Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

Ben Hutchings wrote: > --- a/scripts/mkcompile_h > +++ b/scripts/mkcompile_h > @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ > if [ -n "$SMP" ] ; then CONFIG_FLAGS="SMP"; fi > if [ -n "$PREEMPT" ] ; then CONFIG_FLAGS="$CONFIG_FLAGS PREEMPT"; fi > UTS_VERSION="$UTS_VERSION $CONFIG_FLAGS $TIMESTAMP" > + > +DISTRIBUTION=$(l

Bug#638938: linux-tools-3.0.0: "perf report" segfaults when using binary version; compiling from source works

Package: linux-tools-3.0.0 Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: normal I captured a few perf traces on a live system (using "perf record --event cpu-clock --freq 1000 -a --output=mylog.perf"). When I try to run a report on those perf logs, it segfaults. I can run it under gdb and get a stacktrace (below)

Processed: tagging 637764

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 637764 + pending Bug #637764 [linux-latest-2.6] linux-latest-2.6 [L10N,DE]: initial german debconf translation Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637764: http://bugs.debian

Processed: reassign 638896 to dracut, forcibly merging 627023 638896

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638896 dracut Bug #638896 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'dracut'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64. >

Bug#638896: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot

Based on this new log, it looks like you had dracut installed, and dracut doesn't rebuild the initramfs correctly when you upgrade the kernel. I'll reassign this to dracut. I suggest that you upgrade initramfs-tools and remove dracut for now. Ben. signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Processed: tagging 638878

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 638878 + patch Bug #638878 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 638878: http://bugs.deb

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 14:54 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to > > capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or > > similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient,

Processed: reassign 638878 to src:linux-2.6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638878 src:linux-2.6 3.0.0-2 Bug #638878 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname Ignoring request to reassign bug #638878 to the same package Bug #638878 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-

Bug#638913: linux-source-3.0.0: cpu frequency speedstep_centrino Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor

On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 00:38 +0200, Grzegorz Kochański wrote: > Does acpi-cpufreq not work for this system? > > no, it does not work: > # modprobe acpi-cpufreq > FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq > (/lib/modules/3.0.0-speedstep/kernel/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): > No such device It works

Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac

Mike Hore wrote: > Ummm... Mac keyboards don't have scroll lock! It seems that scroll lock is shift+f14. > Yes, single WAS there!! Let me double-check... > > yes, what I said was what happened. Both single and quiet were there. The > actual line printed was > > Starting GNOME Display Manager:

Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac

Hi Jonathan, Mike Hore wrote: I added "single" and removed "quiet". The boot then proceeded till I got a flashing line at the top of the screen saying lp: driver loaded but no devices found alternating very rapidly with another line I couldn't read. No further progress. Maybe scroll lock

Re: Ubuntu 10.04.2 (2.6.32-32-server) random kernel panic on xfs write

On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:59 +0800, Muhammad Hallaj Subery wrote: > Hi all, I'm getting kernel panic on XFS write process by random. Could > someone point to me if this is a known issue and if there's a fix for > it? Attach is the log for it. Try reporting this to kernel-t...@lists.ubuntu.com or on

Ubuntu 10.04.2 (2.6.32-32-server) random kernel panic on xfs write

Hi all, I'm getting kernel panic on XFS write process by random. Could someone point to me if this is a known issue and if there's a fix for it? Attach is the log for it. [922371.445221] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000389b14ad8 [922371.445730] IP: [] schedule+0x250/0x4

Re: lkcl interference with initramfs-tools bug handling

I notice that bug #636123 is currently assigned to src:linux-2.6, although it may be a bug in initramfs-tools. In any case, both packages are maintained by the kernel team. Ben. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#550534: [firmware-iwlwifi] [ 7663.971686] iwl3945 0000:04:00.0: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x82000008

Package: firmware-iwlwifi Version: 0.33 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I've found a similar error (practically the same I think) with my intel iwl3945 a/b/g wifi card on Sid. It doesn't stop working correctly all the times it happens, only a few of them (possibly, 1 of each 5-

Bug#638921: firmware-netxen: HP NC375i network card fails to autonegotiate with a 100full cisco switch

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Mastrogiacomo wrote: > Package: firmware-netxen > Version: 0.28 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > The HP NC375i network card on an HP ML370 G6 server with Debian > squeeze OS installed as problems. > The server is con

