El 14/1/20 a les 12:53, Andrey Rahmatullin ha escrit: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:14:50PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>> Sorry, are you saying you think it's fine for a package build process to >>> modify the build host system? >> >> just to install some files and yes, I understand that it shouldn't. > "just to install some files to /usr" is a serious modification. Ok,
I have reread and yes, it's a serious to modify the build system. It implies several important things. >>>> But, it's difficult to me understand why I should make a complicate process >>>> decoupling a package, patched and so on if just with one make install >>>> should be >>>> enough. >>> Because the package build process must not modify the build host system. >> >> yes, I agree. > Then I don't know why do you still insist on doing just that. because I'm very stubborn and I didn't understand the whole problem. Now I have a clear idea that when you build a package YOU CANNOT BE ROOT [...] > >> I'm working on a pbuilder, so I create it, build a package an destroy it, no >> problem if the env is modified. > I assumed you are creating a package for Debian, not for local use. > Packages for Debian must follow the guidelines, whether they are built > inside a disposable chroot or not. If you are making a package for local > use please always mention that on deban-mentors resources. yes, it's a debian package (octomap) I said it in the first email. Now I have solved it modifying the CMake generated files [1]. Thanks for the patience. Sometimes to make clean packages seems an obscure magic. Leopold [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/octomap -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
