Re: adding icon to debian/

2020-10-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi Mechtilde. Am 04.10.20 um 12:03 schrieb Mechtilde: > I want to add an icon for the file jverein desktop as a *.png. So I put > this file into the debian/ directory. > > Now I get the message to put it into debian/source/include-binaries. > > After doing it I get the following massage: > dpkg-so

Re: error: 'char16_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'wchar_t'? (Was: Bug#899129: prime-phylo: FTBFS: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j8 -Oline returned exit code 2)

2018-05-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:20:05PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 09:05:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > cd /build/prime-phylo-1.0.11/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cxx/libraries/prime > > && /usr/bin/c++ -DONLY_ONE_TIMESAMPLE -DPERTURBED_NODE > > -Dprime_phylo_EXPORTS

Bug#887369: RFS: libreoffice-style-papirus/20170228-1 [ITP]

2018-01-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:01:32PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 08:20:10PM +0100, I wrote: > > An icon theme might be more work than a cursor or window theme as whatever > > needs the new icon would borrow from another theme and thus look out of > > place. > > > > > Y

Bug#883098: RFS: libreoffice-texmaths/0.43-1 [ITP]

2017-11-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:49:52AM -0600, kkremit...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 19:20 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:05:43AM -0600, kkremit...@gmail.com wrote: > > > * Package name: libreoffice-texmaths > > >

Bug#883098: RFS: libreoffice-texmaths/0.43-1 [ITP]

2017-11-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:05:43AM -0600, kkremit...@gmail.com wrote: > * Package name: libreoffice-texmaths > Version : 0.43-1 > Upstream Author : Roland Baudin > * URL : htthttp://roland65.free.fr/texmaths/ > * License : GPL2 > Section : tex > > It

Re: Droping v5 extension to library names

2017-06-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 08:14:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > when libraries were build with gcc 5 'v5' was added to the soversion > inside the library name. Should this extension be kept even if there is > a new soversion. For instance for the package libbpp-core2v5 which has > now sover

Bug#827715: RFS: muttprint/0.73-5.2 [NMU, RC] -- Pretty printing of mails

2016-06-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:01:24PM +0900, Sean Whitton wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of muttprint, fixing a stretch RC > bug (older than 7 days and no maintainer activity). I use muttprint That is not correct. It is only RC since *2* days. "Severity set to 'serious' from 'import

Re: Endianess testing?

2015-09-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 02:26:42PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > how do I test the endianess of a system for the inclusion in > debian/rules? > > lscpu | fgrep -q "Little Endian" > > comes in my mind; but is this safe? qemu-userland would probably report > something wrong here? You don't need to

Re: tophat: Help needed with boost

2014-03-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:31:21PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2014-03-18 14:19, Andreas Tille wrote: > > segment_juncs.o: In function `boost::thread::get_id() const': > > /usr/include/boost/thread/detail/thread.hpp:730: undefined reference to > > `boost::thread::native_handle()' > >

Re: RFS: wavemon (already in Debian)

2012-02-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:53:50AM -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:46:34PM +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wavemon". > > > > * Package name: wavemon > >Version : 0.7.3-1 > > I'd certainly like to see an

Re: RFS: mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel and Icedove

2008-06-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: > mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extensions for Iceweasel and Icedove > mozvoikko-iceweasel - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel If at all (see also below) iceweasel-mozvoikko. > Package mozvoikko installs the spell-checker extension and mozvoikko-icew

Re: RFS: openoffice.org-voikko (was: oo2-voikko)

2006-09-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 08:22 schrieben Sie: > I did the change to 1.1-2 yesterday evening. I soon got a few notices that > multiple spellcheckers work in OOo just fine. What do you think? Of course Right. > it's not maybe that wise to use more than one spellchecker for a language,

Re: RFS: openoffice.org-voikko (was: oo2-voikko)

2006-09-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Montag, 25. September 2006 18:40 schrieb Timo Jyrinki: > URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openoffice.org-voikko > > I uploaded this packages despite the remaining problems, so that there'd > be the newest version at mentors.debian.net anyway. Hopefully the first > 3-4 pa

Re: use of xvfb-run in pbuilder builds

2006-07-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Montag, 3. Juli 2006 23:33 schrieb Justin Pryzby: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:43:50PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > > > I am trying to use xvfb-run to permit pbuilder to build some packages > > which need to connect to X. > If you're aiming to get the package uploaded, this isn't allowed. You

