Your message dated Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:11:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1072985: RFS: sdpa/7.3.18-1 -- High-performance
package for SemiDefinite Programs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072985,
regarding RFS: sdpa/7.3.18-1 -- High-performance package for SemiDefinite
The file is uploaded to sdpa.sourceforge.net
Thank you very much for your support.
2024年6月23日(日) 3:13 Bastian Germann :
>
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> > Changes since the last upload:
> >
> > sdpa (7.3.18-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> This version is not released. Please release it upstream fir
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Changes since the last upload:
sdpa (7.3.18-1) unstable; urgency=low
This version is not released. Please release it upstream first before packaging
it.
: GPL-2+
Section : math
The source builds the following binary packages:
sdpa - High-performance package for SemiDefinite Programs
libsdpa-dev - Callable library and examples of SDPA
sdpam - Matlab/Octave interface of SDPA
To access further information about this package, please
com/restic/rest-server
* License : BSD-2-Clause
* Vcs :
https://salsa.debian.org/doge-tech/restic-rest-server
Section : httpd
The source builds the following binary packages:
restic-rest-server - high performance HTTP server that implements
restic's REST
Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 2023 22:26:19 +0200
with message-id <732d1337-e8fb-4dbd-9c93-712a5f84d...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: kokkos/3.7.01-2.1 [NMU] [RC] -- C++ Performance
Portability Programming
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053699,
regarding RFS: kokkos/3.7.01-2.
* License : BSD-3-clause, BSD-3-Clause
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/kokkos
Section : science
The source builds the following binary packages:
kokkos - C++ Performance Portability Programming
libkokkos3.7 - C++ Performance Portability Programming
libkokk
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2023 17:24:02 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1003976: RFS: xmrig/6.16.2-1 [ITP] -- High
performance, open source CPU/GPU miner and RandomX benchmark.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003976,
regarding RFS: xmrig/6.19.3+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- High
Hello,
On 5/2/23 5:41 AM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Please have a closer look at the Copyright info.
I have only had a look at a few files but already found the general
copyright header being misrepresented in d/copyright. It has to contain
the following names:
> [snip]
Also, please have a l
Please have a closer look at the Copyright info.
I have only had a look at a few files but already found the general copyright header being misrepresented in
d/copyright. It has to contain the following names:
Copyright 2010 Jeff Garzik
Copyright 2012-2014 pooler
Copyright 2014
Control: retitle -1 RFS: xmrig/6.16.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- High performance, open
source CPU/GPU miner and RandomX benchmark.
On 4/19/23 7:59 AM, Bastian Germann wrote:
I have noticed this is a completely different implementation from the
argon2 package in Debian.
While there could be a way to
Am 18.04.23 um 23:48 schrieb Ben Westover:
I've pushed what I have so far to Salsa; unless randomx is disabled, it won't build without argon2, and I don't know how
to patch it. Can you please help me?
I have noticed this is a completely different implementation from the argon2
package in Debia
Hello,
On 4/18/23 10:18 AM, Bastian Germann wrote:
I looked into this when I first started packaging xmrig.
Unfortunately, for many of these third party libraries, Debian's
packaging of them won't work because the version included in xmrig is
specially modified and contains lots of xmrig-speci
You might also be able to replace src/crypto/randomx with librandomx with
WITH_PROFILING=OFF.
Am 18.04.23 um 00:04 schrieb Ben Westover:
Hello,
On 4/17/23 2:13 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Please see https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/xmrig/-/commit/fa8aaf366f7168be3d30ba9c1d7e5fdaf9bb11bb to get an
idea of what is to exclude. Please use the Debian replacements for those libraries.
Hello,
On 4/17/23 2:13 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Please see
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/xmrig/-/commit/fa8aaf366f7168be3d30ba9c1d7e5fdaf9bb11bb to get an idea of what is to exclude. Please use the Debian replacements for those libraries. adl and libethash are not yet available (see
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Ben,
Please see https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/xmrig/-/commit/fa8aaf366f7168be3d30ba9c1d7e5fdaf9bb11bb to get an
idea of what is to exclude. Please use the Debian replacements for those libraries. adl and libethash are not yet
available (see also #1034528
Hi Bastian,
If you submit the package for package maintenance in the Cryptocoin
Team, I would be inclined to take a look.
