Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:34:39PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote: > >>>>>>arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: >>>>>>arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:81: Error: Macro with this name was already >>>>>>defined >>>>>>arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:100: Error: Macro with this name was already >>>>>>defined >>>>>>make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o] Error 1 > > > I just recompiled kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64-2.6.8 (all flaovours) in a > cleanroom sarge chroot, using kernel-source-2.6.18 2.6.8-16 from sarge, > and it succeeded as expected. > > what are the exact versions of > > binutils > gcc > libc6 >
binutils 2.16.1-2 gcc-3.3 4:3.3.5-3 libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 > which lead to your compilation failure? > did you use a fresh extracted tarball, and wich command did you use to > build? Yes I used a fresh extrated tarball from kernel-source-2.6.8 (version 2.6.8-16) and the command for build it was: make bzImage modules modules_install > do you have a genuine pure64 installation or did you mix in packages from > the old experimental gcc-3.4 branch? I got a new machine, so I installed all packages from http://amd64.debian.net/debian-pure64/ testing does the /usr/bin/gcc symlink point to > gcc-3.3 and did you use gcc-3.3 or gcc-3.4 to compile the kernel image? /usr/bin/gcc points to /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 and it was the only cc compiler installed on my machine. Afterwards I installed gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 to make a probe, with the same resutls. > Did you try to compile from a fresh extracted source tarball? >From the kernel-source-2.6.8 package > I cannot reproduce this problem with sarge versions of the toolchain, > thus I need more info. > I wasn't using Sarge but Etch > > Best regards > Frederik Schueler > Best regadrs Manolo Díaz