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Vedran Fura? wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > After this is fixed (and maybe the version changed) I'll sponsor it. > > Uploaded to mentors: > http://mentors-test.workaround.org/debian/pool/main/m/myspell-hr/ Uploaded. Regards, Rene signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Vedran Fura? wrote: > The upstream doesn't provide any version information so there shouldn't be > any problem if I fake new upstream releases: 1.0-1 -> 1.1-1 -> 1.2-1 . Can't you use dates then? Like MMDD-a? Anyway, I just saw a bug testing this for upload again... You register the h

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Vedran Fura? wrote: > % cat debian/openoffice.org-hyphenation-hr.dictlistinfo > HYPH hr HR hyph_hr_HR > > also: > > % cat debian/myspell-hr.dictlistinfo > DICT hr HR hr_HR Yes, OK... If I oversaw the first, sorry. > > irrelevant. not used by any myspell-using app. > > I know, but you ment

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Vedran Fura? wrote: > I just copied debian/rules and control from myspell-en or something. Could openoffice.org-dictionaries, yes. (openoffice.org-dictionaries is the source package for myspell-en-us/myspell-en-gb) > you tell me what exactly should I remove from debian/rules? But, yes, it >

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Rene Engelhard wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > - Please make everything -1 since the whole thing is your "* Initial > > release" > > - Close the ITP (see above) > > - up-to-date standards-version is 3.7.2 > > - You don't really need the dh_listp

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard wrote: > - Please make everything -1 since the whole thing is your "* Initial > release" > - Close the ITP (see above) > - up-to-date standards-version is 3.7.2 > - You don't really need the dh_listpa

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Eddy Petrisor wrote: > > > - myspell-hr (Croatian dictionary for myspell) > > > > > > Like bfilter, but this one is lintian/linda clean. > > > > > > When I find a sponsor

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Eddy Petrisor wrote: > > - myspell-hr (Croatian dictionary for myspell) > > > > Like bfilter, but this one is lintian/linda clean. > > > > When I find a sponsor I will add a "Initial upload to debian...closes ITP > > bug number" entry to debian/changelog. > > This should be done beforehand

Re: Q on fixed-in-experimental

2006-04-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:18:15AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:14 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > When a bug is tagged "fixed-in-experimental", does that bug number still > > > have to appear in debian/changelog for the next upload to unstab

Fwd: Re: Sponsor wanted - myspell-cz, libnova & more..

2005-11-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
: Re: Sponsor wanted - myspell-cz, libnova & more.. Date: Montag, 7. November 2005 17:27 From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Cc: Petr Kubanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, Am Montag, 7. November 2005 12:54 sch

Re: Sponsor wanted - myspell-cz, libnova & more..

2005-11-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Montag, 7. November 2005 12:54 schrieb Petr Kubanek: > I packed myspell-cz, so one will be able to get Czech spelling in ^^ > Debian, which will work with OpenOffice and Mozilla. It's there: > > http://lascaux.asu.cas.cz/~petr/myspell-cs-cz_20051101-1.tar.gz

Re: RFS: jaxml -- XML document generation for Python

2005-08-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitri Alenitchev wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:53:22PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote > > > Jaxml is a python module that defines a class XML_document, which allows > > > easy and trouble-free generation of XML document

Re: RFS: jaxml -- XML document generation for Python

2005-08-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Dmitri Alenitchev wrote: > Jaxml is a python module that defines a class XML_document, which allows > easy and trouble-free generation of XML documents. If it's a python module, naming it "jaxp" violates the python policy. Go read it ;) Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: pbuilder fails when looking for X / XOpenDisplay [solved]

2005-08-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
s and a empty dummy package anyway... Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Cant build a simple package.

2005-01-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 13:42 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > http://www.ibiblio.org/... > > Yes! I had to 'mkdir ./debian/DEBIAN' manually. :-) > Anyway, manually creating ".debian/DEBIAN" is not clearly mentionned in > tha Debian new Maintainer gui

Re: Cant build a simple package.

2005-01-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote: > #!/usr/bin/make -f > > export DH_VERBOSE=1 > > configure: > > build: > > clean: > > install: > > dh_testdir > cp minimalist.pl $(CURDIR)/debian/minimalist > > binary-indep: > > binary-arch: > > dh_builddeb > > binary: bi

Re: Simple Debian Package Creation?

2004-11-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Joey Hess wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > any debian rules. > > > > the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken. > > No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name > the package's sourc

Re: Simple Debian Package Creation?

