Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 22:06 +0200 schrieb Elmar Stellnberger: > > > The license in use, C-FSL v1.0 will still need to be reviewed. A > predecessor license C-FSL v0.8 had already been discussed on > debian-legal some time ago. However v1.0 has been reworked basing > on the input I had received from there and should now hopefully be > without issues.
I think one recommendation has not been followed. If not, I *strongly* recommend: PLEASE Do not run your own license. See https://people.debian.org/~bap/ dfsg-faq.html §5 I took me some time to locate this license (please put it somewhere and link to it). I located it then in the header of the xchroot script, and as I only had 5 minutes to take a look, I come only to this sentence: "If a specific version number is mentioned then usage rights include this version as well as any newer version which will always be similar in spirit to this license. The term Convertible Free Software license may be abbreviated as C-FSL." - This will fail the the tentacle of evil test. - What happens if there is no version number attached? Choose any? Choose latest? "3. It is your obligation that the changed version of your sources will be available to the public for free within the time frame of a month at least if there is no undue hindrance by the authors to make it available. " As distribution is not limited to the people using the stuff, this is non-free. Fails Desert Island Test and Dissident Tests. (I have stopped here... Above is not a complete analysis of any section, also not up to 3.I) PLEASE do not run your own license. -- tobi
