Le Thursday 18 December 2008 18:21:48 Holger Levsen, vous avez écrit :
> To those thinking about expelling Joss, I'm in favor of this now. Trolling
> on purpose (repeatetly) for the sake of it is nothing I want to see in
> Debian nor do I want to see it as accepted behaviour.
You can't be serious.
Le Thursday 18 December 2008 18:08:00 Josselin Mouette, vous avez écrit :
> Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 à 17:49 +0100, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> > I eat kittens at breakfast
>
> How do you cook them?
>
> I like European cats a lot, but I heard the Siamese meat is more tende
Le Thursday 18 December 2008 19:12:29 Martin Langhoff, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Manners, Josselin, and discretion. There are some places where it's just
> > not appropriate to blurt out whatever you're thinking.
>
> +10 from here.
>
> Of course,
(I answer since there is a question adressed..)
Le Thursday 18 December 2008 22:01:17 Russell Coker, vous avez écrit :
> On Friday 19 December 2008 06:28, Romain Beauxis
wrote:
> > The initial proposition of this thread was this idea of code of conduct..
> > I don't li
Le Thursday 18 December 2008 23:46:25 Josselin Mouette, vous avez écrit :
> So, if I follow you:
> leather -> homosexuality
> homosexuality -> offense
>
> And by saying both of these, you dare say that I am offensive ‽
Well, you could also argue that "in intend to offend" means "pr
Le Friday 19 December 2008 01:04:05 Johannes Wiedersich, vous avez écrit :
> Joss, it is disappointing that after all that time since your faux pas
> [1], you still seem to fail to understand that what might be acceptable
> within one culture (I don't speak or understand 'French') will not
> necess
Le Friday 19 December 2008 09:56:21 Johannes Wiedersich, vous avez écrit :
> What slightly upsets me about the issue is not what happened, but rather
> that the French appear so arrogant as to think what happened on a world
> wide announcement is fine, just because the French think it is fine.
I y
(Resending a previous private answer to Theodore since I believe it is
relevant to the discussion..)
Le Monday 29 December 2008 15:11:01 Theodore Tso, vous avez écrit :
> As I said in my recent blog entry[1], I believe that "100% free" is a
> wonderful aspirational goal --- other things being equ
Le Monday 29 December 2008 17:21:16 Theodore Tso, vous avez écrit :
> I do feel quite strongly, that aspirational goals, if they are going
> to be in Foundation Documents, must be clearly *labelled* as
> aspirational goals, and not as inflexible mandates that _MUST_ be
> kept. In politics, can hav
Le Thursday 15 January 2009 23:25:02 Bernd Eckenfels, vous avez écrit :
> In article <20090115210004.gv21...@serveme.schnalke.local> you wrote:
> > My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
>
> Machines or Users?
>
> According to Linuxcounter there are estimated 29,000,000 users and debian
> has 18.
Le Friday 16 January 2009 11:51:50 markus schnalke, vous avez écrit :
> [2009-01-16 10:09] Neil Williams
>
> > The whole thing is a complete unknown.
>
> Of course you're right. But it's the best we have.
>
> Instead of leaving it with ``we simply don't know'', I prefer to
> estimate on the (unsur
Le Tuesday 28 August 2007 00:17:40 Bruce Sass, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon August 27 2007 04:05:24 pm Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > And
> > it's no way we will accept the statically linked version in Debian.
>
> Why is that?
Quoting [1]:
External libraries
Many programs make use of external libraries
Le Monday 03 September 2007 14:09:14 Luis Matos, vous avez écrit :
> is this doable?
Honnestly, it seems difficult and dangerous to automate that way.
when you backport a package there are plenty of reasons you should take care
of dependencies, in particular when there's a major upgrade at some
Le Wednesday 12 September 2007 14:07:55 Luk Claes, vous avez écrit :
> > Someone who uses the modified RFC would create a buggy-by-design
> > program and when he realized what some DD had done, boy would he
> > (and his bosses, if relevant) be steamed, his trust in Debian would
> > plunge, he might
Le Tuesday 25 September 2007 16:51:10 Patrick Schoenfeld, vous avez écrit :
> > module-assistant installs build-essential it doesn't seem like space is
> > an important consideration.
