On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:03:25PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > That's not nice. I didn't orphan junit-freenet so that someone would > > remove it from debian without even asking me about it. > > But orphaning means that you no longer wish to take responsibility for > the package. Perhaps you wanted to RFA instead?
No, I wanted to orphan because I was unable (due to lack of time) to take responsability for this package. Which is different than not being interested on junit-freenet. If i didn't have any interest on it, I could have requested its removal myself. I think we should have a junit implementation in main; IBM's junit is preferred, but after a long (and useless) discussion with its maintainer to convince him of moving junit into main I opted for packaging junit-freenet. If the junit maintainer agrees to drop junit's arbitrary dependencies on non-free components, then we'll have this problem solved. Otherwise someone will have to ITP junit-freenet again (and it seems that someone will have to be me.. *sigh*) Stefan, now that you bring all this trouble to me it'd be nice if you did something to fix it; like, for example, trying to convince junit's maintainer. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
