Hi, Joey Hess wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > any debian rules. > > > > the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken. > > No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name > the package's source directory. This has been completly unnecessary for > years.
Not for dh_make. dh_make relies on that for filling out the template.. And the convention I meant was for normal source tar.gzs... > > And: You *could* use a random directory name later after dh_install > > (dh_install needs to get the info it puts into the template from somehwre). > > You seem to be confused about what dh_install is. Yes, typo. I of course meant dh_make. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]