> This is a diff of a .symbols file I generated from libvtkgdcm2.8
> versions 2.8.7-1 and 2.8.7-2.
Thanks Mattia for tracking this issue !
As you've noticed the ABI breakage occur in between two minor uploads
-1 and -2. So I suspect this may confuse reader that bug be reported
against src:gdcm, s
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:04 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:41:10AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > As you've noticed the ABI breakage occur in between two minor uploads
> > -1 and -2. So I suspect this may confuse reader that bug be report
Hi Sébastien,
Before you do anything, please have a look at the current state of
orthanc in debian buildd machines:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=orthanc
Thanks !
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Sebastien Jodogne
wrote:
> Dear Andreas and Mathieu,
>
> The Orthanc 0.2.2-1 p
Hi all,
[Sorry for the cross posting]
I am very pleased to announce that refdb has been accepted in debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/refdb/news/20121117T110005Z.html
RefDB is a reference database and bibliography tool for SGML, XML,
and LaTeX/BibTeX documents. It allows users to sh
Dear all,
RefDB has been accepted into debian. I uploaded it into experimental
because I only use refdb from XML (docbook), while the tool allow a
much broader usage (latex, mysql...).
So if you were using RefDB in the past, please let me know if I
missed anything.
Thanks much in advance,
-M
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Thiago Franco Moraes
wrote:
> I have the following question: How can I add a file (Makefile in my
> case) when doing the package? I was thinking in add the Makefile in
> the debian folder and put in debian/rules file a command to move the
> Makefile to the sour
Uploaded.
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Sebastien Jodogne
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream
> version of Orthanc (0.4.0) [1]. Please would you kindly upload it to
> experimental? Thanks in advance!
>
> Cheers,
> Sébastien-
>
Salut Sébastien,
what does this new version brings/fixes ? does it fixes current FTBFS ref:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=orthanc
thanks
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Sebastien Jodogne
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest ups
As a side note, you cannot leave this
...
orthanc (0.4.0-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
...
You'll need to use dch next time.
HTH
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Salut Sébastien,
>
> what does this new version brings/fixes ? does it fixes current FTBFS
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Sebastien Jodogne
wrote:
> Is there a way to subscribe by mail to the addition of new bugs relative
> only to Orthanc? It does not seem possible in the interface.
Simply go there:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/orthanc.html
Scroll to the bottom left and enter y
Hi Ivo !
If you are still interested in cellprofiler and ready to go through
the python-libtiff stuff. Please assign the -closed- RFP back to you:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647995#33
I am not interested in this package for the time being.
Do you also want to maintai
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On March 19, 2013 09:48:15 AM Paul Novotny wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 00:56 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
>> > So I turned on system tiff, added your patch, and updated the
>> > build depends. Depending on libtiff5-dev failed due
I would use the latest package of dcmtk. It will pull in the missing
shared libs.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Sebastian Hilbert
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I saw that Ginkgo-CADx is packaged in experimental. I tried to compile it
> for Ubuntu 12.10 locally (dget -xu, debuild -B) and get the follow
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Sebastian Hilbert
wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. April 2013, 10:45:33 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
>
>> I would use the latest package of dcmtk. It will pull in the missing
>
>> shared libs.
>
>>
>
>
>
> It might have to do wi
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sebastian Hilbert
wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. April 2013, 10:45:33 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
>
>> I would use the latest package of dcmtk. It will pull in the missing
>
>> shared libs.
>
>>
>
>
>
> Would you consi
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > It might have to do with this bug
>> >
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677721
>>
>> Exactly ! (well it&
Good luck with maven/java... See 693234#23
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just for your interest:
>
>https://ctakes.apache.org/
>
> If somebody might take the challenge to spend some time into it to see
> whether we can package this project it would be nice.
>
Off topic, but I stumble on: http://ith-icoserve.com/ this morning,
which really reminded of first image from http://health.gnu.org/
(http://blog.gnusolidario.org/2013/03/we-are-proud-to-invite-you-gnu-health.html)
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the next step woul
At least on two of my machine I am getting:
[ 58%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/CoreLibrary.dir/Core/Lua/LuaFunctionCall.cpp.o
/usr/bin/c++ -DORTHANC_VERSION=\"0.5.2\" -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DORTHANC_STATIC=0 -DORTHANC_SSL_ENABLED=1
-DBOOST_HAS_FILESYSTEM_V3=1 -DBOOST_
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM, wrote:
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695826
Thanks, I could not find the bug report.
