Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 04:57:39 Gunnar Wolf, vous avez écrit : > > I agree. I fail to see where the GR process was abused. Since that seems > > the main argument in favour of this change, I fail to see the motivation > > for it. > > This proposal does not come from an abuse to the GR process, but to > generalized frustration about the way 2008_002 and specially 2008_003 > were handled.
Ok. I understand the furstration about them, but I don't think that the number of seconders was the reasons for the abuse. There was clearly a need for those GR, so raisong the number of seconders would just have the consequence to prevent us from voting on important topics. Furthermore, I don't think it is wise to propose an "enhancement" and not explain what was the abuse with *details* and *examples*, nor how the proposal would enhance it. Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