Processed: reassign 638921 to firmware-netxen, severity of 638921 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638921 firmware-netxen 0.28 Bug #638921 [src:linux-2.6] firmware-netxen: HP NC375i network card fails to autonegotiate with a 100full cisco switch Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'firmware-netxen'. Bug No longer marked as

Processed: reassign 638921 to src:linux-2.6, severity of 638921 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638921 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-35 Bug #638921 [firmware-netxen] firmware-netxen: HP NC375i network card fails to autonegotiate with a 100full cisco switch Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-netxen' to 'src:linux-2.6'. Bug No longer marke

Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac

Mike Hore wrote: > I added "single" and removed "quiet". The boot then proceeded till I got a > flashing line at the top of the screen saying > > lp: driver loaded but no devices found > > alternating very rapidly with another line I couldn't read. No further > progress. Maybe scroll lock can s

Bug#638913: [PATCH] linux-source-3.0.0/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c

Hi, Grzegorz Kochański wrote: > Additional settings for thinkpads Intel M Processors. It is best to credit the original author and mention where the patch came from. IIUC this patch is by Christophe Dumez and can be found at http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick.git;a=commitdiff

Bug#638896: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot [SOLVED?]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:47:24PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote: > After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again. > Guess what? It just works now. > The term.log section looks nothing like the one above. > Also the old kernel has been retained. Please use reply fuction when pos

Bug#638921: firmware-netxen: HP NC375i network card fails to autonegotiate with a 100full cisco switch

Package: firmware-netxen Version: 0.28 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system The HP NC375i network card on an HP ML370 G6 server with Debian squeeze OS installed as problems. The server is connected to a switch that does only 100/full and it fails to autonegotiate correctly

Bug#638913: [PATCH] linux-source-3.0.0/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c

from Grzegorz Kochański Additional settings for thinkpads Intel M Processors. Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Kochański --- --- linux-source-3.0.0/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c.orig 2011-08-23 00:42:04.591009201 +0200 +++ linux-source-3.0.0/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c 2011-

Bug#638913: linux-source-3.0.0: cpu frequency speedstep_centrino Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor

Does acpi-cpufreq not work for this system? no, it does not work: # modprobe acpi-cpufreq FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq (/lib/modules/3.0.0-speedstep/kernel/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): No such device > > If you want to propose a patch to the speedstep-centrino driver, > following the

Processed: tagging 638913

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 638913 + moreinfo Bug #638913 [linux-source-3.0.0] linux-source-3.0.0: cpu frequency speedstep_centrino Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#638913: linux-source-3.0.0: cpu frequency speedstep_centrino Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor

Does acpi-cpufreq not work for this system? If you want to propose a patch to the speedstep-centrino driver, following the instructions in Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.

Bug#638896: clarification

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:48:24PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > valentijn, hi, > Your messages don't reach valentijn if you only send mail to bugnumber address...people aren't automatically subscribed to bugs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#464501: check the attach files

please check the attach files This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201108

Re: Upstream bug 39132 - Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be broken.

From: Ben Hutchings Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:44:14 +0100 > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:27:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Ben Hutchings >> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:08:00 +0100 >> >> > David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable: >> >> The change is already in -stable as it went into 3.

Bug#638913: linux-source-3.0.0: cpu frequency speedstep_centrino Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor

Package: linux-source-3.0.0 Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: normal #modproble speedstep-centrino throws "No such device" for Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor (thinkpad T42) diff my-speedstep-centrino.c speedstep-centrino.c: c 46d45 < CPU_DOTHAN_C0, 55,57c54,55 < [CPU_DOTHAN_B0] = { 6, 1

Re: Upstream bug 39132 - Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be broken.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:27:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:08:00 +0100 > > > David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable: > > The change is already in -stable as it went into 3.0-final. > > If anything this might suggest that the fix in questio

Bug#638896: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot

Well, it’s Debian Stable, with the following changes: Newer kernel from backports (2.6.38 and now 2.6.39) Newer transmission-daemon from experimental (2.32) sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.0 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64 LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20110324-07:27]/ squeeze mai

Bug#638896: Fw: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> From: Valentijn Scholten >> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 10:45 PM >> To: 638...@bugs.debian.org >> Subject: Re: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on >> boot >> >> Luke, >> >> The installer has copied o

Bug#638896: clarification

> After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again. > Guess what? It just works now. arghhh! valentijn, that's *exactly* the "mistake" that i made :) actually in my case, i installed grub (and lvm2) which triggered off the postinst initramfs-tools hook. you cannot "back-recover

Bug#638896: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot [SOLVED?]