I will upload orthanc with explicit reference to boost1.53, as
explained in #708109.
I'd appreciate if you could use DEP3 for patches, and I believe
-
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:19:37AM +0100, Tony Travis wrote:
>> Hi, Andreas.
>>
>> Johannes has asked me about 32-bit support for Flexbar.
>>
>> AFAIK, 32-bit support for tbb would be provided automatically by a tbb
>> dependency
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:39:18PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> $ cat flexbar/trunk/debian/control
>> [...]
>> Architecture
Just my two cents, GPL and/or LGPL are mostly related to code (notion
of 'shared' lib). I would either check one of our french license
CeCILL A/B/C or maybe creative commons which are more oriented with
data stuff.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Eric Maeker wrote:
>
> Le 18 juin 2013 à 17:34, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> Just my two cents, GPL and/or LGPL are mostly related to code (notion
>> of 'shared' lib). I would either check one of our french license
>> C
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which
> was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since
> ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I simply
> update the package t
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Sebastien Jodogne
wrote:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/
Your d/changelog looks corrupted, I do not believe you can close two
bugs with this syntax.
You should not required boost 1.53 explicitely anymore AF
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Sebastien Jodogne
wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Sebastien Jodogne
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/
>>
>>
>> Your d/changelog looks corrupted, I do not believe you c
Dear Sébastien,
Would you care explaining why you reverted my change. I did document
in svn rev 14174 what I did. Furthermore to prevent anyone from
reverting it, I took additional steps and even left the comment:
"remove build type, see #711515"
thanks,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Seba
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> > - there are few subprojects listed in
>> > http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/imaging
>> > with some packaging specified as available
>
>> svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:34:53PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
>> >I have no idea how to really test the binary packages but I surely can
>> >verify whether the package builds or not and finally upload if it looks
>> >OK
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Sebastien Jodogne
wrote:
> Hi Matthieu,
>
>>> OK. I did so and it is great that you did document this in
>>> README.Debian which is very helpful for users starting with a package.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Emmanuel Promayon
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>>> Furthermore I would like to mention another page[3] with lots of
>>> information
>>> about Debian Med packages. Besides the list of RC bugs you can also
>>> see packages that can not be built on a Debian architecture,
>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Emmanuel Promayon
wrote:
> For instance the CamiTK package depends on huge libs such as qt, vtk,
> insighttoolkit and gdcm. When is the best time to try a transition to Qt5,
> Vtk6, itk4 and gdcm2.4?
This is a long debate ;)
Technically this is up to the maintain
Hi,
On 1/26/14, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
> My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM server and
> would be happy to package it for Debian.
>
> I've seen previous works on the package (and the SVN tree), and bug 680352.
> I
> contacted previous maint
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Karsten Hilbert
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
>
>> My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM server and
>> would be happy to package it for Debian.
>
> May I kindly suggest -- if there's a choice
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Karsten Hilbert
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:02:32AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
>
>> > BTW DCMTK has been compiled and tested with hardening flags and proven
>> > to work very well, it is a very robust and mature SCP server.
>>
>> Sure... right now anyo
Nothing too unusual for Brittany:
http://www.ouest-france.fr/grande-maree-saint-malo-bien-secouee-mais-pas-de-blesse-1900920
;-P
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Jorge Sebastião Soares
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Saint Malo looks great.
> As long as it doesn't disappear of the map like what's happen
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Emmanuel Promayon
wrote:
> Mathieu, can you confirm this is ok, and maybe close the bug?
Present in testing (jessie):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731823#32
This need to be fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debia
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Emmanuel Promayon
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>> Present in testing (jessie):
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731823#32
>>
>> This need to be fixed.
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification Mathieu. Concretely what can be done to help
> fixing this?
>
Andreas,
Could you please give us a hint on the libics status ?
Thanks much
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/ca+7wusw3bthtqhopqtgbqog0hputkdf-h-xrd
Anton,
With all due respect, I think you are pusing too hard on vtk6
transition. I may be very biased but for example support for VTK6 was
pushed in GDCM only weeks ago.
