On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:12:39PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> linux-2.6 deprecates kernel-latest, afaict. It provides the same binary
> packages as transition packages that depend on the s/kernel/linux/
> equivalents.
They also describe the upgrade path from sarge.
> The remaining problem is t
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:13:46AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> For 2.6, instead of building it as an outside package,
> perhaps it should be an i386 subarch or flavour within the linux-2.6
> package?
Yes.
>it could just as
>
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_all.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_all.deb
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11.diff.gz
to pool/
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-11_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-11_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386_2.4.27-11_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386_2.4.27-11_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-58
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:32:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320256: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:32:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311164: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 07:16:09AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello Sven,
>
> On 05-Aug-16 21:22, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:22:32PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > Anyway, the patch to support the native ppc64 kernel is very simple.
> > > It adds only 8 lines and t
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:32:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319629: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:32:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323318: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:31:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323481: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: installing with
e2fsprogs 1.35 makes system unbootable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
tag 323363 +pending
thanks
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:29:18AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Severity: important
> Tags: security patch
>
> CAN-2005-2553 describes the following DoS vulnerability:
>
> > The find_target function in ptrace32.c in the Linux kerne
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:53:47AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2005-08-17 00:34:15 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >
> > > On this machine, I get the following error several times by hour:
> > >
> > > hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-11.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-11.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-11_i386.deb
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-2-586tsc_2.4.27-11_i386.deb
ke
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11.dsc
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_all.deb
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_all.deb
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11_al
Hello Sven,
On 05-Aug-16 21:22, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:22:32PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Anyway, the patch to support the native ppc64 kernel is very simple.
> > It adds only 8 lines and two symlinks to the linux-2.6 package. Please
> > make things a little easier
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:22:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > > This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, inclu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 320056 linux-2.6: FTBFS (ppc64): Please support the ppc64 architecture
Bug#320056: linux-2.6: FTBFS (ppc64): current build architecture ppc64 does not
appear in package's list
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323363 +pending
Bug#323363: CAN-2005-2553: DoS in find_target() of ptrace32.c
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:06:59AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:22:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[snip]
> > The rest of this message leads me to believe this is only a call for
> > 2.4.27/unstable builds.
>
> Sorry if this was a bit unclear. Basically I am calling for three
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 02:13 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 19:35, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
> >
> > This should probably be the case anyways, as it appears to be marked
> > EXPERIMENTAL, and the config does support tristate. Not only that, but
> > it's configured differently
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:02:40PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >
> > On the topic of Sid, I think we need to keep 2.4.27 there for now.
> > I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed
> > for some m68k flavours
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:22:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
> > I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
> > and its probably a good time to t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:21PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
> I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
> and its probably a good time to think about some releases -
> security bugs keep coming in all the t
hi
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 22.47, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
>
> I tried latest debian 2.6.12 kernel; see:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321419
>
> irq 11: nobody cared!
> [] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0xa0
> [] handle_IRQ_event+0x3d/0x70
> [] note_interrupt+0x82/0xa0
> []
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 19:35, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Regarding this problem with iproute:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282492
> >
> > Would it be possible to include a fix for this, or at least make
> > CONFIG_ATM_CLIP a module instead of a yes in the stock kerne
On 2005-08-17 00:34:15 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On this machine, I get the following error several times by hour:
> >
> > hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21
> > hda: error waiting for DMA
> > hda: dma timeout retry: status=0x58 { D
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Installing the kernel image breaks the current one and means the server
is in an unrebootable state. It is beause e2fsprogs is printing
some stupid HEX value for some reason. e2fsprogs is
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On this machine, I get the following error several times by hour:
>
> hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21
> hda: error waiting for DMA
> hda: dma timeout retry: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
your drive appears busted.
i wo
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:12 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> linux-2.6 deprecates kernel-latest, afaict. It provides the same binary
> packages as transition packages that depend on the s/kernel/linux/
> equivalents.
>
> The remaining problem is that the version string used by the linux-2.6
> transit
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 14:22 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It won't actually break d-i when installing etch, because the dependency of
> kernel-latest on these kernels will prevent the removal of the necessary
> binary packages from testing.
