On Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Kevin Mark wrote:
> 1) dfsg-free
Not a condition for acceptance in non-free. But then, that ain't Debian, so
your point stands.
> 2) can not be sexist
> 3) has to be able to be mirrored by all mirrors based on the laws of the
> location of the server
> 4) can not offend someo
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, sean finney wrote:
most of the script stuff could be shared in between the two, yeah. i
designed the system such that it could eventually handle supporting
multiple database types, as well as packages that support multiple
database types themselves. then, i proceeded to start
Fernanda Giroleti Weiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> Em Qui, 2004-12-02 às 07:46, Tollef Fog Heen escreveu:
>> * Helen Faulkner
>>
>> | Pornography is widely regarded as being demeaning and insulting to women.
>>
>> - A lot of people don't think the cartoon is pornography.
>
> A
Fernanda Giroleti Weiden wrote:
Em Qui, 2004-12-02 Ãs 05:45, Manoj Srivastava escreveu:
First of all, it's a sexist package, sure. Putting a program on
Debian in which you have pictures of nude women is VERY agressive
to the most women. Yes, it's agressive to me.
As already written in -women, this
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > > operates?
> > >
> > > glastree prov
unsubscribe
Will Newton, on 2004-12-02, 19:57, you wrote:
> On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 07:35, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > Ok, Yes, if push comes to shove, I'll be happy to stand trial for the
> > inclusion of hot-babe in main.
>
> I can't see how that choice is yours to make.
Seen his name?
SCNR,
Joerg
--
Chasecreek Systemhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:18:12 -0500, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't understand what this has to do with Gnome or anything I said.
>
> Maybe its just me -- but your statement about selecting a preferred
> package over any o
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Kevin Mark wrote:
>> also, does anyone know of any other packages that never got in and the
>> reasons?
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 05:04:03AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> dvdcss code, and some other MPAA bait never did, I think.
Sounds like "Must not get Debian wi
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:27:25PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> If our goal is to advance the cause of a Free operating system, then why
> >> should we be including, in our OPERATING SYSTEM, images that serve no
> >> useful purpose, and instead alienate millions or billions of people
> >> worldwi
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [snip]
>> >> very hard (figure out how to make a minimal diff
>> >> from the daylies) or you need every days Packages file (apt-dupdate
>> >> does that).
>> >
>> > It is not "very hard" to re-diff a few files to incorporate
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:56:21PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:03:27PM -0500, Simon Law wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:47:38AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
>> > > please, please treat this machine politely. it's my wor
Chasecreek Systemhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:18:12 -0500, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't understand what this has to do with Gnome or anything I said.
>
> Maybe its just me -- but your statement about selecting a preferred
> package over any ol
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi fellow debianista,
> the package in question has not yet been accepted.
> For a pacakge to be accepted, here is conditions some have mentioned:
> 1) dfsg-free
No non-free? But I guess you ment "accepted to main".
> 2) can not be sexist
Man is sexist,
Am 2004-12-02 14:48:20, schrieb Adam Majer:
> A significant number of packages in Debian are not integral to Debian.
Generaly I am using Debian/WOODY and I have found 8 packages
which may be difficult. One of them is "funny-manpages".
I do not know about the other 6000 Packages which are more in
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:59:33 -0500, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Isn't there already a gimp-dcraw package to do the exact same thing but
> is more mature? Does UFRaw have any advantages over dcraw? Does it open
> different kinds of images?
>
> Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> >Package: wnpp
> >Severity: wis
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 12:15:04PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > - an extra field could be added to such packages so frontends can hide
> > > them (or they just hide all "support package" descriptions. A
> > > "support" section could also work.
> > couldn't this be done via d
On Thursday 02 December 2004 20:00, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The internet community that Debian is apart of would consider this
> fairly tame, considering what a mistyped search engine address seems
> to pop up on the screen.
A few years ago I visited a "sex museum" in Ams
I have not seen this image thus I do not if I would find it offensive or
not. Could someone please upload a .png of it somewhere and post the URL?
My present view is that any packet that carries a strong controversial
message in the eyes of a significant portion of the users and which is
not di
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:11:56PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:17:05 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > My point was for somebody thinking along the lines: "I want to
> > distribute Debian to this target audience but I don't want to risk
> > upsetting anybod
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:18:58PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> It is impossible for Debian to cater to all different ideas of what's
> acceptable and what's not (prOn-lovers is just as valid a group as
> prOn-haters). For that reason alone it's rather pointless for Debian
> _as_a_
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:31:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
> > branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
> > documents or retri
On Friday 03 December 2004 02:25, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Amazingly, not all women believe that any depiction of the naked human
> body is automatically pornography and offensive.