I do not believe that *forcing* for vtk6 transition will help people
move gracefully from one API to the new one. The step
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Corentin,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Corentin DESFARGES wrote:
>> >> VXL (which is obsolete and contains VGL, V3P, VCL...)
>> > Could you please be a bit more verbose? According to SourceForge
>> the version in Debian (
[CC me please]
Does anyone knows what happen to gimias in Debian ?
I see some interest in the past:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed/Meeting/Southport2012
but nothing since...
Thx for updates,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi,
I hereby resign from both the debian-science and debian-med maintainer
team in Debian.
I am not able to produce any good work within those teams, so remove
me from the Uploaders field on next upload. Thanks.
Happy holidays,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
[All the following only reflect my sole opinion based on my limited
contribution to Debian, and may not even reflect the reality.]
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hereby resign from both the debian-science and debian-med maintainer
> team in De
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>>> Why tweak it? Why isn't the included library good?
>>
>> Because I use libigraph with external blas / lapack and lots of
>> options which are not the one used in the r interface.
>
> You can build the shared library in the R package with ext
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:58:01PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Thanks for sponsor,
>
> I noticed that the dh_movefiles target in debian/rules was wrong and
> thus the packages remained empty. This is fixed now.
Hi Bill,
What are the transition plan for libjpeg7 ? There are -at least- two
packages that I know of which link to libjpeg62: VTK & ITK ? Should we
update the package control file ? Or is there something else being
prepared (like a libjpeg-default package).
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSC
Hi there,
In order to package pixelmed (Bug#547184), I need to package JmDNS
(#486697). Because I could nor find it neither get in touch with
upstream, I decided to package it up (still things to do).
My issue is that it does not really belong to debian-med so I'd
prefer put it outside of debi
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Bill Allombert
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:16:22PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> What are the transition plan for libjpeg7 ? There are -at least- two
>> packages that I know of which link to libjpeg62: VTK
For reason beyond my understanding, I am still getting the same error
on armel (it disappear on powerpc)
https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gdcm
[ 88%] Building CXX object
Utilities/VTK/CMakeFiles/vtkgdcmJava.dir/vtkGDCMThreadedImageReader2Java.cxx.o
make[3]: *** No rule to make
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Dominique Belhachemi
wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 22:31 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> For reason beyond my understanding, I am still getting the same error
>> on armel (it disappear on powerpc)
>>
>> http
Hi mitchell,
Sorry to hear your misfortune with ctn. did you report any of the bugs you
mentionned ? Are they easily reproducable ?
Thanks,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:38 PM, m laks wrote:
Mathieu,
I am a great fan of debian (i use it on over 50 pcs in my department and home
and my parents a
Steve,
Did you try with python-numpy ? If this did not worked did you keep
the build log ?
Thanks,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Steven Michael Robbins
wrote:
> Author: smr
> Date: 2009-09-26 17:08:46 + (Sat, 26 Sep 2009)
> New Revision: 4040
>
> Modified:
> trunk/packages/insighttoo
Steve,
2009/9/29 Gaëtan Lehmann :
>
> Le 29 sept. 09 à 09:27, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am reading through the code of itkPyBuffer and found:
>>
>> $ cat Wrapping/WrapITK/ExternalProjects/PyBuffer/itkPyBuffer.txx
>> ...
&g
hard to do as I dont know it so much. (maybe something in perl would
> make me more adventurous).
>
> On the other hand I wondered if you had any info from other users or personal
> experience.
>
> Mitchell
>
>
> --- On Mon, 9/28/09, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
&g
Hi there,
In the mid-term I'd like to package VXL (for FARSIGHT project), see
current status:
https://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gdcm/Sandbox/debian-med/vxl
In the long term this means ITK will be able to use a system VXL.
Cheers,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-
Hi there,
I'd like to add VXL as part of Debian Med. A large portion is
included in ITK as convenient libraries and I tested it, I can use a
system installed VXL to build ITK.