>
> It will break d-i installs of sid, until the point t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:22:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, including but
> > > not limited to things like linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6, pwc,
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-5_powerpc.d
linux-2.6_2.6.12-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-5_powerpc.deb
linux-imag
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-5_s390.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-5_s390.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says op
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-5_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-5_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-5_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-5_s390.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.12-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-5
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, including but
> > not limited to things like linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6, pwc,
> > user-mode-linux, kernel-headers-2.6-generic (alpha), etc etc.
FWIW
linux-2.6_2.6.12-5_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-5.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12-5.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-5_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-5_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-5_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-5_all.deb
hi all,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:46:53PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:14, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:05:02AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > received another bug report concerning TI irq routing.
> > > your pa
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: important
On this machine, I get the following error several times by hour:
hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21
hda: error waiting for DMA
hda: dma timeout retry: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
and the who
forwarded 323289 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3869
tags 323289 + upstream
thanks
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 07:53 -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> Dann Frazier suggested to me to try the 2.6.12 kernel image in
> unstable (linux-image-2.6.12-2) on the system with the
> Intel 88e8050 Chip NIC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 323289 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3869
Bug#323289: The sk98lin driver does not work with the Intel 88e8050 Chip
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3869.
> tags 32328
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
> I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
> and its probably a good time to think about some releases -
> security bugs keep coming in all the time, bu
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:22:32PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello Sven,
>
> On 05-Aug-16 17:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:33:02PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > I mean, what are the advantages of your solution over the biarch way ? Right
> > now i see it is duplic
Hello Sven,
On 05-Aug-16 17:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:33:02PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> I mean, what are the advantages of your solution over the biarch way ? Right
> now i see it is duplicated work and incures a performance penalty, which are
> not counterbalanced
Hi fellow developers,
I just want to let you know that the GNU/kFreeBSD port has finished the
transition to the new Debian kernel naming scheme. We now have one
source package, kfreebsd-5 which is in unstable and which produces the
following binary packages:
- kfreebsd-image-5.3-1 (binary-al
Am 16.08.2005 13:13:44 schrieb(en) maximilian attems:
> thanks for your feedback!
>
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Norbert wrote:
>
> > The cpufrequence doesn't work since the kernel variable
> > CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_TABLE was included. I guess the frequency
> > table will not be read from the
On Aug 13, 2005, at 18:54:30, LT-P wrote:
Le lun 08 aoû 2005 17:57:04 CEST, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
Can you please enable BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and see if that resolves
your
problem. If it does, then the following patch should fix Kconfig
so that BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI needs to be enabled
severity 323143 wishlist
retitle 323143 linux-2.6: CONFIG_ATM_CLIP should be configured as a module
thanks
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:08:18PM -0700, Alvaro Martinez Echevarria wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.12
> Version: 2.6.12-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
> Regarding this problem with iprout
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323143 wishlist
Bug#323143: ip neigh flush (iproute) hangs because CONFIG_ATM_CLIP=y
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> retitle 323143 linux-2.6: CONFIG_ATM_CLIP should be configured as a module
Bug#323143: ip neigh flush (iproute) hangs because C
thanks for your feedback.
tg3 is again included in 2.6.12 due to relicensing of the firmware.
please try that linux image.
As I have already written in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314954;msg=27 ,
this bug still occurs, but only very seldomly.
I think it occured only abou
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Horms schrieb:
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > >>Broken
> > > Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
> >
> > -4 is already
# dpkg -i --force-overwrite
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb
Thanks,
Norbert
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le lun 08 aoû 2005 17:57:04 CEST, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> Can you please enable BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and see if that resolves your
> problem. If it does, then the following patch should fix Kconfig
> so that BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI needs to be enabled for BLK_DEV_IDE_PMAC
> to be enabled. It
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:33:02PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello Sven,
Hello Andreas,
Again, before we go ahead, do we really need still a separate powerpc64
archive like you do, or a separate kernel ? I mean since you are hacking dpkg
and stuff anyway, you could as well make it accept to
Dann Frazier suggested to me to try the 2.6.12 kernel image in
unstable (linux-image-2.6.12-2) on the system with the
Intel 88e8050 Chip NIC.
I did try this kernel and it still did not work.
