y the binary .debs from the first build machine over to the second,
dpkg-buildpackage will take note of them and will create a .changes file that
includes information about both sets of binary packages.
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:14:13AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> > > Is there a way to upload two architectures at once, and include them in
> > > the
> > > same .chang
he library so number (and thereby change the package name).
However, a binary compiled against libfoo 2.1.2 that uses foo_read will /not/
work with libfoo 2.1.1, so you need a version in shlibs.
HTH,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
t;dh_installman
> debian/XCounter.1" in my debian/rules file, and have tried
> adding the x on the end here aswell.
No clue on this one, sorry.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
u have two calls to ldconfig in the resulting postinst script,
and lintian is expecting only one. :)
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
omain, or provide users with a license -- simply
disclaiming /his/ copyright does not give /us/ any rights.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
elevant information about the package, such as copyright
information and what the program does. It may also be helpful to mention that
you already have created .deb packages for the software.
Regards,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:49:56AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > You can submit an RFP by filing a wishlist bug in the Debian BTS against the
> > 'wnpp' package, including 'RFP' in the title of the bug. Pl
't part of the value that dpkg-architecture returns.
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpQtiurpGv4d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
x-gnu anyway...
Ah... yes, you're right. The -gnu doesn't remove the need for
config.sub, so there's no point in adding it. My mistake. :)
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpMpQTLKs3t9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
onger in the
Debian archive, you have to change you build-deps /again/
Saluti,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpPEOkSv4mfA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ser.
To the question of which journalling filesystem is the best choice on
Linux, I recommend XFS, because of its combination of maturity as a
filesystem in general and maturity on Linux in particular -- but I'm
sure you'll get many different answers to this question. :)
Regar
ed method of handling config
files through debconf. It is hopefully doable without any 'hackery':
you just need a parser for your config file that can properly extract
the current settings. If your postinst is written in POSIX sh, many
times sed and awk work very well together as a parser.
confuse ourselves too much
yet by the fact that wlan-source is a "binary package" in dpkg parlance,
especially since we're going to turn around and use it to build
/another/ binary package, wlan-module-.
dh_make should provide a starting point for creating the binary package
containing
t help us because that term is not legally
meaningful.
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpQaKv7LWsRO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e of law; this means there
is legal ambiguity surrounding any code distributed with this "license",
and we expose our users and distributors to legal risk if we assume it's
equivalent to public domain.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgptyJkIMAklJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I looked. Or, it could be that
/etc/environment is not loaded by whatever script starts your webserver;
this seems likely. If you run the php script from the commandline using
php4-cgi, does it still say "C" instead of "it_IT"?
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgptkbyUcmuLH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nterests with that person within Debian, so letting us know what your
interests are makes it easier to put you in touch with a good advocate.
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpOQjq6WNPyi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
one limitation is that you can't have a versioned dependency on a
virtual package (i.e., a package that exists only in the Provides:
field of other packages).
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpIYkYtFJxoY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
u build both Lestif and Motif binaries from the same source
package, they both still have to go in contrib, because of a Build-Dep
on non-free code...
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpE3H1Rejilh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ly, all diacritics are omitted.
Examples:
coöperate
preëmpt
... but good luck finding either of those spellings with dict, or
anywhere on your Debian system. ;)
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpmyOtND6UYN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
if you have one binary you need stripped, and one binary
you need left alone, and dh_strip doesn't do the trick, call strip
yourself.
strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note path/to/foo.opt
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpmA7G3lMq6d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
wn substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
You probably are missing a call to dh_shlibdeps somewhere above the call
to dh_gencontrol.
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpUp9RD84wUS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ation in the sections that are stripped? It seems to me
that this is a bug in the package's build sequence or in the compiler.
Or is it a file format that can't be stripped, which dh_strip is trying
to act on anyways (which would be a bug in debhelper)?
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp6EWIxaPdjN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:54:00PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:12:04PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Incidentally, is there a reason that the bytecode version stores
> > important information in the sections that are stripped? It seems to me
&
de gui access to a digital
> > camera.
> > gphoto2 is a library which is used by frontend (gui). A command-line
> > frontend is included in the package but others are available.
> Then why not libgphoto2? Or something making it more obvious it's a lib?s
> YA
The pac
of individual ports at any point in time.
Consider also the possibility of a user who might /prefer/ to use ispell
instead of aspell, regardless of which port they're running.
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpNhJ4t8YNvP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
preloading a library to ld.so.preload affects all software
on the system and a bug in the library can lead to dangerous system
instability. Perhaps you could provide specific details on what this
library is, and why it needs to be preloaded (instead of, say, provided
in a wrapper for a specific
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:01:24PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:57:06 -0600, Steve Langasek
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As you know, preloading a library to ld.so.preload affects all software
> >on the system and a bug in the library can
gt; this clause '#4 Integrity of The Author's Source Code' to be accepted.
