Hi,
Heikki Mäntysaari wrote:
> mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extensions for Iceweasel and Icedove
> mozvoikko-iceweasel - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel
If at all (see also below) iceweasel-mozvoikko.
> Package mozvoikko installs the spell-checker extension and mozvoikko-icew
s and a empty
dummy package anyway...
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Dmitri Alenitchev wrote:
> Jaxml is a python module that defines a class XML_document, which allows
> easy and trouble-free generation of XML documents.
If it's a python module, naming it "jaxp" violates the python policy. Go
read it ;)
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitri Alenitchev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:53:22PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote
> > > Jaxml is a python module that defines a class XML_document, which allows
> > > easy and trouble-free generation of XML document
Hi,
Am Montag, 7. November 2005 12:54 schrieb Petr Kubanek:
> I packed myspell-cz, so one will be able to get Czech spelling in
^^
> Debian, which will work with OpenOffice and Mozilla. It's there:
>
> http://lascaux.asu.cas.cz/~petr/myspell-cs-cz_20051101-1.tar.gz
: Re: Sponsor wanted - myspell-cz, libnova & more..
Date: Montag, 7. November 2005 17:27
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Cc: Petr Kubanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Am Montag, 7. November 2005 12:54 sch
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:18:15AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:14 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > When a bug is tagged "fixed-in-experimental", does that bug number still
> > > have to appear in debian/changelog for the next upload to unstab
Hi,
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> > - myspell-hr (Croatian dictionary for myspell)
> >
> > Like bfilter, but this one is lintian/linda clean.
> >
> > When I find a sponsor I will add a "Initial upload to debian...closes ITP
> > bug number" entry to debian/changelog.
>
> This should be done beforehand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> > > - myspell-hr (Croatian dictionary for myspell)
> > >
> > > Like bfilter, but this one is lintian/linda clean.
> > >
> > > When I find a sponsor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> - Please make everything -1 since the whole thing is your "* Initial
> release"
> - Close the ITP (see above)
> - up-to-date standards-version is 3.7.2
> - You don't really need the dh_listpa
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > - Please make everything -1 since the whole thing is your "* Initial
> > release"
> > - Close the ITP (see above)
> > - up-to-date standards-version is 3.7.2
> > - You don't really need the dh_listp
Hi,
Vedran Fura? wrote:
> I just copied debian/rules and control from myspell-en or something. Could
openoffice.org-dictionaries, yes.
(openoffice.org-dictionaries is the source package for
myspell-en-us/myspell-en-gb)
> you tell me what exactly should I remove from debian/rules? But, yes, it
>
Hi,
Vedran Fura? wrote:
> % cat debian/openoffice.org-hyphenation-hr.dictlistinfo
> HYPH hr HR hyph_hr_HR
>
> also:
>
> % cat debian/myspell-hr.dictlistinfo
> DICT hr HR hr_HR
Yes, OK... If I oversaw the first, sorry.
> > irrelevant. not used by any myspell-using app.
>
> I know, but you ment
Hi,
Vedran Fura? wrote:
> The upstream doesn't provide any version information so there shouldn't be
> any problem if I fake new upstream releases: 1.0-1 -> 1.1-1 -> 1.2-1 .
Can't you use dates then? Like MMDD-a?
Anyway, I just saw a bug testing this for upload again...
You register the h
Hi,
Vedran Fura? wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > After this is fixed (and maybe the version changed) I'll sponsor it.
>
> Uploaded to mentors:
> http://mentors-test.workaround.org/debian/pool/main/m/myspell-hr/
Uploaded.
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am Montag, 3. Juli 2006 23:33 schrieb Justin Pryzby:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:43:50PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
>
> > I am trying to use xvfb-run to permit pbuilder to build some packages
> > which need to connect to X.
> If you're aiming to get the package uploaded, this isn't allowed. You
Hi,
Am Montag, 25. September 2006 18:40 schrieb Timo Jyrinki:
> URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openoffice.org-voikko
>
> I uploaded this packages despite the remaining problems, so that there'd
> be the newest version at mentors.debian.net anyway. Hopefully the first
> 3-4 pa
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 08:22 schrieben Sie:
> I did the change to 1.1-2 yesterday evening. I soon got a few notices that
> multiple spellcheckers work in OOo just fine. What do you think? Of course
Right.
> it's not maybe that wise to use more than one spellchecker for a language,
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:53:50AM -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:46:34PM +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wavemon".
