Steve, 2009/9/29 Gaëtan Lehmann <gaetan.lehm...@jouy.inra.fr>: > > Le 29 sept. 09 à 09:27, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > >> Hi there, >> >> I am reading through the code of itkPyBuffer and found: >> >> $ cat Wrapping/WrapITK/ExternalProjects/PyBuffer/itkPyBuffer.txx >> ... >> // Deal with slight incompatibilites between NumPy (the future, >> hopefully), >> // Numeric (old version) and Numarray's Numeric compatibility module (also >> old). >> #ifndef NDARRAY_VERSION >> // NDARRAY_VERSION is only defined by NumPy's arrayobject.h >> // In non NumPy arrayobject.h files, PyArray_SBYTE is used instead of >> BYTE. >> #define PyArray_BYTE PyArray_SBYTE >> #endif >> ... >> >> There will be an issue soon in debian as python-numarray is >> deprecated so we need to transition -hopefully- to numpy. >> >> A couple of questions: >> - Does anyone use Numpy ? Is this working ? > > I do - it works. > >> - What is the difference in between (the patched) >> Wrapping/WrapITK/ExternalProjects/PyBuffer/itkPyBuffer.txx and >> Wrapping/CSwig/CommonA/itkPyBuffer.txx ? > > > I never succeeded to use the later, while the former works great :-) > The new one is a rework of what was began with the old one, but never > polished enough to be production ready.
What do you think ? Should we just wait until ITK_WRAP_ITK becomes the default ? Or use the old CSWIG approach and just re-activate NUMARRAY using NUMPY (it does compile, I tested it), knowing that it is not 'production ready' ? -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