>
> When i read this sentence I had an idea of what would eventually be
> better. module-assistant is installing bu
Le Tuesday 25 September 2007 17:37:03 Patrick Schoenfeld, vous avez écrit :
> Romain Beauxis schrieb:
> > Well the real solution to solve this is to count the ratio of packages
> > that provides sources as a bzip2 tarball with regard to gzip tarballs.
>
> Why do you call i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-xml-htmlsax3
Version : 3.0.0~rc1
Upstream Author : Harry Fuecks
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/XML_HTMLSax3/
* License : PHP
Programming Lan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-html-safe
Version : 0.9.9~beta
Upstream Author : Roman Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Safe
* License : BSD
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-xmlplaylist
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Savonet Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-lastfm
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.rastageeks.org/lastfm.html
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-soundtouch
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-ladspa
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL + Linki
Le Thursday 15 November 2007 15:11:55 Cyril Brulebois, vous avez écrit :
> > The problem is related to Iceweasel only: Opera and Epiphany work
> > correctly.
>
> Looks like a job for “reportbug iceweasel” to me.
Or worse, "reportbug fglrx"...
Romain
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-portaudio
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL+link exception
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi !
I've mantained this driver for some times now, and I think it would be
better to maintain it as a team.
Honnestly this piece of software is not really great, but it's really
needed for a lot of users.
Because it is not free, most of the time the onl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-taglib
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL+link exception
Prog
Le Sunday 09 December 2007 09:56:39 Zack Weinberg, vous avez écrit :
> I'm curious what prompted your message. Did a program you use
> actually break? What was the failure mode?
Yes, I agree too.
I've been using this flag recently, and in most cases it just does what's
required...
I think th
Le Sunday 09 December 2007 20:03:27 Kurt Roeckx, vous avez écrit :
> Anyway, I think it is bad style to use macro's in public header
> files that call functions from another library. It's also easy
> to replace them with real functions. If there are such functions
> being called I suggest you rep
Le Sunday 09 December 2007 22:45:46 Nikita V. Youshchenko, vous avez écrit :
> > However, most of the applications don't need to link against theora and
> > speex.
>
> Doesn't libshout reference symbols from libspeex and libtheora?
Yes
> If it does, resulting binary must be linked against both th
Le Monday 10 December 2007 20:03:50 Pierre Habouzit, vous avez écrit :
> > Perhaps the "absurd and wrong" part is that pkg-config does not
> > provide a way to distinguish between use cases, and that the name for
>
> Wrong, please read pkg-config(1) and think again.
>
> $ pkg-config tokyocabinet
Hi,
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 12:28:57, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx a
écrit :
> The list of people voting is at:
> http://master.debian.org/~secretary/leader2010/voters.txt
(...)
> | 2009 | 1013 | 47.741 | 366 |361 | 43 | 35.636 | 7.56155 |
> | 2010 | 886 | 44.648
severity 584021 normal
thanks
Le mardi 1 juin 2010 06:17:23, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au a écrit :
> > I agree on all points of [Roland Stigge] ...
>
> Please read my reply to him.
Well, I still fail to see why you need to fill RC bugs everywhere. If your
rational for filling bugs against all pack
Le mardi 1 juin 2010 12:12:23, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> I am not closing but downgrading for mediawiki, unless you prove that there
> is a real security issue.
Ok, I have looked at the source code. We use dvips to generate the postscript
file.
Does the issue happen for dvips ?
Hi !
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010 13:41:10, vous avez écrit :
> Something to consider for Squeeze + 1?
Agreed. Just like you it seems at some point the installation would use tools
like dpkg and install according to the priority.
Nowadays, a clear setting where we select the tip of the i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-speex
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the speex
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-gavl
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.rastageeks.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-samplerate
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-theora
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net.
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the theora
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-pulseaudio
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for
Le Friday 20 March 2009 02:06:37 Ben Finney, vous avez écrit :
> > Is this the right way to spend developer time? as far as I see it,
> > developer time is our most valuable resource, and should not be
> > treated as such.
>
> Certainly, the time of people is valuable. I would like to see a
> forma
Le Friday 20 March 2009 10:58:53 Josselin Mouette, vous avez écrit :
> Le vendredi 20 mars 2009 à 08:28 +, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
> > If anyone wants to actually try working with copyright files for one of
> > those "bigger" packages, Mike O'Connor helpfulyl just opened #520485 to
> > track one
Le Friday 20 March 2009 12:55:05 Josselin Mouette, vous avez écrit :
> > If that's too much effort for your, get a co-maintainer or a different
> > package.
