Am Samstag, den 28.01.2012, 20:12 +0100 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Tobias Frost , 2012-01-28, 19:52:
> > * Update standards version to 3.9.2, no changes required
>
> No, no, no. We don't do such things in NMUs.
>
> --
> Jakub Wilk
Fine with me, reverted & upload
ool/main/s/solarpowerlog/solarpowerlog_0.22.dsc
* Package name: solarpowerlog
Version : 0.22
Upstream Author : Tobias Frost
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/solarpowerlog/
* License : GPL, LGPL
Section : utils
I would be glad if someone uploaded th
)
* update -dbg Package description (Closes: #596502)
* Fixes lintian warning "manpage-section-mismatch"
* Fixes lintian warning "debug-package-should-be-priority-extra"
on libtokyocabinet-dbg
-- Tobias Frost Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:22:42 +0100
-- System Information:
De
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 15:33 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht:
> And it doesn't build for me in a clean chroot, I get the following error
> (full build log attached):
Hallo Benoît,
well, that's strange... My packages are always pdebuild-checked and I
built it successfully on amd64, i386 and ar
Am Freitag, den 17.02.2012, 12:48 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht:
Sorry for the late reply, spare time was quite spare the last days...
> Hi Tobias,
>
> As promised, here's my review of your package:
>
> - In debian/solarpowerlog.default, you define /etc/solarpowerlog as
> the default RUNDIR
-dev (changes includes)
> > * Fix "python-gearman.libgearman and python-gearman: error when trying
> >to install together" Cherry-picking relevant sections of the attached
> >patch in the bugrport (Closes: #620469)
> >
> > -- Tobias Frost Sat, 03 Mar
:24, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Hallo Sanrdo,
> > thanks for your response. I'll add the patches to the BTS.
> >
> > Note: Clynt (the current maintainer) asked me in a response to one the
> > BTS entries fixes (#6318020) to include his changes from his VCS as
> >
ise, any feedback/ review is
of course highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Tobias Frost (coldtobi)
Am Freitag, den 17.02.2012, 12:48 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht:
>
> Sorry for the late reply, spare time was quite spare the last days...
>
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> As prom
Hallo Michael,
You do not need to wait for the NMU.
If you upload a newer version before the DELAY expires, the NMU is
automatically cancelled.
Am Freitag, den 13.04.2012, 01:39 +0400 schrieb Michael Tokarev:
> On 13.04.2012 01:08, Tomasz Muras wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A Debian developer has up
Am Montag, den 07.05.2012, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Jérémy Lal:
> On 07/05/2012 15:41, Olе Streicher wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am the maintainer of the package "cpl". Upstream just released a new
> > version 6.0 and changed the SONAME for the built libraries from 12 to
> > 20. So, the source n
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2012, 09:19 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> Thomas,
>
> Couple of quick comments:
>
> * d/copyright does not contains copyrights for debian/* files.
(Disclaimer:I did not check the package in question)
I think this is no longer required from policy 3.9.3 on but corre
Hallo Artur,
thanks for your quick response.
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 13:17 +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the debian
>
be suitable?
Another idea I have is to use git for this task and keep the debian
directory in a dedicated branch. I think this could integrate well when
using git-buildpackage
coldtobi
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 14:43 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Hallo Artur,
> >
> >
ber 2011 13:37:36 Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "solarpowerlog".
> >
> > * Package name: solarpowerlog
> >Version : 0.21-1
> >Upstream Author : Tobias Frost
&
Am Donnerstag, den 22.12.2011, 19:59 -0200 schrieb Fernando Lemos:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> >> The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the
> &g
Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 01:20 +0200 schrieb George Danchev:
> On Thursday 22 December 2011 23:49:36 Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Hallo George,
>
> Hoi,
>
> (top posting is not preferred:)
>
> > dbixxx is currently not used and could be removed for the moment -- I
Hallo,
I implemented your suggestions and re-uploaded the package.
I also eliminated the "empty-debian-diff" linitian warning by now using a
dedicated branch for the debian/ foler.
regards,
coldtobi
Am Donnerstag, den 22.12.2011, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> Dear mento
to sponsor this package, to define clear goals and clear actions whats
needed to get this package into debian and avoiding wasting effort by
focused work.
