Re: Laptop safe for flight in planes?

On Wednesday 23 February 2005 09:44, Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um? Actually, you know your 1.4GHz machine? It emits 1.4GHz, as well > as every harmonic above - 2.8, 4.2, 5.6, Ghz. And if you are only > executing an instruction every n clock cycles, then you also emit at > 1.

Re: unsubcribe from peoplepc. and do not draft from my account

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > cancel my peoplepc and do not draft from my account starting today 9/26/94 Sorry you are too late to cancel the account in 1994, you should have sent the message at least ten years ago. Your peoplepc account is still active, your account wil

Re: unsubcribe from peoplepc. and do not draft from my account

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > cancel my peoplepc and do not draft from my account starting today 9/26/94 Sorry you are too late to cancel the account in 1994, you should have sent the message at least ten years ago. Your peoplepc account is still active, your account wil

Re: lg lpnc lan + modem combo

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:18, "A. MUTONO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi looking for winxp driver for dis modem know where i can find one? > please please Lg site negative We finding no driver for dat modem. Know Microsoft has found one, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and say "please" at least th

Re: lg lpnc lan + modem combo

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:18, "A. MUTONO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi looking for winxp driver for dis modem know where i can find one? > please please Lg site negative We finding no driver for dat modem. Know Microsoft has found one, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and say "please" at least th

Re: your spam

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:41, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not use the Weblink on > > > > The archive is updated all 20 minutes... Thanks, below is the URL for the spam: http://lists.debian.org/debian-laptop/2004/07/ms

Re: your spam

Could someone please educate this user and their ISP about how mail servers work and why it's a really bad idea to send unsolicited email to thousands of innocent people. This user doesn't seem to believe that they sent a message to this list, rather than waiting for a few hours for the list ar

Re: your spam

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:41, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not use the Weblink on > > > > The archive is updated all 20 minutes... Thanks, below is the URL for the spam: http://lists.debian.org/debian-laptop/2004/07/ms

Re: your spam

Could someone please educate this user and their ISP about how mail servers work and why it's a really bad idea to send unsolicited email to thousands of innocent people. This user doesn't seem to believe that they sent a message to this list, rather than waiting for a few hours for the list ar

Re: Un-installing this......

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:33, "Bill Gladney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not to sound like a grumpy old man..but I don't see what gives you the > right(with all your knowledge and wizardry)...to ridicule someone > asking for a little insight on something that makes no sense to himonce > again

Re: Un-installing this......

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:33, "Bill Gladney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not to sound like a grumpy old man..but I don't see what gives you the > right(with all your knowledge and wizardry)...to ridicule someone > asking for a little insight on something that makes no sense to himonce > again

Re: Dead TP600X...

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:47, "Brendan Dacre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have not been able to find a way to set any cmos values and there is a > hardware manual I have read which seems to imply it might be a motherboard > fault. So, Try powering the machine on with the F1 key pressed and keepin

Re: Dead TP600X...

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:47, "Brendan Dacre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have not been able to find a way to set any cmos values and there is a > hardware manual I have read which seems to imply it might be a motherboard > fault. So, Try powering the machine on with the F1 key pressed and keepin

Re: Moving to 2.6 and wondering about wireless

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 06:15, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anything else to be aware of with regard to the upgrade? Can I just > install kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686 and expect sound and wireless to just > work? And should I also be able to switch between the new kernel and my > exiting ker

Re: Moving to 2.6 and wondering about wireless

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 06:15, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anything else to be aware of with regard to the upgrade? Can I just > install kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686 and expect sound and wireless to just > work? And should I also be able to switch between the new kernel and my > exiting ker

Re: PCMCIA problems, 2.6.1 [Fixed]

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:54, "Jon Fawcett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I have XP, and my recently purchased DVD burner, when connected, > disconnects a second or two later. I presume that this is a subtle driver > issue to do with currents through wires acknowledged or something... > > Any ideas

Re: PCMCIA problems, 2.6.1 [Fixed]

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:54, "Jon Fawcett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I have XP, and my recently purchased DVD burner, when connected, > disconnects a second or two later. I presume that this is a subtle driver > issue to do with currents through wires acknowledged or something... > > Any ideas

Fwd: RE: Your e-mail

ntercepted a virus and notified the sender the reason why the mail was not delivered. Suggest you be wary of debian-laptop@lists.debian.org -Original Message- From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 January 2004 08:18 To: Petronis Martin Subject: Re: Your e-mail Please learn