>
> Fine. Do you have co-maintainers on sale?
It is not about co-maintaining, but about co-reviewing which is a totally
different task.
Ro
Le Friday 20 March 2009 13:07:44 Josselin Mouette, vous avez écrit :
> > It is not about co-maintaining, but about co-reviewing which is a totally
> > different task.
>
> Do you really think we can find an unlimited amount of volunteers
> willing to continuously read thousands of files to find the
Le Friday 20 March 2009 14:18:22 Mike Hommey, vous avez écrit :
> > This idea of a public reviewing page for NEWly uploaded packages really
> > looked appealing to me.
>
> On the other hand, when you look at projets such as Mozilla or Webkit,
> there are people already doing that upstream, or ensur
Le Friday 20 March 2009 19:38:34 Russ Allbery, vous avez écrit :
> > But do you think this is possible ?
>
> Sure. Resolving this sort of thing is the point of the Policy process,
> after all, and we have a clear authority that does the enforcement
> (ftp-master), so it seems likely that we can re
Le Friday 20 March 2009 19:12:02 Russ Allbery, vous avez écrit :
> Maybe the best resolution to this is to have a broader discussion that
> leads to a rewording of Policy 12.5 that makes the requirements explicit,
> with ftp-master buy-in on what the requirements are?
> on the same page and every
Le Friday 20 March 2009 15:54:14 Noah Slater, vous avez écrit :
> Not sure what else you expect someone to respond with apart from throwing
> their hands up and conceding that we should adopt policy to conform with
> peoples wish to avoid additional work.
You know, if you get some agressive answer
Le Friday 20 March 2009 19:55:29 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, vous avez écrit :
> > Since the vast majority of the packages fall into a regular copyright and
> > licensing, this would also mean overload the policy with stuff that is
> > only relevant in a very small number of cases in proportion.
>
> If
Le Saturday 21 March 2009 15:42:35 Manoj Srivastava, vous avez écrit :
> Now, it might be perfectly fine for the ftp team to impose such
> restrictions on packages, and create their own policy; but please at
> least say so, and do not hide being hand waving of either copyright law
> requ
Le Sunday 22 March 2009 14:45:18 Noah Slater, vous avez écrit :
> > Could you provide a use case or two to help clarify things? The main
> > one I see is for an end user to look at a packages copyright file and
> > say 'yes, I can use it for $foo', which is a case that's detracted from
> > in the p
Le Sunday 22 March 2009 23:53:02 Bill Allombert, vous avez écrit :
> Furthermore I am a Debian since 2001 and I see no evidence than the GR
> process was abused during that time. On the contrary, some GR were delayed
> to the point where it was inconvenient for the release process.
I agree. I fail
Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 04:57:39 Gunnar Wolf, vous avez écrit :
> > I agree. I fail to see where the GR process was abused. Since that seems
> > the main argument in favour of this change, I fail to see the motivation
> > for it.
>
> This proposal does not come from an abuse to the GR process, b
Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:08:28 Stefano Zacchiroli, vous avez écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11:03AM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > > Most of the time this is the case. But, if you upload a large, complex
> > > package, that might get passed by for a while so that several small,
> > > eas
Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:18:46 Mike O'Connor, vous avez écrit :
> > I have several very small ocaml packages waiting in NEW for several weeks
> > now. I am upstream on these packages, and, honnestly, it takes few
> > minutes to check them (only 3 files of code in tarball).
>
> Of course, keep
Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:45:59 Russ Allbery, vous avez écrit :
> > There was clearly a need for those GR, so raisong the number of
> > seconders would just have the consequence to prevent us from voting on
> > important topics.
>
> FWIW, it is not at all clear to me that there was any need for
Le Monday 06 April 2009 08:18:33 Lionel Elie Mamane, vous avez écrit :
> My reasoning is that a package that has had only "team uploads" for
> three years is a package where effectively no human is taking charge
> for maintaining it, just as a package that has had only NMU uploads in
> three years;
Le Monday 06 April 2009 09:32:14 Matthew Johnson, vous avez écrit :
> > > Don't we have some install paths that still depend on LILO?
> >
> > Yes: /boot on LVM is the main one.