2004-11-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Joey Hess wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > any debian rules. > > > > the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken. > > No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name > the package's sourc

Re: Simple Debian Package Creation?

2004-11-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, I know both the deb (Debian developer) and the rpm (at work) side.. Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 17:47 schrieb Zach Garner: > First: > 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of > scripts built on top of each other is really confusing. You don't need to use them... m

Re: Simple Debian Package Creation?

2004-11-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, I know both the deb (Debian developer) and the rpm (at work) side.. Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 17:47 schrieb Zach Garner: > First: > 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of > scripts built on top of each other is really confusing. You don't need to use them... m

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

2004-10-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time. Uploaded. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

2004-10-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time. Uploaded. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

2004-10-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in > August. I need a sponsor to upload it. > > In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply > with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs > (3 out of 7)

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

2004-10-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in > August. I need a sponsor to upload it. > > In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply > with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs > (3 out of 7)

Re: Sponsor for openoffice.org-help-pl

2004-08-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > I've packaged polish help for openoffice.org. The package > openoffice.org-help-pl is now on mentors and I'm recently > looking for sponsor. Anyone? Put it somewhere web-accssible (no, I don't mean mentors.debian.net) and I'll look... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`.

Re: Sponsor for openoffice.org-help-pl

2004-08-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > I've packaged polish help for openoffice.org. The package > openoffice.org-help-pl is now on mentors and I'm recently > looking for sponsor. Anyone? Put it somewhere web-accssible (no, I don't mean mentors.debian.net) and I'll look... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`.

Re: problem with debug libraries

2004-07-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, martin f krafft wrote: [ snip ] > I am using dh_strip --keep-debug to keep these binaries purposely in > place. Thus, I should probably override the last two errors. > However, I am unsure about the first six lines. What do they mean? > What am I

Re: problem with debug libraries

2004-07-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, martin f krafft wrote: [ snip ] > I am using dh_strip --keep-debug to keep these binaries purposely in > place. Thus, I should probably override the last two errors. > However, I am unsure about the first six lines. What do they mean? > What am I

Re: Removing Other Packages' Conflicting Files

2004-07-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in > another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also > contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A > Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contai

Re: Removing Other Packages' Conflicting Files

2004-07-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in > another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also > contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A > Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contai

Re: CVS versions

2004-07-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Dan Korostelev wrote: > How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's > no tarballs and no in directory name. Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co. and name it something like +cvsYYMMDD Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: CVS versions

2004-07-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Dan Korostelev wrote: > How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's > no tarballs and no in directory name. Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co. and name it something like +cvsYYMMDD Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

2004-06-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in > > Build-Depends even. > > /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore > build-essential. XML::Parse

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

2004-06-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in > > Build-Depends even. > > /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore > build-essential. XML::Parse

Re: RFS: swftools - collection of SWF (Flash) manipulation and generation

2004-06-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Clement nodens Hermann wrote: [ snip ] > ~ It also provide librfxswf, a fully featured library which can be used > ~ for standalone SWF generation. It includes support for bitmaps, buttons, > ~ shapes, text, fonts, sound etc. It also has support for ActionScript > ~ using the Ming ActionCompil

Re: RFS: swftools - collection of SWF (Flash) manipulation and generation

2004-06-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Clement nodens Hermann wrote: [ snip ] > ~ It also provide librfxswf, a fully featured library which can be used > ~ for standalone SWF generation. It includes support for bitmaps, buttons, > ~ shapes, text, fonts, sound etc. It also has support for ActionScript > ~ using the Ming ActionCompil

Re: renaming source package

2004-05-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Obviously 1.3.3 is less then 20040120, how can I cope with this issue? epoch. Grüße/Regards, René - -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~r

Re: renaming source package

2004-05-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Obviously 1.3.3 is less then 20040120, how can I cope with this issue? epoch. Grüße/Regards, René - -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~r

Re: renaming source package

2004-05-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > The other approach is to ask for removal of the old source package and > upload a new one which generates the same binary packages. This seems to > be the best approach but I'm a bit scared about the transition phase ..

Re: renaming source package

2004-05-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > The other approach is to ask for removal of the old source package and > upload a new one which generates the same binary packages. This seems to > be the best approach but I'm a bit scared about the transition phase ..

