I have installed tomcat4 on a testing machine (using apt-get) and I am
using the IBM JDK 1.3.1 ( I have also tried their 1.4 ) but without
success.
Tomcat4 itself runs fine, but the problems start when I try to enable
SSL. I have downloaded JSSE 1.0.3 (which seems to be the latest) and
added the
I have a WAR file which runs quite happily on the Sun JWSDP packaged version
of Tomcat 4, but will not run on the tomcat4 package on Debian.
The WAR file has two servlets and some JSPs, an HTML page and all the
necessary web.xml, dtds and jars properly packaged in their correct
directories. It ha
I have some applications which work just fine under the Sun packaged JWSDP,
but which fail when I try to load them under Tomcat as packaged for Debian
on a testing machine (so Tomcat version 4.0.4).
The applications are packaged as WAR files, and contain all the tlds and
the JARs for JSTL.
When
As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I fired
up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble started.
This box already had G{CI}J installed, and I had noticed that this seemed
On Saturday 08 February 2003 10:08, David Goodenough wrote:
> As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
> about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I
> fired up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:03, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1 (unstable) won't install
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:23:26 +
>
> > Well the problem is libbcel-java,
>
> I confirmed some of
On Sunday 09 February 2003 11:03, David Goodenough wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:03, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > From: David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1 (unstable) won't install
> > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:23:26 +
>
I tried to apt-get dist-upgrade today and when upgrading eclipse it came
up with the the following complaint:-
error processing eclipse-xerces_4.0.7-1_all.deb
trying to overwrite
/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.xerces_4.0.7/xercesImpl.jar
which is also in package eclipse-platform.
Any ideas
On Sunday 01 June 2003 18:19, Michael S Daines wrote:
> When I try to compile an EJB, I get this message:
>
> xxx.java:3: package javax.egb does not exist
> import javax.ejb.*;
> ^
> 1 error
>
> How do I solve this problem? I tried copying all the j2ee files into the
> jdk directory, but this didn
I recently decided that I needed to move from a hand installed eclipse to a
debian installed one. So duly installed it only to discover that I do not
seem to have the the choice of using the GTK binding.
I do not run Gnome, and have been running the Motif binding (I would love
a KDE binding bu
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 18:52, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recently decided that I needed to move from a hand installed eclipse to
> > a debian installed one. So duly installed it only to discover that I do
> > not seem to h
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 14:31, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Hallo David,
>
> * David Goodenough wrote:
> >On Tuesday 10 June 2003 18:52, Jan Schulz wrote:
> >> In the moment it uses gtk bindings by default and its the only one,
> >> which is compiled.
> >
> >
On Sunday 03 August 2003 09:56, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hallo!
>
> Yo!
>
> > http://people.redhat.com/~jhealy/eclipse
> >
> > Seems that the debian gcj is also recent enough. Lets wait for the
> > patches... I'm curently downloading the src.rpms to
On Monday 04 August 2003 11:52, Mark Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm modifying bugwatcher so that it uses a machine readable interface
> to the bts (http://bugs.debian.org/~mh/ - experimental). My current
> intentions are to simply return the entire bug log from the server and
> then parse this into se
Does anyone have experience they could share in converting a Java DEB to use
GCJ where available.
In particular I want to convert kdebindings so that it can be accepted into
main.
Looking at the configure file, and the bits that make it up, there is some
specific hand coded function to look
On Monday 11 August 2003 23:33, Michael R Head wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 17:37, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:40:11PM -0400, Michael R Head wrote:
> >
> >
> > Which is something that Unix users have been able to do since the dawn of
> > time, in a more generic way, with
On Monday 11 August 2003 21:18, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> > * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >JAVA_HOME seems silly in Debian, where we have alternatives to manage
> > > these things. I wish it would go away.
> >
> > I do not!
> >
> > The curr
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:02, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > I propose the following changes in the policy, instead of the above
> > paragraphs:
> >
> > Programs /must/ depend on /java-virtual-machine/ and the needed runtime
> > environm
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:34, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > Surely this says that having explicit runtime-? virtual packages is the
> > wrong way to go. What is needed is that the virtual package has a
> > version and then it can be compared in the nor
Does anyone know that the GCJ version of Jar is? If not is there an open
source version of Jar somewhere. Its close to zip of course, but just not
quite close enough, and the options are more like those from tar.