After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again. Guess what? It just works now. The term.log section looks nothing like the one above. Also the old kernel has been retained. term.log: Log started: 2011-08-22 22:23:29 (Reading database ... M(Reading database ... 5%M(Reading database

Re: Upstream bug 39132 - Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be broken.

From: Ben Hutchings Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:08:00 +0100 > David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable: The change is already in -stable as it went into 3.0-final. If anything this might suggest that the fix in question is the cause of this bug, since the commit went in right after 3.0-rc4 Try

lkcl interference with initramfs-tools bug handling

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl) reported bug #636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me) a different bug. He insists on asking the second submitter to investigate things as if the second bug is the same as his bug, while I have asked the second submitter to open a n

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to > capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or > similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient, > but then the uname commands probably work for almost every other

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:27:10AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > tags 638878 + moreinfo > thanks > > Touko Korpela wrote: > > Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname > > output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v > > (now it's "#1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22

Processed: Re: Bug#638896: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638896 src:linux-2.6 2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 Bug #638896 [linux-image-2.6 / linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64] linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6' Warning: Unknown package '

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem not recognised -> new bug report

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Valentijn Scholten wrote: > I opened a new bug report: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638896 thanks valentijn. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem not recognised -> new bug report

I opened a new bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638896 It also questions Luke's questions. Thanks so far. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:10:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient, but then the uname commands pr

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> Touko Korpela wrote: > > >>> Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname > >>> output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v > >>> (now it's "#1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:

Re: Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:44:35PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton >> > wrote: >> >> Valentijn,

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> Touko Korpela wrote: > > >>> Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname > >>> output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v > >>> (now it's "#1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:55:28PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten >> > wrote: >> >> Hello Luke,

Re: Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > Valentijn, this is very important: > > please can you keep and make available the initrd that was generated > by initramfs-tools? [...] There isn't one. That is the problem. I don't believe this has anything to do w

Re: Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:55:28PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten > > wrote: > >> Hello Luke, > >> Thanks for jumping in. > >> I only have a /boot/initrd.im

Re: Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> Valentijn, this is very important: >> >> please can you keep and make available the initrd that was generated >> by initramfs-tools? > [...] > > There isn't one.

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten > wrote: >> Hello Luke, >> Thanks for jumping in. >> I only have a /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 at the moment. >> This is the one probably generated (reinstalled) after I

Re: Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:44:35PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > > wrote: > >> Valentijn, this is very important: > >> > >> please can you keep and mak

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

Ben Hutchings wrote: >> Touko Korpela wrote: >>> Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname >>> output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v >>> (now it's "#1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011". >>> This information is present in /proc/version and could be i

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten wrote: > Hello Luke, > Thanks for jumping in. > I only have a /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 at the moment. > This is the one probably generated (reinstalled) after I reinstalled Squeeze > on top of the existing problematic install. ah. _drat

Processed: tagging 638659, bug 638659 is forwarded to ti...@suse.de

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 638659 - moreinfo Bug #638659 [linux-2.6] [linux-2.6] No sound Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > forwarded 638659 ti...@suse.de Bug #638659 [linux-2.6] [linux-2.6] No sound Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'ti...@suse.de'. > thanks Stopping processin

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64 root filesystem not found (backported kernel on squeeze)

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote: > Below is the snippet from term.log > As you can see I carefully ignored the warning about the kernel being removed. > I am used to having the old kernel still available as a boot option in grub. > > After this I rebooted and ran

Bug#638659: [linux-2.6] No sound

> > If the driver is auto-muting when nothing is plugged in, that seems to > be a bug which should be fixed. > > Can you provide the information listed under 'Reporting problems' at > ? > > Ben. OK, I re-enabled the auto-mute featu

Bug#636123: similar issue with 2.6.39.2 from backports

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote: > I am running into a similar isue with 2.6.39.2. amd64. > > Intel DH55TC with a Pentium G6950. > > I was running a Debian Squeeze with 2.6.38.2 from backports. Was > running fine. > > I decided to install 2.6.39.2 from backport

