Version to use in package for a program with non standard versioning

2005-12-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
As of November 2005, I've picked up maintainance of qd, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] queue dumper, after it's author passed away in August 2005. I'm trying to create native Debian packages for qd, it's data file (qdinfo.dat) and another program to print the content of the data file (qdiprint). qd and qd

Re: Version to use in package for a program with non standard versioning

2005-12-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> You have sorted out the licence problems with qd? It's currently in contrib. What license problem whould that be? Dick Howell, the original author, explicitly says on his website: "This is free software; you can distribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Public License. There is

Re: Version to use in package for a program with non standard versioning

2005-12-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Williams wrote: > I'm not claiming to have an authoritative answer for all this, I'm not a DD > yet. Don't worry, I appreciate all feedback. But I would like to know what a DD has to say about this. > Why is it in contrib then? Just curious rea

Bug#723175: [SoB] Vcs is not up to date

2013-09-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, Thanks for looking into osgEarth so shortly before you VAC. On 09/18/2013 01:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > on SoB Wiki page[1] you asked for sponsering your package. I checked > out VCS via > > gbp-clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/osgearth.git > > and found an old version

Bug#723175: [SoB osgearth] Vcs is not up to date

2013-09-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/18/2013 03:11 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Bas, > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Thanks for looking into osgEarth so shortly before you VAC. > > Well, forcing people to wait is demotivating ... and I want to push a > bi

Bug#723175: [SoB osgearth] Vcs is not up to date

2013-09-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 09/18/2013 03:32 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> I'll merge the changes for jessie into master and push it to git.debian.org. > > Only cosmeti

Re: Bug#724670: RFS: pgrouting/2.0.0-1 [ITP] -- basic routing functionality support for PostgreSQL

2013-09-26 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Michael, Would it be an idea to maintain pgRouting under the DebianGis [1] umbrella instead of collab-maint? We already maintain the closely related PostGIS and QGIS packages, so I think pgRouting would fit right in. We're always looking people like you helping to package GIS software for Debi

Bug#725831: RFS: libkml/1.3.0~r864-1

2013-10-09 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/09/2013 10:19 AM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Bas did you verify if the new version is still back-compatible against the old > one? In the opposite case, a SONAME bump is mandatory. Yes, the only change from upstream is "Allow colors to have leading whitespace, with or without '#'." That

Re: Gitorious and debian/watch file

2013-10-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Creating a watch file for Gitorious will most likely require a redirect service to translate the refs JSON to download URLs. Take for example your osm-c-tools package, it has JSON data with the repo branches and tags available at: https://gitorious.org/osm-c-tools/osmctools/refs The tags can be

Re: Gitorious and debian/watch file

2013-10-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/15/2013 05:58 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Same link works for tags: > https://gitorious.org/osm-c-tools/osmctools/0.1.tar.gz That's nice to know, but it only works when you add 'archive/' before the 0.1.tar.gz. > So the only real problem is to find the right tag. Those are listed in the r

Bug#736885: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-4

2014-01-27 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/28/2014 12:01 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2014-01-27 23:34:25, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdal" >> >> [...] >> >> Chang

Bug#736884: Bug#736885: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-4

2014-01-27 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/28/2014 08:03 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:20:39AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> gdal is currently involved in the ongoing poppler transition. To >>> not entangle the poppler and libepsilon transition, please talk to >>> the R

Bug#736885: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-4

2014-01-28 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/28/2014 03:51 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:34:25PM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: normal >> >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> * Rebuild for libepsilon1. >> > > Please, don't. You should ask for a bNMU in thi

Bug#739029: RFS: qgis/2.0.1-2

2014-02-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Paul, On 02/15/2014 08:24 AM, Paul Gevers wrote: > [ Sorry, no intent to sponsor this right now, but ... ] No problem, the Sponsoring Of Blends initiative is working very nicely. > On 15-02-14 03:12, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> I am looking for a

Bug#739029: RFS: qgis/2.0.1-2

2014-02-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/15/2014 05:42 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Some minor nitpicking: > > On Saturday, 15. February 2014 03:12:36 Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> qgis-plugin-globe- OSG globe plugin for QGIS >> qgis-plugin-globe-common - OSG GLOBE plugin for QGIS - > > inconsistent capitalization >

Re: Bug#742173: Please commit your changes to VCS

2014-03-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, > I guess you forgot to `git push` ... I did, sorry for my oversight. The branch on git.d.o is update to date now. Kind Regards, Bas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org A

