On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:25:08PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: > > I believe the g++ migration is now the only thing we're waiting on for > > KDE3.
> That was my understanding as well. Do you know the timeframe that this > is expected to take? Nope, I'm pretty well removed from the C++ stuff. > > Various people have stated an intention to make gcc 3.x (for x >= 2) > > the default compiler for sarge. If upstream already has a new version > > of the package that works with g++ 3.x and KDE3, I wouldn't recommend > > that you spend a lot of time trying to get your current version of the > > package to work with gcc 3.x -- especially since, on alpha at least, > > you *can't* compile Qt-based packages using g++ 3.x. > Hmmm . . . that's problematic. Do you know if Qt3 and gcc-3.0 will play > nicely on alpha? Since the problem is a bug in gcc 2.95, there shouldn't be any alpha-specific problems with Qt compiled with gcc-3.x. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgpFw8DrrxNG5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
