On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:38, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm. I would like some Raphael budes, yes. and some studies by > > michelangelo too. Oh, you think that is not porn? > > I think calling the hot-babe package and images 'art' is a bit > farfetched.
Do you consider pictures by the same artist of characters that have more clothing to be art? If so do you believe that less clothing makes art suddenly cease being art? Why can't art be pornographic and porn be artistic anyway? -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
