plementation.
You are incorrect. The HFS file system has gotten zero development
attention and the bugs were not the result of the API changes. The
main issue here is that the HFS file system does not have maintainer,
and decreasing the workload will not magically make someone appear
with deep knowle
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> You've misunderstood. Google have decided to subject the entire kernel
> (including obsolete unmaintained filesystems) to stress tests that it's
> never had before. IOW these bugs have been there since the code was
> merged. There's nothing to
Hi Michael!
On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 07:05 +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Installing a new kernel to the HFS filesystem, or a boot loader like
> yaboot, might be another matter. But there still is an user space option
> like hfsutils or hfsplus.
Both won't work with GRUB. grub-i
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:03:28AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> > > I suspect that this is one of those catch-22 situations: distros are
> > > going to enable every feature under the sun. That doesn't mean that
> > > anyone is actually _using_ them thes
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I suspect that this is one of those catch-22 situations: distros are
> > going to enable every feature under the sun. That doesn't mean that
> > anyone is actually _using_ them these days.
I think the value of filesystem code is not just a question o
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 15:37, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> I think you're missing the context. There are bugs in how this filesystem
> handles intentionally-corrupted filesystems. That's being reported as
> a critical bug because apparently some distributions automount
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:38:52PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:39 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesy
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:27:50PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 18:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesystems. They're orpha
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:39 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesystems. They're orphaned in
> > > MAINTAINERS and if distros are going to do such a
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 18:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesystems. They're orphaned in
> > > MAINTAINERS and if distros are going to do such a dam
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesystems. They're orphaned in
> > MAINTAINERS and if distros are going to do such a damnfool thing,
> > then we must stop them.
>
> Both HFS and HFS
Marco LANDI was born in Italy. He worked at APPLE (he was world
president) and now lives in France, he invests in artificial intelligence.
https://editions-balland.com/Marco-Landi_auteur_6667.html
Or sending a petition to Apple?
If you have an idea how to do that, I am more than listening.
ht
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 12:04 +0200, David VANTYGHEM wrote:
> Perhaps asking to Marco LANDI at info AT quest-it.com?
I don't know who that is. Can you enlighten me?
> Or sending a petition to Apple?
If you have an idea how to do that, I am more than listening.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian
Perhaps asking to Marco LANDI at info AT quest-it.com?
Or sending a petition to Apple?
Le 18/06/2023 à 11:55, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
Hello!
I have made some more progress on the hfs package to the point that it
now builds fine on Linux. I have not tested the binaries yet
Hello!
I have made some more progress on the hfs package to the point that it
now builds fine on Linux. I have not tested the binaries yet, except for
a quick "mkfs.hfsplus" which seemed to work.
All the changes can be found in the "linux" branch in [1]. I have also
added a
On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 11:19 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Since it's easier and more productive to collaborate on this project in
> public,
> I would like to ask everyone to submit patches via pull request on the Github
> project.
Ping. Could you guys re-send your patches as pull requ
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > There is currently one limitation with the HFS patch as it doesn't allow
> > setting
> > a custom volume name and hard-wires it to "untitled" [4]. This is because
> > the original code uses an Apple-specifc function
Hi Jeffrey!
On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 07:11 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Apple has a modified iconv, if I recall correctly. It is modified for
> their filesystem, and it properly handles filenames on OS X. I don't
> know about MacOS 9, however.
>
> An open source port of Apple iconv with utf-8 supp
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:20 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> [...]
>
> There is currently one limitation with the HFS patch as it doesn't allow
> setting
> a custom volume name and hard-wires it to "untitled" [4]. This is because the
> original code
Hello!
Since I have posted about my initial work on my updated »hfsprogs« [1]
package based on the new »hfs« [2] package, multiple people send me patches
for improvement off-list.
Since it's easier and more productive to collaborate on this project in public,
I would like to ask everyo
yet.