> >
> > * Package name: wavemon
> >Version : 0.7.3-1
>
> I'd certainly like to see an
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:31:21PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2014-03-18 14:19, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > segment_juncs.o: In function `boost::thread::get_id() const':
> > /usr/include/boost/thread/detail/thread.hpp:730: undefined reference to
> > `boost::thread::native_handle()'
> >
Hi,
Adam Kessel wrote:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
yes.
You won't be approved with no package in the a
Hi,
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
> On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote:
>
> > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it,
> > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package,
> > but I can't upload it because I'm not y
Hi,
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
>
> bullshit
>
> Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no
> packages sponsor
Hi,
K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
> created (the ITP is bug #206290).
[ snip ]
I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections.
Beware, I wrote the myspell policy... :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- D
Ky Vinh Tran Luu wrote:
> that mentors are not too busy preparing for the sid release.
There won't be a sid release ever
SCNR,
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> I am currently running AxKit on woody + backports of many packages on
> which it depends. If I understand correctly, I will need to build on
> sarge (or sid?) in order to produce a package fit for upload. Should I
clean sid.
> begin by setting up a sarge system,
Hi,
Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
> I'm still looking for someone to test and upload the following package.
[ snip ]
replied to him on -qt-kde where he posted that request too...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people
Hi,
Bob Proulx wrote:
> dpkg-deb --info /var/cache/pbuilder/result/*.deb |grep Depends:
>Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
>
> So then in an attempt to resolve this I add DISTRIBUTION=woody to my
Why? This libc6 Depends: is fully correct for builds on woody...
> Why does building a package with
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
> August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
>
> In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
> with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
> (3 out of 7)
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
Uploaded.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key
Hi,
Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
> (*) My former sponsor seems to be MIA (Rene, are you out there?).
*raises hand* :)
Yes. I am. And I am not MIA.
I just forgot you :/
Grüße/Regards,
René
P.S: Get a MUA so you can cosspost rightly or let it be...
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Deve
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage,
> changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not
> complain. I would be happy if someone could check and sponsor my package.
> It is available at http://fig2sxd.sf.net/.
T
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Alexander Bürger wrote:
> > I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage,
> > changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not
> > complain. I would be happy if someone could check an
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> No. Don't package it Debian-native even if you are the upstream. It's
> not.
What I forgot here:
Fix this:
dpkg-source: warning: source directory `./fig2sxd' is not
- `fig2sxd-0.9a'
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Eng
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8
> (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of
> course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files,
> including .dsc etc. are available at sourcefo
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
>
> I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not
> give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the
> changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> That something was time passing by :) To create all the files I wrote a
> small script which created a orig.tar.gz and calls dpkg-source -b etc.
> Unfortunately I made it recreate the orig.tar.gz for each run, resulting
> in different time stamps inside the tar and sl
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> Thanks. Now revision 3 is on sf.
>
> I must admit that I skipped the NMU chapter. But still I do not find such
> a statement that dots in debian revision are reserved. Chapter 5.11.4.1 of
> the developers-reference says "should add a new minor version number".
> Does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ read http://learn.to.quote ]
Hi,
elijah wright wrote:
> frank, can i beg you to doublecheck the way your last name is encoded in
> your email client? it corrupts the screen state in pine EVERY time i get
> one of your email messages... mutt doesn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Ali Bombali wrote:
> The right way to do this is to use the X-Debbugs-CC header. Add a line like
> this to your message's mail header (not to the pseudo header with the
> package field):
>
> X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Could someone gi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Steffen Nissen wrote:
> Tried to build it with pbuilder, but still the same problem. Am I doing
> something wrong?
You probably are missing an appropriate Section: field for the source
part (the first one) of your debian/control file..)
Grüße/Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The other approach is to ask for removal of the old source package and
> upload a new one which generates the same binary packages. This seems to
> be the best approach but I'm a bit scared about the transition phase ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Obviously 1.3.3 is less then 20040120, how can I cope with this issue?
epoch.
Grüße/Regards,
René
- --
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~r
Hi,
Clement nodens Hermann wrote:
[ snip ]
> ~ It also provide librfxswf, a fully featured library which can be used
> ~ for standalone SWF generation. It includes support for bitmaps, buttons,
> ~ shapes, text, fonts, sound etc. It also has support for ActionScript
> ~ using the Ming ActionCompil
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
> > Build-Depends even.
