Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > P.S.: The latest dhelp 0.3.14 supports FHS *and* FSSTND :). > > I just installed it, but as far as I can see this doesn't integrate > FHS and FSSTND in any way but creates two completely incompatible > trees one next to the other. Now I can read parts of the > documentation as http://localhost/doc/ (which points to /usr/doc/) and > others as http://localhost/fhs/ (which points to /usr/share/doc/).
I have a recent potato install and dhelp 0.3.14 and _don't_ have http://localhost/fhs/ support. > My packages which > follow the tech-ctte decision (using debhelper and dh_installdocs) are > only visible in http://localhost/fhs/HTML/ but not in > http://localhost/doc/HTML/. > > In the past we had two places where the user had to look for > documentation on programs: http://localhost/doc/HTML/ and > http://localhost/dwww/menu.html > > Your new version of dhelp splits this to three places: > http://localhost/doc/HTML/, http://localhost/fhs/HTML/ and > http://localhost/dwww/menu.html and all three include different doc, I could see http://localhost/doc/HTML/, but all new docs visible as file:/usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html could not be seen under the http://localhost interface to dhelp. Is `fhs' supposed to be a new Alias? Am I doing anything wrong? [I also agree that it would be annoying to have two distint directories to point a browser at (if it worked at all for me).] Marco, do you have upgrade plans for dhelp? Thanks, -- Peter Galbraith, research scientist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada P.O. Box 1000, Mont-Joli Qc, G5H 3Z4 Canada. 418-775-0852 FAX: 775-0546 6623'rd GNU/Linux user at the Counter - http://counter.li.org/
