Re: Mac On Linux

On Wednesday 19 April 2006 09:38, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 4/18/06, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Specifically to Sven I was wondering if anyone was still having trouble > > > compiling the MOL module in Etch. It took trial and error for me all > > > day, (and about twelve dif

Re: Mac On Linux

On 4/18/06, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Specifically to Sven I was wondering if anyone was still having trouble > > compiling the MOL module in Etch. It took trial and error for me all > > day, (and about twelve different HowTo's) but I finally got the modules > > done. The rea

Re: Mac On Linux

> Specifically to Sven I was wondering if anyone was still having trouble > compiling the MOL module in Etch. It took trial and error for me all > day, (and about twelve different HowTo's) but I finally got the modules > done. The reason I ask Sven is because I read your name on one of the > mess

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

Hi, Mark Brown writes: > There's been some discussion on the topic on -devel in the past. I'd hate to replicate this discussion here. Can you narrow `on -devel' down to a date range, or a subject header, or whatever so I can read up on this? Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 01:29:39AM +, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Mark Brown writes: > > I'd question having the dependancy in the first place, though - > > nothing else with similar needs (lm-sensors for example) does that > > and it is unhelpful if one doesn't wish to use kernel-package. > You

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

Hi, Mark Brown writes: > > perhaps mol-modules-source should also provide "mol-modules"? > I'd question having the dependancy in the first place, though - > nothing else with similar needs (lm-sensors for example) does that > and it is unhelpful if one doesn't wish to use kernel-package. You ha

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 11:02:33PM +0100, Nik wrote: > perhaps mol-modules-source should also provide "mol-modules"? Have you taken a look at the result of using mol-modules-source? The package produced is what's needed to satisfy the dependancy, not the sources for the modules. I'd question h

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

Hi, Nik writes: > i consider it a bug that mol depends on mol-modules, This does make sense to me. mol is not functional without its modules. > and the packages which provide this are modules for 2.2.18 + 2.2.19 > kernels Actually, I narrowed this down to 2.2.19 only. It only makes sense to

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

> > failing that, download the source, and compile everything.. ,. > > Please. If a Debian package fails in any way, you should file a bug > against it, so the maintainer (in the case of mol, yours truly) can > fix it. ok, sure. thanks for the reminder :) in this case, i consider it a bug that m

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

Hi, Nik writes: > > I'm wanting to install Mac-On-Linux on my potato system > doesnt this work -> > apt-get install mol No, this doesn't work. mol is in sid and woody, but not in potato. I'm not running a powerpc system with potato, so a backport would be a major effort. > failing that, down

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

> > doesnt this work -> > apt-get install mol Not for potato, I think. Michael

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

> I'm wanting to install Mac-On-Linux on my potato system at work. The > problem is, the downloads are in RPM format. I tried using alien to > convert them to .deb, but I get an error message saying that the major > number must be <= 3, or something like that. doesnt this work -> apt-get install

Re: Mac-On-Linux?

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Paul F. Pearson wrote: > I'm wanting to install Mac-On-Linux on my potato system at work. The > problem is, the downloads are in RPM format. I tried using alien to > convert them to .deb, but I get an error message saying that the major > number must be <= 3, or something like

Re: Mac-on-Linux

> properly do to unresolved symbols. specifically MUNGE_CONTEXT. Also, > only molsymglue1.o inserts properly. mol.o doesn't insert after I > insert molsymglue1.o either. > > I'm currently running the BK development kernel. 2.4.7-pre6. Use the MOL source from MOL CVS. See the discussion on the s

Re: Mac-on-Linux

What if you have standard (or slightly patched) 2.2.18 kernel? I downloaded mol from debian-testing using apt-get, and it doesn't run...I had fun modifying the source so it would compile, since mol seems to require a 2.4.x kernel...which I don't understand. But it still doesn't work, and I still

Re: Mac-on-Linux

Hi, Rob Latham writes: > recent rsync's of mol have the fixes, but i don't know when such a > version will hit debian. Shortly after it is released by Samuel. In the meantime, you may try your luck with the packages by Jonas Smedegaard at deb http://debian.jones.dk/debian/local sid misc AFAI

Re: Mac-on-Linux

Marshal Wong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Hello! > > I've been trying to get Mac-on-Linux running on my PowerBook prismo. > I've compiled the modules, but I can't insert the mol.o module > properly do to unresolved symbols. specifically MUNGE_CONTEXT. Also, > only molsymglue1.o inserts properly.

Re: mac-on-linux: any success yet?

On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:15:23AM -0600, Chris Ivanovich wrote: > > yeti:~# strip_nwrom "/mnt/System Folder/Mac OS ROM" /usr/lib/mol/rom/rom.nw > yeti:~# startmol > Mac-on-Linux 0.9.53, (C) 1997-2000 Samuel Rydh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This kernel is NOT runtime patched > Trying to apply MOL runtim

Re: mac-on-linux: any success yet?

At 5:02 PM +0100 1/7/01, Michel Dänzer wrote: Alienated RPMs have worked fine for me so far. I'll jump into this one, too... I'm a Linux newbie, but I ran alien on the RPM and it converted to a .deb package just fine. But after installing it and following the documentation for MOL, I got this

Re: mac-on-linux: any success yet?

Garry Roseman schrieb: > > >On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:22:11PM -0600, Phil Fraering wrote: > >> I was wondering if anyone was trying to compile or put together a > >> package for mac-on-linux? The docs that came with the tarfile weren't > >> too clear on what extra libraries I need to get it

Re: mac-on-linux: any success yet?