BR
coldtobi
Am Dienstag, den 27.12.2011, 20:04 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am (still) looking for a sponsor for
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 04:10 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
> > OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use?
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Werner
>
> As per:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/
>
> t
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 14:29 -0430 schrieb Luis Alejandro Martínez
Faneyth:
> If you need a simple script logic, you could use bash like this:
>
> ==>8==>8==
> #!/bin/bash
>
> PACKAGES="package1 package2 package3"
>
> for PACKAGE in ${PACKAGES}; do
>
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 13:30 + schrieb Tony Houghton:
> The debian packaging and upstream are in one repository and I didn't
> want the contents of the release tarball to be inconsistent with what's
> in the package. I would also have to change the way I use git tags to
> generate a ve
Just a general remark just came into my mind about the symbols
dicssusion:
Is is really *safe* to use inline methods as API in libraries?
My belly states "no", because you might found yourselg to be unable to
fix bugs in library, if the software using the interface will use a
inline here and if t
Package: eiskaltdcpp
Followup-For: Bug #655184
Dear Mentors,
please take a look at the package update from Boris Pek and maybe consider
uploading the package.
It fixes a FTBFS due to the libboost transition.
You can find the package here:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/eiskaltdcpp
http://m
Dear mentors,
I kindly ask you sponsoring a NMU on this package. It fixes 3 RC-bugs
(#647709, #647743, #653627) and was crafted on a minimal-invasiv-basis.
* Package name: drizzle
Version : 2011.03.13-1.1
Upstream Author : Drizzle Developers team
* URL : http://www
Am Donnerstag, den 13.06.2013, 15:46 +0100 schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
> Hi,
>
> On 13/06/13 13:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > GCC 4.8 is now the default on all x86 architectures, and on all ARM
> > architectures (the latter confirmed by the Debian ARM porters). I did not
> > get
> > any feedback
Am Mittwoch, den 26.06.2013, 11:40 +0200 schrieb Samuel Mehrbrodt:
> Hi,
> Do I really need to have a manpage for my program?
> And what is a watch file?
>
Yes, you need a manpage, see policy 12.1
(It will also create the lintian warning binary-without-manpage)
A watch file helps to detect if th
Ltt-controls has not been built on all archs (those out of date messages on the
PTS). Seems that there are build deps not available.
(Take a look at the buildds status page)
Jon Bernard schrieb:
>Hello,
>
>I'm facing a problem with two packages that are blocked from migrating
>into
>testing.
Am Freitag, den 19.07.2013, 13:02 +0600 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 07:53:51AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Ltt-controls has not been built on all archs (those out of date messages on
> > the PTS). Seems that there are build deps not available.
> >
Hallo Elmar,
Not sure what your intention of this mail was, but I think its either
that you want to tell that xchroot might be worth for Debian or you
want to express your intention to package it yourself which brought you
to the mentors mailling list.
Well, in the first case you should file a R
Hallo Daniel,
maybe you want also to file a wishlist bug "new upstream version"
available against the packages. You can also upload your package to
debian-mentors and give a link to the .dsc in the filed bugs and then
maybe wait some time for reaction.
There is a procedure in the developer manual
Halo Fernando,
(i'm not a DD)
Some first look at the package soley at mentors:
- copyright (and d/copyright) file ist missing (make sure always to run lintian
best with pedantic and experimental options)
- please fix all lintian warnings. (I count 7
- you need to file an itp bug and close it in
Same as with dcl : Please first fix all the lintian warnings.
Fernando schrieb:
>Package: sponsorship-requests
>Severity: normal
>
>Dear mentors,
>
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "avt"
>
>* Package name: avt
> Version : 0.2-1
> Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla
>* UR
Same as with dcl : Please first fix all the lintian warnings.
Fernando schrieb:
>Package: sponsorship-requests
>Severity: normal
>
>Dear mentors,
>
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "metar"
>
>* Package name: metar
> Version : 0.2-1
> Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla
>
Hallo Fernando,
Some additional notes:
(Disclaimer: I'm not a DD/DM; also I am quite new to reviewing...)
