On 6/29/25 5:16 AM, Ben Westover wrote:
I have tried a few times to upload in the past three days. I always get
rejected with the message "ACL dm: not allowed to upload source package
'libquazip1-qt5'". Are you sure I was added to the access list properly?
It's not there yet (libquazip1-qt6 is)
On 9/9/23 09:17, Lorenzo wrote:
and at the end of the build I see the lintian error,
what I'm doing wrong?
You're not. lintian hasn't been updated in time to know about bookworm:
https://bugs.debian.org/1033894
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41
On 8/29/23 10:38, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
FTBFS on several architectures:
That's actually a related issue, I am working with upstream to fix
those. In order to do so, I'd like to co-install i386 and amd64. Right
now I can only install one *or* the other. I'd like to install *both*:
You can't
On 8/29/23 09:45, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Could someone please review what I did wrong for src:highway. For some
reason I cannot install libhwy1:amd64 + libhwy1:i386 on my system:
FTBFS on several architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=highway
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
On 1/13/23 08:14, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
This is a follow-up to my previous message. This time libjxl is build
on s390x but the autopkgtest does not seems to see the new binaries:
[...]
E: Unable to locate package libjxl-devtools
E: Unable to locate package libjpegxl-java
run-unit-test
On 1/12/23 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am trying to understand why src:jpeg-xl is in Needs-Build state for
the past 7 days:
* https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=jpeg-xl&suite=sid
I cannot remember where else I should be looking for a hint of this
state ? I tried there but did
On 12/31/22 23:39, Barry wrote:
This is where i need help understanding what i do to get that deb.
Wait for it to migrate to testing. Keep an eye on the excuses:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qscintilla2
Or install it from unstable in the meantime.
Testing migration is complicated by the o
On 2/22/21 3:08 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> A follow up question, dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) suggests to use
>
> Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.17.14)
>
> But of the several packages that use rm_conffile that I checked, none
> of them is using `Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.17.14)` in their control
> file. Was I no
On 2/22/21 2:23 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> However, when I did some research, I found that most packages put
> rm_conffile in the .maintscript file. Where does that come from? It
> is even not in the man page. OK that I put rm_conffile in the
> .maintscript file as well, instead of in all 3 scripts (pr
On 11/3/20 8:50 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I am trying to use the following dh_link command:
>
> $ cat d/rules
> [...]
> dh_link -p$(pkg_dev) usr/include/charls usr/include/CharLS
>
> Which gives:
>
> $ dpkg -c ../libcharls-dev_2.1.0+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
> [...]
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0
On 4/24/20 12:01 AM, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the TeX Live packages do not migrate to testing, although there is no RC
> bug and they are old enough. The only reason I see is:
>
> autopkgtest for jupyter-sphinx-theme/0.0.6+ds1-9: amd64: Regression ♻ ,
> arm64: Regression ♻
It has a popcon
On 4/16/20 8:34 AM, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> schroedinger-coordgenlibs is not migrated although the delay is over
> [1]. Is there something I can do about it? This package prevents
> migration of other packages.
The britney update_output shows:
trying: schroedinger-coordgenlibs
skipped: schroed
On 7/13/19 9:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
>> wrote:
>>> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes...
>>
>> Backport for B
On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> wrote:
>> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes...
>
> Backport for Buster:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit
> Please spons
On 07/08/2018 10:41 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Does anyone have a tip or a solution to the problem?
codesearch can help to find watch file examples.
> Or is there a package in which this has already been solved?
uversionmangle does the trick, see the attached watch files.
Kind Regards,
Bas
On 05/15/2018 08:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If I try science-team or r-pkg-team it returns nothing. Any idea
> what might be wrong here?
You're not parsing the other pages of results.
https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/#pagination
Kind Regards,
Bas
On 04/06/2018 05:48 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 04/06/2018 02:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> after adding a symbols file to libbpp-core all other architectures are
>>> fail
On 04/06/2018 02:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> after adding a symbols file to libbpp-core all other architectures are
> failing due to different symbols (see below for ppc64el[1]) but others
> are failing as well. What is the correct way to fix this?
Use (arch=ppc64el) tags for the symbols, or so
The parallel option is enabled by default for compat level >= 10, try
setting `dh --no-parallel` to disable the parallel option again.
Kind Regards,
Bas
Hi Gudjon,
Please also fix #886171 with qwt (6.1.3-1) by incorporating the attached
changes, specifically the dh_makeshlibs override.