Fwd: RE: Your e-mail

ntercepted a virus and notified the sender the reason why the mail was not delivered. Suggest you be wary of [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 January 2004 08:18 To: Petronis Martin Subject: Re: Your e-mail Please learn to quote, it

Re: Strange Zip Attatchment

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François TOURDE) wrote: > > Since there have been quite a few virus epidemies recently (and maling > > lists are a good place for spreding them), I would like to propose > > following alternatives: > > > > 1. Dissallow atachments alltogether on debian l

Re: Strange Zip Attatchment

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François TOURDE) wrote: > > Since there have been quite a few virus epidemies recently (and maling > > lists are a good place for spreding them), I would like to propose > > following alternatives: > > > > 1. Dissallow atachments alltogether on debian l

Re: questions on ACPI

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:11, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 23 January 2004 01:55, Russell Coker wrote: > > > How do you then explain that without APM or ACPI, the fans do not start > > > up leaving the system frozen after eve

Re: questions on ACPI

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:11, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 23 January 2004 01:55, Russell Coker wrote: > > > How do you then explain that without APM or ACPI, the fans do not start > > > up leaving the system frozen after eve

Re: questions on ACPI

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 05:21, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > APM does not permit the OS to control fans etc. It is totally different > > to ACPI. The fact that your fan works is a matter of hardware and BIOS, > > if it didn't work then it would not be any fault of Linux's

Re: cursor problem please help!!!!!

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > just got a toshiba laptop because we had this wretched little compaq (that > we will now drive over with an SUV and crush to a fine dust). the compaq > had this nefarious little quirk... as you passed the cursor over anything, > an icon or text,

Re: questions on ACPI

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 05:21, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > APM does not permit the OS to control fans etc. It is totally different > > to ACPI. The fact that your fan works is a matter of hardware and BIOS, > > if it didn't work then it would not be any fault of Linux's

Re: cursor problem please help!!!!!

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > just got a toshiba laptop because we had this wretched little compaq (that > we will now drive over with an SUV and crush to a fine dust). the compaq > had this nefarious little quirk... as you passed the cursor over anything, > an icon or text,

Re: questions on ACPI

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:05, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 22 January 2004 10:17, Russell Coker wrote: > > > APM works here. As does ACPI. Running Kernel 2.6 from sid on an ASUS > > > A1300 laptop. > > > > Do you have apmd

Re: questions on ACPI

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:05, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 22 January 2004 10:17, Russell Coker wrote: > > > APM works here. As does ACPI. Running Kernel 2.6 from sid on an ASUS > > > A1300 laptop. > > > > Do you have apmd

Re: questions on ACPI

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:05, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 22 January 2004 06:57, Russell Coker wrote: > > Or APM. APM works fine on all 2.4.x kernels on all laptops I've tried, > > it seems broken in 2.6 though. > > APM works he

Re: questions on ACPI

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:05, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 22 January 2004 06:57, Russell Coker wrote: > > Or APM. APM works fine on all 2.4.x kernels on all laptops I've tried, > > it seems broken in 2.6 though. > > APM works he

Re: questions on ACPI

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 05:09, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only way to suspend on 2.4 is using swsusp2. Or APM. APM works fine on all 2.4.x kernels on all laptops I've tried, it seems broken in 2.6 though. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packa

Re: questions on ACPI

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 05:09, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only way to suspend on 2.4 is using swsusp2. Or APM. APM works fine on all 2.4.x kernels on all laptops I've tried, it seems broken in 2.6 though. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packa

Re: Embedded Mail Server

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:50, James Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone seen a lightweight (portable or embedded) mail sever > running postfix? (Sendmail if that's all that is available would work). > It'd have to have ethernet, and at least 500MB > of storage. Solid state storage(compact

Re: Embedded Mail Server

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:50, James Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone seen a lightweight (portable or embedded) mail sever > running postfix? (Sendmail if that's all that is available would work). > It'd have to have ethernet, and at least 500MB > of storage. Solid state storage(compact

Re: Sony Laptop question

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i am having a problem with my Sony Vaioo PCG-FX120, i read that someone was > having the same problem and i am concerned. I dont know how to get rid of > the problem, i have deleted so many things that i dont use and it will be > at 150MB, then g

Re: Sony Laptop question

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i am having a problem with my Sony Vaioo PCG-FX120, i read that someone was > having the same problem and i am concerned. I dont know how to get rid of > the problem, i have deleted so many things that i dont use and it will be > at 150MB, then g