Processed: reassign 638878 to src:linux-2.6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638878 src:linux-2.6 3.0.0-2 Bug #638878 [coreutils] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname Bug reassigned from package 'coreutils' to 'src:linux-2.6'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions coreutils

Bug#638316: base: Task blocked for more than 120 seconds

Roberto Dal Zilio writes: > On the xenserver I do not have a crashdump because the VM does not > crash Can you delibaretly crash it to obtain such a dump? The stuck processes would still be visible in the dump. > (I only get the task hang and the error in dmesg on the VM). Is it > helpfull for y

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

Hello Luke, Thanks for jumping in. I only have a /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 at the moment. This is the one probably generated (reinstalled) after I reinstalled Squeeze on top of the existing problematic install. There's no initrd img for 2.6.39, there's the kernel image itself however. roo

Re: Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

Valentijn, this is very important: please can you keep and make available the initrd that was generated by initramfs-tools? the file is going to be /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-2-{insert_arch_name} DO NOT attempt to "recover" the system right away (unless you take a backup of /boot/initrg.img-2.6.38-

Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64 root filesystem not found (backported kernel on squeeze)

Below is the snippet from term.log As you can see I carefully ignored the warning about the kernel being removed. I am used to having the old kernel still available as a boot option in grub. After this I rebooted and ran into the kernel panic. Log started: 2011-08-21 22:40:54 (Reading database .

Bug#638863: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Errors/warnings show during startup

Hi, Thanks for a quick reply. Ralf Jung wrote: > Hi, >> The test has been that way ever since v2.6.15-rc1~731^2~22^2~13 >> (shpchp: detect SHPC capability before doing a lot of work, >> 2006-10-13). The false positive (if it actually is a false positive) >> is clearly harmless. If someone want

Re: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

Hi Valentin, Valentijn Scholten wrote: > [Subject: Bug#636123: similar issue with 2.6.39.2 from backports] Please keep in mind that these appear as emails in a crowded inbox, so the subject line can be a good place to put valuable context. [...] > I was running a Debian Squeeze with 2.6.38.2 fr

Processed: Re: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638878 coreutils 8.5-1 Bug #638878 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'coreutils'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 3.0.0-2. Bug #63887

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

reassign 638878 coreutils 8.5-1 quit Hi Touko, Touko Korpela wrote: > Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname > output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v > (now it's "#1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011". > This information is present in /proc/versi

Bug#636123: similar issue with 2.6.39.2 from backports

I am running into a similar isue with 2.6.39.2. amd64. Intel DH55TC with a Pentium G6950. I was running a Debian Squeeze with 2.6.38.2 from backports. Was running fine. I decided to install 2.6.39.2 from backports (apt-get install ...) It removed the old kernel and installed the new one. I

Bug#638878: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel version with uname

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: wishlist Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v (now it's "#1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011". This information is present in /proc/version and could be in un

Bug#638863: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Errors/warnings show during startup

Hi, > Let's deal with the first one. It seems like a real problem because > it distracts people debugging other problems. The second should be > filed as a separate bug if you are interested in working on it. > [snip] > > The test has been that way ever since v2.6.15-rc1~731^2~22^2~13 > (shpch

Bug#638863: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Errors/warnings show during startup

Hi Ralf, Ralf Jung wrote: > Each time I start up my laptop, the following errors (warnings?) appear: > > [5.083819] shpchp :00:01.0: Cannot reserve MMIO region > [5.447322] SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use > > The system is working fine as far as I can tell. Ho

Processed: Re: Bug#638867: linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638867 gcc-multilib Bug #638867 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32 Bug reassigned from package 'linux-libc-dev' to 'gcc-multilib'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.0.0

Bug#638867: linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32

reassign 638867 gcc-multilib forcemerge 638418 638867 thanks On 2011-08-22 17:55 +0200, François Revol wrote: > Le 22/08/2011 17:48, Sven Joachim a écrit : >> On 2011-08-22 17:07 +0200, François Revol wrote: >> >>> Package: linux-libc-dev >>> Version: 3.0.0-2 >>> Severity: important >>> >>> Last

Bug#638867: linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32

Le 22/08/2011 17:48, Sven Joachim a écrit : On 2011-08-22 17:07 +0200, François Revol wrote: Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: important Last update seems to break compiling some Haiku build tools which currently require -m32. Build log below. I bet /usr/include/asm is an em