Kind Regards,
Bas
diff -Nru qwt-6.1.2/debian/changelog qwt-6.1.2/debian/changelog
--- qwt-6.1.2/debian/changelog 2016-09-05 14:05:19.0 +0200
+++ qwt-6.1.
On 10/01/2016 07:39 PM, Klaus Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 30.09.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
>> So, if you can answer the above points and ping back, I'll be happy to do a
>> review and maybe an upload.
>
> Thanks, that would be great!
Regarding package review, please also build the mo
On 09/30/2016 02:46 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> "the netcdf package. There was an ITP for the netcdf-libcf package, but
> development of this source upstream is stalled.
>
> cf-python depends on netcdf-python being packaged first, and will be
> maintained
> within the Debian GIS team."
>
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:15:08 +0200 Klaus Zimmermann wrote:
> Mattia already declined sponsoring on grounds of not sponsoring Debian
> virgins like myself.
Ross Gammon's initial ITP intended to maintain this package in the
Debian GIS team alongside the netcdf packages where I'm available for
spons
On 09/16/2016 10:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So what might be the problem here?
The strict dependencies on sphinx in cdist-doc apparently.
>From the britney output:
Trying easy from autohinter: clustalo/1.2.3-1 sphinx/1.4.6-1
start: 57+556: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-0:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1:m-556
or
On 09/15/2016 10:02 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 15/09/16 08:53, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> I know this approach
>>> works, but is it the "right" way? Does it matter?
>>
>> your way is the best one if you also add a patch to automatically
>> install the file
>> inside the upstream build
> (can you please check for other hdf breakages in the archive?)
The archive rebuilds resulted in some similar bugreports, the
outstanding one is mathgl (#835680), I've submitted a patch to the
bugreport last Sunday.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE
Hi Felix,
Thanks for your changes.
On 08/06/2016 04:35 PM, Felix Natter wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes:
>> Consider adding the --parallel option to dh in debian/rules to enable
>> the use of parallel builds with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=".
>
> done. (
Hi Felix,
I've had a look at your package and some comments follow. In general the
package looks good, but there is room for improvement.
Please consider bumping the debhelper compatibility to 9.
Also change the LGPL-2.0 shortname to LGPL-2+ to better reflects the "or
(at your option) any later
On 05/22/2016 02:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any hint?
The arch:all package cannot be built on the buildds:
https://bugs.debian.org/824999
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
On 05/20/2016 03:34 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> When I signed up some years ago, I got a user name with -guest appended. I
> guess that was the policy at the time. In any case, how can I change that?
You can get rid of the -guest suffix by becoming a DD or DM.
See also:
Alioth FAQ: 1.1. Why do I
On 05/16/2016 11:07 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> When reading the code it seems to me that actually a test whether this
> code works or not is intended and thus fixing the format is not in the
> intention of the authors. So I tried
>
> export DEB_BUILD_HARDENING_FORMAT:=0
> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS
Hi Brian,
This question is not very suitable for the mentors list, this list is
intended for help with packaging and other developer-related issues.
On 04/14/2016 09:17 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote:
> I am writing this email, not as a Debian Developer in-training, but instead
> asking advice from
>
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work kosmtik and its dependencies.
I've reviewed the package, and it needs a few changes.
Please update the Source URL in the copyright file to use the URL from
the watch file, the homepage link is not as appropriate for the
copyright file.
The Bug-* URLs in upstream/me
On 29-12-15 11:54, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> should I fix the spelling and reupload now or wait for the NEW queue.
I'd fix it in git now, and wait for the next upload until it passes the
NEW queue.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 5
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 20-11-15 20:25, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-leaflet-hash"
I pushed some changes to document the license & copyright for the
embedded copy of leaflet-src.js, and update the Vcs-Browser URL to use
HTTPS.
Wh
On 11-10-15 22:22, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Sebastiaan Couwenberg , 2015-10-08, 21:01:
>> To deal with the external usage of liblwgeom built from the postgis
>> sources, the upstream developers now use the -release libtool option
>> along with -version-info to better support ins
On 09-10-15 00:58, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 08/10/2015 13:40, Bas Couwenberg a écrit :
>
>> Due to the difficulties getting JCS [0] and its dependencies [1]
>> packaged, I've not been able to update to any of the newer JOSM upstream
>> releases making the josm package increasingly irrelevant. An
Hi Emmanuel,
On 09-10-15 00:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 08/10/2015 13:40, Bas Couwenberg a écrit :
>
>> Due to the difficulties getting JCS [0] and its dependencies [1]
>> packaged, I've not been able to update to any of the newer JOSM upstream
>> releases making the josm package increasingly
To deal with the external usage of liblwgeom built from the postgis
sources, the upstream developers now use the -release libtool option
along with -version-info to better support installation of multiple
postgis versions.
