Bug#978440: RFS: paperwork/2.0.2-1 -- Personal document manager

2021-02-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 14/2/21 a les 18:07, Jérémy Lal ha escrit: [...] > > > Hello, > > i'll go ahead. However there is a high chance it won't migrate to testing, > due to soft freeze policy as Thomas pointed out. Let's see. Release Team has sent and email explaining the sate of bullseye. There's a part that says

Bug#978440: RFS: paperwork/2.0.2-1 -- Personal document manager

2021-02-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
ldsystem=pybuild with sphinxdoc. In any case, salsa C-I is passed and doesn't fail, and AFAIK they use a similar env as build machines. Please, DD, push this package. It would be a pity that we don't have this version in Bullseye. Best regards, Leopold > Kind regards > > Mech

Bug#978440: RFS: paperwork/2.0.2-1 -- Personal document manager

2021-02-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Mechtilde, El 14/2/21 a les 14:04, Mechtilde Stehmann ha escrit: [...] > dh clean --with python3,sphinxdoc --buildsystem=pybuild > dh: error: unable to load addon sphinxdoc: Can't locate > Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm in @INC (you may need to install > the Debian::Debhelper::Sequence:

Re: A question about uscan and MUT with different versions

2020-04-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Robin, first of all thanks for the reply. El 21/4/20 a les 20:32, Robin Gustafsson ha escrit: > Hi Leopold, > >> However, when I push it to salsa and run ci, the command executed is this: >> >> uscan --download --download-current-version >> >> and fails because the "data" modules has differen

A question about uscan and MUT with different versions

2020-04-21 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I have some trouble with the soqt package [1]. This package upstream have released with three modules: main, data and gui. If you clone the repo and process uscan with: uscan --verbose --force-download --copy it will download the corresponding files and create: soqt_1.6.0+ds1.orig.tar.xz

Re: Using root privileges to build a package

2020-01-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 14/1/20 a les 12:53, Andrey Rahmatullin ha escrit: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:14:50PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>> Sorry, are you saying you think it's fine for a package build process to >>> modify the build host system? >> >> just to in

Re: Using root privileges to build a package

2020-01-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 14/1/20 a les 10:54, Andrey Rahmatullin ha escrit: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:45:02AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>>> I'm working with a package (octomap) that is composed by two libraries >>>> depending on another one built in the same package. &

Re: Using root privileges to build a package

2020-01-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 14/1/20 a les 9:55, Andrey Rahmatullin ha escrit: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:25:17AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >> I'm working with a package (octomap) that is composed by two libraries >> depending on another one built in the same package. >> >&g

Using root privileges to build a package

2020-01-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm working with a package (octomap) that is composed by two libraries depending on another one built in the same package. The question is that to build that two libraries correctly firstly the library that they depend must be build and _installed_. It's the _only_ way that I have found with

Re: The digit in the library name

2019-11-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 26/11/19 a les 9:14, Sepi Gair ha escrit: > I see the trailing digit in some libraries' names, like libdca0 and libc6. I > wasn't able to find the purpose of them in the Debian Policy and the Debian > Developer Reference. Please point to the place in documentation where I can > learn about these

Re: Phantomjs can't find libQt5Core.so.5 via ldd on buster

2019-11-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 14/11/19 9:26, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > as I reported to BTS[1] phantomjs in Buster is failing: > > $ phantomjs --version > /usr/lib/phantomjs/phantomjs: error while loading shared libraries: > libQt5Core.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > $ ldd /usr/li

Re: Build dependency

2018-10-31 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi El 31/10/18 a les 1:52, gregor herrmann ha escrit: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:52:11 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > >>> reverse-depends -b packageX >>> (reverse-depends is in ubuntu-dev-tools) >> build-rdeps packageX >> (needs just regular devscripts, although you want dose-extra to handle B-Dep >

Build dependency

2018-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I know that apt-cache rdepends packageX show me the list of the packages that depends of packageX. But, how can I obtain the list of packages that build-depends of packageX? Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia - A: Bec

Re: Uploading a new version of a package

2018-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi!! El 27/10/18 a les 03:11, Paul Wise ha escrit: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:33 PM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > >> I have an strange doubt. One of the package I maintain is a library (ompl) >> and >> now I would like to push a new version with new ABI. >

Uploading a new version of a package

2018-10-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I have an strange doubt. One of the package I maintain is a library (ompl) and now I would like to push a new version with new ABI. I have done with others libraries the procedure of ABI transition, with rebuild packages, etc. and it's clear. However, in this case there's no transition with

