Ignore most of my last email.
Of course the jars in jetty/ext are symlinks.
They are just synlinks to the wrong place.
You have:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 44 Jul 16 09:39 jasper-compiler.jar ->
../../tomcat4/common/lib/jasper-compiler.jar
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 43 Ju
Here is some testing feedback on the jetty-4.2.11-2 deb package.
While I'm a debian user I have not used many of the java packages
before - so appologies if any of these comments are a bit stupid.
The logging is setup with
true
This should be false as it makes exceptions almost impossible
to rea
Ignore most of my last email.
Of course the jars in jetty/ext are symlinks.
They are just synlinks to the wrong place.
You have:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 44 Jul 16 09:39 jasper-compiler.jar ->
../../tomcat4/common/lib/jasper-compiler.jar
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 43
Here is some testing feedback on the jetty-4.2.11-2 deb package.
While I'm a debian user I have not used many of the java packages
before - so appologies if any of these comments are a bit stupid.
The logging is setup with
true
This should be false as it makes exceptions almost impossible
to re
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:39:37PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Philipp Meier wrote:
>
> >I'd just wanted to let you know, that there is now a jetty package on
> >mentors.debian.net. Please feel free test the package. If there is
> >positive feedback I will look to make jetty go into debian, soon.
Philipp Meier wrote:
I'd just wanted to let you know, that there is now a jetty package on
mentors.debian.net. Please feel free test the package. If there is
positive feedback I will look to make jetty go into debian, soon.
I just took a look at the diff.gz and it looks very good. Well done!
Just s
[No need to CC a lot of lists, everybody involved is reading
debian-java. I got your mail 3 times!]
Robert Millan wrote:
Now you decided we shouldn't have any junit implementation in main; or
No, I did not. junit's dependecies are:
Package: junit
Section: contrib/devel
Version: 3.8.1-3
Depends: k
Hallo!
* Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should have a junit implementation in main; IBM's junit is
> preferred,
BTW: it's not 'IBMs Junit'. Only one of the Authors is employed by a
IBM owned company (OTI).
> If the junit maintainer agrees to drop junit's arbitrary depend
Hello bebian java users,
I'd just wanted to let you know, that there is now a jetty package on
mentors.debian.net. Please feel free test the package. If there is
positive feedback I will look to make jetty go into debian, soon.
-billy.
--
Meisterbohne Meisterbohne GbR, Küfner, Mekle, Meier T
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:39:37PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Philipp Meier wrote:
>
> >I'd just wanted to let you know, that there is now a jetty package on
> >mentors.debian.net. Please feel free test the package. If there is
> >positive feedback I will look to make jetty go into debian, soon.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:03:25PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > That's not nice. I didn't orphan junit-freenet so that someone would
> > remove it from debian without even asking me about it.
>
> But orphaning means that you n
Philipp Meier wrote:
I'd just wanted to let you know, that there is now a jetty package on
mentors.debian.net. Please feel free test the package. If there is
positive feedback I will look to make jetty go into debian, soon.
I just took a look at the diff.gz and it looks very good. Well done!
Just
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:33:09PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > #165504: ITA: junit-freenet -- basic reimplementation of the JUnit,
> > which was filed ag
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:33:09PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #165504: ITA: junit-freenet -- basic reimplementation of the JUnit,
> which was filed against the wnpp package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the developer
[No need to CC a lot of lists, everybody involved is reading
debian-java. I got your mail 3 times!]
Robert Millan wrote:
Now you decided we shouldn't have any junit implementation in main; or
No, I did not. junit's dependecies are:
Package: junit
Section: contrib/devel
Version: 3.8.1-3
Depends:
Hallo!
* Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should have a junit implementation in main; IBM's junit is
> preferred,
BTW: it's not 'IBMs Junit'. Only one of the Authors is employed by a
IBM owned company (OTI).
> If the junit maintainer agrees to drop junit's arbitrary depend
Hello bebian java users,
I'd just wanted to let you know, that there is now a jetty package on
mentors.debian.net. Please feel free test the package. If there is
positive feedback I will look to make jetty go into debian, soon.
-billy.