The -release option was added to support the multiple version use case
on W
On 01-09-15 14:22, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes:
>> On 01-09-15 11:51, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>> What is recommended way for the watch file that it automatically
>>> generated to correct version number for a newly created orig.tar file?
>> Ad
On 01-09-15 12:24, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-09-01 12:13:07)
>> Add the repacksuffix option, e.g.:
>>
>> version=3 opts=\ dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//,\
>> uversionmangle=s/$/+dfsg/,\ repacksuffix=+dfsg \
>> http://heasarc.gsfc.
On 01-09-15 11:51, Ole Streicher wrote:
> when using the Files-Excluded: tag in debian/copyright, in the past
> there was an "+dfsg" suffix added to the version number
> automatically. This seems to have changed; is there a reason for that?
> Is there any case to use Files-Excluded: *without* actua
Hi Sven,
Thanks for your work on sfcgal.
On 26-08-15 20:17, Sven Geggus wrote:
> I have just uploaded a new Version of sfcgal to mentors.debian.net.
>
> This is a very minor change. I included a patch from upstream which will
> make it compile again using boost boost 1.58 and gcc5
The Tracker r
On 20-08-15 12:52, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Gianfranco Costamagna , 2015-08-20, 10:29:
>> "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" should be added,
>
> FWIW, ${misc:Pre-Depends} was required for partial squeeze->wheezy
> upgrades. It is no longer necessary.
>
>> and the dev package should not marked as mu
On 20-08-15 00:51, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I keep getting the error message:
>
> Error: Unable to check the signature or the signature was invalid:
> ==> : UDFormatError: Signing key
> (80BFC3820C4B26E3, Jerome) has expired
>
> But my key has not expireed. On the other hand, it was renewed a few
On 19-08-15 23:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 19/08/15 14:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>> I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
>>> Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SS
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Forum:
>
> I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
> Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
> must be deposited somewhere: any idea ?
You can change your SSH key via the LDAP mail gateway:
"
Par
On 05-08-15 21:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Setting up pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy (0.invalid.0) ...
> aptitude: symbol lookup error: aptitude: undefined symbol:
> _ZN7cwidget7widgets5pager8set_textERKSsPKc
> [...]
> This is for a package that only Build-Depends debhelper. Other packages
> with m
On 29-07-15 23:33, Sven Geggus wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg schrieb am Mittwoch, den 29. Juli um 23:27 Uhr:
>
>> Did you perhaps upload to ftp-master instead of mentors?
>
> Unfortunately I already closed the terminal where I did the upload, but I do
> definitely have men
Hi Sven,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 29-07-15 22:48, Sven Geggus wrote:
> * Package name: sfcgal
> Version : 1.1.0-2~exp1
It looks like someone may have sponsored the upload already, I got a
bunch of "553 Could not create file" messages from dput:
Good signature on ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/19/2015 12:01 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 18/07/15 22:42, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Try to not use an annotated tag next time to keep all the changes
>> on the branch.
>
> Regarding the debian tag, I just
On 07/18/2015 10:35 PM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> The package is maintained in a git repository that can be found
> here:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/osrm.git/
You still need to finalize the package by setting the distribution:
dch -r -D unstable
git commit -m "Set distribu
On 07/18/2015 10:46 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07/18/2015 10:35 PM, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> The package is maintained in a git repository that can be found
>> here:
>>
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/osrm.git/
>
> You still need t
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on this package.
I noticed some updates to the copyright file were required to include
the changes in the new upstream release, I took the liberty to commit
those changes.
Unfortunately I cannot build the package because the pristine-tar branch
hasn't been updated
> since I'm back from vacation and upgraded my testing system I realised
> that when using pbuilder the Build-Depends of some package seem to be
> required also on the machine that is creating the pbuilder chroot
> (=where you start pdebuild). I regard this a bug but may be I'm missing
> something
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on this package too.
