On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 06:11, Simone Crippa wrote: > I have heard several different opinions about the best CPU optimization > for compiling a new Kernel for a Pentium-M (Centrino) system. > > Some say Pentium-IV others say Pentium-3.
Rumor has it that the Pentium-M core is more similar to P-3 than P-4, but rumors have been wrong before. ;) In casual tests they should both give similar performance, the benefits of optimisation for a kernel are not that great. If you use bonnie++ version 1.9x then the per-char tests may show some difference between kernels, and the file creation tests on bonnie++ may show some difference too (especially on ReiserFS). Also try a benchmark that uses SysV IPC, semaphores etc are areas that may get more benefit from CPU optimisation. If you have gigabit Ethernet then do some tests of that, it's one of the few things that can really stress kernel code without any user-space interaction. Try testing iptables and routing of gig-E. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