My idea was to start working on the split-out »hfs« package anyway since I am
eventually going to update the »hfsprogs« package in Debian unstable anyway.
Currently, »hfsprogs« in Debian is based on »diskdev_cmds«. After version 557.x,
Apple decided to split out the HFS(+) filesystem code i
On 30/05/2023 12:24, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hello!
I have started working on an updated »hfsprogs« packages based on the
split-out version of the HFS(+) code in the »hfs« package. For this,
I have forked Apple's original »hfs« package on Github [1].
Feel free to start contrib
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:12 PM Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:24:42PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > Blocks are like C++ lamda's. ObjC folks like to use them to ensure
> > cleanup in a function, like releasing a handle or free'ing memory.
>
> Funny how the high level de
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:24:42PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Blocks are like C++ lamda's. ObjC folks like to use them to ensure
> cleanup in a function, like releasing a handle or free'ing memory.
Funny how the high level description of them couldn't even bother so
explain that. That does ma
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 4:40 PM Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 01:24:15PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >
> > I have started working on an updated »hfsprogs« packages based on the
> > split-out version of the HFS(+) code in the »hfs« packa
t for you then no option. Just trying to make this
> as easy as possible...
I don’t have a hard requirement on gcc, but
hfs currently has a hard requirement on
clang which isn’t available on all Debian
targets.
Adrian
Yes, Iain Sandoe has had the blocks patches in his gcc repos for many years now
(2016 at least) but has not yet had them polished up enough to push them to gcc
mainline.
If gcc is a hard requirement for you then no option. Just trying to make this
as easy as possible...
K
On 2023-05-30, at 2:
Hi Lennart,
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I had a poke at it, dealt with a couple of compile issues, then
encountered Blocks and went WTF did Apple invent here? I don't even
understand the description of their proprietary extension to C/C++/ObjC.
I had never seen code with ^ prefixed to things in th
On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 13:53 -0700, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> The blocksruntime library is easy to build and available broadly,
> in case just including it becomes the easier path.
>
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libb/libblocksruntime/libblocksruntime_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz
The library has cla
out on my »linux«
> branch
> using a patch originally from Fedora:
>
>> https://github.com/glaubitz/hfs/commit/d6ea3fe324a6b018ebe7934b9f95a624b047dc2d
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hfsplus-tools/blob/rawhide/f/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch
>
> Additional occu
riginally from Fedora:
> https://github.com/glaubitz/hfs/commit/d6ea3fe324a6b018ebe7934b9f95a624b047dc2d
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hfsplus-tools/blob/rawhide/f/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch
Additional occurrences should be patched out in a similar way.
Adrian
--
.'&#x
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 01:24:15PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have started working on an updated »hfsprogs« packages based on the
> split-out version of the HFS(+) code in the »hfs« package. For this,
> I have forked Apple's original »hfs«
Hello!
I have started working on an updated »hfsprogs« packages based on the
split-out version of the HFS(+) code in the »hfs« package. For this,
I have forked Apple's original »hfs« package on Github [1].
Feel free to start contributing. It's currently work-in-progress as
»fsck_hfs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
* Package name: partman-hfs
Version : 1
Upstream Author : John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org
On 5/29/21 1:25 PM, Johannes Brakensiek wrote:
> Is there anything we could to do to motivate people to complete Debian
> Ports packages regarding contrib and non-free?
This is a matter of the Debian Ports FTP admins enabling "contrib" and
"non-free"
for Debian Ports. It's not related to the pack
Hello Adrian,
On 25 May 2021, at 17:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
"contrib" and "non-free" have not been added for Debian Ports yet, I
will ping the responsible
admin again. In the meantime, I will build the hfsprogs package and
upload it manually for powerpc
and ppc64 later today.
p
Hi!
On 5/23/21 7:39 PM, Johannes Brakensiek wrote:
> Did I do anything wrong? Are there new hfs tools on their way?