I uploaded it on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vxl/
I also unarchive/reopen/ and change ow
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:52:41PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> I'd like to add VXL as part of Debian Med. A large portion is
>> included in ITK as convenient libraries and I tested it, I can use a
>> sys
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:20:12PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Done, I was just waiting for the green light :)
>
> The green light was given when you've got write permissions to the
> SVN repository. ;-)
> Th
hi there,
Quick question, is this correct that GDCM is not entering testing
because of fsl:
Ref:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gdcm
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:20:12PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> In the meantime, I'll patch ITK package in trunk (Steve I hope you
>> don't mind).
>
> Please don't change ITK to build with &
This is a follow up on:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549203
Once the boost graph parallel package will be uploaded, one will be
able to compile VTK 5.4 taking advantage of the new Titan toolkit (*).
Packaging file can be found here:
http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gdc
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:55:04PM +0000, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> +common-build-arch::
>> + echo "$(pkg_lib): package-name-doesnt-match-sonames" >
>> debian/$(pkg_lib).lintian-overrides
>>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
<...>
> debuild
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
Here is what I get:
$ fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
[ ! -f Makefile ] || /usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/mathieu/
Hi there,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:42:46PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>> I am continuing the cleanup of dicomscope, but I am getting some
>>>
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:51:20PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> > The package is now lintian clean :) Please consider for upload.
>>
>> I believe dicomscope is ready for upload.
>
I haven't been very lucky with my previous packaging, but I'd like again anyway.
I believe the package for vxl is ready for upload. I did carefully
check the copyright file this time.
Thanks for your time,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Hi Jörg/Marco,
We are having some issue on the packaging of DICOMScope. I thought I
could redistribute it under the following license:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/dicomscope/trunk/debian/copyright
But upon inspection, Charles discover this is not as clear as it
seems
Forwarding on debian-med
-- Forwarded message --
From: OFFIS DICOM Team <>
Date: Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: dicomscope ready for upload
To: Mathieu Malaterre <>
Cc: Charles Plessy <>, Klaus Kleber <>
Hi Mathieu,
sorry for the late reply .
Charles,
Do you consider this is ok then ? Looking at the C++ code however,
this is not clear that DCMTK copyright applies:
$ head -n 35 interface/libsrc/DSRWaveformValue.cpp
/*
*
* Copyright (C) 2000-2003, OFFIS and Institute for MicroTherapy
*
* This software and supporting documentatio
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:38:30PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>> Charles,
>>
>> Do you consider this is ok then ? Looking at the C++ code however,
>> this is not clear that DCMTK copyright applies:
>
for upload
> Datum: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:02:26 +0200
> Von: OFFIS DICOM Team
> An: Charles Plessy
> CC: Mathieu Malaterre , Klaus Kleber
>
>
> Dear Charles,
>
>> thank you for pointing us at the identity of the C/C++ part of DICOMscope
>> with
>> DCMTK. Sin
Steve,
I fixed the issue of transitive linking in GDCM. So next time you do
an upload we can work together to revert all the Build-Depends stuff
you had to add just to be able to link GDCM (technically we should be
back to original state before the USE_SYSTEM_GDCM option).
Cheers
--
Mathieu
Steve,
If you have been reading this thread, what is your point of view ?
Do you think you can move to ITK/WrapITK (this would solve the numpy
vs numarray issue as a side effect) ?
thanks,
2009/11/2 Gaëtan Lehmann :
>
> Le 2 nov. 09 à 09:16, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> Lu
BTW, I cannot build ITK+CSwig+Tcl8.5 anymore. I'll check if switching
to wrapitk work around the compilation issue with Tk_PhotoSetSize
within cswig code.
cheers
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Steve,
>
> If you have been reading this thread, what is
Hi,
I am looking at the following lintian warning:
http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#gdcm
but I do not understand why GDCM is now considered a native debian
package. I could not figure out what I did ...
Thanks for suggestion,
--
Mathieu
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 4:13 PM, David Paleino wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Hello Mathieu,
>
>> I am looking at the following lintian warning:
>>
>> http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-med-
> packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
David,
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM, David Paleino wrote:
> No need to CC me, thanks :)
> Even if I'm not (anymore) active in the team, I follow the mailinglist,
> hoping I can find something I would be useful to.