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
cience-team/ros-image-common Cheers, Leopold > Cheers, > Nico > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:18 PM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda > wrote: > >> On 06/04/18 16:38, Nico Schlömer wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I would like to package a piece of software that

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 06/04/18 16:38, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to package a piece of software that includes both a C++ > library and a Python package. When building locally from scratch, one is > supposed to > > * build and install the library first, > (* then build and run the tests

Re: Help to add synctex to new version of texmaker

2017-09-13 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 13/09/17 14:41, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 02:21:25PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Remove the synctex file from HEADERS and SOURCES and add -lsynctex to LIBS >>> >>> Synctex files are not mentioned in HEADERS nor SOURCES. >> >> % grep -n synctex t

Re: Help to add synctex to new version of texmaker

2017-09-13 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 13/09/17 12:46, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > Debian Science team had no answer to my question below. So how can > I add synctex library to a qmake project? > > Any help would be welcome Done!!! pushed at debian-science git. Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Cat

Re: Please help upgrading eigensoft

2016-07-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, El Dimarts, 19 de juliol de 2016, a les 09:27:10, Christian Seiler va escriure: [] > > DSPEV etc. are LAPACK routines, but you only link against BLAS. [1] > You also need to link against LAPACK for this to work. Add -llapack > before -lblas in your Makefile and it should work. > > (Not

Re: Newbie: "Review request" on an updated LIRC package

2015-10-30 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 30 d'octubre de 2015, a les 09:34:09, Alec Leamas va escriure: > Dear list, > > This is my first contact with the Debian community. I might be doing all > sorts of errors, including sending a questionable message to the wrong > list. Just tell me, I'll listen. > > I'm the upstream L

Re: Bug#788418: New upload in mentors

2015-10-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 14 d'octubre de 2015, a les 09:55:02, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto va escriure: > Hi Ghislain, > > > Alright, I have uploaded a new candidate package on mentors. > > > > However, the lintian on mentors shows an error that I cannot reproduce > > locally on my gbp build. The error is

Re: Reassigning a bug

2015-09-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 9 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:01:21, Andrey Rahmatullin va escriure: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:43:05PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > I fighting against control@bugs and by now it's winning me. :-( I really > > don't understand what I'

Reassigning a bug

2015-09-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I fighting against control@bugs and by now it's winning me. :-( I really don't understand what I'm doing wrong. I have a bug in one of my packages (ompl) that it's not fault of ompl, it's about boost. So, I would like to reassign it to boost1.58 or boost-defaults I have try to do a lot of

Re: Please help me poking around in cmake

2015-07-08 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 8 de juliol de 2015, a les 11:42:20, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi Leopold, > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:38:57AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > El Dimecres, 8 de juliol de 2015, a les 09:41:45, Andreas Tille va escriure: > > > Hi, > &g

Re: Please help me poking around in cmake

2015-07-08 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 8 de juliol de 2015, a les 09:41:45, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi, > > I'm working on the Debian Med target hyphy that is using cmake and I > tried to link against Debian packaged sqlite. I found some promising > code to steal from and created a patch but somehow the -lsqlite3 opt

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Cmake help for htqc needed

2015-06-23 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 22 de juny de 2015, a les 20:38:40, Andreas Tille va escriure: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:49:39PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > > I've attached a patch that should do the trick. (I'm on a computer > > without the ssh-keys for Debian git write access). > > Works perfectly. Thanks a lot

Re: Creating a package with plugins and libs

2015-06-15 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 15 de juny de 2015, a les 16:27:20, Paul Wise va escriure: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > and propose what? > > Sounds like the only thing they need to do is to install them into the > right path: > > /usr/lib/$PACKAGE/

Re: Creating a package with plugins and libs

2015-06-15 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 15 de juny de 2015, a les 12:08:58, Paul Wise va escriure: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > The question is that the package creates a few libraries in /usr/lib and a > > bunch of small libraries (used as plugins but treat

Creating a package with plugins and libs

2015-06-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm packaging a piece of software that are making me crazy with the lintian messages. The piece is rtt-ros-integratiion [1]. An usable package is located here [2]. It belongs to the orocos project. The question is that the package creates a few libraries in /usr/lib and a bunch of small l

Re: Dropping a link reference

2015-03-25 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 24 de març de 2015, a les 18:43:11, Russ Allbery va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda writes: > > I'm packaging a non-free software (better not ask, it's a pain :-(). The > > question is that there are some executables that has a link to an old &g