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 08:57, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> --- David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know that the GCJ version of Jar is? If not is there an open
> > source version of Jar somewhere. Its close to zip of course, but just
> > not
I am running debian format eclipse on an unstable box, and I want to add a
plugin (the Swt-Designer plugin as it happens).
I think I understand from the docs and bits I have found on the web that
I should put the plugin in ~/.eclipse/eclipse/plugins, but I am not quite
sure. I tried that and it d
In the current gcj package there is a symlink from gcj-wrapper to the now
current one, i.e. gcj-wrapper-3.3, but there is not one from gcjh-wrapper to
gcjh-wrapper-3.3. Is there a reason for this, or is it just an ommision?
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 18:29, Per Bothner wrote:
> Jan Schulz wrote:
> > Theoretically (actually: practically) SWT is runable with kaffe, so
> > swt could be build on other platforms. Eclipse on the other hand will
> > not run on a current kaffe.
>
> However, eclipse will run on gcj:
> http:/
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 13:23, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:42:55 + (GMT)
>
> Mats Henrikson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't quite been staying up to date with the mpkg-j2sdk discussions,
> > and what is going to be happening to it. I was just wondering if anybod
how do we keep both openjdk-7 and openjdk-8 installed on sid?
Nildram is(was) an ISP in the UK, which if I recall got taken over by
TalkTalk. So I guess these were customers of Nildram rather than being
employed by them. Might be worth searching by name rather than
domain.
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 13:20:04 BST Gert Wollny wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 11.04.
On Thursday, 12 October 2017 13:13:44 BST Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started working on OpenJFX 9 this week. The good news is that it
> builds fine in Debian now [1]. The bad news is that it's going to be
> significantly more challenging to integrate it with our OpenJDK package.
>
> Wi
On Wednesday, 17 April 2019 09:24:56 BST shirish शिरीष wrote:
> at bottom :-
>
> On 17/04/2019, Sagar Patke wrote:
> > It requires JavaFX, which is no longer bundled with latest versions of
> > Java. It should work with Java 8.
>
> As shared before, I do have javafx installed.
>
>
Yes but. Th
Is this intended to work with all JVM languages, or just Java? I don't expect
support
for other languages, just tolerance.
David
On Friday, 30 August 2019 10:32:34 BST Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Salut Raphael,
>
> thank you very much - we're looking forward to your feedback!
>
> cheers,
> dalibo
the
> "static void main(String[])" method of the specified main class, but
> doesn't otherwise care what is in the application.
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>
> On 30.08.2019 19:31, David Goodenough wrote:
> > Is this intended to work with all JVM languages,
I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only contains
the source for the runtime, and there seem to be no other source packages
referenced so I am a bit lost as to where to look.
David
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Monday 07 December 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, David Goodenough
>
> wrote:
> > I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
> > to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only
> > contains
On Monday 07 December 2009, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, David Goodenough
>
> wrote:
> >> The orig.tar.gz is probably the only one you need though.
> >
> > That does NOT seem to contain the source of the compiler. There
should
>
I have an application running under Tomcat-6 (on a sid system with Sun
Java-6) which uses the java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferences class.
This class assumes it can write to user.home, and in particular that it
can create a directory called .java and create a file .userPrefs inside it.
But with
I am sure I have a memory in a previous Tomcat package that there was
a directory (other than the direct /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps) that we were
supposed to use to install web apps. This directory had write permission
from a group (I think), getting around the problem that otherwise everything
has
On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:49 PM, David Goodenough
>
> wrote:
> > I am sure I have a memory in a previous Tomcat package that there was
> > a directory (other than the direct /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps
JspWiki seems to require tomcat 5.5 (it requires for instance a userid
of tomcat55) but it recommends tomcat6. It is a few mod levels back
(the current version in testing/sid is 2.8.0, the current version at
apache.org is 2.8.4). There are two bugs outstanding for it which
do not seem to have b
I just installed it, and it does not install cleanly, but I have not yet got
it to work.
