I do all my work on Debian Slink i386, but just made a potato
install on Alpha. To my surprise, some of my packages are broken
wrt the /usr/share issue on alpha. Note that these are packages
that I haven't upgraded yet wrt this issue, and so they are
stated in the control file to be compliant to
Now that you mention it, I did the same thing and got the same
result. However, my upgrade worked.
apt-get dist-upgrade' does /not/ upgrade perl from 5.004 to 5.005
for the same reason it won't upgrade emacs19 to emacs20. They
are different packages. The package is perl-5.005_5.005.03 and
not
"Stephen R. Gore" wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > apt-get dist-upgrade' does /not/ upgrade perl from 5.004 to 5.005
> > for the same reason it won't upgrade emacs19 to emacs20. They
> > are different packages. The package is perl-5.005_5.005
I agree with you, and wish we'd toss all non-relevant packages
out, or at least move them into the data section.
(That said, I think stuff like coastline data that we could use
to make maps would be okay for the data section; Where do I draw
the line? Well, can you at least compute the stuff? Or
le ago. What's next?
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 14:42:51 -0400
From: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Accepted Amendments
>
> Data section (#38902)
> * Consensus.
> * Proposed on 3 Jun 1999
Clint Adams wrote:
>Perhaps identd isn't an example to be taken seriously. So let's
> say that I have a POP server.
>These packages don't conflict; they merely provide the same
> service. There is no reason that these three packages cannot
> coexist on the same system. Any namespace ov
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Also use of computer in planes is discouraged and prohibited during landfall
> and takeoff, as it interfer with the onboard radio equipement ...
I wondered about that when a helicopter pilot expressly asked if
if my cell phone worked in the helicopter, so I could call ahead
Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > P.S.: The latest dhelp 0.3.14 supports FHS *and* FSSTND :).
>
> I just installed it, but as far as I can see this doesn't integrate
> FHS and FSSTND in any way but creates two completely incompatible
> trees one next to the
Joey Hess wrote:
> I think it should be possible to come up with a structure where ftp site
> maintainers need not be trusted. The key to doing so is making it possible
> for any change such a person makes to be logged, and reversable.
>
> Anyone can manipulate bugs in
Michael Meskes wrote:
> Do we place our doc directories under /usr/share/doc now? Or is /usr/doc
> still okay?
Although not yet formally in policy, you put them in
/usr/share/doc and create postinst and postrm files to
make/delete symlinks in /usr/doc (as done by the current
debhelper package).
Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> > > > P.S.: The latest dhelp 0.3.14 supports FHS *and* FSSTND :).
>
> > > I just installed it, but as far as I can see this doesn't
> > > integrate FHS and
I finally decided to try out uscan and those debian/watch files,
but I can't get it to work:
$ more /opt/gri/src/deb/2.2.1/gri-2.2.1/debian/watch
# Example watch control file for uscan
# Rename this file to "watch" and then you can run the "uscan" command
# to check for upstream updates and more.
Marco Budde wrote:
> PSG> I have a recent potato install and dhelp 0.3.14 and _don't_ have
> PSG> http://localhost/fhs/ support.
>
> I don#t have it, too :). Is this directory a Debian standard, Roland?
It isn't.
> PSG> I could see http://localhost/doc/HTML/, but all new docs visible
> PSG> a
# apt-get install perl-5.005
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
perl-5.005-base perl-base
The following NEW packages will be installed:
perl-5.005 perl-5.005-base
1 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove an
Ruud de Rooij wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco Budde) writes:
>
> > PSG> I could see http://localhost/doc/HTML/, but all new docs visible
> > PSG> as file:/usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html could not be seen under
> > PSG> the http://localhost interface to dhelp. Is `fhs' supposed to be
> > PSG> a
Your example implies that doc-base's install-docs is at fault for
creating files under either /usr/doc/HTML or /usr/share/doc/HTML
instead of files in a single place, with a /usr/doc/HTML ->
/usr/share/doc/HTML symlink. Am I correct? Or did I miss
something?
In that case, shouldn't the bug go
Raul Miller wrote:
> Send a copy of /var/lib/dpkg/info/status to the apt folks.
>
> To hide the problem, you can do:
>
> dpkg --configure --pending
> apt-get -f install
A few instances of `dpkg -i perl-*' finally got it installed.
