On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Joey Hess writes: > >> Russ Allbery wrote: >> > I think we're still in the middle of our process, which I understand >> > that a lot of people outside the project find baffling and protracted. >> >> Well, not only outside the project. >> >> The tech ctte has always operated in the past by coming to a consensus >> and then voting to satisfy the constitution's procedural requirements. > > The split in the cttee on this issue makes me wonder whether the > answer is "none of the proposed systems is Correct", so we should not > tie ourselves too tightly to any particular answer just yet. That's > not to say that we shouldn't decide upon a default init system for > jessie, but rather that we shouldn't do anything that would make it > harder to change our init system to the Correct one, once the Correct > one is found/decided upon/written/...
This is the exact point I've been making for two months now, but the TC went been full steam ahead on immediate change, disregarding nuanced efforts like init-select making multiple inits more usable. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MN0Dp7USENJX+J6Bmwgj7cYt5rOtrwuZG+BKfxQHzwg=g...@mail.gmail.com