Bug#832985: RFS: svgsalamander/1.0.0+dfsg1-1

2016-07-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Felix, I've had a look at your package and some comments follow. In general the package looks good, but there is room for improvement. Please consider bumping the debhelper compatibility to 9. Also change the LGPL-2.0 shortname to LGPL-2+ to better reflects the "or (at your option) any later

Bug#832985: RFS: svgsalamander/1.0.0+dfsg1-1

2016-08-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Felix, Thanks for your changes. On 08/06/2016 04:35 PM, Felix Natter wrote: > Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes: >> Consider adding the --parallel option to dh in debian/rules to enable >> the use of parallel builds with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=". > > done. (

Bug#836373: marked as done (RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-4 [RC])

2016-09-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> (can you please check for other hdf breakages in the archive?) The archive rebuilds resulted in some similar bugreports, the outstanding one is mathgl (#835680), I've submitted a patch to the bugreport last Sunday. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/15/2016 10:02 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 15/09/16 08:53, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>> I know this approach >>> works, but is it the "right" way? Does it matter? >> >> your way is the best one if you also add a patch to automatically >> install the file >> inside the upstream build

Re: Any reason why sphinx does not migrate to testing?

2016-09-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/16/2016 10:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > So what might be the problem here? The strict dependencies on sphinx in cdist-doc apparently. >From the britney output: Trying easy from autohinter: clustalo/1.2.3-1 sphinx/1.4.6-1 start: 57+556: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-0:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1:m-556 or

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-26 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:15:08 +0200 Klaus Zimmermann wrote: > Mattia already declined sponsoring on grounds of not sponsoring Debian > virgins like myself. Ross Gammon's initial ITP intended to maintain this package in the Debian GIS team alongside the netcdf packages where I'm available for spons

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/30/2016 02:46 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > "the netcdf package. There was an ITP for the netcdf-libcf package, but > development of this source upstream is stalled. > > cf-python depends on netcdf-python being packaged first, and will be > maintained > within the Debian GIS team." >

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-01 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/01/2016 07:39 PM, Klaus Zimmermann wrote: > Am 30.09.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: >> So, if you can answer the above points and ping back, I'll be happy to do a >> review and maybe an upload. > > Thanks, that would be great! Regarding package review, please also build the mo

Bug#747000: Can not find commit in Git

2014-05-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 05/04/2014 09:21 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I can not find a commit for gdal/1.11.0+dfsg-1~exp1 in Git. > > Am I missing something? It's in the experimental branch for the time being. > Kind regards > > Andreas. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Finger

Bug#747000: Can not find commit in Git

2014-05-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/04/2014 10:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 05/04/2014 09:21 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> I can not find a commit for gdal/1.11.0+dfsg-1~exp1 in Git. >>> >>> Am I missing somet

Re: Older release and git-buildpackage

2014-05-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/10/2014 03:56 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > I need some help with a scenario with gbp. Say I have imported a new > upstream version but would like to release a -2 to an older release. > > Is there a simple way to do this ? You can create a branch for your older version, and have git-b

Re: Bug#748784: RFS: proj/4.8.0-5

2014-05-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/20/2014 08:42 PM, Wookey wrote: > +++ Bas Couwenberg [2014-05-20 20:24 +0200]: >> Package: sponsorship-requests > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proj" > > I think you have a regular sponsor now, so assume this will be taken > care of. But if not I have an interest in proj and

Bug#754227: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-6

2014-07-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/08/2014 11:26 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 22:40:17 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > >> Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdal" > > You foun

Bug#754227: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-6

2014-07-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/08/2014 11:34 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 23:26:47 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdal" >> You found one since this contains only my patch, and building >> the package once m

Re: Bug#755049: RFS: libharu/2.3.0-1 (update)

2014-07-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> * Package name: libharu > Version : 2.3.0-1 > [...] > libharu is already packaged in debian, this is just an update to the last > upstream version. It will require a rebuild of the depending packages: > saga > udav > mathgl > emboss > falconpl It may be wise to change the package

Bug#754253: Bug#755553: Can not build osm2pgsql

2014-07-27 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 07/27/2014 06:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I intended to sponsor the latest status of osm2pgsql in Git but it does > not build for me. I attached the build log. > > Any idea what might went wrong? Based on your log I suspect your chroot is outdated. It's using the protobuf 1.0.0~rc2-1 from