Thanks
Peter
[posted this to -mentors 40 hours ago without an answer, so
perhaps I'll try -devel instead]
I recently uploaded i386 packages that were build on a slink system
upgraded to potato's libc6 and C compilers (everything else is
slink). These packages (xcolmix and xplot) have this depends
line:
Dep
Colin Walters wrote:
> In a parallel problem to this thread: I have gpm installed for those times
> when I am doing a lot of console work, but generally I don't run it because
> it interferes with Quake II, among other things. So I did an:
>
> update-rc.d -f gpm remove
>
> But when gpm was up
> Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In a parallel problem to this thread: I have gpm installed for those times
> > when I am doing a lot of console work, but generally I don't run it because
> > it interferes with Quake II, among other things. So I did an:
>
> > update-rc.d -f gpm re
Santiago Vila wrote:
> I wrote
>
> > I recently uploaded i386 packages that were build on a slink system
> > upgraded to potato's libc6 and C compilers (everything else is
> > slink). These packages (xcolmix and xplot) have this depends
> > line:
> >
> > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1), libforms0.88,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 ~ $ sudo apt-move localupdate
> /usr/bin/apt-move: line 122: syntax error near unexpected token ('
See the following:
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=67519
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=67522
http://cgi.debian.org/
Can anyone tell me how many CDs the official ISOs have for:
- i386 main + main/non-US ( + contrib ?)
- sources
Is contrib included as a service on official CDs like it was for
slink?
The reason I ask is that it's time for me to buy some potato CDs,
and I'm having a difficult time deciphering
I wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how many CDs the official ISOs have for:
>
> - i386 main + main/non-US ( + contrib ?)
> - sources
>
> Is contrib included as a service on official CDs like it was for
> slink?
>
> I'm having a difficult time deciphering know what vendors are
> selling (fro
I wrote:
> I sent LSL email and they have corrected their web site to read:
>
> Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 CDR Intel (6 CD Set) $8.99
> Debian 2.2 Binary CDR Intel (3 CD Set) $5.50
>
> So it's consistent now (and pretty cheap too).
>
> Next I'll email cheapbytes because they also ad
Steve Bowman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:01:49PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > The strange part is that _some_ contrib packages are scattered
> > across the 3 CDs, but not all of the packages. For example, lyx
> > is _not
Now that potato is out, it would be nice to finally create the
proposed data and science sections.
Just a reminder.
bug1 wrote:
> It would be cool if packages had better support for build dependencies
> so its easier/more reliable to build from source.
Something like this?
Source: gri
Section: math
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper,
"Sam Sim" wrote:
> Dear Debian Linux,
>
> I am familiar with you operating system and wanted to contact you.
Wow. How familiar can he be?
> we will be in your area towards the end of September.
> I would like briefly stop by your offices
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> There is some inconsistency here.
>
> ulysses:~# which mkisofs
> /usr/bin/mkisofs
> ulysses:~# which mke2fs
> /sbin/mke2fs
tony mancill wrote:
> I disagree. You *NEED* to have a copy of mke2fs in the root filesystem
> in case /usr or any other m
Brian May wrote:
> >From http://www.debian.org/Bugs/>, click on
> "Index of maintainers of packages with bug reports.", and then
> "Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" takes you to:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ma/lBrian_May,bam,debian.org,.html>
>
> Why is bug #69807, for my diskless-image-secure
Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:26:53PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > That to me says Debian has permission to re-distribute our modified
> > version, but that people who recieve it from us do not, unless they
> > too ask permission ("We do expect and appreciate..."). Non-free
`The RSA algorithm was released into the public domain today
(September 6th, 2000). This is in advance of their US patent
expiring on the 20th.'
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/06/1252204&mode=thread
So some stuff can get moved from non-US/main into main proper?
Peter
--
To UNS
Colin Watson wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > `The RSA algorithm was released into the public domain today
> > (September 6th, 2000). This is in advance of their US patent
> > expiring on the 20th.'
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/06/1252204&mode=thread
> >
> > So some stuff can ge
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wanted to give apt-move a try:
> Unfortunately I get only syntax errors:
>
> ~# apt-move
> /usr/bin/apt-move: line 122: syntax error near unexpected token `('
It's a bug in bash. You may work around it by setting ash as
your /bin/sh shell instead of bash.
My current p
"Ivan E. Moore II" wrote:
> as Maintainer of KDE for Debian I'd like to chime in.