That sounds great! I wish I would've known of that team this whole time.
I've listed team+cryptoc...@tracker.debian.org as the maintainer in my
d/control file, and reques
Hi Ben,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:38:25 -0500 Ben Westover wrote:
xmrig (6.16.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial Package.
* Closes: #1003917
If you submit the package for package maintenance in the Cryptocoin Team, I
would be inclined to take a look.
Thanks,
Bastian
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
You should really pay attention to the lintian messages:
E: hpnssh source: alien-tag openssh [debian/source/lintian-overrides:2]
E: hpnssh-server: no-copyright-file
E: hpnssh-server: uncompressed-manual-page
[usr/share/man/man5/hpnauthorized_keys.5]
E: hpnssh-tests: un
Bastian,
On 4/28/22 3:22 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: tags -1 reopen
Am 28.04.22 um 20:53 schrieb rapier:
I guess the uploads needs some processing time because I do not see a
new version yet.
Ugh. I made a mistake because I wasn't paying attention to what I was
doing (see the above
Control: tags -1 reopen
Am 28.04.22 um 20:53 schrieb rapier:
I guess the uploads needs some processing time because I do not see a new
version yet.
Ugh. I made a mistake because I wasn't paying attention to what I was doing (see the above lame excuse). I've deleted
the prior package and have
Control: reopen -1
Bastian,
On 4/28/22 11:51 AM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Am 28.04.22 um 17:38 schrieb rapier:
Control: tags - moreinfo
Bastian,
I've replaced the exitsing PPA with a new one containing a build that
I believe addresses the problems. If you have time to review it I
wo
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Am 28.04.22 um 17:38 schrieb rapier:
Control: tags - moreinfo
Bastian,
I've replaced the exitsing PPA with a new one containing a build that I believe addresses the problems. If you have time
to review it I would appreciate that.
I do not get why you use the word
Control: tags - moreinfo
Bastian,
I've replaced the exitsing PPA with a new one containing a build that I
believe addresses the problems. If you have time to review it I would
appreciate that.
Hopefully I have the right command to uuntag moreinfo. I'm referencing
the docs at https://www.deb
Bastian,
I'm sorry to bother you. I've tried to upload a new version with the
changes you suggested but it was rejected. The error is
Rejected:
hpnssh_8.8p1hpn16v1-1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive.
8.8p1hpn16v1-1 <= 1:8.8p1-hpn16v1-8
hpnssh (8.8p1hpn16v1-1) impish; urgency=medi
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:17:21PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 26.04.22 um 21:04 schrieb rapier:
> > Bastian,
> >
> > On 4/26/22 2:17 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:24:48 -0500 rapier wrote:
> > > > Changes for the initial rel
Am 26.04.22 um 21:04 schrieb rapier:
Bastian,
On 4/26/22 2:17 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:24:48 -0500 rapier wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
hpnssh (1:8.8p1-hpn16v1-9) sid; urgency=medium
.
* Updated copyright.
Please replace
Bastian,
On 4/26/22 2:17 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:24:48 -0500 rapier wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
hpnssh (1:8.8p1-hpn16v1-9) sid; urgency=medium
.
* Updated copyright.
Please replace your massive changelog just with one
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:24:48 -0500 rapier wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
hpnssh (1:8.8p1-hpn16v1-9) sid; urgency=medium
.
* Updated copyright.
Please replace your massive changelog just with one entry that closes your ITP.
The Debian revision has to
: Mazieres-BSD-style,
Expat-with-advertising-restriction, OpenSSH, Beer-ware,
Powell-BSD-style, BSD-3-clause, public-domain
* Vcs : https://github.com/rapier1/openssh-portable
Section : net
HPNSSH is a fork of OpenSSH focused on high throughput and performance
for
enhanced performance and
functionality
Website : https://www.psc.edu/hpn-ssh-home
HPNSSH was first developed around 15 years ago to address significant
performance issue in OpenSSH due to undersized buffers in the
implementation of SSHv2. Throughput performance gains
: https://salsa.debian.org/benthetechguy/xmrig
Section : utils
It builds those binary packages:
xmrig - High performance, open source CPU/GPU miner and RandomX
benchmark.
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.