I notice that in the README.Debian it says that the directory structure
is:-
/var/lib/jspwiki contains WikiPages and attachments.
/usr/share/java/webapps/JSPWiki contains the JSP pages, Java libraries,
and p
pkg-java SVN repo [1] for
> team maintenance and will fix the missing dependency on libjabsorb. We
> can work from repo to sort out the other issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
> [1] svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/jspwiki
>
> On 11/27/2010 03:13 AM, David Goodenough
is supposed to take care of
> everything that install.jsp does.
>
> On 28.11.2010, at 0.40, David Goodenough wrote:
> > There do still seem to be problems with permissions and ownership.
> >
> > Having added libjabsorb-java and found copies of jstl.jar and
> > st
In the Readme.Debian file for ca-certificates-java it states:-
ca-certificates-local doesn't automagically handle local certificates
although these are not overwritten on updates.
So how are local certificates supposed to be handled?
It seems strange that java should handle certificates, or ra
Recently tomcat7 has stopped working. When I start it is complains that
/usr/lib/libnss3.so does not exist. And sure enough it does not, its now
in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libnss3.so.
I guess this is part of the multiarch changes.
What has to change in order to fix this?
David
--
To UNSUB
On Sunday 17 Jul 2011, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-07-17 23:01, David Goodenough wrote:
> > Recently tomcat7 has stopped working. When I start it is complains that
> > /usr/lib/libnss3.so does not exist. And sure enough it does not, its now
> > in /usr/lib/i386
I notice that we have ASM, ASM2 and ASM3 in Debian, and that ASM4 was
released (or at least the latest version of ASM4) in October 2011. Any
chance of getting it packaged up?
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
I have installed tomcat4 on a testing machine (using apt-get) and I am
using the IBM JDK 1.3.1 ( I have also tried their 1.4 ) but without
success.
Tomcat4 itself runs fine, but the problems start when I try to enable
SSL. I have downloaded JSSE 1.0.3 (which seems to be the latest) and
added the
I have a WAR file which runs quite happily on the Sun JWSDP packaged version
of Tomcat 4, but will not run on the tomcat4 package on Debian.
The WAR file has two servlets and some JSPs, an HTML page and all the
necessary web.xml, dtds and jars properly packaged in their correct
directories. It ha
I have some applications which work just fine under the Sun packaged JWSDP,
but which fail when I try to load them under Tomcat as packaged for Debian
on a testing machine (so Tomcat version 4.0.4).
The applications are packaged as WAR files, and contain all the tlds and
the JARs for JSTL.
When
As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I fired
up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble started.
This box already had G{CI}J installed, and I had noticed that this seemed
On Saturday 08 February 2003 10:08, David Goodenough wrote:
> As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
> about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I
> fired up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:03, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1 (unstable) won't install
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:23:26 +
>
> > Well the problem is libbcel-java,
>
> I confirmed some of
On Sunday 09 February 2003 11:03, David Goodenough wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:03, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > From: David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1 (unstable) won't install
> > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:23:26 +
>
I tried to apt-get dist-upgrade today and when upgrading eclipse it came
up with the the following complaint:-
error processing eclipse-xerces_4.0.7-1_all.deb
trying to overwrite
/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.xerces_4.0.7/xercesImpl.jar
which is also in package eclipse-platform.
Any ideas
On Sunday 01 June 2003 18:19, Michael S Daines wrote:
> When I try to compile an EJB, I get this message:
>
> xxx.java:3: package javax.egb does not exist
> import javax.ejb.*;
> ^
> 1 error
>
> How do I solve this problem? I tried copying all the j2ee files into the
> jdk directory, but this didn
On Sunday 03 August 2003 09:56, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hallo!
>
> Yo!