"contrib" and "non-free" have not been added for Debian Ports yet, I will ping
the responsible
admin again. In the meantime, I will build the hfsprog
Hello,
when trying to update to Kernel version 5.10.0-7 I recognized that my
HFS partition at /boot/grub is mounted as read-only now. I am missing
any tools like fsck.hfs or the package hfsprogs to check the partition
and to mount it rw.
As the partition is read-only my system did not break
submit the new
> partman-hfs
> package to unstable.
I had to rebuild the image because I used the wrong partman-auto [1], but with
that
images, the /boot/grub partition is indeed created as intended.
There is an empty question dialog that just needs to be answered with "No", but
I think
Hi!
Here is a new test image [1] which is supposed to test the proper partitioning
of the HFS boot partition and mounting it to /boot/grub.
Note: This image will *not* install GRUB yet properly. The purpose of this image
is just to test whether the changes I made to the package partman
On 2/3/21 7:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/3/21 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> The MDB is still corrupted, so I have to look into that:
>
> And fixed:
Just uploaded the patched version of hfsprogs to unstable:
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hfsprogs/news/2021020
On 2021-02-03 19:28:45 +0100 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
On 2/3/21 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
The MDB is still corrupted, so I have to look into that:
And fixed:
Great work, thank you!
Johannes
Control: tags -1 +patch
Attaching a patch which re-adds support for creating legacy HFS filesystems.
I will hopefully upload an updated version with the patch included tomorrow.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.or
On 2/3/21 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The MDB is still corrupted, so I have to look into that:
And fixed:
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> ./newfs_hfs -h /dev/sdl2
Initialized /dev/sdl2 as a 3863 MB HFS volume
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> fsck.hfs /dev/sdl2
**
; calculations are incorrect:
>>
>> Works:
>
> In case someone is interested, attaching the preliminary patch.
The MDB is still corrupted, so I have to look into that:
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> ./newfs_hfs -h /dev/sdl2
Initialized /dev/sdl2 as a 3863 MB HFS volume
root@
32 GetDefaultEncoding();
static UInt32 UTCToLocal __P((UInt32 utcTime));
+static UInt32 DivideAndRoundUp __P((UInt32 numerator, UInt32 denominator));
+
static int ConvertUTF8toUnicode __P((const UInt8* source, size_t bufsize,
UniChar* unibuf, UInt16 *charcount));
@@ -203,6 +224,146 @@ dowip
On 2/3/21 4:06 PM, Linux User #330250 wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier to use an earlier version of diskdev_cmds, patch
> it to default to hfs instead of hfs+, compile it, and then rename it to
> mkfs.hfs as a separate package?
>
> https://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/diskdev_
On 2/3/21 2:52 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I quickly hacked that together now, but it's not really working yet as some
> size
> calculations are incorrect:
Works:
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> ./newfs_hfs -h /dev/sdl2
Initialized /dev/sdl2 as a 3863 MB H
Wouldn't it be easier to use an earlier version of diskdev_cmds, patch
it to default to hfs instead of hfs+, compile it, and then rename it to
mkfs.hfs as a separate package?
https://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/diskdev_cmds/
On Gentoo Linux, version 332.14 is still fully supporting HFS
On 2/3/21 2:52 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I quickly hacked that together now, but it's not really working yet as some
> size
> calculations are incorrect:
Some more progress:
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> ./newfs_hfs -h /dev/sdl2
Initialized /dev/sdl2 as a 3
On 2/3/21 12:41 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> OK, I have skimmed through the hfsprogs source again and I think, I will
> re-add HFS Legacy support. It should be feasible to add it back in as most
> of the functionality is still there.
>
> There are some extra functions th
On 2/3/21 12:16 PM, Linux User #330250 wrote:
> BUT, one "bug" of this has always been, even with an older version of
> the Apple diskdev_cmds, that the option "-h hfs" was always needed.
