mode just is not gnome 2.32. i know it takes a lot to maintain gnome 2 but will you please keep it in the system. even if you dont maintain gnome 2 at lest keep it in the system. i really dont care if gnome 2 gets maintained j

Re: Debian netinstaller

On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 11:57:43 -0700 Yacin Belmihoub wrote: > > Hi there, I would just like to know how to recompile Debian > netinstaller, I really need help for this. Thx and hopefully you can help me > :) $ sudo apt-get build-dep debian-installer $ apt-get source debian-installer $ c

DEP5: Public domain works

The spec is frustratingly vague when it comes to files in the public domain. The current version of the spec only mentions it once, to say that the Copyright field should note that there are no copyright holders. No guidance is given for the License field and there are no example stanzas of a pub

DEP5: Format example patch

Hello! I noticed that recently all the Format lines in the DEP5 examples changed to "http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/";. But there is still one Format line in the spec that uses the old svn URL. Below is a tiny patch to fix that. However... I'd also just like to clarify what the plan is for 'b

Re: Report from Debian booth at SfN2010

/donations ? Good idea. I've added the link. Michael -- GPG key: 4096R/7FFB9E9B Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Report from Debian booth at SfN2010

her donations to the Debian project. Michael (on behalf of the NeuroDebian team) [-1] http://neuro.debian.net [0] http://www.sfn.org [1] http://www.sfn.org/am2010 [2] http://www.debwrt.net [3] http://neuro.debian.net/_files/brochure_debian-neurodebian.pdf [4] http://git.debi

Re: What is annoying in the flattr buttons?

On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:27:08 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Tshepang Lekhonkhobe > > | It's more like "use this thing that I produced, and if you want, you > | can reward me with a few cents". There simply is nothing distasteful > | about that. > > You don't think so. I do. One of the reaso

  1   2   3   4   5   >