[clip]
> I was interviewed by a few online
> magswhether any of that went anywhere is not my problem.
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/opinions/2281/1/
Editor'
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My current problem with apt-move is that it wants to delete every
> > single deb file I have (instead of only those that have never
> > versions on hand). Also, it makes completely empty Pa
http://people.debian.org/~psg/debian-changelog-mode.el
Roland Mas packaged it about the same time Rob agreed to
include it in emacsen-common, so I'm not sure what's going to
happen.
Peter
zhaoway wrote:
> Where could I get one? Thanks!
> Even no package for it is okay! ;)
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You people told me that:
> - If i make a change to a package i've to list my changes in the package
> changelog (Matt Zimmerman, no one ever objected this).
> - If i build a new upstream, i've to list each change in the upstream
> chang
A recent dist-upgrade on sid mangled the Info dir file beyond
recognition. The indentation was changed to:
* CVS: (cvs).Concurrent Versions
System
* CVS client/server: (cvsclient).Desc
Marcus Frings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) wrote:
> > Incidentally, you might also be interested in debbugs-el, which
> > provides a nice report-debian-bug command.
>
> Thanks for the hint. I'll give it a try!
That would be `M-x debian-bug'. :-)
You might al
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Please, as a courtesy, when you reassign a bug report to another
> > package, cc it to the package maintainer, and put enough information in
> > so they can know why their package is at fault. Also check the severi
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2003 02:16, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > "The biggest deficiency in our free operating systems is not in the
> >software--it is the lack of good free manuals that we can include in
> >our systems. Documentation is an esse
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > No he wouldn't. FDL is about free documentation. :-)
> > >
> > Except it isn't :-)
>
> According to you :-)
According to debian-legal consensus.
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * New upstream release \1
> > > * fixed "BTS summary line of #1" Closes: #1
> > > * fixed "BTS summary line of #2" Closes: #2
> > > * fixed "BTS summary line of #3" Closes: #3
> > >
> > > in changelogs would probably go a lot further to correc
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the goal is?
> > Why do you want the bug submitter named in the Closes entry?
> > If its the title you want, then that is already available after the bug
> > list has been fetched. I've been wanting to use the title as initial
> > in
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:47:46AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> > To address the original point, however:
>
> > I do believe that policy is correct in it's reasoning in this instance. By
> > my understanding, packages go into contrib for one of th
John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my experience with the installer .deb's is limited mostly to the
> installers made for pine and djbware.
>
> they download the source, patch the source, then build the source. the
> result is a .deb. that .deb can then be installed. since it is a
Aigars Mahinovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How would this do as a mass RFP :)
>
> http://sal.kachinatech.com/
>
> SAL (Scientific Applications on Linux) is a collection of information
> and links to software that will be of interest to scientists and
> engineers.
Some are already
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a problem and like to have some lights to correct it...
>
> 1° I did replace the orig.tar.gz of libdtdparser-java to remove the
>generated doc and the generated jar file because I don't need them,
>it's rebuilt from sour
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity,
> and is very useful to maintainers who need advice on licensing
> issues. And I shall stipulate that there is a rough consensus on
> debian-legal about the GFDL.
Right. There is co
Filippo Basso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Configuration file `/etc/logs/php/eth2'
> ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
> ==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
>What would you like to do about it ? Your options are:
> Y or I : install the package maint
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 07:26:31PM +0200, Jeffrey Eugene Crawford wrote:
> > Package: heimdal-docs
> > Version: 0.6-3
> > Severity: important
> > File: heimdal-doc
> > Tags: sid
> >
> > After installing this package I could not read the info
> > documentatio
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> b. Every tool sending automated mail to Debian Developers should add
>headers of the form
>
> X-Debian: $TOOL
> X-Debian-Package: $PACKAGE
It's probably too late, but wouldn't have been better to use the
following instead?
X-Debian-Tool:
Hi all,
I made an upload to ftp.upload.debian.org yesterday and never received
the usual emails about it. It doesn't appear to have hit to the archive,
yet isn't listed under ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/ either.
And http://incoming.debian.org/ isn't responding...
Thanks,
--
Pete
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 21:02, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > I made an upload to ftp.upload.debian.org yesterday and never received
> > the usual emails about it. It doesn't appear to have hit to the archive,
> > yet isn't listed under
Hi all,
My key is old and needs to be replaced. Is there anyone close to
Rimouski (Québec) for key signing?