> Therefor, those two command do the same to create an HFS+ volume:
> * mkf
On 2/3/21 12:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> No, they don't. Again, Apple removed Legacy HFS support from mkfs.hfs.
>
> If someone actually wants to step up and help me, then please wipe
> up a patch to bring HFS Legacy support back to hfsprogs.
OK, I have skimmed thr
ac does support booting from a HFS volume.
> But not all variants of HFS+ are supported by Open Firmware. E.g. if I
> remember correctly, case sensitive variants (HFSX) and software-RAID
> configurations don't work.
>
> https://opensource.apple.com/source/bless/bless-37/README.BOOTIN
Am 02.02.21 um 22:17 schrieb Christian Groessler:
I need to ask now...
On 2/2/21 9:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Yes, and that libhfsp-dev is actually built from the hfsplus source
package which is a
fork of hfsutils to support HFS+ but it doesn't have a hattrib command
an
I need to ask now...
On 2/2/21 9:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Yes, and that libhfsp-dev is actually built from the hfsplus source package
which is a
fork of hfsutils to support HFS+ but it doesn't have a hattrib command anymore
which
is used in hfsutils to bless a file s
On 2/2/21 8:59 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Also OpenBIOS has its own fairly compact HFS+ driver at
> https://github.com/openbios/\
> openbios/tree/master/fs/hfsplus which according to the comments is taken from
> libhfsp
> which still seems to be available in D
On 02/02/2021 19:39, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
- Use HFS+ with hfsprogs and write a blessing tool based on libisofs [2]
The code was contributed by Vladimir Serbinenko in 2012, when he was
the active maintainer of GRUB. See:
https://dev.lovelyhq.com
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> - Use HFS+ with hfsprogs and write a blessing tool based on libisofs [2]
The code was contributed by Vladimir Serbinenko in 2012, when he was
the active maintainer of GRUB. See:
https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libburnia/libisofs/raw/branch/master/libis
On 2/2/21 8:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> We could try re-adding HFS Legacy support to hfsprogs [1] which should
> be feasible as well.
This particular plan would involve:
- re-add HFS Legacy support to hfsprogs
- create hfsprogs udeb package
- create hfsutils udeb package
On 2/2/21 8:15 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> As I explained, from the installer's point of view, hfsprogs is more straight-
> forward because it use the same command line interface as all the other
> filesystem
> utilities, so that "mkfs -t hfs" works.
>
&g
Hello Johannes!
On 2/2/21 7:51 PM, Johannes Brakensiek wrote:
>> On a sidenote: This variant has the huge advantage that the partioning tool
>> in debian-installer takes care of setting up the HFS+ partition and making
>> sure nothing gets overwritten etc.
>>
>> T
Hello Adrian,
thank you for your work and your approach towards fixing this issue.
On 2 Feb 2021, at 16:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 2/2/21 4:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
In order to solve this issue, we have a couple of options:
- Use HFS instead of HFS+ and use the
On 2/2/21 4:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> In order to solve this issue, we have a couple of options:
>
> - Use HFS instead of HFS+ and use the old hformat utility in grub-installer
On a sidenote: This variant has the huge advantage that the partioning tool
in debian-instal
path for GRUB in NVRAM.
At the same time, hfsprogs - the original HFS filesystem utilities by Apple -
can
no longer create HFS filesystem after I updated it to version 543 but only HFS+
filesystems.
While NewWorld PowerMacs can actually boot from HFS+ partitions, we're missing a
tool in D
Control: -1 retitle ITA: hfsplus -- Shared library to access HFS+ formatted
volumes
Control: -1 owner !
Hi!
As one of the maintainers of Debian's PowerPC ports, I'm adopting
this package as it can be useful for manipulating HFS filesystems
on PowerMacs.
There also seems to be
Source: hfsprogs
Severity: normal
User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: powerpc ppc64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Hello!