Re: Problem with Files section in .changes

2004-04-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Steffen Nissen wrote: > Tried to build it with pbuilder, but still the same problem. Am I doing > something wrong? You probably are missing an appropriate Section: field for the source part (the first one) of your debian/control file..) Grüße/Re

Re: Problem with Files section in .changes

2004-04-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Steffen Nissen wrote: > Tried to build it with pbuilder, but still the same problem. Am I doing > something wrong? You probably are missing an appropriate Section: field for the source part (the first one) of your debian/control file..) Grüße/Re

Re: Make me understand the bug system better.

2004-03-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Ali Bombali wrote: > The right way to do this is to use the X-Debbugs-CC header. Add a line like > this to your message's mail header (not to the pseudo header with the > package field): > > X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Could someone gi

Re: Make me understand the bug system better.

2004-03-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Ali Bombali wrote: > The right way to do this is to use the X-Debbugs-CC header. Add a line like > this to your message's mail header (not to the pseudo header with the > package field): > > X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Could someone gi

Re: Should I always clean in debian/rules before making binary?

2004-03-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ read http://learn.to.quote ] Hi, elijah wright wrote: > frank, can i beg you to doublecheck the way your last name is encoded in > your email client? it corrupts the screen state in pine EVERY time i get > one of your email messages... mutt doesn

Re: Should I always clean in debian/rules before making binary?

2004-03-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ read http://learn.to.quote ] Hi, elijah wright wrote: > frank, can i beg you to doublecheck the way your last name is encoded in > your email client? it corrupts the screen state in pine EVERY time i get > one of your email messages... mutt doesn

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > Thanks. Now revision 3 is on sf. > > I must admit that I skipped the NMU chapter. But still I do not find such > a statement that dots in debian revision are reserved. Chapter 5.11.4.1 of > the developers-reference says "should add a new minor version number". > Does

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > Thanks. Now revision 3 is on sf. > > I must admit that I skipped the NMU chapter. But still I do not find such > a statement that dots in debian revision are reserved. Chapter 5.11.4.1 of > the developers-reference says "should add a new minor version number". > Does

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > That something was time passing by :) To create all the files I wrote a > small script which created a orig.tar.gz and calls dpkg-source -b etc. > Unfortunately I made it recreate the orig.tar.gz for each run, resulting > in different time stamps inside the tar and sl

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > That something was time passing by :) To create all the files I wrote a > small script which created a orig.tar.gz and calls dpkg-source -b etc. > Unfortunately I made it recreate the orig.tar.gz for each run, resulting > in different time stamps inside the tar and sl

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > > I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not > give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the > changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > > W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 > > I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not > give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the > changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8 > (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of > course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files, > including .dsc etc. are available at sourcefo

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8 > (basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of > course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files, > including .dsc etc. are available at sourcefo

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > No. Don't package it Debian-native even if you are the upstream. It's > not. What I forgot here: Fix this: dpkg-source: warning: source directory `./fig2sxd' is not - `fig2sxd-0.9a' Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Eng

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Alexander Bürger wrote: > > I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage, > > changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not > > complain. I would be happy if someone could check an

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > No. Don't package it Debian-native even if you are the upstream. It's > not. What I forgot here: Fix this: dpkg-source: warning: source directory `./fig2sxd' is not - `fig2sxd-0.9a' Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Eng

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Alexander Bürger wrote: > > I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage, > > changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not > > complain. I would be happy if someone could check an

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage, > changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not > complain. I would be happy if someone could check and sponsor my package. > It is available at http://fig2sxd.sf.net/. T

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2004-01-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alexander Bürger wrote: > I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage, > changelog, copyright), but still it's my first package. Lintian does not > complain. I would be happy if someone could check and sponsor my package. > It is available at http://fig2sxd.sf.net/. T

Re: RFS(3): kdiff3 - compares and merges 2 or 3 files or directories

2004-01-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Eike zyro Sauer wrote: > (*) My former sponsor seems to be MIA (Rene, are you out there?). *raises hand* :) Yes. I am. And I am not MIA. I just forgot you :/ Grüße/Regards, René P.S: Get a MUA so you can cosspost rightly or let it be... -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Deve

Re: RFS(3): kdiff3 - compares and merges 2 or 3 files or directories

2004-01-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Eike zyro Sauer wrote: > (*) My former sponsor seems to be MIA (Rene, are you out there?). *raises hand* :) Yes. I am. And I am not MIA. I just forgot you :/ Grüße/Regards, René P.S: Get a MUA so you can cosspost rightly or let it be... -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Deve

Re: pbuilder ${shlibs:Depends} yields libc6-2.2.4-4 ???