>
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 07:55:23PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 4:13 PM, David Paleino wrote:
>> >>> I suggest you to correctly re-upload your pa
Hi there,
I have updated the dicomscope package to reflect the copyright
clarification done upstream. If anyone could review it I'd appreciate
!
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Hi there,
If anyone wants to review pixelmed, I believe it is now ready for
upload. This package is a DICOM implementation in Java by D. Clunie.
It comes with a DICOM Image Viewer and a ECG Viewer. There is also a
DICOM Validator for the Enhanced CT/MR Image Storage objects.
Cheers !
--
Mathie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> If anyone wants to review pixelmed, I believe it is now ready for
>> upload. This package is a DICOM implementation in Java by D. Clunie.
>> It com
Hi there,
I believe igraph is now ready for debian upload. I have been working
closely with upstream to get this package ready (Thanks to Gábor &
Tamas for their work).
To get the source code, you need to use: make -f ./debian/rules
get-orig-source
Cheers,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:10:19PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> To get the source code, you need to use: make -f ./debian/rules
>> get-orig-source
>
> I can give it a try but please note that it is just tagged
Steve,
I thought I should give an update.
I have been trying for the past weeks to get WrapITK working without
Review. I have to admit I never succeeded (see all my attempt
commented out in the patch file). I do not say it is not possible, I
am saying this is really hard.
Instead I have simp
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:45:06PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Steve,
>>
>> I thought I should give an update.
>> I have been trying for the past weeks to get WrapITK working without
>> Review.
Just FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Luis Ibanez
Date: Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Insight-users] Fedora-RHEL packages: Status of
"Patented" and "Review" directories
To: Mario Ceresa
Cc: insight-us...@itk.org
Hi Mario,
Thanks a lot for your efforts on packag
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just uploaded a lintian clean package of dcmtk which is compliant to
> our policy which is using quilt patches exclusively. While there is
> one minor problem if you build with debuild twice in a row you get some
> chan
Hi,
Does anyone knows if there is something particular going on with NEW
package ? dicomscope/pixelmed have not been uploaded (submitted ~3
weeks ago).
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org#pending%20uploads
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCR
I thought the situation for the pdf was ok (andreas could you
confirm?). We described what they are in :
$ cat doc-base.dscs
$ cat doc-base.dsum
As for the .lut file. Those are DICOM files:
$ dcmdump dicomscope-3.6.0/DICOMscope/lut/philips256us.lut
# Dicom-File-Format
# Dicom-Meta-Information
Hi there,
I made a package for VTKEdge. I did it using the umbrella of
debian-med, but I am ok changing it to debian-science if people think
this is required.
I am looking for a sponsor BTW :)
Thanks !
-- Forwarded message --
From: mentors.debian.net
Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2010
FYI. This is yet another of those meta-list.
-- Forwarded message --
Hi,
this is meant to drop a short notice about a new listing/platform of
free/libre and open source software (FOSS) projects for the health
care domain. Furthermore if I may ask I would be very much interested
Charles,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>>
>> I made a package for VTKEdge. I did it using the umbrella of
>> debian-med, but I am ok changing it to debian-science if people thin
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> I reuploaded vtkedge, so if anyone wants to sponsor it I'd appreciate.
>> Andreas if you have some time at the end of the week could yo
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I working on packaging ITK-SNAP (http://www.itksnap.org). This software
> is GPL licensed. It is based on ITK, and ITK itself is linked or
> includes any known library on this planet.
>
> It happens that ITK (and GDCM) also links aga
Some people brought my attention on the following package:
http://treetime.linhi.com/
It looks fairly easy to package...
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://l
Hi,
I would like to upload vxl 1.14 as it is the latest version. I
always forgot new upload are prohibited for DM.
Thanks !
-- Forwarded message --
From: Archive Administrator
Date: Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:18 PM
Subject: vxl_1.14.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
To: Mathieu
Hi Andreas,
If you could sponsor me, that would be great ! Thanks !
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to upload vxl 1.14 as it is the latest version. I
> always forgot new upload are prohibited for DM.
>
> Thanks !
>
>
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:45:46AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> If you could sponsor me, that would be great ! Thanks !
>
> Done. I hope you don't mind that I introduced a small change to Source
> Format 3
1 - 100 of 493 matches
Mail list logo