The recently uploaded version 540.1.linux3-1 of hfsprogs no longer supports
creating
legacy HFS filesystems as the "-h" flag is
Control: retitle -1 ITA: hfsprogs -- mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems
Control: owner -1 !
I will adopt this package to update it to the latest upstream
version as HFS support is still needed to support Debian on
Apple PowerMac.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adria
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: powerpc ppc64
Hello!
I'm orphaning the hfsprogs package with the intention to adopt it.
The package hasn't been updated for a long time by the current
maintainer and has a couple of issues that need resolving.
He has
On 3/13/19 21:34, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:56 AM Frank Scheiner wrote:
by popular demand for a working d-i/grub-installer on NewWorld Power
Macs **with** HFS bootstrap method, I made this happen - again. :-D This
time with a reduced footprint compared to the patches
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:56 AM Frank Scheiner wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> by popular demand for a working d-i/grub-installer on NewWorld Power
> Macs **with** HFS bootstrap method, I made this happen - again. :-D This
> time with a reduced footprint compared to the patches propo
Dear all,
by popular demand for a working d-i/grub-installer on NewWorld Power
Macs **with** HFS bootstrap method, I made this happen - again. :-D This
time with a reduced footprint compared to the patches proposed in late
2017 (see [1]).
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2017/11
ons
+ * Handle HFS file systems (format, mount, unmount, fstab entry)
-- Frank Scheiner Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:20:38 +0100
diff --git a/grub-installer b/grub-installer
index 10cce04..63e4a03 100755
--- a/grub-installer
+++ b/grub-installer
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ fi
newline="
"
+NW_OFF
On 11/14/2017 02:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
+- Handle HFS file systems (format, mount, unmount, permanent mount).
This should be "fstab entry", not "permanent mount".
Also, please strip ". Override $bootfs, $bootfstype, $bootdev and $state
for NewWo
; index 752849e..4c056d3 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ grub-installer (1.147) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>d-i/yaboot-installer).
> - Detect and select NewWorld bootstrap partitions (adapted from
> d-i/yaboot-installer)
@@ grub-installer (1.147) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
d-i/yaboot-installer).
- Detect and select NewWorld bootstrap partitions (adapted from
d-i/yaboot-installer).
+- Handle HFS file systems (format, mount, unmount, permanent mount).
-- Frank Scheiner Thu, 06 Nov 2017 08
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0m6300egixkye...@davar.emet.co.il
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0m6300efyxkue...@davar.emet.co.il
On Friday 22 June 2012 22:55:49 George Danchev wrote:
Hi,
Further tests revealed that there is a bug somewhere, which causes production
of unbootable and unmountable images. Please, postpone yours tests, and sorry
if you've already wasted some time with it.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB
--
To UNSU
Hi,
We would like to test the new functionality of xorriso, that is
ISO9660/HFS hybrid images, therefore we would need some testers
who are willing to build and try to boot images on powerpc machines,
at least those supported by Debian. This might also include
downloading some large files
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Super Bisquit wrote:
> boot hd:,ofwboot /bsd
> but why should I?
>
> Or do I place the file somewhere else?
>
> The OpenBSD partition resides on hdb6. I created an hfs bootblock on hdb5.
>
>
>
maybe... you'll have more info
boot hd:,ofwboot /bsd
but why should I?
Or do I place the file somewhere else?
The OpenBSD partition resides on hdb6. I created an hfs bootblock on hdb5.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I would kindly request assistance with maintaining the hfsprogs package,
which is a pair of programs for mkfs and fsck for HFS/HFS+ filesystems.
The package is developed by Apple, but only a small fraction of the
package is actually used. The current packages in
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 13:59 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>
> On Feb 21 2009, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > The HFS filesystem module fails to read some files, in particular files with
> > an underscore in the filename. This makes GRUB2 unable to load _linux.mod
> > from an H
Hi, Michel.
I'm just catching up with some old e-mails, and I found this one.