>
> /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
> build-essential. XML::Parse
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> no tarballs and no in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
and name it something like +cvsYYMMDD
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
martin f krafft wrote:
[ snip ]
> I am using dh_strip --keep-debug to keep these binaries purposely in
> place. Thus, I should probably override the last two errors.
> However, I am unsure about the first six lines. What do they mean?
> What am I
Hi,
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
> I've packaged polish help for openoffice.org. The package
> openoffice.org-help-pl is now on mentors and I'm recently
> looking for sponsor. Anyone?
Put it somewhere web-accssible (no, I don't mean mentors.debian.net) and
I'll look...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`.
Hi,
I know both the deb (Debian developer) and the rpm (at work) side..
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 17:47 schrieb Zach Garner:
> First:
> 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of
> scripts built on top of each other is really confusing.
You don't need to use them... m
Hi,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > any debian rules.
> >
> > the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken.
>
> No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name
> the package's sourc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Steffen Nissen wrote:
> Tried to build it with pbuilder, but still the same problem. Am I doing
> something wrong?
You probably are missing an appropriate Section: field for the source
part (the first one) of your debian/control file..)
Grüße/Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The other approach is to ask for removal of the old source package and
> upload a new one which generates the same binary packages. This seems to
> be the best approach but I'm a bit scared about the transition phase ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Obviously 1.3.3 is less then 20040120, how can I cope with this issue?
epoch.
Grüße/Regards,
René
- --
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~r
Hi,
Clement nodens Hermann wrote:
[ snip ]
> ~ It also provide librfxswf, a fully featured library which can be used
> ~ for standalone SWF generation. It includes support for bitmaps, buttons,
> ~ shapes, text, fonts, sound etc. It also has support for ActionScript
> ~ using the Ming ActionCompil
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
> > Build-Depends even.
>
> /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
> build-essential. XML::Parse
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> no tarballs and no in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
and name it something like +cvsYYMMDD
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
martin f krafft wrote:
[ snip ]
> I am using dh_strip --keep-debug to keep these binaries purposely in
> place. Thus, I should probably override the last two errors.
> However, I am unsure about the first six lines. What do they mean?
> What am I
Hi,
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
> I've packaged polish help for openoffice.org. The package
> openoffice.org-help-pl is now on mentors and I'm recently
> looking for sponsor. Anyone?
Put it somewhere web-accssible (no, I don't mean mentors.debian.net) and
I'll look...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`.
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
> August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
>
> In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
> with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
> (3 out of 7)
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
Uploaded.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key
Hi,
I know both the deb (Debian developer) and the rpm (at work) side..
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 17:47 schrieb Zach Garner:
> First:
> 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of
> scripts built on top of each other is really confusing.
You don't need to use them... m
Hi,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > any debian rules.
> >
> > the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken.
>
> No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name
> the package's sourc
Hi,
Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
>
> export DH_VERBOSE=1
>
> configure:
>
> build:
>
> clean:
>
> install:
>
> dh_testdir
> cp minimalist.pl $(CURDIR)/debian/minimalist
>
> binary-indep:
>
> binary-arch:
>
> dh_builddeb
>
> binary: bi
Hi,
Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 13:42 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/...
>
> Yes! I had to 'mkdir ./debian/DEBIAN' manually. :-)
> Anyway, manually creating ".debian/DEBIAN" is not clearly mentionned in
> tha Debian new Maintainer gui
package -- the best way is to write
* new maintainer (closes: #Bugnr)
in the changelog, then everyone knows you are the new maintainer and
the bug in WNPP is closed.
> way?
There's no difference.
Regards,
Rene (who also isn't a DD yet, wating for DAM approval and get account
cre
Hi Dimitry,
Dimitry Glushenok wrote:
> i want to get some experiance with debian developing and searching for
> developer who have a time to check package. package is guardian for
> snort (a lightweight intrustion detection system).
> guardian watches the output from snort and uses ipchains or i
hem) and linitian hasn't
been fixed yet...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`.Rene Engelhard
: :' :** Debian GNU/Linux Developer **
`. `' http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg07003/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
sary anymore
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`.Rene Engelhard
: :' :** Debian GNU/Linux Developer **
`. `' http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg07004/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Does this sound OK?
For me yes.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
msg07069/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ver programs for KDE in the
distro)
-> see my answer on Ralf's posting.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 2
d with overlayed text in
e.g. GIMP or some other program, and add the text there. This should
not make much more hassle I suppose...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> -> see my answer on Ralf's posting.