>
> > http://people.redhat.com/~jhealy/eclipse
> >
> > Seems that the debian gcj is also recent enough. Lets wait for the
> > patches... I'm curently downloading the src.rpms to
On Monday 04 August 2003 11:52, Mark Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm modifying bugwatcher so that it uses a machine readable interface
> to the bts (http://bugs.debian.org/~mh/ - experimental). My current
> intentions are to simply return the entire bug log from the server and
> then parse this into se
Does anyone have experience they could share in converting a Java DEB to use
GCJ where available.
In particular I want to convert kdebindings so that it can be accepted into
main.
Looking at the configure file, and the bits that make it up, there is some
specific hand coded function to look
On Monday 11 August 2003 21:18, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> > * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >JAVA_HOME seems silly in Debian, where we have alternatives to manage
> > > these things. I wish it would go away.
> >
> > I do not!
> >
> > The curr
On Monday 11 August 2003 23:33, Michael R Head wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 17:37, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:40:11PM -0400, Michael R Head wrote:
> >
> >
> > Which is something that Unix users have been able to do since the dawn of
> > time, in a more generic way, with
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:02, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > I propose the following changes in the policy, instead of the above
> > paragraphs:
> >
> > Programs /must/ depend on /java-virtual-machine/ and the needed runtime
> > environm
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:34, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > Surely this says that having explicit runtime-? virtual packages is the
> > wrong way to go. What is needed is that the virtual package has a
> > version and then it can be compared in the nor
Does anyone know that the GCJ version of Jar is? If not is there an open
source version of Jar somewhere. Its close to zip of course, but just not
quite close enough, and the options are more like those from tar.
David
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 08:57, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> --- David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know that the GCJ version of Jar is? If not is there an open
> > source version of Jar somewhere. Its close to zip of course, but just
> > not
I am running debian format eclipse on an unstable box, and I want to add a
plugin (the Swt-Designer plugin as it happens).
I think I understand from the docs and bits I have found on the web that
I should put the plugin in ~/.eclipse/eclipse/plugins, but I am not quite
sure. I tried that and it d
In the current gcj package there is a symlink from gcj-wrapper to the now
current one, i.e. gcj-wrapper-3.3, but there is not one from gcjh-wrapper to
gcjh-wrapper-3.3. Is there a reason for this, or is it just an ommision?
David
I seem to recall that there were thought to be problems with some of the
directory structure that Debian packaging for Eclipse 2 was using, but I have
heard nothing recently.
Is anyone working on Eclipse 3, and an chance of trying out whatever you
are working on?
David
I am trying to use the IO Taglib from Apache under Tomcat4 on a Debian
unstable system, using the Sun 4.1 SDK.
I have successfully used several other taglibs, the JSTL one, and the String
taglib.
When I try to load the IO tld, it complains:-
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /test.jsp(0,0) X
Currently Tomcat 5 is not available for Debian, only Tomcat4. Can I ask
what is holding 5 back. Is it simple lack of time on the maintainers part,
are there technical problems, is it not stable enough to bother with yet or
is there some other problem not one of the above.
I ask because a number
I just spotted a note on debian-develop that gcc 3.4 is to be uploaded to
unstable this weekend. Does anyone know if this includes all the fixes
that are needed to run Eclipse with gcj?
Also on the subject of getting things running, is anyone working on
getting Tomcat 4 or 5 to run under gcj? I
I am confused about the updates that Sun put out for Java-6 which
are supposed to include the new Look and Feel (Nimbus) and the
updates there have been to the sun-java-6 packages on unstable
which do not include Nimbus.
Can anyone clear up this confusion for me? Or to put it another
way are we
On Friday 11 April 2008, David Herron wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > I am confused about the updates that Sun put out for Java-6 which
> > are supposed to include the new Look and Feel (Nimbus) and the
> > updates there have been to the sun-java-6 packages on unst
I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version
of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script for a start) so I assume that
they are intended just to deliver JARs needed for development.
So this begs two qu
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Goodenough
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
> > intended for? They do not seem to i
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote:
> > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
> > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>
> It's
On Tuesday, 8 November 2022 19:51:12 GMT Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:06:06PM +0200 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> > > Last point, we still have OpenJDK 8 in unstable to help with the
> > > bootstrapping of some packages that can't build directly with the
> > > latest JDK (more
75 matches
Mail list logo