As an example see some of the books of advice for pregnant women. They have
LOTS of photos of
unsubscribe
This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright
belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates ("PHI"). This Email is
intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addre
On Friday 03 December 2004 05:46, "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (btw, is gay porn demeaning to women?)
>
> or femdom porn (if so I'd _really_ like to hear the reasoning behind that
> verdict)
Some people say that in B-D the submissive controls the dominant. I've nev
On Friday 03 December 2004 04:07, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > They are confusing somethings when compares sexual discrimination
> > with any other kind of. Be a women is not a religion choice and is
> > not a the same thing than choose a Desktop Manager. You are
> > argumenting
On Friday 03 December 2004 03:20, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Then distributing of porn journals in Iran to destabilize the
> Gouvernement...
What is this about? Can you provide some URLs that give background
information on it?
> > If you are in Iran/Saudi Arabia/Myanmar/ you
On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:38, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm. I would like some Raphael budes, yes. and some studies by
> > michelangelo too. Oh, you think that is not porn?
>
> I think calling the hot-babe package and images 'art' is a bit
> farfetched.
Do you consider
On Thursday 02 December 2004 19:21, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for violent games & religion, the question *does* need to be
> asked: how far will D-Ds bend their mostly libertarian/Leftist
> views in order to ensure that Debian *disks* can be possessed in
> as much of the world as
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The only other real condition is:
>
> 2) is acceptable to one of the ftp-masters.
>
> So ask one of them directly.
Agreed, and I think they've done a good job of it thusfar. That answer
seems, to me anyway, to be an insufficient answer
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:49:44PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> > it in the first place).
> How is that an advantage of use?
One may want to use
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> but I think that hotbabe demonstrates a larger issue.
The only issue I can see is that WNPP does not seem to by a fully
sufficient synchronization point for the creation of new Debian
packages. This ITP has been filed although two RFPs already exist
(as hotbabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:05:08PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 01-12-2004 alle 13:01 +, Mark Sheppard ha scritto:
> > Surely there's room for both
> >
> > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> > | Status=Not/Installed
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:07:14PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2004-12-02 08:44:34, schrieb David Weinehall:
>
> > Really, she's 13, and you think it'd do any difference whatsoever to
> > expose her to a pixelled image of a nude woman?! Sheesh. Either
> > you've been shielding her comple
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> utility effects a constant, sliding window. Similar to pdumpfs; inspired
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:31:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use in a
On Fri, Dec 03, 200
On 03-Dec-04, 07:52 (CST), Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why can't art be pornographic and porn be artistic anyway?
>
I think the very definition of "pornography" (in the US, at least)
denies this possibility. If it's art, then it's "erotic", not
"pornography".
"Nitpickers R Us"
> > Well, if one had a small system and desired not to install ruby, it
> > would still be possible to obtain pdumpfs' functionality. Of course
> > that could be called an installation issue rather than a usability
> > issue.
>
> 3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to sto
> > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > operates?
>
> Or storebackup?
>
> (Actually, storebackup's one-line description doesn't really hint at
> this functionality. But I'm using it to create
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:12:19 -0800, Martin Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have not seen this image thus I do not if I would find it
> offensive or not. Could someone please upload a .png of it somewhere
> and post the URL?
> My present view is that any packet that carries a strong
> contro
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:20:32 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:11:56PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:17:05 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>> > My point was for somebody thinking along the lines: "I want to
>> > di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver has made some new updates to the quik - you can get it
(.deb and source) at the http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/
changes include:
- manpage tells about initrd
- compiles with gcc3
- sprintf bug fixed
- ANS raid supp
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:01:57PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Some of the islamic countries like Turkey, Jordania and Morocco
Turkey isn't islamic country but secular one, AFAIK.
On Friday 03 December 2004 06:19, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi fellow debianista,
> the package in question has not yet been accepted.
> For a pacakge to be accepted, here is conditions some have mentioned:
> 1) dfsg-free
IMHO the only requirement debian as a whole should care about.
> 3) has to be able
On Friday 03 December 2004 03:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:18:58PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
wrote:
> My opinion is that if master or non-us can't distribute it and we find
> any interested mirror which can and would distribute it, then Debian
> should make it
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:00:22 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
>all on for anyone that is *truly* that starved of space.
Low-Memory systems are unlikely to have USB.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 20:48, Adam Majer wrote:
> China would *appear* to be one,
>
> http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/01/28/china.bibles/
> http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=28012002-054849-9679r
If you follow the links you'll find they refer to a man charged with
involvement
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:20:00 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 17:53 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:45:35 -0600, Ron Johnson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:57 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >> On Wed,
On Friday 03 Dec 2004 09:49, Joerg Wendland wrote:
> Will Newton, on 2004-12-02, 19:57, you wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 07:35, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Ok, Yes, if push comes to shove, I'll be happy to stand trial for the
> > > inclusion of hot-babe in main.