I also regurlarly go to Québec City.
Thanks,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
ow to make the auto-tools include the debian directory in
the source tar ball (with `make dist') but NOT maintain any Makefile in
those directories?
Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer
http://people.debian.org/~psg
GPG key 4096/70D
> > I maintain the debian directory in the upstream sources of a package
> > (gri) that uses auto-tools. So far, it seems to need the files:
> >
> > debian/source/Makefile.am
> > debian/source/Makefile.in
>
> Something like
>
> EXTRA_DIST = $(wildcard source/*)
>
> in debian/Makefile.am sh
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Alioth is not accepting ssh connections and mail to a mailing list is
> neither arriving nor bouncing.
I noticed the same from work earlier today, and the same from home now.
:-(
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:31:01PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > >Try reading upgrading-checklist.txt.
> >
> > Where do I get a copy of this document? A summery of what to check
> > for when updating a packa
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I'd better send all my passwords and serial numbers here. In
> > case my hard disk crashes I can always recover it from the mailing list
> > archives. SCNR.
>
> Isn't this basically how Linus does/
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
> opinion of others developpers ]
>
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
> > into two. There's no need t
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Peter S Galbraith
>
> | AFAIK, you need to depend on emacs itself (and not emacs-common) if you
> | byte-compile it. I _think_ stuff can break if you don't, but I'm vague
> | on why. Search the debian-emacsen a
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:14:53PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > I don't know whether to file a bug report or just laugh my head off.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% vrms
> > Non-free packages installed on espresso
> >
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:32:59PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> Can "requesting removal from archive" be automated, to occur say after 3
>>> weeks of inactivity of rc/grave/serious bug?
>>>
>>> As a DD, I assume there is some pride and/ o
Anthony Towns wrote on debian-devel-announce:
> I think the best way is to
> file a RFA (which we're redefining as "Request For Assistance" instead
> of just "Request For Adoption") report against wnpp
[cut]
> Third, personnel deployment. As a complem
> On Dec 4, 2003, at 10:56, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> > But another package's was using convert
> > in the build stage to convert some images and it was failing. The bug
> > was elevated to release-critical. I don't think it would be fair to
> > remo
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:38:10AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Anthony Towns wrote on debian-devel-announce:
> >
> > > I think the best way is to
> > >
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:46:19PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Anyone know the answer to my second question?
> > : Does the OTA bug get filled against the package you are offering to help
> > : with, or against wnpp? I presume against the pac
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am working on packages from cvs upstream sources. How should I name
> > their debian version ? I give a few examples below.
> >
> > Is there a spec for this somewhere ?
>
> In the policy?
>
> /usr/sha
Hi, What are the currently valid distribution to which we can make
uploads to?
debian-changelog-mode.el currently allows the user to set the
distribution field for an upload to multiple distributions, e.g.
xwatch (2.11-8) frozen unstable; urgency=low
The list of possibilities is currently set t
I wrote:
> > Hi, What are the currently valid distribution to which we can make
> > uploads to?
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't that be unstable, woody-proposed-updates, and experimental?
Possibly. That's why I'm asking. ;-)
I would have assumed stable-proposed-updat
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:08:27PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Hi, What are the currently valid distribution to which we can make
> > uploads to?
>
> Have a look in bug #150466, on lintian. One of the ftpmasters is q
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Hi, What are the currently valid distribution to which we can make
> > uploads to?
>
> I think the list currently is:
>
> unstable experimental stable-proposed-updates s
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Hi, What are the currently valid distribution to which we can make
> > uploads to?
> >
> > debian-changelog-mode.el currently allows the user to set the
> > distribution field for a
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
> > program which has a user interface.
>
> I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after
> all has a graphical user interface, if it's
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About 8 packages in non-free are in the process of being removed
> entirely from both testing and unstable. After this happens, the
> difference in the number of non-free packages between slink and sid
> will be +1.
That probably doesn't count the on
Hi,
Is it possible to configure email forwading in https://db.debian.org/
such that emails are sent to two addresses?
I tried separating two addresses with a space and also with a comma, but
it didn't seem to work.
Thanks!
Peter
I can't connect to alioth.debian.org via http.
Anyone know what's up?