Re: 2.6.0 & PCMCIA

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:10, "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Issue: HP Pavillion 5425 1Ghz laptop. Recently downloaded & compiled > custom 2.6.0 kernel from www.kernel.org sources. Everything working 32EW > cards are (strangely) loaded, but nothing happening on any of the cards. > For the record

Re: 2.6.0 & PCMCIA

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:10, "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Issue: HP Pavillion 5425 1Ghz laptop. Recently downloaded & compiled > custom 2.6.0 kernel from www.kernel.org sources. Everything working 32EW > cards are (strangely) loaded, but nothing happening on any of the cards. > For the record

Re: full screen console under 2.6, + some small bugs

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:13, Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > EG "vga=791" for 1024x768x16bpp or "vga=788" for 800x600x16bpp. > > > > This is documented in linux/Documentation/fb/vesafb.txt > > Yes yes, I know this.  I get an error on boot -- "invalid mode" -- and > am aked to choose from 8 o

Re: full screen console under 2.6, + some small bugs

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:13, Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > EG "vga=791" for 1024x768x16bpp or "vga=788" for 800x600x16bpp. > > > > This is documented in linux/Documentation/fb/vesafb.txt > > Yes yes, I know this.  I get an error on boot -- "invalid mode" -- and > am aked to choose from 8 o

Re: full screen console under 2.6, + some small bugs

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:12, Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just to report in: this offers no improvement. To be honest I'm kind of > surprised... Anyway, with vesafb compiled into my kernel, and other > framebuffer modules left out, I get an error "/dev/fb: no such > device". Is vesafb s

Re: full screen console under 2.6, + some small bugs

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:12, Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just to report in: this offers no improvement. To be honest I'm kind of > surprised... Anyway, with vesafb compiled into my kernel, and other > framebuffer modules left out, I get an error "/dev/fb: no such > device". Is vesafb s

Re: Debian Users...

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:40, Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fvwm is cool. It takes a fair bit of configuration, but it's fast, > > small and absolutely bomb-proof in my experience. And several of the > > newer WMs still don't match its features... > > Bulletproof my oath. One thing you *

Re: Debian Users...

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:40, Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fvwm is cool. It takes a fair bit of configuration, but it's fast, > > small and absolutely bomb-proof in my experience. And several of the > > newer WMs still don't match its features... > > Bulletproof my oath. One thing you *

Re: Debian Users...

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:00, Caoilte O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > doesn't fam engage in periodic disk access? i certainly get > a lot less when not using kde despite having 256M RAM. I was under the impression that the sole point of FAM was to avoid disk access, it should use the kernel dn

Re: Debian Users...

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:00, Caoilte O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > doesn't fam engage in periodic disk access? i certainly get > a lot less when not using kde despite having 256M RAM. I was under the impression that the sole point of FAM was to avoid disk access, it should use the kernel dn

Re:

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:10, jamal khan wrote: > i want driver for crystal sound fusion (tm) cs-4281 Enable the option CONFIG_SOUND_CS4281 and rebuild your kernel. One problem with that sound module is that it will not work correctly after suspend, so on resume you have to unload the module (fuser

Re:

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:10, jamal khan wrote: > i want driver for crystal sound fusion (tm) cs-4281 Enable the option CONFIG_SOUND_CS4281 and rebuild your kernel. One problem with that sound module is that it will not work correctly after suspend, so on resume you have to unload the module (fuser

Re: Pentium-M

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 06:11, Simone Crippa wrote: > I have heard several different opinions about the best CPU optimization > for compiling a new Kernel for a Pentium-M (Centrino) system. > > Some say Pentium-IV others say Pentium-3. Rumor has it that the Pentium-M core is more similar to P-3 than P-

Re: Pentium-M

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 06:11, Simone Crippa wrote: > I have heard several different opinions about the best CPU optimization > for compiling a new Kernel for a Pentium-M (Centrino) system. > > Some say Pentium-IV others say Pentium-3. Rumor has it that the Pentium-M core is more similar to P-3 than P-

Re: changing root shell

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 04:33, Anish Muttreja wrote: > I did something very silly on mu laptop. I manged to set the root shell to > an incorrect value. > Now I can't login as root. For future reference, the way to solve this is to append "init=/bin/bash" to the kernel boot parameters (both GRUB and L

Re: changing root shell

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 04:33, Anish Muttreja wrote: > I did something very silly on mu laptop. I manged to set the root shell to > an incorrect value. > Now I can't login as root. For future reference, the way to solve this is to append "init=/bin/bash" to the kernel boot parameters (both GRUB and L

Re: Second hand laptop

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 07:49, ralph bacolod wrote: > Hi! Im planning to buy a second hand laptop .How do I > know if the monitor is a TFT monitor? What other > things should I look out for? One thing to consider is purchasing through your local LUG. If the laptop already runs Linux and the function

Re: Second hand laptop

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 07:49, ralph bacolod wrote: > Hi! Im planning to buy a second hand laptop .How do I > know if the monitor is a TFT monitor? What other > things should I look out for? One thing to consider is purchasing through your local LUG. If the laptop already runs Linux and the function

Re: [OT] Virusses (many!) via list?