On 06/16/2015 09:18 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geolinks"
This package also as small copyright issue. Please add a Files section
for debian/* with your copyright unless you want to assign this to up
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 06/16/2015 09:10 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib"
The copyright for several authors is missing from the debian/copyright
file, among them Luís de Sousa for the newly added wcs111.py for example.
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 06/15/2015 05:20 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cligj"
I've sponsored the upload, and since it was a straightforward new
upstream release I have not further comments.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GP
On 06/10/2015 10:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 06/10/2015 10:22 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>> Package name: fiona
>> Version : 1.5.1-1
>
> The package cannot be built from git because the upstream & pristine-tar
> branches have not been pushe
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on this package too.
On 06/10/2015 10:22 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Package name: fiona
> Version : 1.5.1-1
The package cannot be built from git because the upstream & pristine-tar
branches have not been pushed.
Please run `git push --all && git
> c) upload immediately.
> i) use a new version?
Because NEW processing takes such a long time now, I don't wait for FTP
master to review my packages in NEW before working on them again.
When I have a new revision of the package ready I just upload it so that
the latest revision will get i
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 05/23/2015 12:21 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osm-gps-map"
I've sponsored the uploaded, but there are a couple of unused
substitution variables in the control file you may want to have a look at.
Kind Regar
> It seems it is forbidden to read the web dir directly. Any reason for
> this and if it is intentional what would be the alternative to fetch
> data about packages in new?
If indexes are forbidden intentionally now, extracting the links from
new.html may be reasonable alternative.
https://ftp-m
Hi Ross,
On 05/03/2015 01:21 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> * Package name: pyshp
> Version : 1.2.1-2
Because version 1.2.1+ds-1 was the actual version to be uploaded to the
archive, the packages for version 1.2.1-2 was not automatically removed
from mentors.
Can you remove it to get rid
On 04/03/2015 05:56 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Thanks again for another review Bas.
>
> On 02/04/15 19:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> You may want to consider extending Use_through2.patch to cover all files
>> that use the through module, there are some tests that require
Hi Ross,
Also thanks for your work on this package.
This package a few minor issues just like node-convert-source-map (#781701).
The Testsuite header in the control file should be XS-Testsuite.
The copyright year by npm2deb is not reflected in the upstream source,
it doesn't list any so I sugge
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 04/01/2015 08:53 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-convert-source-map"
There are some minor issues that needs to be addressed before the upload
to the archive.
debian/control:
Testsuite: autopkgtest
AFAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/04/2015 09:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 08:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>> I think reverting this change and adding a lintian
>>>>>> override instead is a better idea.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/04/2015 07:53 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead
>>
>> This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work on the bluebird packaging!
On 03/03/2015 09:01 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> * Fix duplicate package descriptions
You may want to tweak these a bit to be more in line with other node-*
and libjs-* packages.
See for example node-q:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-j
On 02/15/2015 08:26 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-geojson"
I'm partially done with the review, but I have to leave for work now.
I'll continue tonight after I get back.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182
Hi Johan,
Thanks for fixing the issues with the initial upload.
On 02/15/2015 08:26 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Package name: python-geojson
> Version : 1.0.9-1
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * Initial upload (closes: #690833)
>
> [Note] that this package was previousl
On 02/05/2015 10:33 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> It works for me in unstable. You will need a recent update of unstable
> as fiona relies on python-cligj which was only added yesterday.
You don't need to have python-cligj installed locally to build the
package with pbuilder, you do need cython a
On 02/05/2015 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I: pybuild base:170: python3.4 setup.py clean
> WARNING:root:Failed to get options via gdal-config: [Errno 2] No such file or
> directory: 'gdal-config'
> CRITICAL:root:Cython.Build.cythonize not found. Cython is required to build
> from a repo.
> E
On 02/05/2015 06:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> [...] I'll leave it at this.
Famous last words. There is just one more thing.
The doc-base control file has an unusual suffix:
.docbase instead of .doc-base.
It also uses an unusual Document ID: fiona.docbase, using the (source)
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on fiona and related packages!
Some comments regarding the package based on my review.
lintian reported two issues with the copyright file, both having the
same cause:
I: fiona source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright
docs/data/tests/data/* (paragraph at
Hi Johan,
Sorry for not doing this sooner, but I have reviewed the package now.
Some comments follow.
The copyright file only documents the upstream copyright, documenting
the copyright & license for debian/* is a good idea unless you want to
assign the copyright to MapBox.
There seems to be an
On 01/16/2015 10:49 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
>>> `lintian -I --show-overrides --pedantic -E `.