Your message dated Fri, 8 Oct 2021 17:50:27 +0200
with message-id <16204a7a-91e8-b547-e8dd-2c1b4ed91...@debian.org>
and subject line Sponsored
has caused the Debian Bug report #995841,
regarding RFS: c-blosc/1.21.1+ds1-1 [ITA] -- high performance meta-compressor
optimized for binary data
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 22:10:51 +0200 haavard_aa...@yahoo.no wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
c-blosc (1.21.1+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* Adopt package. Closes: #945176
* d/watch: Update URL to GitHub.
* d/control:
- Drop version constriction on
pat, BSD-3-clause
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/c-blosc
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libblosc1 - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary data
libblosc-dev - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary
data (develop
D-3-clause, Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/c-blosc
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libblosc1 - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary data
libblosc-dev - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary
data (develop
D-3-clause, Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/c-blosc
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libblosc1 - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary data
libblosc-dev - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary
data (develop
D-3-clause
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/c-blosc
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libblosc-dev - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary
data (development files)
libblosc1 - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binar
Your message dated Sat, 30 May 2020 14:19:05 +0200
with message-id
and subject line RFS: nattable/1.5.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- high performance SWT data
grid
has caused the Debian Bug report #943350,
regarding RFS: nattable/1.5.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- high performance SWT data grid
to be marked as done
: Apache
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/module/scalene
Section : python
It builds those binary packages:
python3-scalene - high-performance CPU and memory profiler for Python
(Python 3)
To access further information about this package, please visit the
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2020 11:54:24 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: netperfmeter/1.8.4~rc1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934157,
regarding RFS: netperfmeter/1.8.6~rc2-1 -- Network Performance Meter
(measurement program)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
filed against the sponsorship-requests package:
#946661: RFS: c-blosc/1.17.1+ds1-1 [QA] -- high performance meta-compressor
optimized for binary data (development files)
It has been closed by Adam Borowski .
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is
Your message dated Fri, 13 Dec 2019 03:12:08 +0100
with message-id <20191213021208.ga16...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#946661: RFS: c-blosc/1.17.1+ds1-1 [QA] -- high
performance meta-compressor optimized for binary data (development files)
has caused the Debian Bug report #
g/debian/c-blosc
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libblosc-dev - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary
data (development files)
libblosc1 - high performance meta-compressor optimized for binary data
To access further information about this package, please
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-j...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "NatTable":
* Package Name : nattable
Version : 1.5.0+dfsg-1
Upstream author : Nat
Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2018 04:20:21 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: hdparm/9.54+ds-1 -- tune hard disk parameters for
high performance
has caused the Debian Bug report #891138,
regarding RFS: hdparm/9.54+ds-1 -- tune hard disk parameters for high
performance
to be
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hdparm"
* Package name: hdparm
Version : 9.54+ds-1
It builds those binary packages:
hdparm - tune hard disk parameters for high performance
hdparm-udeb - tune
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:05:53 +0100
with message-id <20170125180553.g7amuynwwuwfd...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#852474: RFS: hdparm/9.51+ds-1 -- tune hard disk
parameters for high performance
has caused the Debian Bug report #852474,
regarding RFS: hdparm/9.5
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: mailatgo...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hdparm":
* Package name: hdparm
Version : 9.51
Upstream Author : Mark Lord
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/hdparm/fil
Your message dated Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:27:04 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: arrayfire/3.0.1-1 [ITP] -- High performance
library for parallel computing
has caused the Debian Bug report #786814,
regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.0.1-1 [ITP] -- High performance library for parallel
: BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: C++
Description : High performance library for parallel computing
It builds the following binary packages:
libarrayfire-cpu3 -- Shared library (CPU backend)
libarrayfire-cpu3-dbg -- Debug symbols for CPU backend shlib
libarrayfire-cpu-dev -- Development
Your message dated Sun, 22 Feb 2015 16:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pyoperators/0.13.5-2 -- Operators and solvers for
high-performance computing.
has caused the Debian Bug report #778847,
regarding RFS: pyoperators/0.13.5-2 -- Operators and solvers for
high
Upstream Author : Pierre Chanial
> * URL :http://pchanial.github.io/pyoperators/
> * License : CeCILL-B
> Programming Lang: Python
> Description : Operators and solvers for high-performance
> computing.
