Le Friday 20 March 2009 19:55:29 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, vous avez écrit : > > Since the vast majority of the packages fall into a regular copyright and > > licensing, this would also mean overload the policy with stuff that is > > only relevant in a very small number of cases in proportion. > > If copyright holder listing isn't needed at all, there's no special-casing > needed for autofoo stuff (wrt copyright listing, not wrt licenses though).
But this is also problematic for license ! Even in the case in which we accept my above rational, it is still possible that the configure.ac contains custom macros with a bad license... Hence, if we were to decide on a general basis, it would be either to check for all configure.ac or for no one.. Do you think one of these possibilities is reasonable ? Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
