On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> wrote: > Le Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:38:30PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : >> Charles, >> >> Do you consider this is ok then ? Looking at the C++ code however, >> this is not clear that DCMTK copyright applies: > >> I can change the debian/copyright, but the ftp-master will be a bit >> surprise that the debian/copyright does not reflect what upstream is >> saying. With those machine readable format it is uneasy to specify >> that... > > Hi Mathieu, > > I have answered to the OFFIS people in the original thread. Since they point > at > a copyright statement that is not in the dicomscope source, but in dcmtk, the > simplest is to quote their statement and to include the copyright notice of > dcmtk in dicomscope. If you would like to do this in a machine-readable > manner, > you can for instance add a ‘Comment:’ field in the paragraph for the files > that > are distributed under these terms.
Excellent thanks for your help ! Will do it ASAP. I now understand what is going on. dicomscope on its own does not have build system. According to the build instruction in the PDF, it would require to copy a subset of file into DCMTK itself, patch the DCMTK Makefile system to add dicomscope own files and then build that new plugin as part of DCMTK. I guess that implied -for them- that dicomscope C++ files had the same copyright as DCMTK itself (since build within a subdir of DCMTK itself). -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