I then pulled the source code from debian unstable
(linux-source-2.6.12) and looked at the sources for the
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:35:47PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> binutils 2.16.1-2
> gcc-3.34:3.3.5-3
> libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22
this must be an etch toolchain problem then, as sarge has older binutils
(version 2.15-6) and you experienced a problem in the assembler.
> > I
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, including but
> not limited to things like linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6, pwc,
> user-mode-linux, kernel-headers-2.6-generic (alpha), etc etc.
Since kernel-lastest in testing still points to 2.6.8, it will also
bre
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Willi Mann wrote:
> maximilian attems schrieb:
> >On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Willi Mann wrote:
> >
> >
> >>gpm restart as solution only helps in case I switch to the console.
> >>Restarting gpm from an x terminal does not help.
> >>
> >>Willi
> >
> >
> >could you please try newer k
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Please remove the following packages from sid:
> * kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha
> * kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64
> * kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa
> * kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
> * kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64
> * kernel-image-2.6.8-m68k
> * kernel-image-
I've just realized that I've got installed gcc-3.3-base gcc-3.4-base and
gcc-4.0-base due packages dependences.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:34:39PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote:
>
>>arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
>>arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:81: Error: Macro with this name was already
>>defined
>>arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:100: Error: Macro
reassign 319789 linux-2.6
stop
On Sun, 07 Aug 2005, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
> fre 2005-08-05 klockan 16:30 +0200 skrev Maximilian Attems:
> > does the pain subsist with the linux-image 2.6.12?
> >
> > please send in the output of lspci?
>
> 2.6.12 detects something - not sure what it is though.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Alexander Fieroch wrote:
> Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > did you try latest 2.6.12 from unstable?
> > did it help?
>
> yes I did a try but there are the same problems.
> I'm also testing the current development git-kernel snapshots with still
> no change.
> Follow this thread
reassign 297832 xserver-xfree86
stop
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:34:06AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > any update on the matter?
> > have you tried linux image 2.6.12?
>
> Note that I had the same problem when I still had my iBook2.2. The
> p
thanks for your feedback!
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Norbert wrote:
> The cpufrequence doesn't work since the kernel variable
> CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_TABLE was included. I guess the frequency table
> will not be read from the processor.
>
>
> Am 26.07.2005 17:49:03 schrieb(en) Maximilian At
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 312973 linux-2.6
Bug#312973: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: system clock drifts ahead of hardware
clock
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686' to `linux-2.6'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 319789 linux-2.6
Bug#319789: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: Does not detect builtin MPU of via82C686
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
* Horms wrote:
> I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed for
> some m68k flavours (mac users who want a working keyboard IRRC).
2.4.27 is also still needed for the alpha installer.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> On the topic of Sid, I think we need to keep 2.4.27 there for now.
> I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed
> for some m68k flavours (mac users who want a working keyboard IRRC).
Mac users who want a working keybo
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Severity: important
Tags: security patch
CAN-2005-2553 describes the following DoS vulnerability:
> The find_target function in ptrace32.c in the Linux kernel 2.4.x
> before 2.4.29 does not properly handle a NULL return value from
> another function, which allows loc
Hi,
this is a followup for the patch I sent earlier (like about 2 minutes
ago) regarding isofs options parsing. In the course of debuging this
Marcelo pointed out the following code
#ifdef CONFIG_JOLIET
if (!strcmp(this_char,"iocharset") && value) {
popt->
Hi,
On Marcelo's request I have taken a closer look at this.
It seems that Alexander Pytlev's original (simple) patch was correct.
Without it the logic looks a bit like this.
while (...) {
if iocharset
...
else if map
...
if session
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Horms schrieb:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >>Broken
> > Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
>
> -4 is already in, so not important. :)
> (Was a request from uploader to kick
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Horms schrieb:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >>Broken
> > Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
>
> -4 is already in, so not important. :)
> (Was a request from uploader to kick
Horms schrieb:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>>Broken
> Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
-4 is already in, so not important. :)
(Was a request from uploader to kick it because its broken...)
--
bye Joerg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:32:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Broken
>
> Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
Yep, -3 did not set the --subarch option to make-kpkg, and as a result
make-kpkg did auto-detect the subarch us
76 matches
Mail list logo