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

2014-08-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/17/2014 06:35 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > I just uploaded new upstream version of qmapshack 0.3.0 to debian mentors. > This package fixing all previous issues, I would be grateful for reviewing. Regarding the copyright file I suggest to use the SPDX license shortnames as much as possible. ht

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

2014-08-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/17/2014 07:46 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Can you please advice what to do with "LGPL-2.1 with Digia Qt LGPL Exception > 1.1" license? The relevant documention in the copyright-format 1.0 states: " An exception or clarification to a license is signalled in plain text, by appending /with keyw

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

2014-08-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Thanks for incorporating the feedback. I think the WTFPL short name should keep the version number, WTFPL-2 was better IMHO. The text of the QT license exception is still missing the LGPL exception text. I suggest at least the changes included in the attached patch. Since the license text of the

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

2014-08-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/17/2014 10:55 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Regarding the patch: I'm not near a PC right now, so can't check: Are you > sure the license of those files with the exception had a "or later" on their > GPL option? I'm pretty sure about that. The QT project licensing page links to the licenses as

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

2014-08-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/18/2014 08:52 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hi Sebastiaan, > > On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 23:57 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 08/17/2014 10:55 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: >>> Regarding the patch: I'm not near a PC right now, so can't check: Are you >&g

Bug#760725: lintian: "File without copyright info" in gdal-grass

2014-09-07 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 09/07/2014 06:12 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > it seems lintian found a new target and gdal-grass is affected: It looks like a recent change in lintian. > Since I think this is easy to fix this should be done. Keep an eye out for updated copyright files in git. Kind Regards, Bas

Bug#764831: RFS: geolinks/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2014-10-11 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/11/2014 04:41 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > * Package name: geolinks >Version : 0.0.1-1 The package doesn't have Vcs-* URLs in debian/control, and the git repository doesn't seem to exist yet under pkg-grass on Alioth. Can you create the repository on Alioth and push your

Bug#764831: RFS: geolinks/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2014-10-11 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/11/2014 05:23 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/11/2014 04:41 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> * Package name: geolinks >>Version : 0.0.1-1 > > The package doesn't have Vcs-* URLs in debian/control, and the git > repository doesn't se

Bug#766508: Libjpeg trouble in jmapviewer

2014-10-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/23/2014 08:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends: > > > 0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used. > The following packages have u

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/23/2014 09:26 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Bas, > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> [no love for enigmail today] > > try mutt ;-) Should be fixed with manual configuration now. > switched to public discussion anyway

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> >> It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 >> build depends on libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~). >> >

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet >>> build dependenc

Bug#766662: RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 10/24/2014 06:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > * Bump JOSM dependency to 7643. > (closes: #764176) JOSM 7643 has hit the mirrors, so josm-plugins can be built now. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4A

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. > -The following packages have unmet dependencies: > - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. > - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:

Bug#766662: RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/25/2014 12:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Bas, > > thanks for the hint. > > Do you know any method to get pinged about such updates? Unfortunately I don't, I just periodically check the version in latest the Packages file on the mirror. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF

Bug#767763: RFS: ossim/1.8.16-3 [RC]

2014-11-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Tobias, On 11/02/2014 08:26 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > I will upload this once build is complete, thanks for providing the > fix. Thanks for sponsoring the upload, I've removed the entry from the Sponsoring of Blends wiki. > For the long evening

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-11-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 10/25/2014 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). > > As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in > experime

Bug#769604: RFS: pktools/2.5.4-1~exp1

2014-11-14 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Francesco, Can you sponsor the upload of pktools? Andreas is unavailable until December 5th. Kind Regards, Bas On 11/14/2014 11:44 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pktools" > > Pa

Bug#770521: RFS: rasterio/0.15.1-1 [ITP]

2014-11-22 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 11/22/2014 12:40 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Feel free to review and/or sponsor. > In case you wonder, I have disabled the python3 package because there > are a lot of problems when using LANG=C . I may add support later if > python3-click has a solution. Your package looks good in general,

Bug#772614: Fail to see experimental branch

2014-12-09 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12/09/2014 09:03 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > qgis(master) $ git branch > * master This is correct. For qgis, the packaging targeting experimental lives on the master branch. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 --

