On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote: > > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for > > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told). > > It's a bug that you aren't told (-: > > I'd say either there's a wishlist or normal bug about the description > and documentation, or there's an important, severe or grave bug about > > the functionality. In either case there's a bug though (-:
Yes but which to submit. Lets sort that out then I will add a bug (unless someone beats me to it). David > > For this reason I thought that a discussion on the list was the best > > starting point. > > That's still reasonable. Sadly I can't answer the original question > though (-: > > Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