Hrmpf.
Stephen's posting of course...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `
; in Konqueror or the shell of your choice, compress it to a .tar.bz2
> archive, or define your own cleanup actions.
Found a sponsor already?
If no, I can sponsor you.
Mail me back if you need one.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Dev
ing if the email is valid and can be read by the keyowner
does weasel's cabot for me => http://www.palfrader.org/#cabot
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`
ita.ath.cx/~yath/debian/penggy_0.1.0-1_i386.deb and is
> lintian-clean.
>
> Would be nice to find a sponsor, regards,
I just contated him with my comments to the state of the packages
now...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : ht
able bit on these files after installing them and
you're fine (or use install -m644)
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
msg08596/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;> 4.1.0), xlibs (>> 4.2.0) is senseless
cp debian/kover.substvars debian/kover.substvars.tmp
cat debian/kover.substvars.tmp | sed -e s/"xlibs (>> 4.1.0), "// \
> debian/kover.substvars
rm debian/kover.substvars.tmp
dh_genc
pload one, it won't have any effect ;)
I think, as the keyserver sync themselves it should be no problem
finding your key there...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `'
.substvars.tmp
cat debian/kover.substvars.tmp | sed -e s/"xlibs (>> 4.1.0), "// \
> debian/kover.substvars
rm debian/kover.substvars.tmp
dh_gencontrol
[...]
Regards,
Rene
- who wonders why people don't read the archives; this i
Hi,
[ please do not send me a identical mail besides that mail you sent to
-mentors. I _am_ subscribed to -mentors. Thanks! ]
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> >>Or you could try a shlibs override. look at dpkg-shlibsdep manpage for
> &
e it doesn't exist...
> but i would like to know O:-)
man uupdate
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerp
nd
b) it seems that it is closed anyway
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information?
In this case not.
In many other cases also not...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
Jaime Robles wrote:
> I have packaged two KDE apps.
> KWifimanager, a WIFI card configuration program.
> KImageMapEditor, a html image map editor.
>
> I would like you to test them and check for bugs, errors and so on.
kimagemapeditor is already in the archive, currently maintain
Hi,
Adam Kessel wrote:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
yes.
You won't be approved with no package in the a
Hi,
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
> On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote:
>
> > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it,
> > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package,
> > but I can't upload it because I'm not y
Hi,
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
>
> bullshit
>
> Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no
> packages sponsor
Hi,
K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
> created (the ITP is bug #206290).
[ snip ]
I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections.
Beware, I wrote the myspell policy... :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- D
Ky Vinh Tran Luu wrote:
> that mentors are not too busy preparing for the sid release.
There won't be a sid release ever
SCNR,
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> I am currently running AxKit on woody + backports of many packages on
> which it depends. If I understand correctly, I will need to build on
> sarge (or sid?) in order to produce a package fit for upload. Should I
clean sid.
> begin by setting up a sarge system,
Hi,
Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
> I'm still looking for someone to test and upload the following package.
[ snip ]
replied to him on -qt-kde where he posted that request too...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people
Hi,
Bob Proulx wrote:
> dpkg-deb --info /var/cache/pbuilder/result/*.deb |grep Depends:
>Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
>
> So then in an attempt to resolve this I add DISTRIBUTION=woody to my
Why? This libc6 Depends: is fully correct for builds on woody...
> Why does building a package with
Hi,
Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
> (*) My former sponsor seems to be MIA (Rene, are you out there?).
*raises hand* :)
Yes. I am. And I am not MIA.
I just forgot you :/
Grüße/Regards,
René
P.S: Get a MUA so you can cosspost rightly or let it be...
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Deve
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage,
> changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not
> complain. I would be happy if someone could check and sponsor my package.
> It is available at http://fig2sxd.sf.net/.
T
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Alexander Bürger wrote:
> > I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage,
> > changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not
> > complain. I would be happy if someone could check an
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> No. Don't package it Debian-native even if you are the upstream. It's
> not.
What I forgot here:
Fix this:
dpkg-source: warning: source directory `./fig2sxd' is not
- `fig2sxd-0.9a'
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Eng
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8
> (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of
> course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files,
> including .dsc etc. are available at sourcefo
Hi,
Alexander Bürger wrote:
> > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
>
> I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not
> give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the
> changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