> >
> > I can't see how that ch
On Friday 03 Dec 2004 00:11, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Umm, the linux kernel, the purity tests, and the offensive
> fortunes are not G rated, so can't be given to minors without
> parental consent. I guess that makes it illegal in the united
> states.
You can't distribute text with the word "
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:45:26PM +, Will Newton wrote:
> On Friday 03 Dec 2004 00:11, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > Umm, the linux kernel, the purity tests, and the offensive
> > fortunes are not G rated, so can't be given to minors without
> > parental consent. I guess that makes it ille
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mpegdemux
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Hampa Hug
URL : http://www.hampa.ch/mpegdemux/
License : GPL version 2
Description: a MPEG1/2 system stream demultiplexer
Mpegdemux is an MPEG1/MPEG2 system stream demultipl
> You can't distribute text with the word "fuck" in it anywhere to minors in
> the
> US?
>
> Truly remarkable. Are there any minors reading this? Where do I hand myself
> in?
Well, you would need to check the penal codes of each individual state
wherein such a minor resides; some states will a
It must be 4/20 already -- cuz this discuss makes me think everyone
is stoned out of the reality check minds.
--
WC -Sx- Jones
http://insecurity.org/
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:20:48PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > You can't distribute text with the word "fuck" in it anywhere to minors in
> > the
> > US?
> >
> > Truly remarkable. Are there any minors reading this? Where do I hand myself
> > in?
>
> Well, you would need to check the penal co
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
very hard (figure out how to make a minimal diff
from the daylies) or you need every days Packages file (apt-dupdate
does that).
Is there any program in Debian to do this for ed script style diffs?
pat
Ce jour Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Christian Leimer a dit:
> Hi!
>
> Can someone please post a sample quik.conf?
>
> Do you use the ramdisk option or the append string one, any other settings?
>
> I have an Umax S900 and it does not work here.
> Says something about can not find the root device.
>
> I
Ce jour Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Simon Vallet a dit:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:58:48 +0100
> Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc and initrd : I get stuck at
> VFS : Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (1,0),
> which is what I experienced with previous quik versio
Ce jour Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Simon Vallet a dit:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:05:03 +0100
> Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The quik.conf should be :
> >
> > image=/boot/vmlinux-2.6.9-powerpc
> > append="root=/dev/ram video=radeonfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > initrd=/boot/initrd.im
Ce jour Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Colin Watson a dit:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:58:48AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > and, better not to forget, the new quik.deb is available at
> > http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/
>
> Could the quik.conf(5) man page also be modified to include
> documentation of
Ce jour Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Holger Levsen a dit:
i'd appreciate not having it hijacked from under me. i don't mind
getting help, and i do appreciate that, but i get the feeling it's being
hijacked from me. you could at least tell me WTF is going on.
eric
(the current quik maintainer)
--
Microsoft
Eduard, I put you in the TO because this should improve your
apt-dupdate nightly runs:
Anthony Towns writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>very hard (figure out how to make a minimal diff
>>from the daylies) or
Nathanael asks,
> Or at least their own tag in debtags (do they
> have one?)
They do. Relevant facet::tags include
data::font
media::font
role::font
x11::font
pgpaQIFXVPUdR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:02:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:00:22 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
> >all on for anyone that is *truly* that starved of space.
>
> Low-Memory syste
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
We're talking about free software. Modifying it to fit your needs is a
perf
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> >>The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> >>in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> >>it in the first place).
> >
> >
> >How is that an
Hi,
I was bored last night (not enough funny mails in the Hot-babe
thread :) so I went off and played around with gimp a bit:
ftp://mrvn.homeip.net/hot-babe-data.tar.bz2
Or for some even nicer themometers (but only 4 frames and GFDL
[non-free]):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wikistress3D_
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Sounds like you need to expand your repertoire a bit.
Possibly so, but unfortunately my time is a finite. There are far too
many languages (even in debian main) for me to learn them all.
Can you imagine a world in which your argument was taken at face value?
There would be
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:55:28PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> 2) Where do we point out to our users that the laws which govern what
> we'll distribute are those of the US and finland (or wherever) and that
> the laws in their country may forbid distribution?
>
> Especially if they're downloadin
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 01:30 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was bored last night (not enough funny mails in the Hot-babe
> thread :) so I went off and played around with gimp a bit:
>
> ftp://mrvn.homeip.net/hot-babe-data.tar.bz2
Nice and boring. Informational, too.
An earlier s
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 00:55 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 19:21, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As for violent games & religion, the question *does* need to be
> > asked: how far will D-Ds bend their mostly libertarian/Leftist
> > views in order to ensure th
70 matches
Mail list logo