* avt seems to me not as a best-practice name: it is very short (and
might cause name collisions later), does not give a glue about the
package. How's about aviation-tools
* As said already
Hallo Jon,
(Disclaimer: I'm not a DD/DM; also I'm quite new in reviewing, so I
might also overlook smth or be wrong)
Some notes while I looked at your package:
* d/patches/* please add dep3 headers.
* Can you upgrade standards-version to 3.9.4?
* Please enable hardening (maybe along with setting
Hallo Dave,
(I am not a DD/DM; also I am new to reviewing, so I might missed smth or
I might be wrong)
Note: This refers to 0.6.15-3 on mentors
* d/changelog: usually you skip those versions NOT uploaded to Debian
and you document only changes made to the Debian packaging, not the
(upstream) cha
Hi Kevin,
Am Freitag, den 20.09.2013, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Kevin Bortis:
> - Changelog should have just one note: "Initial packaging, Closes...".
> First debian/changelog entry closes ITP
> Last debian/changelog closes RFS
> OK like this?
No, RFS are not to be closed within the changelog. Your spon
of the package comes also to a end. Popcon says around 500
installs, (with a big jump going up early this year); so IMHO the
package is still useful for quite many users.
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> > Hallo Jon,
> >
> > (Disclaimer: I'm not a D
Hallo Adam,
thanks for your work :) I think the package would be fine for upload and
a great improvment over the current package in the archives. But I am
not a DD and I cannot judge the code quality, as my knowledge on pyhton
is very limited.
But maybe some DD on mentors sees this mail as insp
Am Samstag, den 21.09.2013, 11:27 +0100 schrieb Adam Sampson:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:14:05AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > [...] you might want to add the appropriate VCS-* fields into your
> > debian/control.
> > There was also some discussion in the thread abou
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #722432
Adding block to 722609, as you say on mentors:
"The package FTBS currently (09/12) because of this unrelated bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722609";
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #722432
Hallo Nicolas,
a very short review:
-> please tell what you needed to do to bump S-V. (state no changes if there
were none necessary
-> you should add the remark "upload to unstable" when your previous upload
was to experimental
-> I
Hallo Fernando,
please do not open new bug when you upload a new (not-uploaded) version
to mentors, just reply to your old bug. (I merged both bugs)
There, you should describe what you changed since the last update.
Ok, lets take a look.
--> Package name metar is already taken. You'll need a di
Hallo Fernando,
I saw on mentors that you've uploaded a new version and commented there:
> Do i need to throw a new RFS?
No, you just send a mail to 723...@bugs.debian.org
I already took a look this morning, here you go:
-> Do NOT override binary-without-manpage --> You need to write a manpage
-
Hallo Uditha,
(I'm not a DD/DM... Also quite new to reviewing)
Thanks for your work, however there is already a iostream based socket
library in Debian: libskstream. So maybe you can elaborate a little why
you think this library is a must in Debian :) (like reverse
dependencies...)
The package i
Am Samstag, den 21.09.2013, 07:45 -0400 schrieb Jon Daley:
> >> Yes, I saw the debian-lintian errors. And I can take a look at
> those - I
> >> wanted to see if I had the packaging procedure down correctly
> before
> >> attacking those. (and those issues have been around for years, so
> I
> >> wa
Hallo Rich,
A short review: (I am not a DD/DM, so I cannot upload.)
I think "yt" as a package name is too short and well can cause
collisions down the road, please consider renaming it (and the
executeable) How about youtube-cli?
Your package has linitian warnings, please fix them.
You should al
Hallo Bamm,
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 21:23 +0800, Bamm wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for replying to my inquiry.
>
> > Please file an ITP (Intend to package) bug against the WNPP (pseudo)
> > package. You should use the reportbug command for that, as it gives you
> > the proper template to file out.
You should male a dedicated dbg package.
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-dbg
Tony Houghton schrieb:
>ROXTerm is going to need a new release soon and I'd like to include
>debugging symbols. It currently has binary packages roxterm-common
>(
Hi Tong,
You should always have an updated development system.