On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:22:11PM -0600, Phil Fraering wrote: I was wondering if anyone was trying to compile or put together a package for mac-on-linux? The docs that came with the tarfile weren't too clear on what extra libraries I need to get it to compile. i have compiled it and have it

Re: mac-on-linux: any success yet?

> i can make a patch of my changes (against 0.53) available if anyone > wants it. i know Dan was planning to package it but has been too busy > and has not had a mac with a head on it to test with. Please do - I'd volunteer to at least initially package it, and maintain it as time permits.

Re: mac-on-linux: any success yet?

On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:52:53PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > i can make a patch of my changes (against 0.53) available if anyone > wants it. i know Dan was planning to package it but has been too busy > and has not had a mac with a head on it to test with. If you make the path available, th

Re: mac-on-linux: any success yet?

On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:22:11PM -0600, Phil Fraering wrote: > I was wondering if anyone was trying to compile or put together a > package for mac-on-linux? The docs that came with the tarfile weren't > too clear on what extra libraries I need to get it to compile. i have compiled it and have it

Re: mac on linux compilation

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Eric Deveaud wrote: > > > and sotty I don't now yet how to done the same with Xfree86-fbdev nor > > Xfre86-4.*. > > It's not done by the server there but by the kernel. The > adb_buttons=, kernel option for 2.2 kernels handles this, you > have to put k

Re: mac on linux compilation

On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:22:01AM -0500, Clay Ginsburg wrote: > Howdy, I was recently attempting to compile mac on linux hwne it gave me > the errors(see attached log file) Just a quick insite on my system, i > have kde2 installed, i had to apt-get install binutils-dev and apt-get > install nc

Re: mac on linux compilation

Clay Ginsburg wrote: > > Howdy, I was recently attempting to compile mac on linux hwne it gave me > the errors(see attached log file) Just a quick insite on my system, i > have kde2 installed, i had to apt-get install binutils-dev and apt-get > install ncurseslib5-dev before the mac on linux woul

Re: mac on linux compilation

Eric Deveaud wrote: > and sotty I don't now yet how to done the same with Xfree86-fbdev nor > Xfre86-4.*. It's not done by the server there but by the kernel. The adb_buttons=, kernel option for 2.2 kernels handles this, you have to put keycodes as shown by showkey there. > NB I've not seen xev

Re: mac on linux compilation

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Clay Ginsburg wrote: > Oh one other thing, what is the best way to emulate a 2 button or 3 > button mouse for X(in particular either afterstep or kde). emulation of mouse buttons depends on wich Xserver your using. in Xpmac-rev10 you should emulate the buttons with the foll

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Kent West wrote: > > > Running in PowerPC 750 mode (G3) > > newworld: elf32_getehdr failed > > cleaning up... > > Terminating threads > > DONE > > > > Is the claim of running in G3 mode significant, since I don't > > have a G3 but rather a 4400? > > Yes, you also ha

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

"C.M. Connelly" wrote: > > "KW" == Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >KW> Thanks! That's a lot of good info. Do you reckon I'd be >KW> better off going to 2.2.17 now, or is 2.2.16 acceptable >KW> enough to keep using it? > > Alan said (in his diary,

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

Kent West wrote: > Running in PowerPC 750 mode (G3) > newworld: elf32_getehdr failed > cleaning up... > Terminating threads > DONE > > Is the claim of running in G3 mode significant, since I don't > have a G3 but rather a 4400? Yes, you also have to choose the CPU in /etc/molrc Michel -

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

"KW" == Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KW> Thanks! That's a lot of good info. Do you reckon I'd be KW> better off going to 2.2.17 now, or is 2.2.16 acceptable KW> enough to keep using it? Alan said (in his diary, ) June 11th Built and rele

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

"C.M. Connelly" wrote: > > "KW" == Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >KW> Since I had read that 2.2.15 had problems (which is >KW> what I started with on this Mac), I downloaded the source >KW> for 2.2.16 (I couldn't find 2.2.16 on the Debian site, only >KW> older versions a

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

"KW" == Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KW> Since I had read that 2.2.15 had problems (which is KW> what I started with on this Mac), I downloaded the source KW> for 2.2.16 (I couldn't find 2.2.16 on the Debian site, only KW> older versions and 2.2.17pre6 -- why isn't 2.2.16 ther

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

Chris Baker wrote: > > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've just managed to get Debian installed on a PowerMac 4400/200. > > The base install > > wasn't too hard, but getting X to work was a bear. > > > > Finally, I've gotten X to work. > > > > Now I'm trying to get Mac-on-Linux (MOL)

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just managed to get Debian installed on a PowerMac 4400/200. > The base install > wasn't too hard, but getting X to work was a bear. > > Finally, I've gotten X to work. > > Now I'm trying to get Mac-on-Linux (MOL) to work. If you're at > all familiar

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 02:26:35PM -0500, Kent West wrote: > > Now I'm trying to get Mac-on-Linux (MOL) to work. If you're at > > all familiar with MOL, you know it's very Redhat-centric. So > > rather than try to work with the RPM, I tried to compile it from > > sourc

Re: Mac-On-Linux - elf32_getehdr failed

On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 02:26:35PM -0500, Kent West wrote: > Now I'm trying to get Mac-on-Linux (MOL) to work. If you're at > all familiar with MOL, you know it's very Redhat-centric. So > rather than try to work with the RPM, I tried to compile it from > source, but I kept running into a "can't fi