Dropping a link reference

2015-03-24 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm packaging a non-free software (better not ask, it's a pain :-( ). The question is that there are some executables that has a link to an old version of libraw1394-8. The funny thing is that I have tested to create a fictitious libraw1394.so.8 library making a symbolic link to the cur

Re: Upstream release with two source packages

2015-03-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 13 de març de 2015, a les 00:08:07, Paul Wise va escriure: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Can I have in alioth a single repo with two debian packages? > > How you structure the git repository doesn't have much correlatio

Upstream release with two source packages

2015-03-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm thinking to package [1]. This package is in the github and upstream release it with two main directories: one with the C++ version (complete) and another with a python binding against the first one. The Python version cannot be built without the C++ version. Can I have in alioth a sing

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 11:09:23, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > Le 05/02/2015 10:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit : > > El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va > > > > escriure: > >>> Are you sure that in b

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > > Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is this > > acceptable? > > > > Leopold > > Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pass... And I > can't include the data int

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-04 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 4 de febrer de 2015, a les 17:23:04, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > > I'm trying to build the fw4spl, in a pbuild environtment and I got this. > > [...] > > Any idea? > > > > Leopold > > Sorry, I've wasted your time. I forgot to push some lines in my > CMakeLists.txt. But now the

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-04 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 4 de febrer de 2015, a les 12:26:18, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > Hi Leopold, > > > I'm trying to build the package. CMake fails. Needs to be called twice. > > This is not good. Please, try to patch cmakelist.txt to solve it. > > I fixed and pushed the changes. CMake shouldn't

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-03 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 17:02:02, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > > in the packages that I have, I pass these options to cmake: > > > > override_dh_auto_configure: > > dh_auto_configure --\ > > -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:STRING="

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-03 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 23:12:36, Andrey Rahmatullin va escriure: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:46:10PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > I have seen a similar issue trying to package another piece of software. > > The question is, IMHO that: > > >

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-03 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 22:22:07, Paul Wise va escriure: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > > corentin@debian:~/dev1/fw4spl$ objdump -x > > > > /home/corentin/dev1/fw4spl/debian/fw4spl/usr/bin/fwLauncher | grep -i > > rpath > > > > corentin@debian:~/d

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-03 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 20:29:30, Paul Wise va escriure: > > Leopold: we are talking about a private library here, rpath is what > you set for private libraries. :-) thanks for the clarification Paul. Looking on the problem, there's a package: zathura, that has a private lib,

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-03 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 12:24:36, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > Le 03/02/2015 10:53, Paul Wise a écrit : > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > >> corentin@debian:~$ ldd /usr/bin/fwLauncher > >> > >> libfwCore.so.0 => not found > >> libfwRunti

Re: Package with CMAKE based C library

2014-12-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 21 d'octubre de 2014, a les 23:27:30, Werner Detter va escriure: > Hi everybody, > > I want to package a library, developed in C (libcmime) which is based on > cmake. If I'm right - there should be > > a) the main package "libcmime" > /usr/lib/libcmime.so.0.1 (symlink to the next one)

Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Mattia Rizzolo va escriure: [...] > The developer run an instance here: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/ (also > with a really nice web interface see github for the source). > (if you are going to ask, the packages are currently keep for 15 days) Thanks it

Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Paul Wise va escriure: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > But I have to install it, and prepare a server to do that. There's no a public > > service for debian that do that, no? > > The Deb

Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Charles Plessy va escriure: > Le Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit : > > > > I build my packages with pbuilder, but I'm looking for an automatic place to > > build packages for debian. > &

Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez va escriure: > On 12 December 2014 at 08:57, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source > > package and it was

launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as launchpad service for ubuntu? And, if it doesn't exist, could some of you explain why we don't have this? Or, should I have to create a someth

Re: Recreating a package

2014-10-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous, 9 d'octubre de 2014, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda va escriure: > Hi, > > thanks for the reply. However, there's one thing that I don't understand. > > A Dijous, 9 d'octubre de 2014, Joachim Wiedorn va escriure: > > > > While compil

Re: Recreating a package

2014-10-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, thanks for the reply. However, there's one thing that I don't understand. A Dijous, 9 d'octubre de 2014, Joachim Wiedorn va escriure: > > While compiling with debuild it creates files like this one: with debuild, it makes a debian clean and after another clean. I don't have any log at the

Recreating a package

2014-10-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm creating a large package and when I modify some target in the rules file, if I don't make a clean, the package is not rebuild. The question is that I don't want to recompile the sources, I just would like to recreate the debs. Here [1] mention a method to do that, but it doesn't work i