On Feb 21 2009, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> The HFS filesystem module fails to read some files, in particular files with
> an underscore in the filename. This makes GRUB2 unable to load _linux.mod
> from an
Package: grub-ieee1275
Version: 1.96+20081201-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The HFS filesystem module fails to read some files, in particular files with
an underscore in the filename. This makes GRUB2 unable to load _linux.mod
from an HFS
On Dec 12 2007, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> and if someone raises their voices we can think of offering the
> package through backports.org.
Thanks for the words as usual, Rhonda.
The package builds well in an older chroot and, thus, I believe that it
can be backported without any problems.
Tschüss
Hi.
On Dec 11 2007, Ruben Vandeginste wrote:
> And, regarding the other mails, I did switch off journaling for my
> shared HFS+ partition (on purpose to be able to use it on the linux
> side).
Yes, otherwise, you can't write to the filesystem (unless you force it,
which should not
and you cannot, for example, use that utility
> to mount a volume in Konqueror or Gnome.
>
Nope! I tried all of them, excep hfsprogs (it's in 'unstable') and seems
to be having some problems (see older posts).
What seems strange to me is that checking the hfs partition
> > Ennio-Sr wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > fsck.hfs is included in the "hfsprogs" package, but I don't have any
> > > experience with it.
> > >
> > > Ruben
> > >
> >
> > hmm ... I only succeded
* Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 00:34:09 CET]:
> * Ruben Vandeginste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <
> > [2007-12-11]:
> > fsck.hfs is included in the "hfsprogs" package, but I don't have any
> > experience with it.
>
> hmm ... I
s" package, but I don't have any
> > experience with it.
> >
> > Ruben
> >
>
> hmm ... I only succeded in getting 'hfsutils' which does check hfs
> directories, but doesn't unlock them!
> I couldn't fine 'hfsprogs' (debia
.. I only succeded in getting 'hfsutils' which does check hfs
directories, but doesn't unlock them!
I couldn't fine 'hfsprogs' (debian ppc) pckg.
Anyway I moved a few files to the hfs exchange partition the longer way:
uploaded them to my web private space ...
Thanks
ing from linux i still get:
>
> "hfs: filesystem was not cleanly unmounted, running fsck.hfs is
>
> BTW, 'fsck.hfs' is nowhere to be found (but I downloaded and ran
> hfsplus).
>
> Perhaps the lock has anything to do with 'file sharing' on OS9?
>
&g
* Ruben Vandeginste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <
> [2007-12-10]:
>
> At Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:49:49 +0100, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> >
> > [using 2.6.18-5-powerpc GNU/Linux on a iBool]
> > [...]
>
> Since you have a hfs partition, I assume you have a dual-boot wi
* Ruben Vandeginste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10 20:33:09 CET]:
> At Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:49:49 +0100, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> >
> > [using 2.6.18-5-powerpc GNU/Linux on a iBool]
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to copy a file from ext2 to hfs
2.6.18-5-powerpc GNU/Linux on a iBool]
Hi all,
I'm trying to copy a file from ext2 to hfs partition, but the command:
# mount -t hfs -o rw /dev/hda25 /mnt
yields the warning:
hfs: filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.
Is there any way to unlock it?
Thanks for your
wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> [using 2.6.18-5-powerpc GNU/Linux on a iBool]
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm trying to copy a file from ext2 to hfs partition, but the command:
> >>>> # mount -t hfs -o
'm trying to copy a file from ext2 to hfs partition, but the command:
# mount -t hfs -o rw /dev/hda25 /mnt
yields the warning:
hfs: filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.
Is there any way to unlock it?
Thanks for your attention,
Ennio
Since you have a hfs partition, I
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to copy a file from ext2 to hfs partition, but the command:
> > > # mount -t hfs -o rw /dev/hda25 /mnt
> > > yields the warning:
> > > hfs: filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.
1 - 100 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