Peter
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having a one or two liner message
> during startup of a command line utility is fine by me. Having
> 5 pages of stuff is not fair to the user. Period.
>
> The job of a maintaier is to make the software as usable to a u
I rarely announce software, but this could be useful to DDs.
Whenever I wanted to add tags or something to a bug report, I'd start my
browser to http://www.debian.org/ -> Bug Reports -> Developers'
information on manipulating bugs by email. Just to get the syntac
right.
So I wrote debian-bts-con
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Assuming the mail client pays attention, of course.
>
> I guess using MIME structures like that more would make more people complain
> to devlopers of MUAs that don't handle this properly...
>
> I don't know many MUAs, but perh
Michael Meskes wrote:
> Subject says it all. Do I have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
Yes.
I'm not a C++ hacker, and would appreciate any help on this.
In preparation for g++-3.0, I setup a Debian unstable chroot tree
on a friend's Red Hat system. He is upstream for the `gri'
package. It currently doesn't build on g++-3.0, and he wanted to
port the code.
He is stuck on a problem:
:
The following (template instantiations), lines 48 and 49 of a file
(which attached in full)
template void reverse(std::vector::iterator,
std::vector::iterator);
template void sort(std::vector::iterator, std::vector::iterator
compile in g++ 2.96, but they fail in g++ 3.0, with the error message:
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > What do you intend doing with distros, BTW? Will there be three or
> > four distros? (Freezing == testing?) Will the "migration into
> > testing" scripts be (partially) switched off? What happens when
>
I'll make my question clear.
debian-changelog-mode.el currently allows you to set the
distribution field for an upload to multiple distributions, e.g.
xwatch (2.11-8) frozen unstable; urgency=low
The list of possibilities is currently set to:
unstable
frozen
stable
frozen unstable
st
Martin F Krafft wrote:
> first of all, is this the right way to do ITP's? i just simply sent a
> mail...
If you use Emacs, install the package debbugs-el from testing and
do:
M-x debian-bug-ITP
Peter
I, for one, am very thankful for this thread. I could no longer
connect to some sites which I used in daily work collaborations
for some time now. Turns out it's since an upgrade from 2.2 to
2.4. I have now disabled this option in the 2.4 kernel and now
connect again.
Thanks!
(Yes, it's info
Has base actually frozen? Is there a space on www.debian.org to
track this? Or which mailing list?
More importantly, will autobuilders use it?
If they don't and rather continue to track unstable, then how
will new optional package enter testing before the `optional'
freeze? They may get bui
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Visual is a library for 3D scientific visualization. It allows rapid
> development of programs in Python, but is itself written in C++ for speed.
> It currently supports various colored geometrical primitives (texture
> support
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: g3data
Version : 1.06
Upstream Author : Jonas Frantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.physics.helsinki.fi/~frantz/software/g3data.html
License : GPL V2 or later
Description : extract data from scann
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 04:54:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Rather than making it to be reassigned to something else,
> > it might be better to retitle it to make it look
> >
> > "ITP-uploaded: package - description"
> >
> > and still assigned to wnpp.
>
> >
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 25-Sep-01, 17:56 (CDT), Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a) you declare a relation on a package more than once i.e. Depends:
> > foo, foo (<< 2.0). Note this check assumes that '|' relations are
> > sane, so Depends: foo | bar | baz, foo is ok.
>
>
Sam Powers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 04:54:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> >
> > > closed automatically, but this way it is clear that the matter is out of
> > > the (prospective) package maintainer's hands, or those of the W
"Tille, Andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The same for bug/reportbug.
> Or you could just write an E-Mail to BTS or write your
> own super duper bug reporting tool.
Yes you could, like debian-bug.el
;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
One of my packages disappeared from testing recently (not sure why) and
a recent upload is only lacking a m68k to get in. And now this:
File `log' in gri_2.8.6-2_m68k (Apr 10 07:53)
gri >> 2.8.6-2 >> Apr 10 07:53 >> log
Automatic build of gri_2.8.6-2 on thing2 by sbuild/m68k 1.168
Build star
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space
>
> Just FYI, this '0k disk space' means there was 0k disk space needed to
> build the package. (Since it got killed with SIGTERM).
Ah, I thought the reverse for some rea
peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith:
>
> > One of my packages disappeared from testing recently (not sure why)
>
> Well, it was listed in the removal list that was posted on March 3rd:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/d
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