Yes, all of the restrictions below are equivalent to restrictions
included in the GPL. This license is DFSG-free.
BTW, debian-legal is a better list for questions about the DFSG-freeness
of software.
Che
ysign, but no-one is listed as being available to sign a
> key here. It looks like there aren't any developers in Arizona at all.
According to the public LDAP database at db.debian.org, there are DDs in
Tucson and Chandler, AZ. Email privately if you need their contact
info.
Steve Langa
ou do link against motif, then the
software belongs in contrib. If you create a dynamically-linked package
that depends on the openmotif package, there's no longer any reason for
creating a statically-linked package.
This would be a good thing that someone who's concerned with such things
to
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:20:02AM -0400, Dale E Martin wrote:
> How do I put an arch-specific build flag into a source package? I've
> googled a bit, and grepped policy, but I'm not finding the answer. Also,
> does anyone know if this is really an hppa issue, or is it a more general
> g++ 3.0 is
have any proof that there isn't someone between you and him that
intercepts all of his email and re-signs it with a different key.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpMzofg9N9QY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ng to become a DD, he will need to have a PGP key that has
his real, legal name on it, with a valid email address, and this key
must be signed by an existing DD. If he doesn't have a PGP key that has
his name on it, that's the first step that he must take.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpFuy5k8oWly.pgp
Description: PGP signature
later that does have a name on it (not necessarily his), this will
mistakenly be accepted by the DAM as identification, correct? Honestly,
I don't believe DAM is that sloppy, and I wouldn't worry about it...
Given how often people complain about the process being slow, I think
it's cle
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:20:30AM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:11:25AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Upon rereading, I see what you're asking here. You're worried that if
> > you sign a uid that doesn't have his name on it, and he a
horde2 and imp3
packages have made so far in supporting automatic database creation at
package install time, and I also don't have a problem with deleting the
databases at purge time -- so long as the package asks before deleting!
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpO3LdZ0W43g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
y to issue a 'delete' command to keyrings, and even if
there were, there's no way for keyrings to propogate that command to
local GPG rings. The only way to successfully take a GPG uid out of
circulation is by appending /more/ information to it that renders it
invalid: a revocation certificate.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpF1vJO6nX7k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hat directory for a package to
function correctly. Checking for actual features that are going to be
used is always the safest solution -- and often the most efficient.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpIpnwPlpc53.pgp
Description: PGP signature
er, I'm currently bouncing between
> Appleton, WI and Omaha, NE, and so it's difficult to schedule anything
> concrete.
If you ever make this run on land, you might pass close enough to me (or
another DD) to make a physical meeting possible.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpzOSPbGfRuJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s a bad idea.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp017tjBQ4OM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s the best way to do this? I haven't done much shell or m4 programming,
> so this may be a stupid question.
You're better off putting this in your Makefile, and passing it to the
compiler via -DBASE_PATH=\"$datadir\".
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpZA5cJsvHrC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
points to is that the packager hasn't reviewed the file
locations and permissions in the binary package, to ensure that they all
comply with policy.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpmKrnA2NVDz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
wed to
modify this file (not even login itself).
The libpam maintainer has a plan for restructuring the PAM config files,
making it possible to change the global configuration according to what
modules are installed. In the meantime, you should leave it up to the
administrator to config
a place as any.
Since no Debian policy can keep admins from referencing files in /usr
when they shouldn't, I think this is as good a solution as any.
This is not policy, but it's the status quo; I can find at least 3 other
PAM modules in Debian that handle this the same way.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpM0xd5Nny7G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is as good a solution as any.
>
> True, but we can build our software and packages to avoid such
> situations. What the admin does is his fault/problem - by choice. What
> we build into the system is ours.
>
> I suppose you could argue that the admin *chose* to enable my
s a waiting
list to even get into it. Being actively involved in the Debian
development process is considered a prerequisite for applying to become a
DD.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpOuYIO9XLuR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
You may want to pose the question there.
It seems to me that if it does work out of the box with MIT and not with
Heimdal, you ought to build it for MIT (at least for now). Though I'm
curious, why does it need anything other than the SASL module in order to
support Kerberos?
Steve Langasek
po
of hosts and such.
I'm not sure I understand the former, and the latter seems a little
fishy: the only bits of code that should need to know what Kerberos
thinks are the canonical names are within the SASL module itself.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpf3avd6Tx3H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The one package I work on that carries a debian/ directory
upstream puts it elsewhere, where it doesn't conflict with official
Debian work.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpxR25jtVysy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
age; nor should you
build-depend on libc6-dev, since it's a build-essential package. This is
why the package in question is broken on alpha and ia64, where libc is
versioned differently.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpFGgZJlHyZD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:15:08PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > These are both dependency lines, not build-depends. You should *never*
> > build-depend on libc6, as it is an essential package; [...]