>
> This doesn't show anything serious for me:
> ```
> $ lintian -I --show-overrides --pedantic -E
> netcdf_4.3.3~20150116-utopic2_source.changes
> E: netcdf changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file uto
On 01/16/2015 10:20 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
>> I've push some changes on the split-c-f-cxx branch.
>
> I've created upstream pull requests for the patches you added. Let's
> see if they make it in for the 4.3.3 release.
I'm still working on the changes to support Policy 3.9.4 and up, and
have ju
On 01/15/2015 07:57 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
>> that you still have local changes not pushed to Alioth?
>
> Right; fixed now.
Thanks for the push!
Can you also update the pristine-tar branch with your upstream tarballs
as imported into the upstream branch?
I've push some changes on the split-c-
Hi Nico,
On 01/15/2015 09:52 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> I'd be great if you could have a look at the branch `split-c-f-cxx` on
> alioth to see if there are any obvious shortcomings. If we can fix
> those, we should be finally able to upgrade from the several years old
> 4.1.3.
I only find netCDF
> I see the file
> ```
> libnetcdf-dev.doc-base
> ```
> in the debian/ folder [1]. I suppose renaming that to
> ```
> netcdf-doc.doc-base
> ```
> will do the trick. Is that your intention, too?
Yes. Although the warnings may need to be fixed with additional changes to
the file.
The Document field
Hi Nico,
First of all thanks for your work on NetCDF!
> The package I'm looking at is netCDF [1] which â apart from the
> library and headers â installs the file
> ```
> $ cat /usr/share/doc-base/netCDF
Interestingly there is no doc-base file in the souce package. Do you have
local changes n
On 01/05/2015 09:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> On 01/04/2015 05:03 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 01/04/2015 03:55 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>>> Can this package be used by Osgeo live or is there a reason not to do
>>> so (Angelos recently packaged version
On 01/04/2015 03:55 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Is there a specific reason you are targeting experimental and not unstable?
Mostly because it's not targeted for migration to jessie.
> Can this package be used by Osgeo live or is there a reason not to do
> so (Angelos recently packaged version
Do you intent to add this RFS to SoB wiki page?
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
Both python-descartes and python-geopandas were added to the Debian GIS
Blend.
http://blends.debian.org/gis/tasks/workstation#python-descartes
http://blends.debian.org/gis/tasks/workstation#python-geopan
Hi Andreas,
On 12/10/2014 10:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I had some real life things to do and bad bandwidth.
That's perfectly understandable, I was worried there might be another
problem with the build.
> I'll do the build over night and try to upload tomorrow morning.
Take your time, there
Hi Andreas,
Are you able to build the package using the master branch?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On 12/09/2014 09:03 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> qgis(master) $ git branch
> * master
This is correct. For qgis, the packaging targeting experimental lives on
the master branch.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
--
On 11/22/2014 12:40 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Feel free to review and/or sponsor.
> In case you wonder, I have disabled the python3 package because there
> are a lot of problems when using LANG=C . I may add support later if
> python3-click has a solution.
Your package looks good in general,
Hi Francesco,
Can you sponsor the upload of pktools? Andreas is unavailable until
December 5th.
Kind Regards,
Bas
On 11/14/2014 11:44 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pktools"
>
> Pa
Hi Andreas,
On 10/25/2014 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694).
>
> As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in
> experime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Tobias,
On 11/02/2014 08:26 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I will upload this once build is complete, thanks for providing the
> fix.
Thanks for sponsoring the upload, I've removed the entry from the
Sponsoring of Blends wiki.
> For the long evening
On 10/25/2014 12:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> thanks for the hint.
>
> Do you know any method to get pinged about such updates?
Unfortunately I don't, I just periodically check the version in latest
the Packages file on the mirror.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used.
> -The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed.
> - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:
Hi Andreas,
On 10/24/2014 06:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> * Bump JOSM dependency to 7643.
> (closes: #764176)
JOSM 7643 has hit the mirrors, so josm-plugins can be built now.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4A
On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet
>>> build dependenc
Hi Andreas,
On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>
>> It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1
>> build depends on libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~).
>>
>
On 10/23/2014 09:26 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> [no love for enigmail today]
>
> try mutt ;-)
Should be fixed with manual configuration now.
> switched to public discussion anyway
On 10/23/2014 08:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends:
>
>
> 0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used.
> The following packages have u
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