Bug#638867: linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32

On 2011-08-22 17:07 +0200, François Revol wrote: > Package: linux-libc-dev > Version: 3.0.0-2 > Severity: important > > Last update seems to break compiling some Haiku build tools which currently > require -m32. Build log below. > > cf. https://www.haiku-os.org/guides/building > > $ (cd generated-

Bug#638316: base: Task blocked for more than 120 seconds

Hi, Roberto Dal Zilio writes: > [904313.840676] updatedb.mloc D 880001855c40 0 14983 14979 > 0x > [904313.840684] 880001855c40 0282 000800017880 > 8800032f5810 > [904313.840693] f9e0 > 88002cf2dfd8 > [904

Bug#638867: linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent asm/errno.h for -m32

Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: important Last update seems to break compiling some Haiku build tools which currently require -m32. Build log below. cf. https://www.haiku-os.org/guides/building $ (cd generated-x86-gcc4/; jam -q haiku-vmware-image) patience... patience.

Re: Upstream bug 39132 - Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be broken.

David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable: commit 797fd3913abf2f7036003ab8d3d019cbea41affd Author: Julian Anastasov Date: Sun Aug 7 09:11:00 2011 + netfilter: TCP and raw fix for ip_route_me_harder (Discussed in and

Bug#638863: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Errors/warnings show during startup

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: minor Each time I start up my laptop, the following errors (warnings?) appear: [5.083819] shpchp :00:01.0: Cannot reserve MMIO region [5.447322] SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use The system is working fine as far as

Re: Upstream bug 39132 - Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be broken.

>> -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p udp --dport 53,123 >> -j MASQUERADE >> -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p tcp --dport >> 22,80,119,443 -j MASQUERADE > This config allows packets with private addresses to escape to eth1. Fix it. Granted. Howev

Bug#638555: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: CPU time overflows for long-running processes.

On Saturday 20 August 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This wouldn't entirely surprise me on a 32-bit kernel with 1000 Hz > timer, but we don't build any kernel packages with that configuration. > > Which kernel did you actually find this on? 32 s >> uname -a Linux solstice2 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue

Processed: Re: Bug#638855: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae: kernel BUG at md.c:6630! on reboot -f

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638855 src:linux-2.6 Bug #638855 [linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae] linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae: kernel BUG at md.c:6630! on reboot -f Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae' Bug reassigned from package 'linux-im

Bug#618261: udlfb not acting as console

Hi! I would also like to add my +1 vote to enable this option on all architectures. I can also confirm, that loading this driver no longer redirects console output to the DisplayLink adapter right away. Instead, it is now an option, which is disabled by default. From http://git.kernel.org/?p=linu

Re: Upstream bug 39132 - Starting with 3.0.0-rc6, masquerading seems to be broken.

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Troy Davis wrote: > -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p udp --dport > 53,123 -j MASQUERADE > -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p tcp --dport > 22,80,119,443 -j MASQUERADE This config allows packets with private a

Bug#638172: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [qemu-dm:3205]

Il giorno lun, 22/08/2011 alle 10.00 +0100, Ian Campbell ha scritto: [...] > @Giuseppe: > > Can you confirm the versions of the xen and qemu-dm packages which you > have got installed please. $ COLUMNS=120 dpkg -l \*linux-image\* \*qemu-\* | grep ^ii ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen 2.6.32-35

Bug#638172: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [qemu-dm:3205]

@xen-devel: Does this look familiar to anyone, this is (I expect, hopefully Giuseppe will confirm) from Debian Squeeze which has a Xen 4.0.x with a PVops dom0 kernel based on xen.git from last summer (e73f4955a821) with more recent upstream longterm kernels (up to and including 2.6.32.41) merged i

Bug#630593: The Intel parport bug

Hi, first of all sorry for the delay. I have been out for a few days and I don't see this email. A Dijous, 11 d'agost de 2011, Jonathan Nieder va escriure: [...] > > That's it. Does it sound reasonable to you? Yes, it's so reasonable. I hope write it soon I send it. Thanks a lot for the repo

Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac

Hi Jonathan, Mike Hore wrote: Hi Jonathan, That is bug #636040 (finish-install: hvc0 console added to inittab even when not available), which seems to be mostly harmless. It should be safe to remove the "co:" line to remove the message about spawning getty there. Are you suggesting I do t