Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:45:59 Russ Allbery, vous avez écrit : > > There was clearly a need for those GR, so raisong the number of > > seconders would just have the consequence to prevent us from voting on > > important topics. > > FWIW, it is not at all clear to me that there was any need for either of > those GRs (particularly 2008_002, which did indeed strike me as a waste of > the GR process).
Well, even if I would agree with you, apparently this GR had 21 supporters.. Far from the idea of some abuse from a small number of developpers. So clearly, this proposition would not even "solve" this "issue". > Note that the effective conclusion of both of those GRs was to do what was > happening anyway and would have happened without the GRs, apart from the > secondary effects of making the whole thing more confrontational. For 2008_002 in particular, there was a clear need of such a decision, since the previous announce had been made as if it was about to happen while there was apprently no consensus for it. Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
