Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2014, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Barry Drake: > On 15/04/14 15:08, Barry Drake wrote: > > Just to let you know it worked 'out of the box', and I now have > > packages that seem OK. pbuilder is a very different animal under > > debian. The behaviour in Ubuntu is totally different. Thanks again > > for all your help and patience. > > I have another problem. I installed the newly built packages - > libsword9_1.7.3+dfsg-1_i386.deb and libsword-dev_1.7.3+dfsg-1_i386.deb > from within my chroot debian packaging environment and successfully > built from source a program called 'BibleTime' which is dependant on the > above. > > However, when trying to package BibleTime, dbuilder fails with the above > not satisfied. I've not attached the entire log, but the error seems to > be in: > pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on libsword-dev (>= 1.7.0); however: > Package libsword-dev is not installed. > pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on libsword9 (>= 1.7.0); however: > Package libsword9 is not installed. > > Is this because the packages are unstable, or is there some magic I have > to use to tell pbuilder where the locally held packages are? I > installed them from the same directory that is above the bibletime > source, and that is where they are still. I've re-read the Debian > packaging guide, and it looks to me as though all dependencies must be > met from the Debian package repo. Is this the case, or is there a > workaround?
https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks#How_to_include_local_packages_in_the_build > Kind regards, Barry Drake/ > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1397808284.23957.44.ca...@ithilien.loewenhoehle.ip