--
Meisterbohne Meisterbohne GbR, Küfner, Mekle, Meier T
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:03:25PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > That's not nice. I didn't orphan junit-freenet so that someone would
> > remove it from debian without even asking me about it.
>
> But orphaning means that you n
Things that make me think it is:
1. It hasn't been updated since May 2002.
2. It isn't mentioned in the Debian Policy for Java document (and
java-common is mentioned extensively in conjunction with various
Java 2 virtual packages).
3. I can't find any packages that depend on it.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:33:09PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > #165504: ITA: junit-freenet -- basic reimplementation of the JUnit,
> > which was filed ag
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:33:09PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #165504: ITA: junit-freenet -- basic reimplementation of the JUnit,
> which was filed against the wnpp package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the developer
Things that make me think it is:
1. It hasn't been updated since May 2002.
2. It isn't mentioned in the Debian Policy for Java document (and
java-common is mentioned extensively in conjunction with various
Java 2 virtual packages).
3. I can't find any packages that depend on it.
Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Why not simply depend on libtomcat4-java? Is it that big a package?
It's a bit strange having Jetty depend on libtomcat - simply
from a naming perspective. Kind of like having postgres depend
on mysql.
There is also may be a good reason to split out jasper, from
a versioning
Hallo!
Replying to myself...
update-alternative is working now. I would be really interested if
anyone experiences failures while starting eclipse. I tried to
workaround any big problems...
Two things are still on my Todo: removing the eclipse binary launcher
as a 'Depends' and removing some 'De
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:14:26PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Philipp Meier wrote:
>
> >libtomcat4-java contains a lot of java libraries, even libraries that
> >are already packaged in debian. It's size is over 1MB, and I need only
> >250K.
>
> tomcat4 should not contain any libraries that are
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 13:20, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> D.Hansmann wrote:
>
> > build a java package from source (without changing it before)? There
> > probably won't be a speed improvement... ;)
>
> Hey, that's what free/open source software is about! :-) Think for
> example of security updates
Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Why not simply depend on libtomcat4-java? Is it that big a package?
It's a bit strange having Jetty depend on libtomcat - simply
from a naming perspective. Kind of like having postgres depend
on mysql.
There is also may be a good reason to split out jasper, from
a versionin
D.Hansmann wrote:
I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
Just take a look at the libcommons-*-java packages, they are pretty good
exmaples for building a package with Ant. As soon as Ant has moved
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:50, D.Hansmann wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the tips, everybody! :)
>
> I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
> process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
> build a java package from source (without changing it befor
Cool, thanks for the tips, everybody! :)
I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
build a java package from source (without changing it before)? There
probably won't be a speed improvement... ;)
And
Hallo!
Replying to myself...
update-alternative is working now. I would be really interested if
anyone experiences failures while starting eclipse. I tried to
workaround any big problems...
Two things are still on my Todo: removing the eclipse binary launcher
as a 'Depends' and removing some 'De
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:14:26PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Philipp Meier wrote:
>
> >libtomcat4-java contains a lot of java libraries, even libraries that
> >are already packaged in debian. It's size is over 1MB, and I need only
> >250K.
>
> tomcat4 should not contain any libraries that are
Philipp Meier wrote:
libtomcat4-java contains a lot of java libraries, even libraries that
are already packaged in debian. It's size is over 1MB, and I need only
250K.
tomcat4 should not contain any libraries that are available in other
Debian packages, they should just be symlinks. If I've misse
Philipp Meier wrote:
Both tomcat4 and jetty are servlet engines. It would IMHO make sense to
make both provide sth. like "java-servlet-engine".
I don't think it makes sense. Sure, packages that contain webapps can
depend on "java-servlet-engine" and put their webapp in
/usr/share/java/webapps. Bu
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 13:20, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> D.Hansmann wrote:
>
> > build a java package from source (without changing it before)? There
> > probably won't be a speed improvement... ;)
>
> Hey, that's what free/open source software is about! :-) Think for
> example of security updates
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:55:12AM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Philipp Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Jetty depends on jasper. Jasper is not packaged standalone but included
> > in libtomcat4-java. Shall I file a bug-report against libtomcat4-java or
> > what's the proposed procedure in th
D.Hansmann wrote:
I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
Just take a look at the libcommons-*-java packages, they are pretty good
exmaples for building a package with Ant. As soon as Ant has move
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:50, D.Hansmann wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the tips, everybody! :)
>
> I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
> process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
> build a java package from source (without changing it befor
Philipp Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jetty depends on jasper. Jasper is not packaged standalone but included
> in libtomcat4-java. Shall I file a bug-report against libtomcat4-java or
> what's the proposed procedure in this case?