>
> It builds the following binary packages:
>
* License : CeCILL-B
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Operators and solvers for high-performance
computing.
It builds the following binary packages:
python-pyoperators -- Python 2 version of the module
python3-pyoperators -- Python 3 version of the module
Changes since last upload
Your message dated Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pyoperators/0.13.5-1 -- Operators and solvers for
high-performance computing.
has caused the Debian Bug report #778252,
regarding RFS: pyoperators/0.13.5-1 -- Operators and solvers for
high
* License : CeCILL-B
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Operators and solvers for high-performance
computing.
It builds the following binary packages:
python-pyoperators -- Python 2 version of the module
python3-pyoperators -- Python 3 version of the module
Changes since last uploa
Your message dated Sat, 18 Oct 2014 04:24:39 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pyoperators/0.13-1 [ITP #762752][SoB] --
Operators and solvers for high-performance computing.
has caused the Debian Bug report #765561,
regarding RFS: pyoperators/0.13-1 [ITP #762752][SoB
solvers for high-performance computing.
The rationales behind why to have this software packaged for Debian are
explained
in the ITP bug [1].
This source package builds the following binary packages:
python-pyoperators -- Python 2 version of the module
python3-pyoperators -- Python 3 version of the
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:50:12 -0400
with message-id <8761io5jej@cecht.legt.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#754962: RFS: tiptop/2.2 [ITP] -- performance
monitoring tool for Linux
has caused the Debian Bug report #754962,
regarding RFS: tiptop/2.2-1 [ITP] -- performance moni
On 18/07/14 15:38, Vincent Legout wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
Hi Vincent,
how sponsors are able to spot all these things, amazes me. :)
>
> Tomasz Buchert writes:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tiptop":
>
> I'm interested in sponsoring tiptop, I just have some comments:
>
> The pac
Hi Tomasz,
Tomasz Buchert writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tiptop":
I'm interested in sponsoring tiptop, I just have some comments:
The package doesn't provide the tiptoprc file from upstream. I think it
would make sense to install it somewhere even if it is not used, maybe
utils
It builds those binary packages:
tiptop - performance monitoring for Linux via hardware counters
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/tiptop
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using th
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Let's just agree that it helps me in helping you getting your
> packages updated in Debian if you document that you thought about
> the lintian warnings (by overriding them with a good comment
> attached).
I see; there's no problem at all for me to do that. It would require
c
On 15-07-14 18:46, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a
>> symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned
>> dependency?
>
> Symbols files are ultimately unapplicable for Objective-C libraries
> (see #7492
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:42:40 +0200
with message-id <53c56810.9030...@wollumbin.marsaxlokk.dhcp.io>
and subject line gnustep-performance_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW
has caused the Debian Bug report #753348,
regarding RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep perfo
Paul Gevers wrote:
> I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a
> symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned
> dependency?
Symbols files are ultimately unapplicable for Objective-C libraries
(see #749202). Using them can be very harmful -- lax depende
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a
symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned dependency?
See lintian info tag:
I: libperformance0.5: no-symbols-control-file
usr/lib/libPerformance.so.0.5.0
N:
N:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-performance".
* Package name: gnustep-performance
Version : 0.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Richard Frith-Macdonald
* URL : http://gnustep.org
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:23:37 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: libr3/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- high-performance URL
router library
has caused the Debian Bug report #748870,
regarding RFS: libr3/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- high-performance URL router library
to be marked as done
- High-performance URL router library
libr3-dbg - High-performance URL router library (debug symbols)
libr3-dev - High-performance URL router library (development files)
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> 117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-)
Yes, two years passed since previous stable release of uHub.
> Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor.
Unfortunately my regular sponsor (Dmitry E. Oboukhov) currently is busy.
Package is waiting for up
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:58:57PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
> important as I see in debian-devel-announce mailing list [2].
Sorry, but no:
117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-)
I'm ok with sponsoring ta
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to the debian-s390 mailing list)
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub" [1]. Almost a month
passed without any reply.
This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
important as I see in debian-devel-anno
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 672290 RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced
> Direct Connect p2p hub
Bug #672290 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: uhub/0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1
(updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
Chang
r is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
> package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
>
> It builds those binary packages:
> uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
>
> The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
>
uot; which is already available in Debian.