2003-12-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote: > dpkg-deb --info /var/cache/pbuilder/result/*.deb |grep Depends: >Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4) > > So then in an attempt to resolve this I add DISTRIBUTION=woody to my Why? This libc6 Depends: is fully correct for builds on woody... > Why does building a package with

Re: pbuilder ${shlibs:Depends} yields libc6-2.2.4-4 ???

2003-12-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote: > dpkg-deb --info /var/cache/pbuilder/result/*.deb |grep Depends: >Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4) > > So then in an attempt to resolve this I add DISTRIBUTION=woody to my Why? This libc6 Depends: is fully correct for builds on woody... > Why does building a package with

Re: RFS(2): kdiff3 - compares and merges 2 or 3 files or directories

2003-11-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Eike zyro Sauer wrote: > I'm still looking for someone to test and upload the following package. [ snip ] replied to him on -qt-kde where he posted that request too... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people

Re: RFS(2): kdiff3 - compares and merges 2 or 3 files or directories

2003-11-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Eike zyro Sauer wrote: > I'm still looking for someone to test and upload the following package. [ snip ] replied to him on -qt-kde where he posted that request too... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people

Re: Adopting orphaned packages (axkit and relatives)

2003-11-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > I am currently running AxKit on woody + backports of many packages on > which it depends. If I understand correctly, I will need to build on > sarge (or sid?) in order to produce a package fit for upload. Should I clean sid. > begin by setting up a sarge system,

Re: Adopting orphaned packages (axkit and relatives)

2003-11-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > I am currently running AxKit on woody + backports of many packages on > which it depends. If I understand correctly, I will need to build on > sarge (or sid?) in order to produce a package fit for upload. Should I clean sid. > begin by setting up a sarge system,

Re: Newly created packages from the wishlist

2003-08-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Ky Vinh Tran Luu wrote: > that mentors are not too busy preparing for the sid release. There won't be a sid release ever SCNR, Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Newly created packages from the wishlist

2003-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Ky Vinh Tran Luu wrote: > that mentors are not too busy preparing for the sid release. There won't be a sid release ever SCNR, Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: RFS: ispell-lt -- Lithuanian dictionaries

2003-08-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote: > I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've > created (the ITP is bug #206290). [ snip ] I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections. Beware, I wrote the myspell policy... :) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- D

Re: RFS: ispell-lt -- Lithuanian dictionaries

2003-08-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote: > I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've > created (the ITP is bug #206290). [ snip ] I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections. Beware, I wrote the myspell policy... :) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- D

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. > > bullshit > > Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no > packages sponsor

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive. > > bullshit > > Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no > packages sponsor

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: > > > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, > > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, > > but I can't upload it because I'm not y

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Adam Kessel wrote: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I yes. You won't be approved with no package in the a

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: > On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: > > > Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, > > so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, > > but I can't upload it because I'm not y

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Adam Kessel wrote: > I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my > package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to > include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I yes. You won't be approved with no package in the a

Re: Some packages to you for testing

2003-06-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jaime Robles wrote: > I have packaged two KDE apps. > KWifimanager, a WIFI card configuration program. > KImageMapEditor, a html image map editor. > > I would like you to test them and check for bugs, errors and so on. kimagemapeditor is already in the archive, currently maintain

Re: Some packages to you for testing

2003-06-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jaime Robles wrote: > I have packaged two KDE apps. > KWifimanager, a WIFI card configuration program. > KImageMapEditor, a html image map editor. > > I would like you to test them and check for bugs, errors and so on. kimagemapeditor is already in the archive, currently maintain

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? In this case not. In many other cases also not... Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? In this case not. In many other cases also not... Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTE

Re: The Debian Mentors Project

2003-05-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
it is f*cked. Is this Depends: done manually? I do not thing dpkg-shlibdeps did that. Where is libc6? > I think upload must be moderated somehow. Even the uploader himself claim > that he is unsure about licence of the product. Jup. That is bad. Christoph: setzen, sechs :) Regards, Rene --

Re: lintian and linda

2003-05-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
fy a .changes file, Lintian will process all packages >listed in that file. > > I could not find an analogously statement for linda. linda does that too. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http

Re: Lintian error when packaging an app.

2003-05-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
reports and MANY kde apps seems to suffer the same > error in lintian... > http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tsymlink-should-be-relative.html Yes. That's why am ignoring it right now... Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http

Re: openoffice.org- l10n, spellcheck ,help -hu

2003-05-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
get it submitted for OpenOffice.org's upstream later...) !! Nobody please sponsor these packages now !! Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Gn

  1   2   >