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:53, Stefan Goessling-Reisemann wrote: > since I wrote two messages to the list, I receive approx. 60 virus mails > per day. Seems that my address has gotten into the addressbook of some > poor virus-victims whose mail program (Outlook?) now sends out virusses by > the thousan

Re: [OT] Virusses (many!) via list?

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:53, Stefan Goessling-Reisemann wrote: > since I wrote two messages to the list, I receive approx. 60 virus mails > per day. Seems that my address has gotten into the addressbook of some > poor virus-victims whose mail program (Outlook?) now sends out virusses by > the thousan

Re: Wicked screensaver

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:31, Jason Straw wrote: > Can we please ban these auto responders? > > they are worse then the virus themselves... and I am seeing a lot of > this virus... Just deal with them the way you deal with all other spammers. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security En

Re: Wicked screensaver

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:31, Jason Straw wrote: > Can we please ban these auto responders? > > they are worse then the virus themselves... and I am seeing a lot of > this virus... Just deal with them the way you deal with all other spammers. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security En

Re: experience with late model laptops?

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:41, Micha Feigin wrote: > From personal experience and quite a few people I work with, IBM seem to > be a good option. When in Ottawa my Thinkpad started dieing from over-heat (the cooling fan was not working properly. Also the screen was dull (for unknown reasons - but th

Re: experience with late model laptops?

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:42, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > several manufacturers have expressed concerns over giving out details of > their 802.11{b,g,??} chips. The explanation given is that users could try > to pervert the frequencies or power output of the cards for nefarious > purposes. I am unde

Re: experience with late model laptops?

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:42, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > several manufacturers have expressed concerns over giving out details of > their 802.11{b,g,??} chips. The explanation given is that users could try > to pervert the frequencies or power output of the cards for nefarious > purposes. I am unde

Re: experience with late model laptops?

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:41, Micha Feigin wrote: > From personal experience and quite a few people I work with, IBM seem to > be a good option. When in Ottawa my Thinkpad started dieing from over-heat (the cooling fan was not working properly. Also the screen was dull (for unknown reasons - but th

Re: pcmcia-cs trouble

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 02:00, Derek Broughton wrote: > > However my PCMCIA functionality is currently less than yours, when a card > > is inserted the driver is loaded but no scripts are run. > > iirc, you didn't have a PCMCIA card, it was a Cardbus card. In which case, > it should skip the pcmcia sc

Re: pcmcia-cs trouble

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:33, Ottavio Campana wrote: > The adapter seems to work only with the yenta_socket module. If I load > it I see the correct debug output. I've seens that the debian > package of pcmcia always loads the i82365 module, even if I specify > PCIC=yenta_socket . >

Re: pcmcia-cs trouble

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 02:00, Derek Broughton wrote: > > However my PCMCIA functionality is currently less than yours, when a card > > is inserted the driver is loaded but no scripts are run. > > iirc, you didn't have a PCMCIA card, it was a Cardbus card. In which case, > it should skip the pcmcia sc

Re: pcmcia-cs trouble

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:33, Ottavio Campana wrote: > The adapter seems to work only with the yenta_socket module. If I load > it I see the correct debug output. I've seens that the debian > package of pcmcia always loads the i82365 module, even if I specify > PCIC=yenta_socket . >

Re: kernel pcmcia modules

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:08, mi wrote: > > Here is the contents of my /etc/default/pcmcia: > > # Defaults for pcmcia (sourced by /etc/init.d/pcmcia) > > PCMCIA=yes > > PCIC=i82365 > > PCIC_OPTS= > > CORE_OPTS= > > CARDMGR_OPTS= > > Are there any specific changes that you recommend I should try? > > y

Re: kernel pcmcia modules

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:08, mi wrote: > > Here is the contents of my /etc/default/pcmcia: > > # Defaults for pcmcia (sourced by /etc/init.d/pcmcia) > > PCMCIA=yes > > PCIC=i82365 > > PCIC_OPTS= > > CORE_OPTS= > > CARDMGR_OPTS= > > Are there any specific changes that you recommend I should try? > > y

