On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Michael Gilbert writes ("Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members"):
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> > I don't think this achieves the goal of rotating more project members
>> > through the TC.
>>
>> You could rotate people in to serve in place of the TC members that
>> are on sabbatical, which means at least one new perspective per year.
>
> I really don't like the idea of having two tiers of TC members -
> "permanent" ones and these new rotating one-year ones.A simple analogy, people in the rotating seats are to the permanent TC members as debian-maintainers are to debian-developers. DM has some definite advantages, people more autonomy and have a whole lot more to show when going for DDship, and some flaws, it makes the process of becoming a DD longer and possibly more tedious (depending on perspective) than the question and answer process. The same could be said for rotating TC members. So, I think it worth considering the larger perspective that the project may view the TC as insular, and that possibly something should be done about that. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mnc3brpt2qnu86kopt3+yhq7po1+nncrscnx57f7ae...@mail.gmail.com
