El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 12:24:36, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > Le 03/02/2015 10:53, Paul Wise a écrit : > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > >> corentin@debian:~$ ldd /usr/bin/fwLauncher > >> > >> libfwCore.so.0 => not found > >> libfwRuntime.so.0 => not found > > > > ... > > > >> corentin@debian:~$ objdump -x /usr/bin/fwLauncher | grep -i rpath > >> corentin@debian:~$ > > > > Looks like your binary does not have an rpath, please check the build > > log/system to find out why. > > I'm not sure to know what log you asked me to check. I get this build > log with "sudo pdebuild -us -uc -nc" : > > (the log is too big for the mail list, so I posted the log file here : > > http://www.corentindesfarges.fr/buildlog.txt
Hi, I have seen a similar issue trying to package another piece of software. The question is, IMHO that: - you cannot install a library outside /usr/lib or /usr/lib/$ARCH in debian. Technically you can do it. Put it, add your directory in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ rerun ldconfig and it should run. However, you should have a very good reason, and ask to ftp-masters to let you do that [1]. Others distros have something similar, but maybe not so strict [2,3] Also, I don't think that the rpath could be a good solution [4]. So, my opinion is: - or ask to upstream to change that - or patch the code to install in another place. Best regards, Leopold [1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-modifies-ld.so-search-path.html [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines [3] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_checks [4] https://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