Re: kernel pcmcia modules

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:11, Sam Clegg wrote: > Shouldn't /etc/network/interfaces control when and where to run > dhclient? Presumably the pcmcia scripts should call ifup eth? (or > send a hotplug even which then calls ifup eth?) at some > point which would then trigger dhcp (if thats what you speci

Re: kernel pcmcia modules

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:11, Sam Clegg wrote: > Shouldn't /etc/network/interfaces control when and where to run > dhclient? Presumably the pcmcia scripts should call ifup eth? (or > send a hotplug even which then calls ifup eth?) at some > point which would then trigger dhcp (if thats what you speci

Re: kernel pcmcia modules

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 05:56, mi wrote: > > I have just tried switching from the pcmcia-source package to the kernel > > tree for the PCMCIA drivers. > > /etc/default/pcmcia CPC=yenta_socket is alright ? Here is the contents of my /etc/default/pcmcia: # Defaults for pcmcia (sourced by /etc/init.d/pcm

Re: kernel pcmcia modules

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 05:56, mi wrote: > > I have just tried switching from the pcmcia-source package to the kernel > > tree for the PCMCIA drivers. > > /etc/default/pcmcia CPC=yenta_socket is alright ? Here is the contents of my /etc/default/pcmcia: # Defaults for pcmcia (sourced by /etc/init.d/pcm

kernel pcmcia modules

I have just tried switching from the pcmcia-source package to the kernel tree for the PCMCIA drivers. When I insert my network card the correct device driver is loaded, but the pcmcia-cs code does not run dhclient etc. The kernel is the only thing that I have changed, with the other kernel with

kernel pcmcia modules

I have just tried switching from the pcmcia-source package to the kernel tree for the PCMCIA drivers. When I insert my network card the correct device driver is loaded, but the pcmcia-cs code does not run dhclient etc. The kernel is the only thing that I have changed, with the other kernel with

Re: apache

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:39, Paul Bryan wrote: > > If Apache decides not to die then most (all?) inetd programs will happily > > allow it to do so. [...] > Only serving a single connection makes sense to me, as otherwise it seems > to defeat the purpose of using inetd in the first place. In any event,

Re: apache

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:39, Paul Bryan wrote: > > If Apache decides not to die then most (all?) inetd programs will happily > > allow it to do so. [...] > Only serving a single connection makes sense to me, as otherwise it seems > to defeat the purpose of using inetd in the first place. In any event,

Re: apache

On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:35, Paul Bryan wrote: > That's exactly right. Whenever a request comes in on port 80, inetd starts > up an apache process to handle it. Once the request is completed, inetd > kills the apache process. inetd does not kill the Apache process, it reaps (via wait()) the Apache p

Re: apache

On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:35, Paul Bryan wrote: > That's exactly right. Whenever a request comes in on port 80, inetd starts > up an apache process to handle it. Once the request is completed, inetd > kills the apache process. inetd does not kill the Apache process, it reaps (via wait()) the Apache p

Re: Virus Detected by Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a

On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 22:21, Dan Rasmussen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 12:14:38PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > An E-mail from to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > with subject Re: Application has been intercepted. The virus > > W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] in attachment your_details.zip has been detecte

Re: Virus Detected by Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a

On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 22:21, Dan Rasmussen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 12:14:38PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > An E-mail from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > with subject Re: Application has been intercepted. The virus > > W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] in attachment your_details.z

Re: Debian <---> Gentoo

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:37, Johannes Graumann wrote: > Well, I'm aware that some of the BIG stuff will take a while to compile ... > am not planning to run KDE or Gnome though (Ion is what I use) - non the > less, I assume that a XFree86 compile will take a while ... but would it be > worth performa

Re: Debian <---> Gentoo

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:37, Johannes Graumann wrote: > Well, I'm aware that some of the BIG stuff will take a while to compile ... > am not planning to run KDE or Gnome though (Ion is what I use) - non the > less, I assume that a XFree86 compile will take a while ... but would it be > worth performa

Re: Debian <---> Gentoo

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 01:33, Johannes Graumann wrote: > This might be a provoking question but I was wondering whether anybody on > the list had tried Gentoo Linux ... I get the impression that the custom > compiling done through this distribution might be the right thing for the > limited resources