Bug#772614: Fail to see experimental branch

2014-12-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, Are you able to build the package using the master branch? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Bug#772614: Fail to see experimental branch

2014-12-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 12/10/2014 10:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I had some real life things to do and bad bandwidth. That's perfectly understandable, I was worried there might be another problem with the build. > I'll do the build over night and try to upload tomorrow morning. Take your time, there

Bug#773505: RFS: python-descartes/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

2014-12-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Do you intent to add this RFS to SoB wiki page? https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB Both python-descartes and python-geopandas were added to the Debian GIS Blend. http://blends.debian.org/gis/tasks/workstation#python-descartes http://blends.debian.org/gis/tasks/workstation#python-geopan

Bug#774512: RFS: python-osmapi/0.5.0-1~exp1 [ITP]

2015-01-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/04/2015 03:55 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Is there a specific reason you are targeting experimental and not unstable? Mostly because it's not targeted for migration to jessie. > Can this package be used by Osgeo live or is there a reason not to do > so (Angelos recently packaged version

Bug#774512: RFS: python-osmapi/0.5.0-1~exp1 [ITP]

2015-01-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/05/2015 09:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > On 01/04/2015 05:03 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 01/04/2015 03:55 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >>> Can this package be used by Osgeo live or is there a reason not to do >>> so (Angelos recently packaged version

Re: doc-base errors, documentation installation

2015-01-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Nico, First of all thanks for your work on NetCDF! > The package I'm looking at is netCDF [1] which – apart from the > library and headers – installs the file > ``` > $ cat /usr/share/doc-base/netCDF Interestingly there is no doc-base file in the souce package. Do you have local changes n

Re: doc-base errors, documentation installation

2015-01-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> I see the file > ``` > libnetcdf-dev.doc-base > ``` > in the debian/ folder [1]. I suppose renaming that to > ``` > netcdf-doc.doc-base > ``` > will do the trick. Is that your intention, too? Yes. Although the warnings may need to be fixed with additional changes to the file. The Document field

Re: doc-base errors, documentation installation

2015-01-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Nico, On 01/15/2015 09:52 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I'd be great if you could have a look at the branch `split-c-f-cxx` on > alioth to see if there are any obvious shortcomings. If we can fix > those, we should be finally able to upgrade from the several years old > 4.1.3. I only find netCDF

Re: doc-base errors, documentation installation

2015-01-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/15/2015 07:57 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: >> that you still have local changes not pushed to Alioth? > > Right; fixed now. Thanks for the push! Can you also update the pristine-tar branch with your upstream tarballs as imported into the upstream branch? I've push some changes on the split-c-

Re: doc-base errors, documentation installation

2015-01-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/16/2015 10:20 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote: >> I've push some changes on the split-c-f-cxx branch. > > I've created upstream pull requests for the patches you added. Let's > see if they make it in for the 4.3.3 release. I'm still working on the changes to support Policy 3.9.4 and up, and have ju

Re: doc-base errors, documentation installation

2015-01-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/16/2015 10:49 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote: >>> `lintian -I --show-overrides --pedantic -E `. > > This doesn't show anything serious for me: > ``` > $ lintian -I --show-overrides --pedantic -E > netcdf_4.3.3~20150116-utopic2_source.changes > E: netcdf changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file uto

Bug#775693: RFS: python-cligj/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

2015-01-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Sorry for not doing this sooner, but I have reviewed the package now. Some comments follow. The copyright file only documents the upstream copyright, documenting the copyright & license for debian/* is a good idea unless you want to assign the copyright to MapBox. There seems to be an

Bug#777146: RFS: fiona/1.5.0-1 [ITP]

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on fiona and related packages! Some comments regarding the package based on my review. lintian reported two issues with the copyright file, both having the same cause: I: fiona source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright docs/data/tests/data/* (paragraph at

Bug#777146: RFS: fiona/1.5.0-1 [ITP]

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/05/2015 06:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > [...] I'll leave it at this. Famous last words. There is just one more thing. The doc-base control file has an unusual suffix: .docbase instead of .doc-base. It also uses an unusual Document ID: fiona.docbase, using the (source)

Bug#777146: Fiona does not build

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/05/2015 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I: pybuild base:170: python3.4 setup.py clean > WARNING:root:Failed to get options via gdal-config: [Errno 2] No such file or > directory: 'gdal-config' > CRITICAL:root:Cython.Build.cythonize not found. Cython is required to build > from a repo. > E