Re: Unlicensed files

2014-05-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimarts, 27 de maig de 2014, a les 19:37:52, Tobias Frost va escriure: [...] > > > > I have bug [1] and therefore I asked to upstream about this files. Hi > > kindly reported me the licenses, but I have some files (for instance > > javascripts gen_validatorv31.js) that I have not found any info

Re: Unlicensed files

2014-05-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dimarts, 27 de maig de 2014, Tobias Frost va escriure: > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 08:08 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm making a package and I have two files (scripts) that have no license. I > > have asked to upstream and his answer wa

Unlicensed files

2014-05-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm making a package and I have two files (scripts) that have no license. I have asked to upstream and his answer was that that files are unlicensed. As I have a bug because partially mentions that files, what should I write in the copyright file? I have surfing but I have not found any in

Re: Debug packages

2014-05-20 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dimarts, 20 de maig de 2014, Rebecca N. Palmer va escriure: > The purpose of a -dbg package is to provide a mapping between binary > addresses and source line numbers/variable names, not to provide the > source itself: it's working if your debug backtraces are of the form > > #3 0x00e

Debug packages

2014-05-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, there's one thing that I thing that I have not understood quiet well in the packaging procedure: the debug packages (-dbg) For example, I'm packaging a library (ompl) and I have provided a debug version-. I have added in rules: override_dh_strip: dh_strip --dbg-package=libompl9-dbg

Nomeclator of plugins

2009-07-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I think I have not seen it in the Debian policies. I have a dual role in one application: developer and co-maintainer. I would like to ask one question that fits in both. I'm in the bulmages project. It's a big piece of software with several applications with libs and plugins. It's a cmake

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure: > Hi Leo, > > Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure: > >> The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it > >> has to go to non-free. >

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure: > Hi folks, > > To fix a FTBFS I would like to upload a new version of my game > package "blockade". I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking > for a sponsor. > > The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it > has to go to

Re: A little question of a license THANKS

2008-10-17 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dijous 16 Octubre 2008, Ben Finney va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something > > unclear to me. > > You've received correct responses (the license is effectivel

A little question of a license

2008-10-16 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this: -- Copyright (C) 2005, XX All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted

Re: Packaging a library

2008-09-29 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dilluns 29 Setembre 2008, Neil Williams va escriure: [...] > > > What matters is now - educating upstream to tweak the libtool > > > versioning *separately* from the version string when the ABI next > > > changes. > > > > Uff. Who am I to try to educate to upstream? :-) I can try to send an > > e

Re: Packaging a library

2008-09-29 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dilluns 29 Setembre 2008, Neil Williams va escriure: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:40:47 +0200 > > Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Upstream uses autotools, but not in a very correct way, I guess. The > > > > library is 3.5.6 ve

Re: Packaging a library

2008-09-29 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dilluns 29 Setembre 2008, Neil Williams va escriure: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:31:55 +0200 > > Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm packing a library (not yet an ITP, just learning) and I'm having some > > doub

Packaging a library

2008-09-29 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Hi, I'm packing a library (not yet an ITP, just learning) and I'm having some doubts about it. Upstream uses autotools, but not in a very correct way, I guess. The library is 3.5.6 version, but the configure + make creates libXXX.so.0.0.0. I have looked on the configure.ac, Makefile.am, etc, a

Re: RFS: dcraw (updated package)

2008-07-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dimecres 09 Juliol 2008, Carl Fürstenberg va escriure: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 02:08, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:54:01PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a écrit : > >> A Dimarts 08 Juliol 2008, Carl Fürstenberg va escri

Re: RFS: dcraw (updated package)

2008-07-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dimecres 09 Juliol 2008, Carl Fürstenberg va escriure: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 02:08, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:54:01PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a écrit : > >> A Dimarts 08 Juliol 2008, Carl Fürstenberg va escri

Re: RFS: dcraw (updated package)

2008-07-08 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dimarts 08 Juliol 2008, Carl Fürstenberg va escriure: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 8.86-0.1 > of my package "dcraw". > > It builds these binary packages: > dcraw - decode raw digital camera images > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The pack

Re: Same source package, differents targets

2007-10-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dilluns 01 Octubre 2007 16:28, Justin Pryzby va escriure: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm sorry if the question is a bit silly, but I have a conceptual doubt. > > I would like to package a soft that

Same source package, differents targets

2007-10-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm sorry if the question is a bit silly, but I have a conceptual doubt. I would like to package a soft that with the _same_ source, provides different packages but, this packages have different build dependencies and incompatibles. How is this solved? Regards, Leo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,