Re: Debian <---> Gentoo

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 01:33, Johannes Graumann wrote: > This might be a provoking question but I was wondering whether anybody on > the list had tried Gentoo Linux ... I get the impression that the custom > compiling done through this distribution might be the right thing for the > limited resources

Re: Replacing Stolen laptop

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 19:55, Juergen Stuber wrote: > Not (i.e. no longer) true, the T series machines have touchpads, > otherwise I wouldn't be typing this on a T30 (they have the stick, too). Can you disable one of the forms of mouse device to exclusively use the other? I would like to use the sti

Re: Replacing Stolen laptop

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 19:55, Juergen Stuber wrote: > Not (i.e. no longer) true, the T series machines have touchpads, > otherwise I wouldn't be typing this on a T30 (they have the stick, too). Can you disable one of the forms of mouse device to exclusively use the other? I would like to use the sti

Re: Opinions on Lindows Mobile PC

On Tue, 27 May 2003 02:54, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > The point of this whole diatribe is that I have decided that I will > probably get the Lindows (yuck!) Mobile PC (available from idot.com). If I > purchase it I will erase Lindows and install Debian Sid on it. I am asking > here Lindows does ha

Re: SuSe -> Debian

On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 22:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am to change from SuSE to Debian and also am far from being a Power User. > Thus, is there something in specific that I should take care of before > trying to install Debian on my Notebook? Notebooks can be problemmatic, and getting ALL the i

Re: laptop recommendation

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 06:14, florian wrote: > im currently searching a nice laptop which works well > with debian. basically it should have a at least 15" big > screen and at least 1400x1050 px resolution.. > > would be also great if it would not be too heavy and > big.. anybody got an recommendation

Re: Serious crash

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:25, Gary Hennigan wrote: > The other day I had a serious problem with my Debian laptop. I rarely > run it on batteries but a couple of days ago I did just that. After it > had been idle for around 2 hours I went to try and use it. No response > to any keys, so I powered it do

Re: Serious crash

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:25, Gary Hennigan wrote: > The other day I had a serious problem with my Debian laptop. I rarely > run it on batteries but a couple of days ago I did just that. After it > had been idle for around 2 hours I went to try and use it. No response > to any keys, so I powered it do

Re: Probles with RAM detection IBM TP600

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:12, Andre Timmermann wrote: > So I should be able to use up to 160 MB RAM, but the BIOS shows only > 130496 kb of memory: > > 163840 kb installed, > 130496 kb usable Try forcing the matter with "mem=" on the command line. It may be that you can get Linux to use more memory

Re: Probles with RAM detection IBM TP600

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:12, Andre Timmermann wrote: > So I should be able to use up to 160 MB RAM, but the BIOS shows only > 130496 kb of memory: > > 163840 kb installed, > 130496 kb usable Try forcing the matter with "mem=" on the command line. It may be that you can get Linux to use more memory

Re: grub on ext3

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:36, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.10.1825 +0100]: > > No problem. There is no diference between ext3 and ext2 file system in > > this case. > > ... provided that you did properly umount the filesystem before. > accessing an ext

Re: grub on ext3

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:36, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.10.1825 +0100]: > > No problem. There is no diference between ext3 and ext2 file system in > > this case. > > ... provided that you did properly umount the filesystem before. > accessing an ext

Re: Mail (smtp) config at different locations. Script or ..?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 04:16, Joao Pedro Clemente wrote: > Anyway, I'm working at 2 different locations and besides that I also have > net at home... This totals 3 different configs to send mail, so I would > try to figure out what's best to setup.. For sending mail from my laptop I have Postfix inst

Re: Mail (smtp) config at different locations. Script or ..?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 04:16, Joao Pedro Clemente wrote: > Anyway, I'm working at 2 different locations and besides that I also have > net at home... This totals 3 different configs to send mail, so I would > try to figure out what's best to setup.. For sending mail from my laptop I have Postfix inst

Re: What to choose? Mac or PC?

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:52, Matěj Hausenblas wrote: > Now I stand before a decision, what to buy, I've heard that the Macs are > more powerfull and aren't so quickly obsolete as PC's, but I never touched Being quickly obsolete is a really good thing if you want to buy second-hand! Ebay has

Re: What to choose? Mac or PC?

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:52, Matěj Hausenblas wrote: > Now I stand before a decision, what to buy, I've heard that the Macs are > more powerfull and aren't so quickly obsolete as PC's, but I never touched Being quickly obsolete is a really good thing if you want to buy second-hand! Ebay has

  1   2   3   4   5   >