Bug#777146: Fiona does not build

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/05/2015 10:33 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > It works for me in unstable. You will need a recent update of unstable > as fiona relies on python-cligj which was only added yesterday. You don't need to have python-cligj installed locally to build the package with pbuilder, you do need cython a

Bug#778488: RFS: python-geojson/1.0.9-1 [ITP]

2015-02-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for fixing the issues with the initial upload. On 02/15/2015 08:26 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Package name: python-geojson > Version : 1.0.9-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > * Initial upload (closes: #690833) > > [Note] that this package was previousl

Bug#778488: RFS: python-geojson/1.0.9-1 [ITP]

2015-02-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/15/2015 08:26 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-geojson" I'm partially done with the review, but I have to leave for work now. I'll continue tonight after I get back. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182

Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2015-03-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Ross, Thanks for your work on the bluebird packaging! On 03/03/2015 09:01 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > * Fix duplicate package descriptions You may want to tweak these a bit to be more in line with other node-* and libjs-* packages. See for example node-q: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-j

Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2015-03-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/04/2015 07:53 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead >> >> This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is

Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2015-03-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/04/2015 09:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 03/04/2015 08:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>>>> I think reverting this change and adding a lintian >>>>>> override instead is a better idea. > >

Bug#781701: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#781701: RFS: node-convert-source-map/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2015-04-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Ross, Thanks for your work on this package. On 04/01/2015 08:53 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-convert-source-map" There are some minor issues that needs to be addressed before the upload to the archive. debian/control: Testsuite: autopkgtest AFAI

Bug#781763: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#781763: RFS: node-coffeeify/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2015-04-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Ross, Also thanks for your work on this package. This package a few minor issues just like node-convert-source-map (#781701). The Testsuite header in the control file should be XS-Testsuite. The copyright year by npm2deb is not reflected in the upstream source, it doesn't list any so I sugge

Bug#781763: RFS: node-coffeeify/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2015-04-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 04/03/2015 05:56 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Thanks again for another review Bas. > > On 02/04/15 19:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> You may want to consider extending Use_through2.patch to cover all files >> that use the through module, there are some tests that require

Bug#784132: RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-2

2015-05-09 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Ross, On 05/03/2015 01:21 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > * Package name: pyshp > Version : 1.2.1-2 Because version 1.2.1+ds-1 was the actual version to be uploaded to the archive, the packages for version 1.2.1-2 was not automatically removed from mentors. Can you remove it to get rid

Re: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ not accessible any more

2015-05-21 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> It seems it is forbidden to read the web dir directly. Any reason for > this and if it is intentional what would be the alternative to fetch > data about packages in new? If indexes are forbidden intentionally now, extracting the links from new.html may be reasonable alternative. https://ftp-m

Bug#786571: RFS: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-3 [uploaded]

2015-05-22 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Ross, Thanks for your work on this package. On 05/23/2015 12:21 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osm-gps-map" I've sponsored the uploaded, but there are a couple of unused substitution variables in the control file you may want to have a look at. Kind Regar

Re: Upload new version of a package waiting in NEW

2015-06-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> c) upload immediately. > i) use a new version? Because NEW processing takes such a long time now, I don't wait for FTP master to review my packages in NEW before working on them again. When I have a new revision of the package ready I just upload it so that the latest revision will get i

Bug#788385: RFS: fiona/1.5.1-1

2015-06-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on this package too. On 06/10/2015 10:22 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Package name: fiona > Version : 1.5.1-1 The package cannot be built from git because the upstream & pristine-tar branches have not been pushed. Please run `git push --all && git

Bug#788385: RFS: fiona/1.5.1-1 [uploaded]

2015-06-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 06/10/2015 10:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/10/2015 10:22 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> Package name: fiona >> Version : 1.5.1-1 > > The package cannot be built from git because the upstream & pristine-tar > branches have not been pushe

Bug#788850: RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1 [uploaded]

2015-06-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on this package. On 06/15/2015 05:20 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cligj" I've sponsored the upload, and since it was a straightforward new upstream release I have not further comments. Kind Regards, Bas -- GP

Bug#788984: RFS: owslib/0.9.0-1

2015-06-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on this package. On 06/16/2015 09:10 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib" The copyright for several authors is missing from the debian/copyright file, among them Luís de Sousa for the newly added wcs111.py for example.