> Minor nitpick: libc6 is not essential, only
reating new packages is an easy way to demonstrate that one has many of
the skills required to be a DD, but more is demanded of DDs than just
raw skill.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpmyIiuMdxfK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
version
> 0.33.7.1
> which depends on libaspell10 version 0.33.7
In both cases, the number that's part of the package name should indicate
how many times the ABI has changed.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpi5CThlQGd4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it's absent, and then create the
link (possibly with some /proc autodetection) if the user agrees to let
you create the link.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpV5W1YsbQ2u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mber every time you have to
make changes to the tarball (e.g., libc12_1.6, libc12_1.6+debian.0,
libc12_1.6+debian.1), or you can include any subsequent modifications in
your Debian diff. Your choice. If you expect to be making frequent
changes to how much of upstream's code you're includ
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:14:50PM +0100, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:07:07AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> I'm maintaining pbbuttonsd for PPC-Notebooks.
> >> I'm preparing the new upstream version and I stuck at this point, that
>
least, you *can't*
compile Qt-based packages using g++ 3.x.
If you have some time and energy to devote to the matter, I would suggest
talking with the toolchain maintainers about whether there's anything you
could do to help get the gcc 3.x transition moving forward.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpbqFt5L0tXE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:25:09AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> You could just change the Architecture: field in the control file to not
> attempt to build on the broken arches, for now.
Don't discriminate against architectures because of a temporary build
failure.
Steve Langasek
on alpha?
Since the problem is a bug in gcc 2.95, there shouldn't be any
alpha-specific problems with Qt compiled with gcc-3.x.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpFw8DrrxNG5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ompatible), you could change
the package name. If you keep the same package name and bump the
upstream version, you would reset the Debian version to 1, giving you
kdclabel_2.7-KDE3-1.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpPo4MivZ9lS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:22:33PM -0500, Neil L. Roeth wrote:
> On Oct 30, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The default compiler on alpha is still gcc 2.95, to the best of my
> > knowledge. If the autobuilders are using 3.x, this is not reflected in
> > the d
the ldap-utils package.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpj1XA4X07dr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
quite
effective at parsing Apache config files.
I have serious doubts that using debconf is the right answer at all if
you aren't in a position to parse the config losslessly. What changes
will you be making to these config files that couldn't just as well be
left to the admin to handle?
t should not be, then
someone should talk to DSA about getting the LDAP ACLs changed. In the
meantime, the only protection of the information in the Debian directory
is security through obscurity.
For my part, I don't mind having my city published, and I think it's
potentially helpful for non-
adopt it, you should retitle bug #154098 to an 'ITA'
bug instead of an 'O' bug (this, at least, should be in your grasp before
you try to adopt a package :).
Do you have a likely sponsor for your uploads, or are you in need of one?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgplcciGgkEUA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
't follow its example for, well... anything.
I imagine python stores everything in /usr/lib, again as a practical
concession to the fact that upstream installation directories don't make
it easy to use separate paths for arch-independent and arch-dependent
objects.
--
Steve Langasek
postm
lly guaranteed to be able to access your LDAP server (which
obviously isn't running locally either, with no /usr) until about the
same time as /usr is mounted. If you have records that are needed by the
system prior to mounting of /usr, these ought to be stored in a local
database backend such
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:42:00PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021217 08:47]:
> > What information are you trying to store in LDAP that is so essential to
> > the system prior to mounting of /usr?
> > [...]
> Using LDAP in
post-installation script returned error exit status 30
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> libmidgard
> debconf -s postinst
> runs without any problem
You're missing a '|| true' after the prompt for midgard/error. The
question is being skipped by debconf, probably because it's been shown
before, and this results in a different return code.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp1vODrdCX6F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
are fading already in my minds, so it might be ok.
It looks like the questions asked are related to things that may not be
available on the system (databases) at the preconfigure stage, so in this
case I think it's ok to ask in the postinst script itself.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern prog
code.
> With a '||true' no error is returned , but message is not displayed.
> Shouldn't be something like db_display ??
Why do you believe this message should be shown to the admin again after
it's already been shown once?
It is possible, but you should b
probably unnecessary, if all you're doing is
displaying a message.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpgIaouDvecR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ent at the time drives are
being unmounted should not require NSS to do their job; and in fact, on
none of the machines where I use nss_ldap have I had problems with
drives not being unmounted cleanly.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpRwJMe4DHkJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ble until the
package in testing has been updated.