It can also be a chroot, so it won't interfere with your daily needed
installation. ( Indeed, a chroot for dev work has other advantages too; IMHO
strongly suggested to use it always..)
--
coldtobi
Tong Sun schrieb:
>Hi Eribert
Another possibility: Use qemu to simulate the target arch... Needs usually a
good portion of patience, but helped me a couple times already.
Paul Wise schrieb:
>On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:59 AM, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>
>> What I can't see is their exact error messages. This is because
>automake
>>
Hallo Julian,
Great to see you steping in and lending Debian a hand.
First thing should be that you claim ownership of #726545 and change the bug
title from O: ... to ITA: (You did the first one, but not the second one.
However, the ownership has been already reverted)
Then you should regis
> There isn't a step-by-step manual for beginners.
> I think, it should be added too.
>
> Best Regards,
> Julian Goestl
Can you elaborate where you're stuck?
( eg using the checklist at http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers , "4
Publish your Package")
Tobias
> Am 05.02.2014 20:33, schrieb
Hallo Jonathan,
(first the usual disclaimer: I'm not a DD so I cannot sponsor.)
I only briefly look into the packaage , so this is only a brief review
mostly from the data available from m.d.n... Sorry, also on a hurry ..
I see those problems which should work on:
-> you need to file an ITP Bug
PS:
It also does not build in an pdebuilder environment.
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking libconfig.h usability... no
checking libconfig.h presence... no
checking for libconfig.h... no
configure: error: oops no libconfig.h ?
==> config.log <==
This file contains any messages produced by com
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to work on an orphaned package maradns. It uses quite a
> lot of patches managed with quilt. I created a repo on alioth [1] to
> manage different versions. I imported all the versions (debsnap and
> git-import-dscs). Now I am stuck with two problems:
Thanks for adopting and y
Hallo Darius,
Am Montag, den 17.02.2014, 20:52 +0100 schrieb Dariusz Dwornikowski:
> > > I am trying to work on an orphaned package maradns. It uses quite a
> > > lot of patches managed with quilt. I created a repo on alioth [1] to
> > > manage different versions. I imported all the versions (debs
Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 21:12 +0100 schrieb Dariusz Dwornikowski:
> > >
> > > ACK. (Reading the upstreams' homepage, you should definitly go for the
> > > latest version. The latest upstream fixes a local DoS.
> > > As a side, please add all CVE-# which closes the new version into the
> > > c
Am Mittwoch, den 19.02.2014, 20:00 +0100 schrieb Dariusz Dwornikowski
> I uploaded my version to mentors. Would you be so nice to review it ?
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/maradns
Hi Dariusz,
Sure, I'll take a look. (I'm not a DD, so I cannot sponsor.)
A suggestion: You should the RFS
Am Samstag, den 22.02.2014, 12:21 +0100 schrieb Dariusz Dwornikowski:
>
> > A suggestion: You should the RFS Bug to get a broader audience, maybe
> > someone who can indeed sponsor.
>
> Yes, I thought it would be better to share first with you, since you
> seemed interesed.
Ok, just keep in mi
Hi Jackson,
(Please note that I am not an DD)
Some remarks, not a complete review:
-> you should change the bug-title of 677709 to ITA and set yourself as owner
-> d/copyright:
I think you need also to include a shorttext on the Apache-2.0 license, not
only the link to /usr/share/common-licenses
Am Dienstag, den 18.03.2014, 15:59 +0100 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Christian Kastner , 2014-03-18, 15:31:
> >override_dh_auto_configure:
> > dh_auto_configure -- \
> > --with-boost-libdir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
>
> It doesn't smell good to me. Ideally the upstream build syste
Hi Barry,
Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2014, 17:51 +0100 schrieb Barry Drake:
> Hi ... Can I introduce myself. I've been involved in 'The Sword
> Project' for some years and am now going along the very steep learning
> curve in order to update the packages which are some five years out of
> date.
Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2014, 21:49 +0100 schrieb Barry Drake:
> On 13/04/14 20:40, Wookey wrote:
> > So the simple fix is to update your pbuilder chroot, or build with
> > sbuild instead (which probably involves running sbuild-createchroot to
> > set up an unstable chroot for it to use (and runnin
Am Montag, den 14.04.2014, 15:03 +0100 schrieb Barry Drake:
> On 13/04/14 23:08, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > BTW, the changelog misses "-1" (The Debian revision). This is weird as
> > my pbuilder refuses to build non-native packages with a native
> > version, but you
Am Montag, den 14.04.2014, 22:00 +0100 schrieb Barry Drake:
> On 14/04/14 18:48, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Just debstrap yourself an Debian sid chroot for development :) Will be
> > also easier to get support here, as there are differences to Ubuntu,
> > and you spare your
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2014, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Barry Drake:
> On 15/04/14 15:08, Barry Drake wrote:
> > Just to let you know it worked 'out of the box', and I now have
> > packages that seem OK. pbuilder is a very different animal under
> > debian. The behaviour in Ubuntu is totally differe
Hallo Otto,
(disclaimer: I cannot sponsor it, I'm not a DD)
Am Freitag, den 18.04.2014, 13:20 +0300 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen:
> More information about MariaDB packaging can be obtained by asking
> me by e-mail, I promise to reply quickly.
>
> The packaging is very similar to that of mariadb-5
Am Samstag, den 19.04.2014, 10:24 +0300 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> Thanks for looking into this. My comments:
>
>
> 2014-04-18 15:12 GMT+03:00 Tobias Frost :
> > Hallo Otto,
> >
> > (disclaimer: I cannot sponsor it, I'm not a DD)
>
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 11:59 +0100 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working
> >
> > > the [surface] evolver package ?
> >
> > A bug with patches sh
Hi Gianfranco,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:54:38AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> well, the package hasn't been touched in over a decade, so I presume
> it might be fine to upload the fixes in deferred/15, even as NMU.
> I guess they had *all* the time to refactor the package, and update i
Am Donnerstag, den 30.06.2016, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
>
> >
> > in the meanwhile, according to quantz, the MIA process started some
> > time ago (on 2016-05-24),
>
>
> How can we get the current status of the process ?
>
This is not supposed to be posted to a public mailing lists
Hi Pali,
The udftools package has (now) been orphaned by the MIA Team (#829016).
if you want you can just adopt it.
--
tobi
Some time ago a dh extension has Bern made for aspell dictinaries which should
help. Take a look at aspell-it. (Im currently on the road so I cannot check if
this also applies to this package and it was Quote long ago Ehen I worked
aspell-it)
Am 6. Juli 2016 01:21:32 GMT+02:00, schrieb Adam B
Am Mittwoch, den 06.07.2016, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> Some time ago a dh extension has Bern made for aspell dictinaries
> which should help. Take a look at aspell-it. (Im currently on the
> road so I cannot check if this also applies to this package and it
> was Quote lon
Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2016, 11:33 +0100 schrieb James Cowgill:
> You will have to file all the bugs manually, but I expect all the
> bugs will follow a similar template.
You'll find mass-bug(1) from devscripts helpful on the filing part.
>
> James
--
tobi
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 22:06 +0200 schrieb Elmar Stellnberger:
>
>
> The license in use, C-FSL v1.0 will still need to be reviewed. A
> predecessor license C-FSL v0.8 had already been discussed on
> debian-legal some time ago. However v1.0 has been reworked basing
> on the input I had
Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 20:56 +0200 schrieb Elmar Stellnberger:
(snip)
>
> Anyone else who could assert me that an additional GPL-3 clause
> would
> do what I want: i.e. give an additional right to relicense to a
> group
> called original authors only; let this be called GPL-3 + relic
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #835368
Control: tags -1 wontfix
As the license is non-free, tagging the RFS as wontfix: It cannot be uploaded
to main.
I did not check if if non-free would be possible as target.
--
tobi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT
Hi Goswin,
Am Montag, den 11.07.2016, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat"
>
> Package name: ifstat
> Version : 1.1-9
> Upstream Author : Gal Rouallan
Control: owner -1 !
I will take a look at part of gustavo's NM process.
--
tobi
Control: owner -1 !
