Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure what the goal is? > > Why do you want the bug submitter named in the Closes entry? > > If its the title you want, then that is already available after the bug > > list has been fetched. I've been wanting to use the title as initial > > input to the close command for a wgile, but wasn't convinced it was good > > enough. I guess it's a good first stab. That's what you guys want? > > Erm.. although having the submitter name is probably not the point, > I wanted to point out to you that I want the bug subject,
Right. I understood both points. I was wondering about having the bug submitter there. Maybe change the phrasing? * Bug fix "debian-changelog mode to support fetching of bug to fill in changelog", Thanks to Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #207852). But I've always thought listing the thitle didn't really say _what_ was fixed and _how_. Most times, the title mentions a symptom but not the actual problem. That why I never added that before. I could make it optional...
