Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You people told me that: > - If i make a change to a package i've to list my changes in the package > changelog (Matt Zimmerman, no one ever objected this). > - If i build a new upstream, i've to list each change in the upstream > changelog that let me declare a bug as closed; change that does not > refer to the Debian package (but to the original upstream), and that i > did not applied as part of my package working (because it was applied > from the upstream). > > The second contradict the first, and does not follow what stated in policy > about debian chagelog file (13.7 an 5.3 of policy). > > > Do you think that users should list "each change in the upstream > > changelog" to know how the bug they submitted as been closed? > > If you mean "read" by the word "list", of course i do. First came the > upstream changelog, then the Debian one.
Fine then. In that case it would be better for you _not_ to use the Debian changelog to close bugs by the new upstream version, but rather to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a proper explanation of what was done upstream. Right?