It's also not possible to use the exact same package version twice when
uploading. You must use a unique package version for each upload, while
still meeting the version requirements above.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpHceTSmulSh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 12:18:35AM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:39:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:07:42AM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> > > The only proper solution (which i was looking into this weekend
> >
aybe?
How is that relevant? I hardly think 'umount /usr' should be called
while /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd is running. And why does RPC care about
username resolution?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpJS0v43svpH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
bfribidi0_0.10.4-0.1_i386.deb
Size: 39624
MD5sum: 52dc182866d95e00510b08d3026ba9b4
Description: Free Implementation of the Unicode BiDi algorithm
FriBiDi is a BiDi algorithm implementation for Hebrew and/or Arabic
languages.
Regards,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpfOkgi7n4mJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
P. While this may be fixed in a later version of
smbclient, in the meantime you should use the 'net share' command from
Samba 3.0 to get a list of shares (net share -S server -U username).
Regards,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp8zVTIL7jAy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 05:08:06PM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:39:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As libnss-ldap can be configured to use SASL (and as a result, pluggable
> > modules), I don't think static linking is a very feasible sol
verts the
> icon to 8-bit?
The X server will convert the icon to 8-bit: it won't convert it to
24 colors, or even know which 24 colors to convert to. This means that
leaving it to the X server to do the conversion wil rapidly exhaust the
color map for no good reason.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpGxB3ePVYpk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
lt 1.0 || echo "oops."
oops.
$
You could use an epoch, but epochs are worth avoiding if possible. I
would recommend using something like '0.1+DR7.10' in place of 'DR7.10',
preferably after discussing with upstream to see what version numbers
they'd start with when they got to that point.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpvKlH10O1wg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
packaged separately.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpjrhzCr0MlD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
7; worth of
> holidays and sometimes we decide to avoid computers like the plague
> whilst doing so :-)
Are you familiar with what the Developer's Reference says about one's
duties when going on vacation?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp4bJFKFccQw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
g as a library. You don't need to ship
these as separate packages; you want a single binary package here.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpe9oGqZ3hKO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
clear on what advantages
this module provides over the more widely used DBD/DBI interface. Are
there ODBC modules available for GNU/Linux systems for RDBMS that can't
be accessed through DBD?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
o expire in a few months, is it
> enough to update the expiration date and submit it to the key server?
Yes.
> Do I have to get my key re-signed?
No.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpSeSpjTJ7VA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
groomed to do what you need?
Is the software already in wide use, or will including it in non-free
increase its visibility -- leading more people to use non-free software?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpw6co4ZjtQh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Is this
> package free? I could not find a license anywhere.
I believe it is permitted to depend on a non-free package as a
possible, but not preferred, alternative in a list.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpX5m2Wj9s9t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hibits commercial redistribution, the license is
unambiguously non-free. It does allow non-commercial redistribution, so
it can be uploaded to non-free.
In the future, please send licensing questions to debian-legal.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
;t heard of any
> free-as-in-freedom virus scanner, let alone a production-quality
> one. Did I miss something? If yes, please let me know!
Have you looked at the packages amavis-ng and clamav? I've heard good
things about these DFSG-free virus tools, but haven't tried them yet
myself.
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:07:02AM +0100, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Personally, BTW, I would really, really prefer to maintain Free
> > > Software, not *only* for political reasons but also because a
> > > comm
I'm going to rip his
> hands off :P)
I would suggest ccze-perl and ccze-slang. (Isn't libfoo-perl reserved
for packages that are perl modules?)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpXH8J5pXfHz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
debian.org/CD/vendors/info
> Tal vez esta en ingles, pero probablement este traducida en espagnol
> tambien.
Cierto, la traducción española de esta página está al día.
Saludos,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp16lDUTt4NI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ular set
of kernel headers, at all. You should instead fix your package to
include copies of any headers that you need for building.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpIqPjpvkFE3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hat no one agrees with you, which is also a lesson along the
road to becoming a DD.
Being a DD is about *much* more than packaging new software. Most of the
programs that NMs package as part of their application do not (or should
not) get uploaded to the archive. You're more likely to find an advocate
by helping us fix software that's already here.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp8ANV9TpM6m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
apsearch
client defaults to protocol 3.
There may be something you can add to ldaprc to automate this, but I
don't know the syntax; most servers I use are also LDAPv3, so it's not
useful for me.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpTocLsqUuEL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
or hate libtool, this is not a libtool problem. Are
> you using libtool 1.5 yet?
It's *always* a libtool problem. That's why I hate libtool...
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpk7HVD5I4zG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:52:00PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Jun 1, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > I recently had a bug (193950) filed against one of my packages because
> the
>
501 - 600 of 604 matches
Mail list logo