>
>
> We _certainly_ shouldn't throw it out if there are _known_ situations
> for which it's required.
>
> By all means
og. Also, it seems meaningful to me that the changelog is named after
the team, it seems to be equivalent to the real world "on behalf of the XXX
team".
A correct semantics could then be:
$PACKAGE ($VERSION) unstable; urgency=low
[ Romain Beauxis ]
* Did a very bad thing
-- Packa
be done, to ensure the whole is consistent; and I expect the trailer
> line to tell me who did that work.
Couldn't this also be a line in the changelog ?
This is not a standard but this is done in many cases:
[ Romain Beauxis ]
* Upload to $TARGET
Romain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Le Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:59:00 Sebastien Delafond, vous avez écrit :
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> > important for jruby...
>
> to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
> instance, try th
Hi !
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 09:07:58 Jan Wagner, vous avez écrit :
> > I've requested a slot at DebConf to discuss this into detail, though
> > feel free to start a discussion already on debian-devel.
>
> sorry for coming around with another issue. While reading your comment
> without
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 12:35:12 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
> [Dropping -release and -volatile]
>
> Jan Wagner wrote:
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> >> However, I wonder if this would need yet another
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:52:48 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
> > I gave this example precisely because mediawiki upstream release
> > management is one of the most serious I know in webapps. And even though
> > they fix issues with care, and their code is surely very good, then this
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: xmlm
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel C. Bünzli
* URL : http://erratique.ch/software/xmlm
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml xml manipulation
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: audex
Version : 0.71b2
Upstream Author : Marco Nelles
* URL : http://opensource.maniatek.de/cgi-bin/audex/audex/index.html
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocmal-fdkaac
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : https://github.com/savonet/ocaml-fdkaac
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-gstreamer
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-gdo-npxpm
Version : 1.0~alpha5
Upstream Author : Matthew C. Gushee
* URL : http://matt.gushee.net/software/gd4o/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description
Hi all,
2012/1/4 Simon McVittie :
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 at 20:20:42 +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
>> Enrico Weigelt, 2011-12-31 03:55+0100:
>> > IMHO this is completely wrong, those files should be under
>> > /usr/lib/... or maybe even /usr/share/... as they're not
>> > dynamic data.
>>
>> Well, whe
Hi,
2012/1/5 Paul Wise :
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>
>> I once proposed to push for a general policy regarding this symlink
>> trick for webapps and even to write a debhelper but it did not seem to
>> appeal to anyone. I am still convinced, t
Hi all,
2012/2/18 Julien Cristau :
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 18:36:56 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
>> Oh, so OSS4 provides an Alsa API that is not compatible with Alsa's.
>> Awesome.
>>
> The oss4 package should die a painful death.
2012/2/18 Josselin Mouette :
> Le vendredi 17 février 2012 à 22:1
2012/3/11 Mike Hommey
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:16:47AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:53:18AM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:39:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:00:30AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>
2012/3/17 Arto Jantunen :
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>
>> On 03/17/2012 06:11 AM, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>>> 2012/3/11 Mike Hommey
>>>
>>>> The problem is: decss is illegal in very much more than just the US.
>>>> This is a very different s
2012/3/18 Thomas Goirand :
> On 03/18/2012 08:53 AM, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>> It's a cliche comparison but still, CSS decryption is the knife and
>> DMCA is the murder; the fact that murder is illegal does not imply
>> that knives are.
>>
> Well, the whole concep
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: shine
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : https://github.com/savonet/shine
* License : LGPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Fixed-point MP3 encoding
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-shine
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://github.com/savonet/ocaml-shine
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: C
Description : OCaml bindings
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-opus
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : https://github.com/savonet/ocaml-opus
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-frei0r
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : https://github.com/savonet/ocaml-frei0r
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml
2011/4/4 Stanislav Maslovski :
>> I am not happy that network manager bypasses ifconfig to do this; I
>> would have much preferred a daemon that could properly integrate with
>> the existing infrastructure we had.
>
> Exactly. There is ifplugd that implements some of the functionality
> that is req
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-mm
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL+link exception
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : Multimedia library
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-voaacenc
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : CPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-flac
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the FLAC audio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-schroedinger
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-lo
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : LGPL-2.1 + link exception
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-dssi
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : gPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml interface to DSSI plugins
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-lame
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for the lame
101 - 186 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