Why not simply depend on libtomcat4-java? Is it that big a pa
Cool, thanks for the tips, everybody! :)
I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
build a java package from source (without changing it before)? There
probably won't be a speed improvement... ;)
An
Hello debian java users,
I made some preliminary jetty packages wich I want to share with the
public. Because this the first debian package I built, I'm sure there
are thing I did wrong, so please feel free to nag me. I talked to the
upstram maintainer which will support my effort at first.
While
Arnaud wrote:
> Sun does respond to your question before you ask! ;)
>
> http://javacc.dev.java.net/
>
> Summary: JavaCC is a parser/scanner generator for java
> Categories: None
> License: Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) License
OK, thanks, but the "usage.html" file, provided with the 3.0
Philipp Meier wrote:
libtomcat4-java contains a lot of java libraries, even libraries that
are already packaged in debian. It's size is over 1MB, and I need only
250K.
tomcat4 should not contain any libraries that are available in other
Debian packages, they should just be symlinks. If I've miss
Philipp Meier wrote:
Both tomcat4 and jetty are servlet engines. It would IMHO make sense to
make both provide sth. like "java-servlet-engine".
I don't think it makes sense. Sure, packages that contain webapps can
depend on "java-servlet-engine" and put their webapp in
/usr/share/java/webapps. B
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:55:12AM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Philipp Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Jetty depends on jasper. Jasper is not packaged standalone but included
> > in libtomcat4-java. Shall I file a bug-report against libtomcat4-java or
> > what's the proposed procedure in th
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 07:59, Tasos Vogiatzoglou wrote:
> You can use mkpkg-j2sdk , a util that creates a deb package from j2sdk binary
> distribution .
> You can search Google for mkpkg-j2sdk.
The actual package name is mpkg-j2sdk, and it is part of the debian
distributions, so an apt-get shoul
Philipp Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jetty depends on jasper. Jasper is not packaged standalone but included
> in libtomcat4-java. Shall I file a bug-report against libtomcat4-java or
> what's the proposed procedure in this case?
Why not simply depend on libtomcat4-java? Is it that big a pa
ÎÏÎÏ 15/ÎÎÏÎ/2003, ÎÎÎÏÎ ÎÏÎÏÎ ÎÎÎ ÏÏÎ 04:13, Î/Î Bob
Langford ÎÎÏÎÏÎ:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm trying to install Tomcat 4.1.24-2 from the unstable section,
> and I'm running into a wall. It depends on "j2re1.4" or "java2-runtime",
> neither of which seems to exist. I have installed the Sun JD
Hello debian java users,
I made some preliminary jetty packages wich I want to share with the
public. Because this the first debian package I built, I'm sure there
are thing I did wrong, so please feel free to nag me. I talked to the
upstram maintainer which will support my effort at first.
While
Arnaud wrote:
> Sun does respond to your question before you ask! ;)
>
> http://javacc.dev.java.net/
>
> Summary: JavaCC is a parser/scanner generator for java
> Categories: None
> License: Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) License
OK, thanks, but the "usage.html" file, provided with the 3.0
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 07:59, Tasos Vogiatzoglou wrote:
> You can use mkpkg-j2sdk , a util that creates a deb package from j2sdk binary
> distribution .
> You can search Google for mkpkg-j2sdk.
The actual package name is mpkg-j2sdk, and it is part of the debian
distributions, so an apt-get shoul
Στις 15/Ιούλ/2003, ημέρα Τρίτη και ώρα 04:13, ο/η Bob
Langford έγραψε:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm trying to install Tomcat 4.1.24-2 from the unstable section,
> and I'm running into a wall. It depends on "j2re1.4" or "java2-runtime",
> neither of which seems to exist. I have installed the Sun JD
52 matches
Mail list logo
