Hallo! * Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should have a junit implementation in main; IBM's junit is > preferred,
BTW: it's not 'IBMs Junit'. Only one of the Authors is employed by a IBM owned company (OTI). > If the junit maintainer agrees to drop junit's arbitrary dependencies on > non-free components, then we'll have this problem solved. Otherwise someone > will have to ITP junit-freenet again (and it seems that someone will have to > be me.. *sigh*) Just apart from the thing what good it is to have a testing framework in main, if everything else (java development wise) is in contrib, if kaffe is able to run junit, I also don't really see the point. If it is... (JUnit makes much use of reflection and I don't know how good kaffe is in that direction) Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
