There do still seem to be problems with permissions and ownership. Having added libjabsorb-java and found copies of jstl.jar and standard.jar and given write access to things like /usr/share/jspwiki/WEB-INF I got a bit further.
If one tries running Install.jsp (and I do not know whether this is still supposed to be needed) it says it has already been run. This means that I can not set up the password on the admin user. Am I supposed to run it? I have not uses the pkg-java SVN repo before, can I check a deb file out from it, or do I have to build from it and if so what is the build procedure? David On Saturday 27 November 2010, tony mancill wrote: > Hi David, > > Thank you for testing. It sounds like we have a ways to go before we can > reasonably ask the release team to include jspwiki in squeeze. I've run > the svn-inject to bring the package into the pkg-java SVN repo [1] for > team maintenance and will fix the missing dependency on libjabsorb. We > can work from repo to sort out the other issues. > > Thanks, > Tony > > [1] svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/jspwiki > > On 11/27/2010 03:13 AM, David Goodenough wrote: > > I just installed it, and it does not install cleanly, but I have not yet > > got it to work. > > > > I notice that in the README.Debian it says that the directory structure > > is:- > > > > /var/lib/jspwiki contains WikiPages and attachments. > > > > /usr/share/java/webapps/JSPWiki contains the JSP pages, Java libraries, > > and page templates. > > > > /etc/jspwiki contains all configuration files. > > > > /etc/tomcat6/policy.d/05jspwiki.policy is a symbolic link to > > /etc/jspwiki/tomcat.policy > > > > But there is no directory /usr/share/java/webapps, and these files > > seem to be in /usr/share/jspwiki. This however is just a docs error > > I think, the ContextPath in jspwiki.xml is correct. > > > > However when I try to use JSPWiki, I keep getting a message in the > > tomcat catalina.out log file:- > > > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start: > > LifecycleException: start: : java.io.IOException: Failed to access > > resource /WEB-INF/lib/jabsorb.jar > > > > Looking in the /usr/share/java directory, jabsorb.jar is indeed missing, > > so I guess we have a missing dependency on libjabsorb-java. I also > > notice that there are links to files from the tomcat6-webapps package, > > which is not listed as a dependency and so I did not have loaded. > > Loading libjabsorb-java fixed the first problem, but there is no > > tomcat6-webapps package, yet the links refer to > > /usr/share/tomcat6-webapps/. Looking at the packages.debian.org site, > > the jar files references (jstl.jar and standard.jar) only exist in part > > of netbeans. > > > > David > > > > On Friday 26 November 2010, tony mancill wrote: > >> Hi Adnan, > >> > >> Uploaded to unstable with one additional minor change. In > > > > jspwiki.postinst > > > >> gets the tomcat6 user from debconf instead of using the hardcoded > > > > username > > > >> "tomcat6" for the chown. > >> > >> Regards, > >> tony > >> > >> On 11/26/2010 09:17 AM, tony mancill wrote: > >>> I've pulled the package and the changes look good to me (which could > > > > be > > > >>> because they're almost identical to the changes I worked up locally, > >>> but didn't have time to test thoroughly). I think we can reference > >>> both the libservlet-2.3 bugs, 576903 and 581024 and I think we should > >>> list the team address as the maintainer (I'll put your address in the > >>> uploader field if you'd like), but but otherwise I'll upload your > >>> package as it is on mentors to unstable. > >>> > >>> I know the time is quite short with respect to the the release, but > >>> since the upload addresses a grave bug, it may still be considered. > >>> (On the other hand, given the number of changes, I wouldn't be > >>> surprised if > > > > they > > > >>> opted to pass on this - in any event, the new version is needed in the > >>> archive.) The best way to communicate with them is to use reportbug > > > > to > > > >>> file a bug against > >>> release.debian.org, then indicate the version of jspwiki and note that > >>> the upload of 2.8.0-4 addresses the RC bug. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> tony > >>> > >>> On 11/25/2010 12:00 PM, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > >>>>> That's great. Have you uploaded the package and notified the > > > > release > > > >>>>> team? I don't see the new version on the PTS page [0] yet. > >>>> > >>>> Sorry, I uploaded package to mentors: > >>>> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor- > > > > pkglist?action=details;package > > > >>>> =jspwiki > >>>> > >>>> I haven't notified the release team, if you could provide me guidance > >>>> with what I should tell them, I'll gladly notify them. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Adnan > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 PM, tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> > > > > wrote: > >>>>> Hi Adnan, > >>>>> > >>>>> That's great. Have you uploaded the package and notified the > > > > release > > > >>>>> team? I don't see the new version on the PTS page [0] yet. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> tony > >>>>> > >>>>> [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jspwiki.html > >>>>> > >>>>> On 11/25/2010 08:02 AM, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I just waned to let you know I fixed all the build-deps and as well > >>>>>> all the other stuff depending on tomcat5.5 including postinst. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Building and installing works just fine. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Seems like jspwiki will make it into squeeze after all? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Adnan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, tony mancill > > > > <tmanc...@debian.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> On 10/29/2010 07:39 AM, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 29.10.2010, at 17.14, tony mancill wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Any opinions on adding a tomcat dependency? I realise that > > > > it's > > > >>>>>>>>> conceivable to run JspWiki without it, but suspect that the > > > > vast > > > >>>>>>>>> majority of users would prefer for the wiki to work > >>>>>>>>> "out-of-the-box" (i.e. with minimal setup). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The dependency was removed due to a user request, so my > > > > opinion is > > > >>>>>>>> that it should depend on Tomcat. Yes, you can run JSPWiki with > >>>>>>>> Jetty, but it is a bit hassle, as I understand it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hmmm... for squeeze I think the choices are either to remove > > > > jspwiki > > > >>>>>>> entirely or to depend directly on tomcat6. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any strong opinions or suggestions one way or another? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thank you, > >>>>>>> tony -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201011272240.42060.david.goodeno...@linkchoose.co.uk
