On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0900, Horms wrote: > Hi, > > Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8. > I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN, > and its probably a good time to think about some releases - > security bugs keep coming in all the time, but I really think > we have to draw a line in the sand and make a release. > > To get this ball rolling I plan to release kernel-source-2.4.27 > 2.4.27-11 and kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 2.4.27-11 into unstable tomorrow. > This is tagged in SVN, and I have made the packages available at > http://packages.vergenet.net/pending/ (i386 still building, will > be available soon).
I see 2.6.8-16sarge1 there, but not 2.4.27. Are you wanting us to builds against 2.6.8-16sarge1? And if so, should we be building in a pristine sarge environment and targeting stable-security (vs. unstable)? The rest of this message leads me to believe this is only a call for 2.4.27/unstable builds. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