Thnks
Will take a look ASAP (either today evening or Friday)
--
tobi
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hello
>
> I'm looking for an sponsor of my updated asciinema package
>
> If closes an RC bug, and various fixes/improvements
>
> Here is the last e
Hallo Gustavo,
thanks for adopting the package!
ok, let's start with the review.
(The review is part of the NM process, gustavo's NM archive gets a copy
via BCC)
Am Dienstag, den 04.10.2016, 18:22 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello
>
>
Hallo Gustavo,
> * there is an linitian _error_ init.d-script-needs-depends-on-lsb-
> base, but that should be easy to fix.
Never mind this one, it will be removed from lintian.
(#838997)
--
tobi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Gustavo,
Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2016, 14:15 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> >
> > Please fix the lintian error, the d/copyright and then I'll upload.
> > The *.la can be fixed in a subsequent
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi highvoltage,
Package is fine, however one thing needs fixing:
The themes have authorship attributed, but this is not reflected in
the copyright file. Those themes also do not necessarily have the same
license as the extension itself (e.g Arc-dark s
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hallo highvoltage,
Can you check if you think those comments are valid?
- the patch for the installation directory should be upstreamed,
(I had something similar for one of my extensions, I solved it this
way:)
https://github.com/laserb/gnome-shell-
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi highvoltage,
Package does not build using pbuilder, I think a B-D on zip is missing
dh build
dh_testdir
dh_update_autotools_config
dh_auto_configure
dh_auto_build
make -j1
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/gnome-shell-extensi
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 11:31 +0200 schrieb Jonathan Carter
(highvoltage):
> On 22/10/2016 16:28, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > - translators copyright should be also recorded in d/copyright.
>
> I added the translations with copyright assertions in d/copyright:
>
> https://g
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Jonathan,
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Jonathan Carter
(highvoltage):
>
> * Package name : gnome-shell-extensions-refresh-wifi
> Version : 6-1
> Upstream Author : Gopi Sankar Karmegam
> * URL : https://github.com/kgshank/gse-ref
control: owner -1 !
Hi Jonathan,
Can you rebuild locale/*.mo during build?
Otherwise it is fine!
--
tobi
Control: owner -1 !
Will take a look tonight.
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2016, 10:36 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello
>
> I'm looking for an sponsor for my QA upload to tsocks
>
>
> it closes a bug and prevents a FTBFS (compat level 7),
>
Am Freitag, den 11.11.2016, 20:18 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> control: owner -1 !
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Can you rebuild locale/*.mo during build?
> Otherwise it is fine!
>
> --
> tobi
>
ping :)
--
tobi
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi Thomas,
required fixes for uploads:
- d/changelog:
The entries for not released Debian versions should be deleted
(preferred) or marked as UNRELEASED. You also can concentrate all
entries not part of a prior (Debian) release into the most recent
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jonathan,
Can you "recompile" the schema file in d/rules?
I used for one of my packages something along:
glib-compile-schemas --strict --targetdir=schemas/ schemas
Otherwise the package is fine and I'll upload it ASAP :)
--
tobi
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jonathan,
as before: please recompile the gschema file.
One observation: There seems to be two set of locale directories in the
sources. Maybe something for upstream to sort out? (This is nothing
that blocks the upload)
--
tobi
Hi Kyle,
please also open a RFS bug for this..
packaging:
- there is a missing Dependency on gnome-shell
upstream:
- the version constraint metadata.json looks weird: 3.22.2...
shouldn't it be only 3.22 or like? Not sure, please x-check. (this is
also something for the logout button extension)
Hallo Kyle,
Please open up a RFS bug and also bounce this mail to the bug.
Review:
- the packaging seems fine
upstream related:
- seems so that the gschema is not needed, is it?
- when disabling the extension (e.g via gnome-tweak-tool), the icon
stays in the menu. This is bug, I guess as e.g g
:
>
>
> On 06/12/2016 23:45, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Hi Kyle,
> >
> > please also open a RFS bug for this..
> Done
> >
> > packaging:
> > - there is a missing Dependency on gnome-shell
> Added
> >
> > upstream:
> > - the version
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Most of #847308 also applies here.
--
tobi
1 - 100 of 831 matches
Mail list logo