>
> It builds those binary packages:
> uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
>
> The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
> lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes
>
> You can look at package rules here:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The
Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:22:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658775: fixed in ptop 3.6.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #658775,
regarding RFS: ptop/3.6.2-5 -- PostgreSQL performance monitoring tool akin to
top
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:22:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658775: fixed in ptop 3.6.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #658775,
regarding RFS: ptop/3.6.2-5 -- PostgreSQL performance monitoring tool akin to
top
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Section : misc
It builds those binary packages:
ptop - PostgreSQL performance monitoring tool akin to top
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget
My apologies, I've by mistake left some fields blank.
Upstream author: PostgreSQL team
URL: http://ptop.projects.postgresql.org/
License: BSD
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* License : [fill in]
Section : misc
It builds those binary packages:
ptop - PostgreSQL performance monitoring tool akin to top
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop
Alternatively, one can do
URL : ftp://ftp.lcp.nrl.navy.mil/pub/nuttcp/
* License : GPLv2
Section : net
It builds these binary packages:
nuttcp - network performance measurement tool
This is a newer version of the package than the last RFS i sent due to
the fact that i was able to get upstrea
Kobayashi Noritada wrote:
> Sorry for my late reply. I was out and offline for a few days...
no problem.
> Thank you very much for reviewing my package. I've uploaded a fixed
> version per your comments.
welcome :)
> Could you please upload it?
done.
if you want/need further sponsoring, con
Hi,
Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > - dget
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/serf/serf_0.1.0-1~pre.1.dsc
>
> I guess you meant
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/serf/serf_0.1.0-1~pre.2.dsc
Yeah, right. Thank you for pointing out!
I reuploaded a newer version just before
Hi,
Sorry for my late reply. I was out and offline for a few days...
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/serf/serf_0.1.0-1~pre.1.dsc
>
> * should: remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog.
> * must: use 0.1.0-1 for the next upload to mentors.
Kobayashi Noritada wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/serf/serf_0.1.0-1~pre.1.dsc
* should: remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog.
* must: use 0.1.0-1 for the next upload to mentors.
the rest is good, if you fix above things, i'm happy to upload it.
--
Add
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:14:54 +0900 (JST)
Kobayashi Noritada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "serf". Since this is my
> first experience of packaging a library, I'd love to have it reviewed.
> The package revision suffix "~pre.2" should be d
ary packages:
libserf-0-0 - high-performance asynchronous HTTP client library
libserf-0-0-dev - high-performance asynchronous HTTP client library headers
The upload would fix these bugs: 403704
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/serf
I demand that Shachar Shemesh may or may not have written...
> I'm sorry if this is well known. I haven't seen it anywhere, and I thought
> I'd share it with everybody.
> During the initial package development stage, there is a lot of repeated
> compilation of the same package over and over again
* Shachar Shemesh [Sat, 21 May 2005 14:28:31 +0300]:
> In order to set it up, apt-get install ccache. Then create a directory
> somewhere and put there symlinks from cc, gcc, c++ and g++ to
> /usr/bin/ccache.
Such directory is already provided by the ccache package itself
(/usr/lib/ccache),
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 14:28 +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Personally, I wouldn't use this for compiling the package after you have
> done with the debian related development, but the ccache author claims
> it's totally safe for that as well.
I haven't had any problems with ccache on my unoffi
Hi all,
I'm sorry if this is well known. I haven't seen it anywhere, and I
thought I'd share it with everybody.
During the initial package development stage, there is a lot of repeated
compilation of the same package over and over again. With some packages
that's not so bad, but some take a
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/263830
* Package name: idzebra
Version : 1.3.24
Upstream Author : Adam Dickmeiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.indexdata.dk/pub/zebra/
* License : GPL
Description : high-performance, text indexing and retrieval
http://users.adelphia.net/~david.everly emilda/sarge/
* Package name: idzebra
Version : 1.3.17
Upstream Author : Adam Dickmeiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.indexdata.dk/pub/zebra/
* License : GPL
Description : High-performance
http://users.adelphia.net/~david.everly emilda/sarge/
* Package name: idzebra
Version : 1.3.17
Upstream Author : Adam Dickmeiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.indexdata.dk/pub/zebra/
* License : GPL
Description : High-performance
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