Bug#788986: RFS: geolinks/0.1.0-1

2015-06-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on this package too. On 06/16/2015 09:18 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geolinks" This package also as small copyright issue. Please add a Files section for debian/* with your copyright unless you want to assign this to up

Re: Pbuilder requests Build-Depends on local machine - why this?

2015-06-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> since I'm back from vacation and upgraded my testing system I realised > that when using pbuilder the Build-Depends of some package seem to be > required also on the machine that is creating the pbuilder chroot > (=where you start pdebuild). I regard this a bug but may be I'm missing > something

Bug#792701: RFS: saga/2.2.0+dfsg-1

2015-07-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on this package. I noticed some updates to the copyright file were required to include the changes in the new upstream release, I took the liberty to commit those changes. Unfortunately I cannot build the package because the pristine-tar branch hasn't been updated

Bug#792822: RFS: osrm/4.6.1-1

2015-07-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 07/18/2015 10:46 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 07/18/2015 10:35 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: >> The package is maintained in a git repository that can be found >> here: >> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/osrm.git/ > > You still need t

Bug#792822: RFS: osrm/4.6.1-1

2015-07-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 07/18/2015 10:35 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: > The package is maintained in a git repository that can be found > here: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/osrm.git/ You still need to finalize the package by setting the distribution: dch -r -D unstable git commit -m "Set distribu

Bug#792822: RFS: osrm/4.6.1-1 [uploaded]

2015-07-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/19/2015 12:01 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 18/07/15 22:42, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Try to not use an annotated tag next time to keep all the changes >> on the branch. > > Regarding the debian tag, I just

Bug#886501: RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1

2018-01-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Gudjon, Please also fix #886171 with qwt (6.1.3-1) by incorporating the attached changes, specifically the dh_makeshlibs override. Kind Regards, Bas diff -Nru qwt-6.1.2/debian/changelog qwt-6.1.2/debian/changelog --- qwt-6.1.2/debian/changelog 2016-09-05 14:05:19.0 +0200 +++ qwt-6.1.

Re: Testsuite of package squizz fails for d/compat > 9

2018-02-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
The parallel option is enabled by default for compat level >= 10, try setting `dh --no-parallel` to disable the parallel option again. Kind Regards, Bas

Re: Different symbols files on different architectures

2018-04-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 04/06/2018 02:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > after adding a symbols file to libbpp-core all other architectures are > failing due to different symbols (see below for ppc64el[1]) but others > are failing as well. What is the correct way to fix this? Use (arch=ppc64el) tags for the symbols, or so

Re: Different symbols files on different architectures

2018-04-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 04/06/2018 05:48 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Bas, > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 04/06/2018 02:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> after adding a symbols file to libbpp-core all other architectures are >>> fail

Re: Gitlab API question: Fetching group ID works not reliably

2018-05-14 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/15/2018 08:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > If I try science-team or r-pkg-team it returns nothing. Any idea > what might be wrong here? You're not parsing the other pages of results. https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/#pagination Kind Regards, Bas

Re: watch file for github

2018-07-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 07/08/2018 10:41 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > Does anyone have a tip or a solution to the problem? codesearch can help to find watch file examples. > Or is there a package in which this has already been solved? uversionmangle does the trick, see the attached watch files. Kind Regards, Bas

Bug#931972: Bug#930637: unblock: monit/1:5.25.2-3+deb10u1

2019-07-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg > wrote: >> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes... > > Backport for Buster: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit > Please spons

Bug#931972: Bug#930637: unblock: monit/1:5.25.2-3+deb10u1

2019-07-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 7/13/19 9:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: >> On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg >> wrote: >>> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes... >> >> Backport for B

Re: Package not migrating although status says 'Will attempt migration'

2020-04-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 4/16/20 8:34 AM, mer...@debian.org wrote: > schroedinger-coordgenlibs is not migrated although the delay is over > [1]. Is there something I can do about it? This package prevents > migration of other packages. The britney update_output shows: trying: schroedinger-coordgenlibs skipped: schroed

Re: Again question about migration to testing

2020-04-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 4/24/20 12:01 AM, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Hi, > > the TeX Live packages do not migrate to testing, although there is no RC > bug and they are old enough. The only reason I see is: > > autopkgtest for jupyter-sphinx-theme/0.0.6+ds1-9: amd64: Regression ♻ , > arm64: Regression ♻ It has a popcon

  1   2   >